1.03 Work Que

Post bug reports and ask for support here.

Moderator: MOD_EIA

dodod
Posts: 147
Joined: Wed Dec 26, 2007 1:27 am

RE: 1.03 Work Que

Post by dodod »

how about the pp editor?
User avatar
MarshallEllis
Posts: 5632
Joined: Tue Oct 02, 2001 3:00 pm
Location: Dallas

RE: 1.03 Work Que

Post by MarshallEllis »

I have it recorded but I'm not there yet!
 
 
Thank you

Marshall Ellis
Outflank Strategy War Games


NeverMan
Posts: 1712
Joined: Tue Feb 24, 2004 1:52 am

RE: 1.03 Work Que

Post by NeverMan »

R299: It wasn't (Pr losing minors when it should be Ru), if I remember correctly it was: ("Ru losing minors when it should be Pr). Wasn't that the way? I am just saying in case you are looking at 1 scenario and not able to duplicate and it's the wrong scenario.

R305: This supposedly happened in our game, although I think that maybe the Spanish player had the box checked and didn't realize it.
bresh
Posts: 936
Joined: Mon Aug 08, 2005 9:10 am

RE: 1.03 Work Que

Post by bresh »

ORIGINAL: NeverMan


R305: This supposedly happened in our game, although I think that maybe the Spanish player had the box checked and didn't realize it.

NeverMan if you refering to me, i did not have accept alliance checked.
Im 100% sure, that means 0 % chance of fault.
1.02K.

It happend also in another pbm game where i play Turkey, this happend earlier and was why i could see it was a bug, only had accept alliance by 2 MPs.(GB/FR)
AS Turkey I proposed alliance to GB, who accepted, but could confirm he had not Turkey checked for accept alliance.
And Austria who was not one of those i had checked, asked alliance, and got just like in the game where I play Spain.

We decided to continue the game since it was our 3. restart. But agreed not to call on allies without any agreement.


Regards
Bresh

Post Reply

Return to “Tech Support”