Wish List

Crown of Glory: Europe in the Age of Napoleon, the player controls one of the crowned potentates of Europe in the Napoleonic Era, wielding authority over his nation's military strategy, economic development, diplomatic relations, and social organization. It is a very thorough simulation of the entire Napoleonic Era - spanning from 1799 to 1820, from the dockyards in Lisbon to the frozen wastes of Holy Mother Russia.

Moderators: Gil R., ericbabe

User avatar
Gil R.
Posts: 10820
Joined: Fri Apr 01, 2005 4:22 am

RE: Wish List

Post by Gil R. »

ORIGINAL: Beren

more and more areas, to see real strategic movements...


Redoing the map isn't an option for the expansion pack. I wouldn't rule it out for a COG 2.0, but the map is unlikely to change radically before then.
Michael Jordan plays ball. Charles Manson kills people. I torment eager potential customers by not sharing screenshots of "Brother Against Brother." Everyone has a talent.
User avatar
Russian Guard
Posts: 1251
Joined: Fri Oct 14, 2005 2:05 am

RE: Wish List

Post by Russian Guard »

A late (or maybe early) request for consideration:

I have played the Russians many, many times, and have defended her against French assaults and (when I was way ahead) mass coalition assaults.

An argument for historicity here - why not either:

1) Halve (or even 1/3) the National morale loss when Moscow is besieged or occupied, or
2) Make the enemy have to siege and/or occupy both Moscow and St. Petersburg before the National morale loss kicks in?

Option 2 is the superior choice, but either would help.

It's too easy, in my humble opinion, to get to, and siege, Moscow by invading armies. just doesn't have the historically difficult "feel" in terms of distance and logistics.

And since the Russians DID lose Moscow historically, without surrendering, seems reasonable to reflect that fact. Russia should be a tougher nut to crack.

Edit: Option 1 is actually better, so that the Russians can't just ignore one or the other cities.


User avatar
jkBluesman
Posts: 797
Joined: Mon Feb 12, 2007 6:48 pm

RE: Wish List

Post by jkBluesman »

ORIGINAL: Russian Guard

A late (or maybe early) request for consideration:

I have played the Russians many, many times, and have defended her against French assaults and (when I was way ahead) mass coalition assaults.

An argument for historicity here - why not either:

1) Halve (or even 1/3) the National morale loss when Moscow is besieged or occupied, or
2) Make the enemy have to siege and/or occupy both Moscow and St. Petersburg before the National morale loss kicks in?

Option 2 is the superior choice, but either would help.

It's too easy, in my humble opinion, to get to, and siege, Moscow by invading armies. just doesn't have the historically difficult "feel" in terms of distance and logistics.

And since the Russians DID lose Moscow historically, without surrendering, seems reasonable to reflect that fact. Russia should be a tougher nut to crack.

Edit: Option 1 is actually better, so that the Russians can't just ignore one or the other cities.

As changing the map is not an option (and thus the approach to Moscow cannot be made more difficult), I second your point.
"War is the field of chance."
Carl von Clausewitz
Post Reply

Return to “Crown of Glory”