Pat vs Ronnie GW AAR

Post descriptions of your brilliant successes and unfortunate demises.

Moderator: Shannon V. OKeets

User avatar
rkr1958
Posts: 30268
Joined: Thu May 21, 2009 10:23 am

RE: Pat vs Ronnie GW AAR

Post by rkr1958 »

Turn 17. May/June 1942. Allied #2. Western Allies. Brest. Air-to-Air Combat, part 1.

I believe (hope) I've faithfully executed your instructions in the Brest air to air combat, which hasn't gone well for the axis, to this point.

At this point I need direction from you on whether or not you wish to continue this air to air? If so, what are you instructions?

ORIGINAL: ashkpa
I believe if I get at least 4 GS through it is best to decline the notional, but please verify when the option comes up.
By the way, the choice on whether or not to include the notional had to be made even before adding shore bombardment. Attack odds were in your favor with the notionals so I included them. Hope that was ok.

Image
Attachments
02ALWEST..oAirp1.jpg
02ALWEST..oAirp1.jpg (662.39 KiB) Viewed 194 times
Ronnie
User avatar
ashkpa
Posts: 1513
Joined: Thu Jan 16, 2014 3:11 am

RE: Pat vs Ronnie GW AAR

Post by ashkpa »

staying at least one more round to try and get the bomber through. Please roll well for the axis now.
Pat
User avatar
rkr1958
Posts: 30268
Joined: Thu May 21, 2009 10:23 am

RE: Pat vs Ronnie GW AAR

Post by rkr1958 »

Turn 17. May/June 1941. Allied #2. Western Allies. Brest. Air to Air Combat, part 2.
ORIGINAL: ashkpa

staying at least one more round to try and get the bomber through. Please roll well for the axis now.

Sorry ... [:(]

Stay or leave?

Image
Attachments
02ALWest..oAirp2.jpg
02ALWest..oAirp2.jpg (338.94 KiB) Viewed 194 times
Ronnie
User avatar
ashkpa
Posts: 1513
Joined: Thu Jan 16, 2014 3:11 am

RE: Pat vs Ronnie GW AAR

Post by ashkpa »

So frustrating. Stay.
Pat
User avatar
rkr1958
Posts: 30268
Joined: Thu May 21, 2009 10:23 am

RE: Pat vs Ronnie GW AAR

Post by rkr1958 »

Turn 17. May/June 1942. Allied #2. Western Allies. Brest. Air-to-Air, Part 3.
ORIGINAL: ashkpa

So frustrating. Stay.
Sorry again ... [:(]

Thus, ends to air to air combat over Breast and ground support.

Image
Attachments
02ALWest..oAirp3.jpg
02ALWest..oAirp3.jpg (336.41 KiB) Viewed 194 times
Ronnie
User avatar
rkr1958
Posts: 30268
Joined: Thu May 21, 2009 10:23 am

RE: Pat vs Ronnie GW AAR

Post by rkr1958 »

Turn 17. May/June 1942. Allied #2. St-Malo. Air-to-Air Combat.

Well, if it's any consolation the air to air combat over St-Malo completely goes the axis way.

Image
Attachments
02ALWEST..rtoAir.jpg
02ALWEST..rtoAir.jpg (319.56 KiB) Viewed 194 times
Ronnie
User avatar
ashkpa
Posts: 1513
Joined: Thu Jan 16, 2014 3:11 am

RE: Pat vs Ronnie GW AAR

Post by ashkpa »

Now it is all up to the luck of the attack rolls. Plus, you should be in bed now. Don't you work in the morning?[:D]
Pat
User avatar
rkr1958
Posts: 30268
Joined: Thu May 21, 2009 10:23 am

RE: Pat vs Ronnie GW AAR

Post by rkr1958 »

Turn 17. May/June 1942. Allied #2. Western Allies. Land Combat. Ground Support.

The Western Allies manage to add 6 factors of ground support to their attack on Brest. The axis managed to add 2 factors to their defense of St-Malo.

Image
Attachments
02ALWEST..Support.jpg
02ALWEST..Support.jpg (694.95 KiB) Viewed 194 times
Ronnie
User avatar
rkr1958
Posts: 30268
Joined: Thu May 21, 2009 10:23 am

RE: Pat vs Ronnie GW AAR

Post by rkr1958 »

Turn 17. May/June 1942. Allied #2. Amphibious Landings Brest and St-Malo.
ORIGINAL: ashkpa

Now it is all up to the luck of the attack rolls. Plus, you should be in bed now. Don't you work in the morning?[:D]
Yes it is and yes I do, but if I didn't finish my impulse it would drive me crazy all day at work thinking about the outcome. [:)]

The allies get ashore at both locations but the Brest landings were costly.


Image
Attachments
02-AL-WEST-LC.jpg
02-AL-WEST-LC.jpg (563.76 KiB) Viewed 194 times
Ronnie
User avatar
rkr1958
Posts: 30268
Joined: Thu May 21, 2009 10:23 am

RE: Pat vs Ronnie GW AAR

Post by rkr1958 »

Turn 17. May/June 1942. Allied #2. Western Allies. Northwest France.

Image
Attachments
02ALWESTFrance.jpg
02ALWESTFrance.jpg (1000.07 KiB) Viewed 194 times
Ronnie
User avatar
rkr1958
Posts: 30268
Joined: Thu May 21, 2009 10:23 am

RE: Pat vs Ronnie GW AAR

Post by rkr1958 »

Turn 17. May/June 1942. Allied #2. USSR. Eastern Europe.

Image
Attachments
02ALUSSR.jpg
02ALUSSR.jpg (2.93 MiB) Viewed 194 times
Ronnie
User avatar
rkr1958
Posts: 30268
Joined: Thu May 21, 2009 10:23 am

RE: Pat vs Ronnie GW AAR

Post by rkr1958 »

Turn 17. May/June 1942. Allied #2. USSR. Asia.

Image
Attachments
02ALUSSRAsia.jpg
02ALUSSRAsia.jpg (988.86 KiB) Viewed 194 times
Ronnie
User avatar
rkr1958
Posts: 30268
Joined: Thu May 21, 2009 10:23 am

RE: Pat vs Ronnie GW AAR

Post by rkr1958 »

Turn 17. May/June 1942. Axis #3. Weather.

Pat, back to you and it's indeed WELL past my bedtime.

Goodnight all ... [>:] [>:] [>:] [>:] [>:]

Image
Attachments
03AXWEATHER.jpg
03AXWEATHER.jpg (659.53 KiB) Viewed 194 times
Ronnie
User avatar
rkr1958
Posts: 30268
Joined: Thu May 21, 2009 10:23 am

RE: Pat vs Ronnie GW AAR

Post by rkr1958 »

PS -- Turn 17. May/June 1942. Allied #2.

I forgot to post this earlier. The Soviets railed another blue factor to the east.

Image
Attachments
02ALUSSR..Factory.jpg
02ALUSSR..Factory.jpg (818.06 KiB) Viewed 194 times
Ronnie
User avatar
ashkpa
Posts: 1513
Joined: Thu Jan 16, 2014 3:11 am

RE: Pat vs Ronnie GW AAR

Post by ashkpa »

MJ i3: Naval moves
Japan takes a naval, Italy a combined and Germany a land.
No naval air moves for Italy and Germany. Japan flys out to the Coral Sea and the Solomon Sea.
Early in the naval moves, JP moves to the E. Indian Ocean with a CA, the FR can intercept. Will They?

Image
Attachments
MJ42i3Navalmoves.jpg
MJ42i3Navalmoves.jpg (456.56 KiB) Viewed 194 times
Pat
User avatar
rkr1958
Posts: 30268
Joined: Thu May 21, 2009 10:23 am

RE: Pat vs Ronnie GW AAR

Post by rkr1958 »

ORIGINAL: ashkpa
Early in the naval moves, JP moves to the E. Indian Ocean with a CA, the FR can intercept. Will They?
No thank you.
Ronnie
User avatar
ashkpa
Posts: 1513
Joined: Thu Jan 16, 2014 3:11 am

RE: Pat vs Ronnie GW AAR

Post by ashkpa »

Next, an unloaded Transport and BB move into the China Sea. Will the subs intercept?

Image
Attachments
MJ42 i3 Na.. moves b.jpg
MJ42 i3 Na.. moves b.jpg (574.55 KiB) Viewed 194 times
Pat
User avatar
rkr1958
Posts: 30268
Joined: Thu May 21, 2009 10:23 am

RE: Pat vs Ronnie GW AAR

Post by rkr1958 »

ORIGINAL: ashkpa

Next, an unloaded Transport and BB move into the China Sea. Will the subs intercept?
Yes.
Ronnie
User avatar
ashkpa
Posts: 1513
Joined: Thu Jan 16, 2014 3:11 am

RE: Pat vs Ronnie GW AAR

Post by ashkpa »

Rolled a 1 and found. The units stopped in the 2-box and the transport picked up the Osaka MIL. A second transport for Tokyo, without escort, made the same run. This time you rolled a 6 and missed. It continued onto the S. China Sea.

Pat
User avatar
ashkpa
Posts: 1513
Joined: Thu Jan 16, 2014 3:11 am

RE: Pat vs Ronnie GW AAR

Post by ashkpa »

The Transport in Fukuoka moved into China Sea loaded with the 8-3 Corp. The interception roll was again a 6. It moved on to Shanghai.
Pat
Post Reply

Return to “After Action Report”