Reduced PP for DOW on Major Powers from 4 to 3

Empires in Arms is the computer version of Australian Design Group classic board game. Empires in Arms is a seven player game of grand strategy set during the Napoleonic period of 1805-1815. The unit scale is corps level with full diplomatic options

Moderator: MOD_EIA

Post Reply
User avatar
Mardonius
Posts: 654
Joined: Mon Apr 09, 2007 4:04 pm
Location: East Coast

RE: Reduced PP for DOW on Major Powers from 4 to 3

Post by Mardonius »

I reckon 3 should be the number. If you include an option for Casus Belli rules later then it could go to -4 or -2 with a Casus Belli. This is probably a good idea. But until then, 3 should be the number.
"Crisis is the rallying cry of the tyrant" -- James Madison
"Yes, you will win most battles, but if you loose to me you will loose oh so badly that it causes me pain (chortle) just to think of it" - P. Khan
Top
User avatar
MarshallEllis
Posts: 5632
Joined: Tue Oct 02, 2001 3:00 pm
Location: Dallas

RE: Reduced PP for DOW on Major Powers from 4 to 3

Post by MarshallEllis »

"3" shall be the count! Not 2, nor 4 BUT "3" shall be the count!
 
Actually we could still implement a Casus Belli and charge 1 or 2.
 
IMO, I always thought that a Casus Belli should exist for called allies. My reasoning was they were upholding their end of the allied agreement.
 
 
 
Thank you

Marshall Ellis
Outflank Strategy War Games


Top
iamspamus
Posts: 433
Joined: Wed Nov 15, 2006 10:23 pm
Location: Cambridge, UK

RE: Reduced PP for DOW on Major Powers from 4 to 3

Post by iamspamus »

Concur...but we can't have any connection to EIH, now...[:'(]

Is that an African or a European Swallow?
Jason

ORIGINAL: Marshall Ellis

"3" shall be the count! Not 2, nor 4 BUT "3" shall be the count!

Actually we could still implement a Casus Belli and charge 1 or 2.

IMO, I always thought that a Casus Belli should exist for called allies. My reasoning was they were upholding their end of the allied agreement.


Top
User avatar
Mardonius
Posts: 654
Joined: Mon Apr 09, 2007 4:04 pm
Location: East Coast

RE: Reduced PP for DOW on Major Powers from 4 to 3

Post by Mardonius »

That concept makes sense to me... Just the "Just War" parameters should be discussed before hand, as there are multiple convolutions...

ORIGINAL: Marshall Ellis

"3" shall be the count! Not 2, nor 4 BUT "3" shall be the count!

Actually we could still implement a Casus Belli and charge 1 or 2.

IMO, I always thought that a Casus Belli should exist for called allies. My reasoning was they were upholding their end of the allied agreement.


"Crisis is the rallying cry of the tyrant" -- James Madison
"Yes, you will win most battles, but if you loose to me you will loose oh so badly that it causes me pain (chortle) just to think of it" - P. Khan
Top
User avatar
MarshallEllis
Posts: 5632
Joined: Tue Oct 02, 2001 3:00 pm
Location: Dallas

RE: Reduced PP for DOW on Major Powers from 4 to 3

Post by MarshallEllis »

This has been changed in 1.06 (Just the 4pp moved to 3pp).
 
Thank you

Marshall Ellis
Outflank Strategy War Games


Top
Post Reply

Return to “Empires in Arms the Napoleonic Wars of 1805 - 1815”