Just initials of person doing changed.ORIGINAL: koniu
what [MEM] and [DCB] mean in 1008k changelog list in first post?
Moved to another Patch 06 - Public Beta - Build 1108p3 updated 10 July
Moderators: wdolson, MOD_War-in-the-Pacific-Admirals-Edition
- michaelm75au
- Posts: 12463
- Joined: Sat May 05, 2001 8:00 am
- Location: Melbourne, Australia
RE: Patch 06 - Public Beta - Build 1108j (build03) updated 27 Feb
Michael
RE: Patch 06 - Public Beta - Build 1108j (build03) updated 27 Feb
Dunno if this was already answered yet, but in ref the "rebuilt/destroyed units,(Philippine and Dutch especially)....They will continue to indicate an arrival date of 1 or 2 days and never appear until you change their command from "independent" to an actual command..Unfortunately the only way I have seen this possible is if they are part of a larger unit, (a Bn part of a regiment, for instance), and you must go to an existing member unit and find the "missing" unit to change the Hq from independent..
It would be real nice if this option were available when purchased, or better yet, if the 'puter knew to automatically assign it to a matching component??....Love the game....
It would be real nice if this option were available when purchased, or better yet, if the 'puter knew to automatically assign it to a matching component??....Love the game....

RE: Patch 06 - Public Beta - Build 1108j (build03) updated 27 Feb
Are you using the latest beta patch? This should be fixed ....
Pax
RE: Patch 06 - Public Beta - Build 1108j (build03) updated 27 Feb
I am about to make my first turn with the new patch..Thank you for asking..

RE: Patch 06 - Public Beta - Build 1108j (build03) updated 27 Feb
Are the guns of the porter class fixed(from DP to SP)?
Thread started a long time ago but the error is still there in my game(running 1106i)
tm.asp?m=2356324&mpage=1&key=
Furthermore why are the gun values in the tooltip so strange:
Values for Porters:
62 Gun, 320 AA, 8 Torpedo & 2 ASW
compared to a Bagley class:
62 Gun, 130 AA, 16 Torpedo & 2 ASW
So why does a ship with 8x 5" SP has 62 just like a ship with 4x 5".
Thread started a long time ago but the error is still there in my game(running 1106i)
tm.asp?m=2356324&mpage=1&key=
Furthermore why are the gun values in the tooltip so strange:
Values for Porters:
62 Gun, 320 AA, 8 Torpedo & 2 ASW
compared to a Bagley class:
62 Gun, 130 AA, 16 Torpedo & 2 ASW
So why does a ship with 8x 5" SP has 62 just like a ship with 4x 5".
- vonTirpitz
- Posts: 510
- Joined: Tue Mar 01, 2005 6:30 pm
- Location: Wilmington, NC
- Contact:
RE: Patch 06 - Public Beta - Build 1108j (build03) updated 27 Feb
Michael,
I found the save files and a possible explanation that caused the TOE to change and emailed the files to you.
Marc
I found the save files and a possible explanation that caused the TOE to change and emailed the files to you.
Marc
ORIGINAL: michaelm
ORIGINAL: vonTirpitz
version 1108k
General Defence Army and Kwantung Army take replacements this turn and changed OOB.
Save attached
I ran this save (looks like it was saved under 1108c) under K3 and it didn't add any extra devices.
I'll try the others.
Looks like something funny must have been present in k1 or k2.
The starting weapons (TOE) for General Army HQ show these extra devices which seems to be from a VM TOE.

RE: Patch 06 - Public Beta - Build 1108j (build03) updated 27 Feb
Regarding the activation of certain rebuilt destroyed units....I see no change in this patch..The units still stand in limbo in the Unit reinforcement queue at "1 day till arrival", and in the case of the Filipino units, I even own the intended point of re-entry, (Cagayan)..
This is in an existing game,though, so may not be valid for a new ,(fresh) game?
The remarks I made above seem to still be the only (current) "fix"..
This is in an existing game,though, so may not be valid for a new ,(fresh) game?
The remarks I made above seem to still be the only (current) "fix"..

