Taming the Tiger or Slaying the Bear......loki100 (Axis) vs Speedy (SU)

Please post your after action reports on your battles and campaigns here.

Moderator: Joel Billings

User avatar
loki100
Posts: 11708
Joined: Sat Oct 20, 2012 12:38 pm
Location: Utlima Thule

T42 - Finding Tolbukhin

Post by loki100 »

T42 – 5 April 1942

Weather is cold/snow pretty much everywhere but the forecast for next week is rain over most of the front (apart from the Black Sea region).

Running the turn end, confirmed most of this.

Must say the Rumanians really are rather useless.

Image

One important difference is most of the malus on trucks and trains is removed. Looks like first impact is a lot of manpower arriving inthe combat formations

Image

So cleared up the mess in the Crimea. Judging by the weather forecast this sector should avoid the first batch of the rains.

Image

Carried on with the Orel-Kursk operation. Endless reserve reactions but I've just started to build that into my attacks. Good thing is the reserve formation often collapses along with the front line units. Soviets abandoned their old front line.

Tolbukhin has left Leningrad and has his very own Shock Army on this sector.

Not shown but a bit of probing around Stalino. Found where Chuikov has got himself to.

Image

Not much but a hex that is better under my control than left with the Soviets.

Image

Fairly heavy losses for both sides.

Image

My manpower pool starting to reduce – this is good as it means I am finally pushing replacements up into the combat formations.

Image

Tank pools showing some signs of recovery – brought the last batch of replacement battalions to the map.

Image

VP situation. Guess my first goal is to avoid the sudden death HWM for 1 October. Beyond that, not going to win at the next test, guess I'll take Kursk, Orel and Sevastopol by mid-May – so that will be around 600.

Image
User avatar
loki100
Posts: 11708
Joined: Sat Oct 20, 2012 12:38 pm
Location: Utlima Thule

T43 - Hungary to the rescue?

Post by loki100 »

T43 – 12 April 1943

Very annoying weather pattern (and I realise I have no grounds to complain), As predicted heavy rains north of Orel, snow-cold from there to Stalino and then rain/heavy mud all along the Black Sea region.

If I believe the forecast then next turn its going to be much the same with heavy rain in the north and rain along the Black Sea and clear skies in between. At least that makes the air phase easy to set up.

One good thing from last turn is it has shown where the Gds Rifle Corps are.

While it was tempting to see if I could cut them off decided to concentrate on Kursk-Orel for the moment. 2 PGA has a lot of units back on refit but 1 PGA is still fresh (and has had a lot of new tanks delivered).

Usual endless round of reserve reactions, as with last turn just built this into my planning. Helps I now have a reasonable number of 40 MP+ formations. 2 PGA managed to cut the Kursk-Orel rail and 1 PGA broke deep into the Soviet defences east of Kursk (this does all rather feel like 1943).

Image

Given the weather, nothing happened anywhere else.

Not exactly a great loss ratio.

Image

Nicer when viewed from the perspective of the LW.

Image

Hungarian 2 Army is released and moving up – not exactly going to lead the offensive but will help fill in a few of the large gaps I'm leaving.

Army supply chart. Still some large gaps in what is being sent against what is needed but another 75,000 replacements rounded up from the Schnapps bars of Berlin and sent east.

Image
User avatar
loki100
Posts: 11708
Joined: Sat Oct 20, 2012 12:38 pm
Location: Utlima Thule

T44 - Horses, horses and horse ....

Post by loki100 »

T44 – 19 April 1942

So apart from near Stalino its heavy mud and mostly heavy rain everywhere. There the skies are clear but still mud. Forecast for next turn is mostly clear skies but still heavy mud.

No point doing much other than small redeployments to optimise CPP gains.

Soviet garrison box, have been sending a few weaker brigades there and it has helped keep the impact of the partisans under control.

Image

Seems the Soviets think this is sort of re-enaction of the Middle Ages. Thats one badly churned up field covered in several layers of horse s... .

Image

So overview of the supply network, actually quite neat for unit traces apart from a few odd ones (mostly linked to a few units that are being redeployed).

Image

Good steady flow of manpower to the front line formations.

Image


But still too many hanging around the Berlin night spots (actually only 220k of them are German so its time to encourage my noble allies to commit to some serious losses).

Image

Well for a turn where nothing really happened, I made a lot of changes setting up for my last chance to gain anything significant.
DeletedUser1769703214
Posts: 9319
Joined: Fri Feb 05, 2016 12:26 am

RE: T44 - Horses, horses and horse ....

Post by DeletedUser1769703214 »

I see you two are still bashing each other from the beginning of release ;-P Will see what rabbit Loki pulls out of the hat here in a few turns of how 42' may show what the year has in store. But I have my hypothesis already. Wish I had more time to play but I still just don't and first I have even been able to read and post :(

Wish both of ya good luck and keep it up!
User avatar
loki100
Posts: 11708
Joined: Sat Oct 20, 2012 12:38 pm
Location: Utlima Thule

RE: T44 - Horses, horses and horse ....

