Just had to show this

Gary Grigsby's strategic level wargame covering the entire War in the Pacific from 1941 to 1945 or beyond.

Moderators: Joel Billings, wdolson, Don Bowen, mogami

bradfordkay
Posts: 8592
Joined: Sun Mar 24, 2002 8:39 am
Location: Olympia, WA

RE: Just had to show this

Post by bradfordkay »

ORIGINAL: bradfordkay

Nasssty little plane.... We hatessss it! [;)]


Day Air attack on TF, near Derby at 24,85

Japanese aircraft
A6M3a Zero x 24
G3M Nell x 19
G4M1 Betty x 18
G4M2 Betty x 9

Japanese aircraft losses
G3M Nell: 3 destroyed, 13 damaged
G4M1 Betty: 2 destroyed, 14 damaged
G4M2 Betty: 1 destroyed, 7 damaged

Allied Ships
BB Nevada, Torpedo hits 4, on fire, heavy damage
CA Canberra
BB Oklahoma, Torpedo hits 1
CL Perth



Nasssty, sssneaky little airplanessss! We hatessss them!


Uhhh... LRCAPed the wrong TF! [:o]
fair winds,
Brad
User avatar
RevRick
Posts: 2615
Joined: Sat Sep 16, 2000 4:00 pm
Location: Thomasville, GA

RE: Just had to show this

Post by RevRick »

Ohh.. I have something special for Miss Betty....



Image
Attachments
l39action43p46.jpg
l39action43p46.jpg (79.53 KiB) Viewed 156 times
"Action springs not from thought, but from a readiness for responsibility.” ― Dietrich Bonhoeffer
User avatar
sventhebold
Posts: 360
Joined: Fri Dec 22, 2006 8:16 pm
Location: From MN now AZ Prescott Valley

RE: Just had to show this

Post by sventhebold »

Is that a test model aircraft? Note the small strings on wings.
Or is it my eyes deceiving me???
ssgt usaf 84-91 f-15a/c ops puke 525 tfs & 7th tfs
lolz
Posts: 149
Joined: Mon Nov 22, 2004 11:05 am

RE: Just had to show this

Post by lolz »

Awesome artwork
Cathartes
Posts: 1585
Joined: Fri Jan 05, 2001 10:00 am

RE: Just had to show this

Post by Cathartes »

Betty's favorite resting place:


Image
Attachments
bettydown.jpg
bettydown.jpg (135.74 KiB) Viewed 156 times
User avatar
ChezDaJez
Posts: 3293
Joined: Fri Nov 12, 2004 7:08 am
Location: Chehalis, WA

RE: Just had to show this

Post by ChezDaJez »

What a great way to start a new year... 1/1/1944
quote:

ORIGINAL: bradfordkay

Nasssty little plane.... We hatessss it!

Day Air attack on TF, near Derby at 24,85

Japanese aircraft
A6M3a Zero x 24
G3M Nell x 19
G4M1 Betty x 18
G4M2 Betty x 9

Japanese aircraft losses
G3M Nell: 3 destroyed, 13 damaged
G4M1 Betty: 2 destroyed, 14 damaged
G4M2 Betty: 1 destroyed, 7 damaged

Allied Ships
BB Nevada, Torpedo hits 4, on fire, heavy damage
CA Canberra
BB Oklahoma, Torpedo hits 1
CL Perth

Nasssty, sssneaky little airplanessss! We hatessss them!


Uhhh... LRCAPed the wrong TF!

I think this may well be the last time my "precioussssss" Bettys and Nells have something to gloat about!

Chez
Ret Navy AWCS (1972-1998)
VP-5, Jacksonville, Fl 1973-78
ASW Ops Center, Rota, Spain 1978-81
VP-40, Mt View, Ca 1981-87
Patrol Wing 10, Mt View, CA 1987-90
ASW Ops Center, Adak, Ak 1990-92
NRD Seattle 1992-96
VP-46, Whidbey Isl, Wa 1996-98
User avatar
John 3rd
Posts: 17557
Joined: Thu Sep 08, 2005 5:03 pm
Location: La Salle, Colorado

RE: Just had to show this

Post by John 3rd »

ORIGINAL: lolz

Awesome artwork

Where did this picture come from? What is the link/site?
Image

Member: Treaty, Reluctant Admiral and Between the Storms Mod Team.
User avatar
Prince of Eckmühl
Posts: 2459
Joined: Sun Jun 25, 2006 4:37 pm
Location: Texas

RE: Just had to show this

Post by Prince of Eckmühl »

ORIGINAL: John 3rd

Where did this picture come from? What is the link/site?

It looks like art from the top of a model airplane box.
Government is the opiate of the masses.
User avatar
jwilkerson
Posts: 8110
Joined: Sun Sep 15, 2002 4:02 am
Location: Kansas
Contact:

RE: Just had to show this

Post by jwilkerson »

ORIGINAL: Dili
G4 doesn't have correctly the bomb bay doors.
Early models of the "Betty" did not have normal bomb bay doors. The early versions were removed on the ground prior to ordnance bearing missions (according to some sources the early door(s) were even removed prior to departure from the homeland!). More of a "bomb bay cover" than a "door". Later versions of Betty had regular bomb bay doors.



Image
Attachments
Betty.jpg
Betty.jpg (25.17 KiB) Viewed 156 times
AE Project Lead
SCW Project Lead
User avatar
Terminus
Posts: 39781
Joined: Fri Apr 22, 2005 11:53 pm
Location: Denmark

RE: Just had to show this

Post by Terminus »

Apparently, Dili didn't think so. