USS Long Island was a CVE!!

Please post here for questions and discussion about scenario design and the game editor for WITP.

Moderators: wdolson, Don Bowen, mogami

el cid again
Posts: 16983
Joined: Mon Oct 10, 2005 4:40 pm

RE: USS Long Island was a CVE!!

Post by el cid again »

ORIGINAL: JWE

ORIGINAL: m10bob

Wonder why the USS Long Island, in every mod, enters as pretty much a "door stop", when it was really the 1st CVL in the USN?

http://www.navsource.org/archives/03/001.htm

Was used to ferry by late 1942, but that is an option all gamers have.. I would like to see the ship enter as a CVE, as designed.

Must agree with Bob (what in the world is m10?), with all due respect to Terminus, Conways and DANFS.

In a perfect world, a CVE, as an aircraft transport, can deliver a day-1, fully operational air group (ok squadron or 2), as opposed to mailing it by AK, boxed and 'assembly required' upon delivery. Thus the CVE has a place in the lineup.

Notwithstanding, as players, we are Roosevelt, King, BUSHIPS, Nimitz, etc.. (and Churchill, and Somerville, hello Dixie) and can decide how we wish to allocate our resources. Given a 'carrier capable' squadron, there is no reason why we cannot choose to deploy it on any 'air' capable ship. Don't forget, during the Korean Agression, Marine F-4 FB squadrons were routinely deployed on CVE types, offshore in the Sea of Japan.

Ciao. JWE

Due to a technical problem - or disagreement if it isn't a problem in the mind of Matrix programmers - there are lots of "extra" carrier squadrons in RHS right now. The problem - partially cleaned up in the last two updates from Matrix - is the "resize" of carrier squadrons. This is ahistorical - insofar as the software imposes ahistorical sizes on units at ahistorical times - and results in significant issues even though now it won't overload the ship. I used the CVE fleet as a way to define squadrons that will "resize" to the "standard" squadron sizes - mainly 18 - sometimes other values - which you can then use in place of squadrons that resize in unpleasant ways if that happens to you. Anyway - IRL units sometimes were transferred to carriers - particularly USMC units - so in RHS you now have this option even for units nominally "land" based. IF you want Long Island with an air group, transfer an 18 plane unit to her from a different CVE/CVL/CV. These ships sometimes get sunk or damaged - and you may end up with squadrons that need a temporary home - as it were. Long Island is just about the only US CVE without an air group in RHS.
el cid again
Posts: 16983
Joined: Mon Oct 10, 2005 4:40 pm

RE: USS Long Island was a CVE!!

Post by el cid again »

ORIGINAL: wdolson

Marine F4U squadrons were first deployed on CVEs in 1945. I can't recall if it was during the Iwo Jima or Okinawa campaign.

It would be nice if the game gave us the flexibility to assign air groups to carriers in any way we choose. The game engine doesn't lend itself to that sort of flexability. Bill

Not exactly for this reason - but it is ratified by this reasoning - RHS does give you this flexability. We will not think of removing it unless Matrix removes the air group resize code - which IMHO forces you NOT to use historical units.
Why do all the research on units only to have blind code ruin it? Never understood that. So I put in lots of units that - under 1.6 code - will be stable in size - of one of the standard sizes you need - and you will find that you have lots of options to "mix and match." Maybe when a unit is not in good shape you simply put some Marines on board for a while?
User avatar
DuckofTindalos
Posts: 39781
Joined: Fri Apr 22, 2005 11:53 pm
Location: Denmark

RE: USS Long Island was a CVE!!

Post by DuckofTindalos »

ORIGINAL: JWE

ORIGINAL: m10bob

Wonder why the USS Long Island, in every mod, enters as pretty much a "door stop", when it was really the 1st CVL in the USN?

http://www.navsource.org/archives/03/001.htm

Was used to ferry by late 1942, but that is an option all gamers have.. I would like to see the ship enter as a CVE, as designed.

Must agree with Bob (what in the world is m10?), with all due respect to Terminus, Conways and DANFS.

In a perfect world, a CVE, as an aircraft transport, can deliver a day-1, fully operational air group (ok squadron or 2), as opposed to mailing it by AK, boxed and 'assembly required' upon delivery. Thus the CVE has a place in the lineup.

Notwithstanding, as players, we are Roosevelt, King, BUSHIPS, Nimitz, etc.. (and Churchill, and Somerville, hello Dixie) and can decide how we wish to allocate our resources. Given a 'carrier capable' squadron, there is no reason why we cannot choose to deploy it on any 'air' capable ship. Don't forget, during the Korean Agression, Marine F-4 FB squadrons were routinely deployed on CVE types, offshore in the Sea of Japan.

Ciao. JWE

Erm, when did I ever say that the Long Island had no place in the lineup? I've had lots of use for her in my various games, as an aircraft ferry and ASW platform...[&:]
We are all dreams of the Giant Space Butterfly.
User avatar
JWE
Posts: 5039
Joined: Tue Jul 19, 2005 5:02 pm

RE: USS Long Island was a CVL!!

Post by JWE »

You never did. I was just acknowledging your original take.
ORIGINAL: Terminus

The Long Island never operated as anything other than a testbed and aircraft transport. She wasn't used offensively...

As you know, I'm one who believes in games as simulations. I do not hew to the rule that every action must give a precisely historical result, or that every 'item' must only be utilized in its strict historical context.

I want to be Ernie King, that arrogant, pigheaded, brilliant old man, and make operational decisions on my own nickel. If I screw up, then I learn. It's not like real war, I can restart.

I was just acknowledging that others might have a different perspective and was offering them all due respect. Please accept my apologies for any misunderstandings.

JWE
User avatar
m10bob
Posts: 8583
Joined: Sun Nov 03, 2002 9:09 pm
Location: Dismal Seepage Indiana

RE: USS Long Island was a CVL!!

Post by m10bob »

ORIGINAL: JWE

You never did. I was just acknowledging your original take.
ORIGINAL: Terminus

The Long Island never operated as anything other than a testbed and aircraft transport. She wasn't used offensively...

As you know, I'm one who believes in games as simulations. I do not hew to the rule that every action must give a precisely historical result, or that every 'item' must only be utilized in its strict historical context.

I want to be Ernie King, that arrogant, pigheaded, brilliant old man, and make operational decisions on my own nickel. If I screw up, then I learn. It's not like real war, I can restart.

I was just acknowledging that others might have a different perspective and was offering them all due respect. Please accept my apologies for any misunderstandings.

JWE

Okay..that is 3 attorneys I like....BTW..Love the unit crest..I was 2/503rd
Image

User avatar
DuckofTindalos
Posts: 39781
Joined: Fri Apr 22, 2005 11:53 pm
Location: Denmark

RE: USS Long Island was a CVL!!

Post by DuckofTindalos »

ORIGINAL: JWE

You never did. I was just acknowledging your original take.
ORIGINAL: Terminus

The Long Island never operated as anything other than a testbed and aircraft transport. She wasn't used offensively...

As you know, I'm one who believes in games as simulations. I do not hew to the rule that every action must give a precisely historical result, or that every 'item' must only be utilized in its strict historical context.

I want to be Ernie King, that arrogant, pigheaded, brilliant old man, and make operational decisions on my own nickel. If I screw up, then I learn. It's not like real war, I can restart.

I was just acknowledging that others might have a different perspective and was offering them all due respect. Please accept my apologies for any misunderstandings.

JWE

So am I. No apology needed...
We are all dreams of the Giant Space Butterfly.
User avatar
MkXIV
Posts: 343
Joined: Fri Jun 03, 2005 10:04 pm
Location: North Georgia

RE: USS Long Island was a CVL!!

Post by MkXIV »

ORIGINAL: m10bob

Taken at Pearl, summer of '42

Image

First time I have seen this photo, I knew she had no island, where was her bridge?
F4U Corsair; When you Absolutely, Positively need to kill every freaking Zero in a 40 mile hex....
el cid again
Posts: 16983
Joined: Mon Oct 10, 2005 4:40 pm

RE: USS Long Island was a CVL!!

Post by el cid again »

A tiny control station starboard side forward - you can see it - barely
Post Reply

Return to “Scenario Design”