Post by loki100 »

ORIGINAL: HardLuckYetAgain

I see you two are still bashing each other from the beginning of release ;-P Will see what rabbit Loki pulls out of the hat here in a few turns of how 42' may show what the year has in store. But I have my hypothesis already. Wish I had more time to play but I still just don't and first I have even been able to read and post :(

Wish both of ya good luck and keep it up!

I'm doomed ... my decision to rely on shatters in the early phase (allied to Steven being very pocket averse) has left me facing too many formations, so no new pockets (or marginal single hex affairs), and my MP evaporates.

I'll get to the auto-loss threshold, may get somewhere near the historical HWM, but not much more than that.

My only hope is to exploit the 4 months (May-Sept) to exploit the impact of the low Soviet NM, its just possible I can seriously degrade his army enough to create some movement space - and even less possible that I can do so without wrecking mine.

Laying aside plenty of small mistakes that add up, pre-release I'd played too much vs the Axis AI>120 morale. While that gives you a good fun game, it also over-emphasises the extent that units shatter rather than just rout with heavy losses in the opening part of 1941.
Speedysteve
Posts: 15975
Joined: Tue Sep 11, 2001 8:00 am
Location: Reading, England

RE: T44 - Horses, horses and horse ....

Post by Speedysteve »

Thanks HLYA![:)]

No war or performance is ever perfect and I too feel there's much I've learnt that I would do differently in the next war.

Ironically with my Army being 'relatively large' (for the time of The War) the biggest mini-game I have on-going right now is ensuring supply of Vodka to my men and focussing the replacements where they are most needed.
WitE 2 Tester
WitE Tester
BTR/BoB Tester
User avatar
loki100
Posts: 11708
Joined: Sat Oct 20, 2012 12:38 pm
Location: Utlima Thule

T45 - reflections on a winter lost (if Proust is your thing)

Post by loki100 »

T45 – 26 April 1942

Weather is clear skies and light mud over most of the front (still much worse around Leningrad). But there are patches of heavy mud all over the place. Next turn looks like a return to heavy rains.

Seems the Soviets are carrying on with their irrational hatred of my Italians.

Image

Experimenting a little with AD design. That large Soviet force at Orel is very dependent on the dual track rail to the NW so ran a rail-interdiction mission. Didn't do a lot of damage but that added around 5-6,000 units of usage to each hex (the on map interdiction is a secondary bonus). Depending on their usage (& that junction is also supplying their forces south of Vyazma too) that could add a bit of an extra problem to their freight shipments (remember that interdiction 'usage' is treated differently to normal operational usage when its cleared the next logistics phase).

Image

Anyway, spent some time thinking of options, especially with that weather forecast and ended deciding to do very little. Pulled units back to optimise CPP gain, occupied a vacated Kursk and took Kerch after the Soviets had abandoned that region. This handily released the Pzr Corps that I'd been using there so it can refit and then act as a reserve for the opening attacks.

Other than that, still managing the refit cycle as well as I can and trying to fill in some secondary parts of the rail net, especially where I plan to make my opening attacks.

So that was a short post and I think we can treat this turn as the end of winter for all intents and purposes.

So some reflections as it was my first time as the Axis.

First the key context, I really botched T11-T16 and that is going to be the most important feature going forward. Not only did I make no real gains I actually inflicted far too few losses on the Soviets as I went off an excited squirrel hunt.

Now the good thing? Well the front line was probably well laid out but only if your interest was being able to optimise supply. Only the 9A was so badly placed that it effectively dropped off the supply net.

I didn't lose much. Vyazma, which took long enough to take the sting out of any Soviet offensive towards Smolensk and Kursk, which was indefensible and I probably shouldn't have taken.

As Steven's posts make clear the weather made a mess of his plans at Leningrad, all those turns of light snow meant that a well equipped AGN never came under pressure. Now, personally I'm not sure the Soviets can do much on this sector but in effect the current front is exactly as it was at the start of December.

Image

Unfortunately due to some pretty unnecessary comments in the game he took over from Robert, we won't get his views on what happened so you'll only get my perspective.

So, logistics. I've kept a running commentary here so I'll pull it together. First you are going to take a lot of losses in December-January and I don't think there is much you can do about it. Gaining level 2 forts out of the front lines is not easy as fortified units can be hard to reinforce to the point where they actually function.

I basically created 3 supply bastions, one never moved (Pskov), the other two rotated around Smolensk and Kharkov respectively. Every now and then I dismantled these two to improve my secondary network. The remaining FBD worked behind AGC and AGS to give me secondary lines.