- michaelm75au
- Posts: 12463
- Joined: Sat May 05, 2001 8:00 am
- Location: Melbourne, Australia
RE: Patch 06 - Public Beta - Build 1108j (build03) updated 27 Feb
ORIGINAL: vonTirpitz
Michael,
I found the save files and a possible explanation that caused the TOE to change and emailed the files to you.
Marc
ORIGINAL: michaelm
ORIGINAL: vonTirpitz
version 1108k
General Defence Army and Kwantung Army take replacements this turn and changed OOB.
Save attached
I ran this save (looks like it was saved under 1108c) under K3 and it didn't add any extra devices.
I'll try the others.
Looks like something funny must have been present in k1 or k2.
The starting weapons (TOE) for General Army HQ show these extra devices which seems to be from a VM TOE.
Marc has found the problem with the corrupting GHQ/Kwantung HQ TOE.
It is related to when the VM units get activated.
I'll update the EXE.
Thanks again, Marc.
Can't restore the corruption, though.
Michael
- michaelm75au
- Posts: 12463
- Joined: Sat May 05, 2001 8:00 am
- Location: Melbourne, Australia
RE: Patch 06 - Public Beta - Build 1108j (build03) updated 27 Feb
ORIGINAL: m10bob
Regarding the activation of certain rebuilt destroyed units....I see no change in this patch..The units still stand in limbo in the Unit reinforcement queue at "1 day till arrival", and in the case of the Filipino units, I even own the intended point of re-entry, (Cagayan)..
This is in an existing game,though, so may not be valid for a new ,(fresh) game?
The remarks I made above seem to still be the only (current) "fix"..
They should arrive.
Drop in a save and let me see.
Michael
- michaelm75au
- Posts: 12463
- Joined: Sat May 05, 2001 8:00 am
- Location: Melbourne, Australia
RE: Patch 06 - Public Beta - Build 1108k4 (build03) updated 21 March
Updated
Changed Code base of reformed LCUs that can't arrive [MEM]
Fixed Error in limiting CD fire [MEM]
Fixed Occassional drop out of base selection, disappearance or mouse over [MEM]
Fixed Building VM units corrupts TOE of GHQ and Kwantung HQ [MEM]
Fixed Old convoy units could show up in Destroyed LCU list [MEM]
Changed Code base of reformed LCUs that can't arrive [MEM]
Fixed Error in limiting CD fire [MEM]
Fixed Occassional drop out of base selection, disappearance or mouse over [MEM]
Fixed Building VM units corrupts TOE of GHQ and Kwantung HQ [MEM]
Fixed Old convoy units could show up in Destroyed LCU list [MEM]
Michael
RE: Patch 06 - Public Beta - Build 1108j (build03) updated 27 Feb
At the office right now, will send asap..TY Michael..

RE: Patch 06 - Public Beta - Build 1108j (build03) updated 27 Feb
Hello
Version 1108K4
Side Japanese
Go to Lingayen...48th Div. remember the number of support units. Run a turn. And look at the 48th Div. again.
In my games it had 450 Support units and after it hat 1-7.
I recombine the 48th Div on 30th Dec... the 8th Div. and the 1st Div. has the same problem. Both i recombine.
Omat
Version 1108K4
Side Japanese
Go to Lingayen...48th Div. remember the number of support units. Run a turn. And look at the 48th Div. again.
In my games it had 450 Support units and after it hat 1-7.
I recombine the 48th Div on 30th Dec... the 8th Div. and the 1st Div. has the same problem. Both i recombine.
Omat
- Attachments
-
- wpae021.zip
- (2.37 MiB) Downloaded 8 times
"The whole problem with the world is that fools and fanatics are always so certain of themselves, and wiser people so full of doubts."
Bertrand Russell
Bertrand Russell
- michaelm75au
- Posts: 12463
- Joined: Sat May 05, 2001 8:00 am
- Location: Melbourne, Australia
RE: Patch 06 - Public Beta - Build 1108j (build03) updated 27 Feb
I can't see anything with this save.ORIGINAL: Omat
Hello
Version 1108K4
Side Japanese
Go to Lingayen...48th Div. remember the number of support units. Run a turn. And look at the 48th Div. again.
In my games it had 450 Support units and after it hat 1-7.
I recombine the 48th Div on 30th Dec... the 8th Div. and the 1st Div. has the same problem. Both i recombine.
Omat
Have you uploaded the wrong one???
Michael
RE: Patch 06 - Public Beta - Build 1108j (build03) updated 27 Feb
Michael, I have not offered a save in years, forgot where to find it.....(Am I embarrassed)..Going public with this confession so others may (re) learn the answer.....[:)]

