Empire Mod PBEM ( From 1 Jan 43) Game finished Sept 45 as a draw.
Moderators: wdolson, MOD_War-in-the-Pacific-Admirals-Edition
Re: Empire Mod PBEM ( From 1 Jan 43) 2 days turns realistic R+D - no Dean
How is something that massive supposed to maneuver to be able to 'aim' torpedoes accurately? Might as well make it carry a Kaiten or the Ohka instead...
Sorry, I do not know the history & development of this plane. I see you also have it carry the jury-rigged 14" shells (aka 800kg bombs).
This is not meant to be a snarky comment, I am genuinely interested in the thought process.
Sorry, I do not know the history & development of this plane. I see you also have it carry the jury-rigged 14" shells (aka 800kg bombs).
This is not meant to be a snarky comment, I am genuinely interested in the thought process.
-
Cavalry Corp
- Posts: 4282
- Joined: Tue Sep 02, 2003 5:28 pm
- Location: Sampford Spiney Devon UK
Re: Empire Mod PBEM ( From 1 Jan 43) 2 days turns realistic R+D - no Dean
Thanks for the input
Actually was thinking about taking the TT option out as well, its a hypothetical dead end development from the Liz, using 6 modest engines.
Working on a new small patch now and take note of what you said- I see no issue with the 800kg though- its a pretty big beast. But yeh perhaps the TT have to go, considering what you said about its size etc. There is a Ohka variant of the next development G8 in 2nd half 44. BUT it would be realistic and interesting to consider that these units ( and the Liz) if they survive could go for the Ohka once it arrives so I will add it in but they need to wait until mid 44 for that weapon to be available.
I value all input as even though its hypothetical this mod is not asking for science fiction level of belief
We have low tech at the start then it accelerates faster than real time by 44.
anything else please feel free to comment. next official update in June44 but if you are interested I can mail you a copy after the next patch which sorts out mainly micro issues, load outs, fine tuning arrival dates, AA etc all fine tuning stuff.
Cav
Actually was thinking about taking the TT option out as well, its a hypothetical dead end development from the Liz, using 6 modest engines.
Working on a new small patch now and take note of what you said- I see no issue with the 800kg though- its a pretty big beast. But yeh perhaps the TT have to go, considering what you said about its size etc. There is a Ohka variant of the next development G8 in 2nd half 44. BUT it would be realistic and interesting to consider that these units ( and the Liz) if they survive could go for the Ohka once it arrives so I will add it in but they need to wait until mid 44 for that weapon to be available.
I value all input as even though its hypothetical this mod is not asking for science fiction level of belief
anything else please feel free to comment. next official update in June44 but if you are interested I can mail you a copy after the next patch which sorts out mainly micro issues, load outs, fine tuning arrival dates, AA etc all fine tuning stuff.
Cav
-
Cavalry Corp
- Posts: 4282
- Joined: Tue Sep 02, 2003 5:28 pm
- Location: Sampford Spiney Devon UK
Re: Empire Mod PBEM ( From 1 Jan 43) 2 days turns realistic R+D - no Dean
Oh some help please
when I change it to Okha the load out is nothing for Naval attack in Dec 41 test mod ( it should be greyed out?) Are you able to tell me what the code should be to allow this to happen when the missile is available and so it can use bombs in the meantime??
planes are the same in terms of the loadout numbers
when I change it to Okha the load out is nothing for Naval attack in Dec 41 test mod ( it should be greyed out?) Are you able to tell me what the code should be to allow this to happen when the missile is available and so it can use bombs in the meantime??
planes are the same in terms of the loadout numbers
Re: Empire Mod PBEM ( From 1 Jan 43) 2 days turns realistic R+D - no Dean
Just think if you could use that plane with the Ohka on a port strike! No AAA units bothering the plane, just the Ohka . . .
Seek peace but keep your gun handy.
I'm not a complete idiot, some parts are missing!
“Illegitemus non carborundum est (“Don’t let the bastards grind you down”).”
; Julia Child

I'm not a complete idiot, some parts are missing!
“Illegitemus non carborundum est (“Don’t let the bastards grind you down”).”