One experiment was to set border depots to high priority one turn and then low the next. The theory is these should grab some freight that can't make it to the front depots and then that has a shorter journey (ie can cope with more congested rail lines) the next turn. I'm not sure this really worked not least as depots will only take freight if they perceive a local demand (so priority is not the only condition). I found Warsaw worked consistently but that hosts OKH (with a lot of SU), elsewhere this seemed to be rather hit and miss.

Second big bit is managing the army. You won't be able to push many replacements to the front and actually you don't want to (they will just get frostbite etc) until late February. But you need to manage your formations so none slip to unready and ideally none go below 30% TOE. I think you have to set a 'budget' of 'x' divisions per turn out of the line to recover, as the fresh units arrive from the West that gives you some leeway. But this is not easy to do, deep snow and often poor terrain really slows your movement so the journey to a decent depot takes around 3 turns. I don't think there is any magic solution here, just grinding your way through the CR and taking notes as to which units you need to move (it really helps to have an opponent like Steven who doesn't think taking a week over each turn is a good idea).

So here is my list of my worst German infantry divisions for their current TOE:

Image

On balance, reasonably happy with how I've managed that aspect.

As to the Panzers, the killer is not outright losses but damaged tanks. So pull all your armoured SU out very early and dump in either the reserve or OKH. Just do without them as all that will happen is they will be lost. Harder with the Pzrs but ideally you don't want to fight with them and you never want to be retreated. But of course you need them … sigh.

The Pzr replacement battalions are so valuable here. Fit out in the reserve, send to OKH and they can be in the Pzr division next turn. Just try to hold back if you can, again at least into February or those nice new tanks just become damaged. In the end I've had to pull 2 Pzr divisions off map to refit, the rest I've managed on map (in the short term this is compensated by the two Pzr divisions released from the West).

So a few tables.

Loss tables over the winter. So here we've both suffered. I've just over doubled my totals but the re-assuring one is the captured line. Nothing lost, or shattered and most routs were Italian or Rumanian formations. The Soviets have lost 1.6m men (900k permanent) and 20,000 guns (and from experience that hurts).

Image

Some idea of my actual tank losses. In a way the bits that really matter are Pzr III and IV and there I lost 640 (960 to 1600) – my view is trashing a few French tanks and even the Czech ones doesn't matter too much.

Image

And the OOB. Which is less good, the Soviets have gained 1.6m men and 16,000 guns (I'm not too worried about planes or tanks). That is a lot of formations, lets say the equivalent of 160 rifle divisions, so its clear that any attack is going to run into multiple lines and lots of fortifications. Hence the minimal goals below.

Image

This has come up in a discussion in M60's AAR so I'll say something here. Clinging to the poor terrain to the east of Bryansk is an important sub-goal for the axis player. By the time you can return to some sort of offensive operations, it is a hugely vital shield, if you are dug in, it can be safely held by a line of infantry divisions.

To me, its a vital pivot for any 1942 offensive into the more open terrain. If the Soviets hold that belt, you have to commit a large mobile reserve to the Smolensk sector given the threat of an advance. Basically in 1942, well dug in German units in poor terrain demand a lot of Soviet effort to shift. By 1944, they have the capacity to bust open any defensive line.

Image

(the image is from T49 – but makes the point of how I am using that sector).

So what now. Well I'm not sharing the plans … clearly I've decided to clear out the Crimea. That will free up 11A and a Pzr Corps. The Hungarians and Italians are handy for filling in gaps.

My basic goal is to have the historical HWM score by the end of 1942. Any more is nice. In effect I am playing for the December 1944 victory test.

One thing, first goal is destroyed units, VP come second. If I shed the +6 for removing even a few divisions I'll take the trade off.
User avatar
loki100
Posts: 11708
Joined: Sat Oct 20, 2012 12:38 pm
Location: Utlima Thule

T46 - lets do summer ...

Post by loki100 »

T46 – 3 May 1942

So, its spring time, so much to look forward to ... more Soviet troops.

Image

Loads more of them coming to the map, and I start losing a few formations to disbands, or to refit to PzrGr style formations.

Image

And really nice weather. Should improve just to light rain in the north next week.

The detailed reality is that leaves sectors with clear ground or light mud but the worst is concentrated around Orel.

Image

So a few small attacks on the Stalino-Kharkov sector and start to dismantle the Sevastopol positions. Pulled the bulk of the mobile formations out to rest but kept some for the possibility of a reserve reaction.

Image

Supply charts. Still some gaps but nothing too worrying. Good to see a solid flow of replacements as I complete the post-winter refit cycle. Have no German divisions under 50% TOE.

One of the Pzr divisions I returned to the reserve has almost fully refitted in a turn as a result. Definitely worth it in particular circumstances.

Image
User avatar
loki100
Posts: 11708
Joined: Sat Oct 20, 2012 12:38 pm
Location: Utlima Thule

T47 - advertising for vehicle mechanics

Post by loki100 »

T47 – 10 May 1942

So ... a huge increase in Soviet numbers and my trucks are not really being repaired.

Image

Weather splits in two. Roughly north of Smolensk remains rain/light mud, but its clear to the south. Looks like next week will be exactly the same.

Soviets were back to being aggressive and very nosey.

Image

That recon was spread all along the AGC/S front. Managed to really catch one of their naval air missions – it will be some time before they can replace those specialist naval air planes.

Image

Tried rail bombing again around Yelets (so rail junction both for Orel and the south) but not sure why I picked up so much flak damage – mission was at 15,000' and there are no units actually in the target zone.

Image

Start the process of taking Sevastopol, if I can manage this from the current 2 hex frontage the secondary advantage is a pocket of those units to the south of the city.

2 of the infantry divisions in the opening assault are in a complete mess as a result.

Image

Putting this together was a real pain of organising. On that sector is a mix of heavy mud, light mud and clear ground conditions. Of course the heavy mud was where I really wanted to go.

Anyway, that is the equivalent of 2 armies routed and a Gds corps in a pocket. No doubt it will be broken but I doubt it will escape as it got involved in some reserve reactions so must be low on MP.

Almost every attack involved a number of reserve reactions and quite a few holds.

Image

Not a great loss ratio (obviously losing 9,000 men at Sevastopol doesn't help), but don't think I have much choice. The hope is this operation creates the space for a running battle back to Voronezh.

Image

Luftwaffe was heavily committed, again think its best used in this sort of situation as saved for 'later'.

While that explains why I am hitting endless lines of Soviet formations, have a small suspicion that they may also find it hard to supply so many at this stage. You can use up the notional truck surplus of 1941 very easily and lend-lease really doesn't help that much at this stage.

Image

No action south of Kharkov, content for 17A to hold the line here for the moment. Also have a near complete Pzr Army in reserve.

Less sure that my idea of rotating a few Pzr divisions via the reserve worked out. Ok it has a lot of tanks, but no trucks, can only hope it finds a few spare ones in Berlin.

Image
User avatar
loki100
Posts: 11708
Joined: Sat Oct 20, 2012 12:38 pm
Location: Utlima Thule

T48 - blowing up some T34s

Post by loki100 »

T48 – 17 May 1942

Start with some bad news ... does look like the Soviets are generating new formations faster than I can inflict any losses.

Image

Weather is clear south of Smolensk, rain above that line, next turn looks like rain all over the front.

Much to my surprise my pocket held (the 203 Pzr Regiment is using French S-35s and Char-Bs).

Rather glad I left GS on.

Image

Image

In outcome that was a bit of a massacre of the VVS.

Image

Gave up on my previous GA missions and redeployed all the relevant bombers to the Black Sea, want to try and isolate Sevastopol if I can.

Since I had to rest some formations and others had low mileage its not quite as good as I'd hoped but that helps (and with very low losses).

Its not isolated but will raise the cost of resupply.

Image

The Soviet counter-stroke had left a lot of their Tank Corps in the front line, given the likely weather next turn, decided to try and trash them if I could. Will then let most of the mobile formations rest next turn.

If I have a strategy, its time. Crudely I have a huge NM advantage from now to September. While the Soviets can (and will) both pull back here and there and can enmesh me in multiple lines, I can push them back and generate a stack of routed formations.

I'm already mostly hitting level 1 fortifications. So my view is I might as well keep my army as intact as possible and use that goal to set the operating tempo.

Less useful, some probing attacks in the Kharkov-Stalino sector.

Let 11A rest from last turn, a few of the divisions were in a real mess but I think I can recover faster than the Soviet defenders. Pulled a few fresh divisions from my limited reserve to help keep the pressure going here.

Image

Losses for once in my favour – helped by the destruction of a Gds Rifle Corps.

Image

I guess I should take some optimism from the small Soviet reserve.

Image

Their manpower pool indicates they really need their one off allocations. 193K of mine are Gernan

Image
Rosencrantus
Posts: 458
Joined: Sat Jan 09, 2021 5:49 am
Location: Canada

RE: T48 - blowing up some T34s

Post by Rosencrantus »

Are you going to consider limiting the TOE on your units that are just in static positions in the North? Setting practically almost the entire AGN to a lower TOE aside from some key divisions can really spare some manpower for your 42 offensive.
User avatar
loki100
Posts: 11708
Joined: Sat Oct 20, 2012 12:38 pm
Location: Utlima Thule

RE: T48 - blowing up some T34s

Post by loki100 »

ORIGINAL: Rosencrantus

Are you going to consider limiting the TOE on your units that are just in static positions in the North? Setting practically almost the entire AGN to a lower TOE aside from some key divisions can really spare some manpower for your 42 offensive.

manpower isn't really my problem, its tanks. Most of AGN is in the front lines with a couple of small reserve clusters behind the lines so they are not drawing on my manpower reserve and I think it would take some time for a TOE adjustment to leach out much manpower.

other bit is I've played Stal-Berlin as the axis and am very painfully aware that low TOE infantry formations rapidly become worse than useless by mid-43. So I'd rather keep them as high as I can - the LW formations are different, they can't be trusted in the front lines so are far better set back creating defensie lines. In that case, they will go to a lower TOE simply as its a poor use of the available assets to have them much over 60%.

