ORIGINAL: Jorge_Stanbury
I got a business trip to Europe cancelled [:@] [:@]
I think this is overblown by panic-mongers
Yeah common sense seems to have left the subject for the media.
Moderators: wdolson, MOD_War-in-the-Pacific-Admirals-Edition
ORIGINAL: Jorge_Stanbury
I got a business trip to Europe cancelled [:@] [:@]
I think this is overblown by panic-mongers


Wine has anti-viral, anti-bacterial, and anti-fungal properties.
Remember take everything with a grain of salt.
ORIGINAL: JohnDillworth
The statistics are not giving a good picture of what may be going on. So the U.S. does not look so bad with 100 cases. The problem is is that only 500 people in the U.S. have been tested! 500! So, 20% of all people tested have test positive. I suspect there is a lot more than 100 cases. https://www.theatlantic.com/technology/ ... us/607348/

As I mentioned a couple of pages back; the Washington outbreak tells you that the virus is already in the general population. We also know that many (but % not yet quantified) people will contract it and be asymptomatic (no symptoms). This is good for that person, bad for the rest of us as it means carriers with no outward appearance of being so. This means all the travel screening is already pretty much moot and for show.ORIGINAL: RangerJoe
ORIGINAL: JohnDillworth
The statistics are not giving a good picture of what may be going on. So the U.S. does not look so bad with 100 cases. The problem is is that only 500 people in the U.S. have been tested! 500! So, 20% of all people tested have test positive. I suspect there is a lot more than 100 cases. https://www.theatlantic.com/technology/ ... us/607348/
But who needs to be tested? As far as I know, I've had no contact with anyone who has or had it. I have not traveled. That is the problem, it takes a lot of money to test and without a good reason to do so it will not be done.

Well, we have a guy in NYC who has it. Traveled to Israel, Florida, went to Temple 3 times, traveled by commuter rail to mid-town Manhattan via Grand Central Terminal a few times. They just quarantined hundreds of people. Who needs to be tested? His wife, his co-workers, anyone he traveled on a plane with, a train with, he went to Temple with? Lots of those people need to be tested. And when some come back positive, and they likely will, their contacts may need to be tested. 500 tests in the whole country seems to me we are either slow to react, way behind, ignorant, unprepared or whistling in the wind....or all of the above.But who needs to be tested? As far as I know, I've had no contact with anyone who has or had it. I have not traveled. That is the problem, it takes a lot of money to test and without a good reason to do so it will not be done.

No, I think we are simply past that stage. When a virus is in the general population, testing is kinda moot except for people are really ill to determine what (which virus/secondary infection) they have.ORIGINAL: JohnDillworth
Well, we have a guy in NYC who has it. Traveled to Israel, Florida, went to Temple 3 times, traveled by commuter rail to mid-town Manhattan via Grand Central Terminal a few times. They just quarantined hundreds of people. Who needs to be tested? His wife, his co-workers, anyone he traveled on a plane with, a train with, he went to Temple with? Lots of those people need to be tested. And when some come back positive, and they likely will, their contacts may need to be tested. 500 tests in the whole country seems to me we are either slow to react, way behind, ignorant, unprepared or whistling in the wind....or all of the above.But who needs to be tested? As far as I know, I've had no contact with anyone who has or had it. I have not traveled. That is the problem, it takes a lot of money to test and without a good reason to do so it will not be done.
ORIGINAL: RangerJoe
ORIGINAL: JohnDillworth
The statistics are not giving a good picture of what may be going on. So the U.S. does not look so bad with 100 cases. The problem is is that only 500 people in the U.S. have been tested! 500! So, 20% of all people tested have test positive. I suspect there is a lot more than 100 cases. https://www.theatlantic.com/technology/ ... us/607348/
But who needs to be tested? As far as I know, I've had no contact with anyone who has or had it. I have not traveled. That is the problem, it takes a lot of money to test and without a good reason to do so it will not be done.
ORIGINAL: Sardaukar
I was detained for 3 days for suspected COV-19...our legistlation is bit rude when it comes to that [:D]