Re: Empire Mod PBEM ( From 1 Jan 43) 2 days turns realistic R+D - no Dean
Is it possible that Ohka should be in the last slot? Put the bombs & whatnot to the top & the last available weapon at the bottom. Just guessing though!
-
Cavalry Corp
- Posts: 4282
- Joined: Tue Sep 02, 2003 5:28 pm
- Location: Sampford Spiney Devon UK
Re: Empire Mod PBEM ( From 1 Jan 43) 2 days turns realistic R+D - no Dean
I will play with it - but the last slot is always Engines- or do you mean the last weapon slot I have - I think that makes no difference.
-
Cavalry Corp
- Posts: 4282
- Joined: Tue Sep 02, 2003 5:28 pm
- Location: Sampford Spiney Devon UK
Re: Empire Mod PBEM ( From 1 Jan 43) 2 days turns realistic R+D - no Dean
OK could not get that load out to work -
So... I have added new TT device for very un manoeuvrable planes. With half the accuracy of other typical weapons. Seems like a good fix to me.
So... I have added new TT device for very un manoeuvrable planes. With half the accuracy of other typical weapons. Seems like a good fix to me.
-
Cavalry Corp
- Posts: 4282
- Joined: Tue Sep 02, 2003 5:28 pm
- Location: Sampford Spiney Devon UK
Re: Empire Mod PBEM ( From 1 Jan 43) 2 days turns realistic R+D - no Dean
9/3/44 more action over the map.
Re: Empire Mod PBEM ( From 1 Jan 43) 2 days turns realistic R+D - no Dean
That was a nice intercept!
Of course, the fault is entirely the Allied players'... that convoy was routed way too close to Truk.
Of course, the fault is entirely the Allied players'... that convoy was routed way too close to Truk.
-
Cavalry Corp
- Posts: 4282
- Joined: Tue Sep 02, 2003 5:28 pm
- Location: Sampford Spiney Devon UK
Re: Empire Mod PBEM ( From 1 Jan 43) 2 days turns realistic R+D - no Dean
We did spot them 2 turns ago.. and thanks. any spotted unit in this game is in some sort of danger.
-
Cavalry Corp
- Posts: 4282
- Joined: Tue Sep 02, 2003 5:28 pm
- Location: Sampford Spiney Devon UK
Re: Empire Mod PBEM ( From 1 Jan 43) 2 days turns realistic R+D - no Dean
Another failed attempt on Wake leads to allied retribution.
-
Cavalry Corp
- Posts: 4282
- Joined: Tue Sep 02, 2003 5:28 pm
- Location: Sampford Spiney Devon UK
Re: Empire Mod PBEM ( From 1 Jan 43) 2 days turns realistic R+D - no Dean
13/3/44
I 24 strikes and Sinks CVL with one Kaiten and two TT ( causing ammo explosion) then puts 2 TT in CV Essex ( Not Sunk). Never had a sub make two attacks like this before.
Allies left the group unloved with high DL at night and day, No ASW escorting TF and probably there are slow escort ships in the TF - I will ask Dean. All these thing make trouble
In this mod what is left of the SS that Japan has now have Radar and we do have Kaiten in Jan 44 - as explained we have faster tech arriving now. I have around 5 SS with Kaiten just now another launch at an XAK but missed as well this turn.
The selection of firing a Kaiten ( pair) or TT seem quite random and hard coded.
Cav
I 24 strikes and Sinks CVL with one Kaiten and two TT ( causing ammo explosion) then puts 2 TT in CV Essex ( Not Sunk). Never had a sub make two attacks like this before.
Allies left the group unloved with high DL at night and day, No ASW escorting TF and probably there are slow escort ships in the TF - I will ask Dean. All these thing make trouble
In this mod what is left of the SS that Japan has now have Radar and we do have Kaiten in Jan 44 - as explained we have faster tech arriving now. I have around 5 SS with Kaiten just now another launch at an XAK but missed as well this turn.
The selection of firing a Kaiten ( pair) or TT seem quite random and hard coded.
Cav
-
Cavalry Corp
- Posts: 4282
- Joined: Tue Sep 02, 2003 5:28 pm
- Location: Sampford Spiney Devon UK
Re: Empire Mod PBEM ( From 1 Jan 43) 2 days turns realistic R+D - no Dean
15th March 44
more infiltration and more action - Japan doing good just now.
more infiltration and more action - Japan doing good just now.
-
Cavalry Corp
- Posts: 4282
- Joined: Tue Sep 02, 2003 5:28 pm
- Location: Sampford Spiney Devon UK
Re: Empire Mod PBEM ( From 1 Jan 43) 2 days turns realistic R+D - no Dean
1/4/44 Allies too quiet they are preparing for a big push - some success in china for Japan - China is much tougher in this mod. Allied subs get more active off HI.
-
Cavalry Corp
- Posts: 4282
- Joined: Tue Sep 02, 2003 5:28 pm
- Location: Sampford Spiney Devon UK
Re: Empire Mod PBEM ( From 1 Jan 43) 2 days turns realistic R+D - no Dean
9/4/44 - More attrition action allied subs sinks CVE but we got all the pilots off - allied subs do not move enough and also suffering losses.
Re: Empire Mod PBEM ( From 1 Jan 43) 2 days turns realistic R+D - no Dean
If the Allied subs do not move much and it is safe to do so, I suggest flooding the area with aerial Naval Search and ASW assets while also making some hunter killer groups with highly skilled crews.
Seek peace but keep your gun handy.
I'm not a complete idiot, some parts are missing!
“Illegitemus non carborundum est (“Don’t let the bastards grind you down”).”
; Julia Child

I'm not a complete idiot, some parts are missing!
“Illegitemus non carborundum est (“Don’t let the bastards grind you down”).”
-
Cavalry Corp
- Posts: 4282
- Joined: Tue Sep 02, 2003 5:28 pm
- Location: Sampford Spiney Devon UK
Re: Empire Mod PBEM ( From 1 Jan 43) 2 days turns realistic R+D - no Dean
Ranger - Yep you are quite that is what I have done - he never moves the subs once detected they do not attack as much and can be hunted out. He should stay further out IMO
In this mod Japanese ASW is worse 41-43 than stock but in 44 is better. In late 44 we also get a new weapon against subs if there are ships left to use it.
In this mod Japanese ASW is worse 41-43 than stock but in 44 is better. In late 44 we also get a new weapon against subs if there are ships left to use it.
-
Cavalry Corp
- Posts: 4282
- Joined: Tue Sep 02, 2003 5:28 pm
- Location: Sampford Spiney Devon UK
Re: Empire Mod PBEM ( From 1 Jan 43) 2 days turns realistic R+D - no Dean
11T APRIL 44
Pagan falls after a good fight
Pagan falls after a good fight
-
Cavalry Corp
- Posts: 4282
- Joined: Tue Sep 02, 2003 5:28 pm
- Location: Sampford Spiney Devon UK
Re: Empire Mod PBEM ( From 1 Jan 43) 2 days turns realistic R+D - no Dean
11/4/44
Amazing effort by allied LST nearly sinks Jap sub.
PT boats miss everything
Amazing effort by allied LST nearly sinks Jap sub.
PT boats miss everything
-
Cavalry Corp
- Posts: 4282
- Joined: Tue Sep 02, 2003 5:28 pm
- Location: Sampford Spiney Devon UK
Re: Empire Mod PBEM ( From 1 Jan 43) 2 days turns realistic R+D - no Dean
17/4/44
Allies boast of invasion plans
estimated month before something big happens.
So far the number that will be committed
13 CVs, 13 CVLs, 31 CVEs, 15 BBs, 2 BC, 1 CB, 15 CAS, 18 CLs, 10 CLAAs, 210 DDs, 35 DEs, 8 APDs,
along with 163 thousand troops
and you'll probably be on vacation before it launches sad.
Allies under pressure in China
Allies boast of invasion plans
estimated month before something big happens.
So far the number that will be committed
13 CVs, 13 CVLs, 31 CVEs, 15 BBs, 2 BC, 1 CB, 15 CAS, 18 CLs, 10 CLAAs, 210 DDs, 35 DEs, 8 APDs,
along with 163 thousand troops
and you'll probably be on vacation before it launches sad.
Allies under pressure in China