The wider issue is that both sides have too much manpower. Now its a tricky issue as basically AI-AI testing tends to come out pretty well at key dates but player's (both) use their agency to limit losses, this means less draw down to simply replace regular losses and neither side end up with the endemic problem of low manpower formations. No easy solution, in effect mutual ahistoric game play (that is perfectly within the game engine) tends to generate lower losses.
User avatar
loki100
Posts: 11708
Joined: Sat Oct 20, 2012 12:38 pm
Location: Utlima Thule

heading for the end game

Post by loki100 »

been thinking about this and am going to stop this in any level of detail here. Not at all sure this has any value (but is time consuming) and we've reached a point (T52 really) where it can only end in one way.

Will play out to that point as it could be interesting to test the actual mechanisms.

But in effect this is what I started to put together for a T52 report but think it stands alone pretty well as a summary of where the game is.

To put things in context, that is the state of my on map Pzr and tank formations (incl Rumanian and Hungarian units). 11A was really hit in the Sevastopol battles so won't be available for at least another 3 turns.

Image

Tank pools (German only), including stuff out of production. There is no practical way to recover my losses or those under-strength divisions.

Image

Current VP chart, so I pass the October HWM loss. I can't see how I'm going to take more than 2 more of that list (& maybe not even that), so lets say I get a HWM of 610.

Image

So for the Soviets to regain the initiative they need to knock 61 off this. They are well placed for time bonus so each lost city will be 16 not 10. Given where the front is, Stalino, Orel (I am assuming I will take that), Kharkov and Kursk are all easy losses (the +6 for Kursk is already claimed). That is then 58, a few for theatre boxes and we are looking at an initiative change in say October/November.

Image

Given what I've not taken, the time bonuses are then allocated. This is going to be around +42 (locations never taken that were taken).

The Soviets then get the VP for the cities they hold at that stage. That is going to be well over 400 (in my Soviet AAR I had 340 on initiative change and the only ahistoric hold was Stalingrad).

So, a loss in early 1943?

Should note not blaming the game system. I made enough mistakes in the second half of the summer of 1941 to have set this up. The reality is I have turned 1942 into 1943, in reality I should go over to the strategic defensive now and try to maximise my options in that phase rather than lose more making increasingly limited gains.
Sammy5IsAlive
Posts: 652
Joined: Sun Aug 03, 2014 11:01 pm

RE: heading for the end game

Post by Sammy5IsAlive »

Do you already have stuff written for turns 49-51? I thought things seemed fairly positive in your T48 report and the plan seemed sound. Has something changed in the last couple of turns?

What kind of shape are your Motorised divisions in?

FWIW I think that at this stage not long after release getting an insight into how a much more experienced player is thinking and approaching things always has value. So even if you posting every 5 turns this would still be of interest to me at least.
jubjub
Posts: 641
Joined: Sun May 02, 2021 12:52 pm

RE: heading for the end game

Post by jubjub »

I think an offensive is a still a good idea. You are only one point away from your HWM, and it seems like you could go for a limited offensive to take rostov, orel, tula, and voronezh. There's potentially 50 points there, and they're not that far with only good terrain in between. Rostov in particular is a major supply hub in the south, and taking it will hurt future Soviet offensives.


Not only that, but you can focus on destroying his army as much as you can while you still have a NM advantage.
Speedysteve
Posts: 15975
Joined: Tue Sep 11, 2001 8:00 am
Location: Reading, England

RE: heading for the end game

Post by Speedysteve »

I've not been posting much on here recently due to some 'forum activity' but to add my 2p to the current situation:

I do totally agree with Loki's view that it was those crucial late Summer-early Autumn 1941 turns that have strategically influenced where we are now.

Naturally there's lots of other 'minor' actions that all add upto when each of our games are. Others that spring to mind are the Axis cross-country chase NE of VL. That led to a Pz Gp being out of more valuable action elsewhere for weeks. Another is I feel I balanced my defence very well in 1941. Preventing any large encirclements, placing units in vital defensive hexes, enough blockers to sap Axis MP etc etc.

I can, obviously, express the situation better from the Soviet side since I'm playing them[:D] Some random thoughts:

Winter Offensive - My winter offensive was hardly stellar, partly due to weather going against me and partly due to it being the first run through of winter I'd played in WITE2 (hence I learnt much). I gained the most in the Vyazma sector which will be useful come 1943 onwards.....