- Hanzberger
- Posts: 925
- Joined: Wed Apr 26, 2006 12:16 pm
- Location: SE Pennsylvania
- Contact:
RE: Patch 06 - Public Beta - Build 1108j (build03)
Yes I think that would be a good idea. I would have read that as 181. LOLORIGINAL: michaelm
You'r right!ORIGINAL: drw61
One of the new features surprised me when I first thought that the 2/1 AIF Pioneer had 181 AIF infantry. Took me a little time for my old eyes to register it was 18![:D]
Again thanks for all the hard work.
![]()
I didn't even notice it.
I might see if can use some other symbol to amke it more obvious.
RE: Patch 06 - Public Beta - Build 1108j (build03) updated 27 Feb
Hello
Sorry was the wrong file.
I did this turn two times and got the same result. I got 460 Support units and after running that trun 1 and the other attempt 6. I don`t think this is working as indeed. I hope I am not wrong with my assumption. If yes I will regret my mistake.
Omat

Sorry was the wrong file.
I did this turn two times and got the same result. I got 460 Support units and after running that trun 1 and the other attempt 6. I don`t think this is working as indeed. I hope I am not wrong with my assumption. If yes I will regret my mistake.
Omat
ORIGINAL: michaelm
I can't see anything with this save.ORIGINAL: Omat
Hello
Version 1108K4
Side Japanese
Go to Lingayen...48th Div. remember the number of support units. Run a turn. And look at the 48th Div. again.
In my games it had 450 Support units and after it hat 1-7.
I recombine the 48th Div on 30th Dec... the 8th Div. and the 1st Div. has the same problem. Both i recombine.
Omat
Have you uploaded the wrong one???

- Attachments
-
- a1.jpg (129.35 KiB) Viewed 211 times
"The whole problem with the world is that fools and fanatics are always so certain of themselves, and wiser people so full of doubts."
Bertrand Russell
Bertrand Russell
RE: Patch 06 - Public Beta - Build 1108j (build03) updated 27 Feb
Here the next turn


- Attachments
-
- a2.jpg (145.06 KiB) Viewed 211 times
"The whole problem with the world is that fools and fanatics are always so certain of themselves, and wiser people so full of doubts."
Bertrand Russell
Bertrand Russell
RE: Patch 06 - Public Beta - Build 1108j (build03) updated 27 Feb
This one please
- Attachments
-
- wpae022.zip
- (2.36 MiB) Downloaded 12 times
"The whole problem with the world is that fools and fanatics are always so certain of themselves, and wiser people so full of doubts."
Bertrand Russell
Bertrand Russell
- USSAmerica
- Posts: 19211
- Joined: Mon Oct 28, 2002 4:32 am
- Location: Graham, NC, USA
- Contact:
RE: Patch 06 - Public Beta - Build 1108j (build03) updated 27 Feb
I've seen similar things to what Omat has captured above, but from the Allied side. Sorry, I have not been diligent to capture before and after turns when it happens, but I will watch carefully for it in the future. BTW, I'm seeing it very rarely, but on patch 1106g, so I don't think it's something introduced in the beta patch levels.
Mike
"Good times will set you free" - Jimmy Buffett
"They need more rum punch" - Me

Artwork by The Amazing Dixie
"Good times will set you free" - Jimmy Buffett
"They need more rum punch" - Me

Artwork by The Amazing Dixie
RE: Patch 06 - Public Beta - Build 1108j (build03) updated 27 Feb
Hi
The Problem what I mentioned appear after a unit recombine. Than I see this. In my safe game u can see also units (1st Div. And 8th Div) which had recombine earlier. But this unit did not take support replacements. But I am not sure id this unit did not take support replacements because of an other bug or because of insufficient of support unit in the replacement pool.
I did not see this happened for a unit which comes as whole unit or start as a combined unit. But I have also to admit that I did not pay much attention [;)]
Omat
The Problem what I mentioned appear after a unit recombine. Than I see this. In my safe game u can see also units (1st Div. And 8th Div) which had recombine earlier. But this unit did not take support replacements. But I am not sure id this unit did not take support replacements because of an other bug or because of insufficient of support unit in the replacement pool.
I did not see this happened for a unit which comes as whole unit or start as a combined unit. But I have also to admit that I did not pay much attention [;)]
Omat
ORIGINAL: USS America
I've seen similar things to what Omat has captured above, but from the Allied side. Sorry, I have not been diligent to capture before and after turns when it happens, but I will watch carefully for it in the future. BTW, I'm seeing it very rarely, but on patch 1106g, so I don't think it's something introduced in the beta patch levels.
"The whole problem with the world is that fools and fanatics are always so certain of themselves, and wiser people so full of doubts."
Bertrand Russell
Bertrand Russell