Logistics/Unit creation - In addition to placing my units well I've streamlined the logistics side of things over the last 2 months (thanks to Loki for some tips here) which has improved the overall 'health' of my units overtime. I've also not over stretched on unit building. It's so tempting to 'go crazy' when you see Cavalry, Tank and Rifle Corps being able to be built. Let alone the 100's of new SU's you can build. Truck use is still fragile and it's easy to 'break' the current status quo you have in terms of supply, trucks, men, artillery etc etc. As such I've gradually built them overtime for use in the crucial active sector.

VVS - Rightly or wrongly but I'm pushing and using them hard in each of my turns now. 1942 is the crucial year and even though I will lose 1000's of them like flies if they can attrite the enemy that extra bit, turn the odd battle in my favour I think it's worth it.

Target selection - since the start of the game I've tried to focus on taking out the Panzers. At the time it was just a random theory as it seemed logical they would be the most exposed units. From looking at Loki's post above it seems to have had a material affect on degrading the Axis AFV pools noticeably.

Unit density - Due to all of the mentioned factors the Soviets are clearly in a strong position right now. I've a large army on the field, units in depth combined with the emergence of Corps. I still feel Loki has a chance as the Soviets (on an individual basis) are generally still weak with low NM BUT I feel the next 2 months are crucial. IF Loki can somehow breakthrough enough and capture enough of my forces (i.e a stunning Bialystock/Kiev type encirclement) then it will make the game interesting. I do agree with Loki's assessment, though, that this is a slim chance due to my strength on the field.

Last musing - We've both done some things good in game and both made mistakes. What's clear is the Soviet's can afford to make more mistakes (as long as it's not 10's of massive ones) than the Axis one's and still come out in front. I know we know this but this game emphasises that. The 'swingometer' affect of the first 4 months of the War is the biggest single element in the game and deciding it's outcome, clearly.
WitE 2 Tester
WitE Tester
BTR/BoB Tester
DeletedUser1769703214
Posts: 9319
Joined: Fri Feb 05, 2016 12:26 am

RE: heading for the end game

Post by DeletedUser1769703214 »

ORIGINAL: Speedysteve

I've not been posting much on here recently due to some 'forum activity' but to add my 2p to the current situation:

I do totally agree with Loki's view that it was those crucial late Summer-early Autumn 1941 turns that have strategically influenced where we are now.

Naturally there's lots of other 'minor' actions that all add upto when each of our games are. Others that spring to mind are the Axis cross-country chase NE of VL. That led to a Pz Gp being out of more valuable action elsewhere for weeks. Another is I feel I balanced my defence very well in 1941. Preventing any large encirclements, placing units in vital defensive hexes, enough blockers to sap Axis MP etc etc.

I can, obviously, express the situation better from the Soviet side since I'm playing them[:D] Some random thoughts:

Winter Offensive - My winter offensive was hardly stellar, partly due to weather going against me and partly due to it being the first run through of winter I'd played in WITE2 (hence I learnt much). I gained the most in the Vyazma sector which will be useful come 1943 onwards.....

Logistics/Unit creation - In addition to placing my units well I've streamlined the logistics side of things over the last 2 months (thanks to Loki for some tips here) which has improved the overall 'health' of my units overtime. I've also not over stretched on unit building. It's so tempting to 'go crazy' when you see Cavalry, Tank and Rifle Corps being able to be built. Let alone the 100's of new SU's you can build. Truck use is still fragile and it's easy to 'break' the current status quo you have in terms of supply, trucks, men, artillery etc etc. As such I've gradually built them overtime for use in the crucial active sector.

VVS - Rightly or wrongly but I'm pushing and using them hard in each of my turns now. 1942 is the crucial year and even though I will lose 1000's of them like flies if they can attrite the enemy that extra bit, turn the odd battle in my favour I think it's worth it.

Target selection - since the start of the game I've tried to focus on taking out the Panzers. At the time it was just a random theory as it seemed logical they would be the most exposed units. From looking at Loki's post above it seems to have had a material affect on degrading the Axis AFV pools noticeably.

Unit density - Due to all of the mentioned factors the Soviets are clearly in a strong position right now. I've a large army on the field, units in depth combined with the emergence of Corps. I still feel Loki has a chance as the Soviets (on an individual basis) are generally still weak with low NM BUT I feel the next 2 months are crucial. IF Loki can somehow breakthrough enough and capture enough of my forces (i.e a stunning Bialystock/Kiev type encirclement) then it will make the game interesting. I do agree with Loki's assessment, though, that this is a slim chance due to my strength on the field.

Last musing - We've both done some things good in game and both made mistakes. What's clear is the Soviet's can afford to make more mistakes (as long as it's not 10's of massive ones) than the Axis one's and still come out in front. I know we know this but this game emphasises that. The 'swingometer' affect of the first 4 months of the War is the biggest single element in the game and deciding it's outcome, clearly.

Yup, this game is not as forgiving to the Germans as WITE1 is. You have to be on your toes from the very beginning with clear objectives & stellar logistics. Proper SU mgmt as Germans is a must too to get the biggest bang for your buck where & when you need it. Then as Germans you have to know how to attack and with how much. Added to this the light mud weather that plasters almost the whole of Russia from turn 5 on you are going to have the majority of German flapping around like a fish out of water.

User avatar
loki100
Posts: 11708
Joined: Sat Oct 20, 2012 12:38 pm
Location: Utlima Thule

T49

Post by loki100 »

Since I have these written and there is a lack of 1942 reports for the 1941 GC, I'll post what I have. After that it'll be intermittent catch up and data dumps if anyone is interested:

T49 – 24 May 1942

Weather as predicted, light rain, ground conditions either clear or light mud. Looks like exactly the same next week.

Soviet attacks all along the front but nothing sustained. Exception to this was at Leningrad where they got a bit frisky ... .

Guess that means they are still heavily committed to this sector as that was a substantive effort by the VVS (remember at this stage there is a shortage of ShAK AOGs).

Image

So with a larger commitment that isolates Sevastopol, I only lost 15 planes in the operation so this is now sustainable.

Image

Followed up with another attack, not a serious commitment but it takes out more fortifications and hard to replace supply and ammunition. Completely fresh units arrived this turn and a few of the refitting ones will be ready next turn as well.

Image

Shift of focus, 19 Pzr is now mobile, 1 Pzr gets released from Berlin next turn. The local nightclub owners lament the loss of business (but there are still about 200,000 potential replacements wandering around the place).

Image

Let the units involved in the Kursk-Orel operation have a break, but since 4 PzrA was only partially committed last week, attacked north of the Donets. Small pocket, a few shattered units and one stomped all over Cavalry Corps. Some probing attacks around Stalino suggest the Soviets may have pulled off their reserves here.

Image

Army level supply position, still some shortages and my rails are very congested.

Image

Quick truck review. The Soviets have stopped sending me sufficient replacements.

Not really making much progress with repairs.

And respective losses so far.

Image

Wider losses. The 3:1 overall ratio is pretty dire but reflects where I am in that I have little choice but to fight to gain even a small bit of movement capacity.

Image

Guess the best that can be said is they have no effective reserves at the moment.

Over the next few turns I gain a few infantry divisions returned from France and the Italian 8A. At least that will fill in some of the gaps I am leaving.

Image

One part of my current mindset is the line I've held this winter will also be an important defensive line late in 1942 (I am not optimistic about what the summer offensive will yield). So as I have a lot of #2 and a number of #3 level fortifications, often in what are key hexes, I'm making sure this line doesn't degrade and even builds up if I can. The Italians will be very useful in this role.

More generally, have been spending an age on studying the map and rail/supply net. So the operation along the north bank of the Donets is chosen for 2 reasons.

One is it will make a mess of the Soviet N-S rail system (if they are pushed to rely on the single track lines down the Volga that is real constraint). Second the end goal is ambigious, it can become an attack towards the Don south of Voronezh or to cut the Dombas-Stalingrad rail junctions.

In both cases, the 11A post-Crimea becomes the key to both flank security and for any stage when the fighting becomes sustained rather than based around movement.
User avatar
loki100
Posts: 11708
Joined: Sat Oct 20, 2012 12:38 pm
Location: Utlima Thule

T50

Post by loki100 »

T50 – 31 May 1942

Weather as predicted, but clear skies along the Black Sea/Sea of Azov. Elsewhere ground is a mix of clear and light mud. Air blockade of Sevastopol held so its now isolated. Limited Soviet attacks on AGC but nothing sustained.

Main specific air operation is secure the approaches to Sevastopol again. Major reorganisation of the Rumanian and Hungarian commitment. Pulled their less useful formations off the map and some disbanding of recon formations to put planes and pilots into a small number of active units.

So, a rare outright victory, and that leaves some 7 rifle divisions ripe for picking off.

Image

But you really have to give it to the Rumanians, that is inept stuff. So have to use German units just to reduce a small pocket of brigade sized formations.

Image

Anyway despite that world beating display of incompetence, overran the pocket and actually managed to break out. I'm using up a lot of MP moving infantry into contact to try and judge the Soviet front line but that, combined with air recon, does start to pay off. This turn the pocket is 2 rifle divisions and a cavalry corps.

I know they have a lot of powerful units just to the north around Stary Oskol (at least 2 of their Gds Rifle Corps) so they can close this off but finally may have to start weakening one sector to seal down another.

Small bonus is cutting the single track N-S rail, only the dual track to the east to go for that part of the operation.

Image

Now that revision of their front line strengths adjusting my plans. Decided to let 1 Pzr A have another rest, just in case they do weaken their lines covering the direct route to Voronezh.

Basically 3 Pzr A is a defensive force, though it controls my forces facing Orel, I am actually afraid the Soviets will take advantage of this relatively weak spot.

Unit and air recon suggests that the Soviet are weak around Kastornoe (ie the direct route to Voronezh) and Livny (which threatens their large group around Orel with encirclement – or more plausibly with resupply problems).

In the end struck around Livny, Orel is a more immediate objective (I want the rail junction as much as anything else) and that starts to construct a salient that in theory 2 and 3 Pzr could snip off with a small pocket.

One immediate gain of dealing with Sevastopol is I can bring a group of bombers back to this section and return to rail usage interdiction. Really anything that adds to the stress the Soviets must be under to keep a large force at Orel as I slowly break up its communications.


Image

Losses, for once, rather good to read. Almost 150k permanent Soviet losses must hinder their ability to both generate replacements and new formations. That includes 10 destroyed divisions and 7 brigades. There are another 7 divisions still in the Crimea.


Image

Manpower pools, for the moment have the Red Army's ability to grow under some degree of control.

Image

Bit of an overview to put some of that discussion into context.

Image

So that gives me 587 VP (and a new HWM) for Sevastopol and the +6 time bonus. I guess that the bulk of 11A won't be available till late June as there will be at least one, possibly 2 turns to finish the Soviets off, some time for refit and redeployment.

Small point, have now exceeded the 'Sudden Loss' score for October, so we have to go to (at least) December 1944 for the next game end point.

I'll leave you to guess how all these individual operations are meant to slot together, but I do have a long term structure (even if it is totally unrealistic).
User avatar
loki100
Posts: 11708
Joined: Sat Oct 20, 2012 12:38 pm
Location: Utlima Thule

T51

Post by loki100 »

T51 – 7 June 1941

So .. clearly the Soviets are fleeing to the Urals, and my truck repair mechanics remain utterly useless.

Image

Weather remains rain and odd combinations of light mud or clear. Next turn the rain should just be over the northern half of the front.

Looks like the Soviets are getting frisky again – but mostly hit my allies.

Image

Back to bombing what I think are key parts of their rail net, can't help them much even if its all rather low key.

Image

To describe this sector as 'hotting up' is perhaps a bit excessive but the Soviets were trying things on, so decided to remind them who is meant to have the initiative at this phase of the war.

Image

2 and 3 Pzr A continued to attack around Orel. Another small pocket (5 divisions) carved out.

To the south, 1 Pzr A launched a limited attack towards Voronezh. Soviet tank corps intervened (via reserve reactions) but mostly just added to the damage handed out. Mostly pulled back to limit my exposure and encourage the Soviets forward.

Feasibly that sets up a potential pocket around Novy Oskol if the Soviets aren't careful (or more likely aren't set up in multiple lines as usual). More usefully it tells me where the Soviets don't want me to go, especially given their relatively weak (if deep) set up around Orel. Also their strong commitment in the Stalino sector where unusually even the front line is heavily stacked.

Not shown but apart from clearing out the pocket, 4 Pzr A opted to spend the week recovering.

No attacks in the Crimea as those Soviet units around Sevastopol remain too strong to handle. Pulled about half the axis assault forces out of the Crimea to refit, rest need to stay to deal with what I've cut off.

Image

Losses, at a guess I am stopping any further growth of the Red Army if I can sustain over >100k casualties per turn. Setting up a sequence of small pockets does help quite a lot. Less interested in knocking out Soviet tanks but I know their Tank Corps are not going to be very mobile next turn.

Image

Air losses remain heavy, pragmatically I'm prepared to take losses for the occasional massive GS boost.

Image

Rare view of the destroyed unit table. In effect it shows why I'm in this mess.

Over the last 4 turns I've destroyed 1 Rifle Corps, 1 Cavalry Corps, 14 Rifle Divisions, 1 Cavalry Division, 11 Rifle Brigades and 3 Tank Brigades. There are 5 Rifle and 2 Cavalry divisions cut off in the Crimea and 5 Rifle Divisions in a pocket south of Orel.

All very nice but really not even starting to make up for the lack of destroyed formations in 1941.

Image

So this really doesn't get any better to look at as a result.

Image

Hard to work out the Soviet deployment. My best guesses is they don't seem to care if I make gains along the line of the Donets and seem to have given up at Orel. Here they are in depth but never very strong. They seem to really not want me to move towards Voronezh or around Stalino.

Not sure if their various operations against AGN are serious attempts or just probing.

My fear is a sustained effort towards Smolensk but no signs of that. That would be the one thing that would force a major redeployment, but equally I'd quite like a running battle in relatively open terrain. I'm suspicious as to why they are so strong around Stalino. I can't believe its in preparation for an offensive but its not a sector where they have much to lose if I made any small gains.

From my perspective, all I can do is to exploit my 2 remaining advantages. The low Soviet NM up to September will mean that many battles end with them routing and that helps degrade their forces on a given sector. And time, I basically have 3 months of good weather and they don't seem to be keen to pull off a major retreat. In effect, my supply situation for the current front lines is decent and I'm filling in the few gaps in the rail net.
Post Reply

Return to “After Action Reports”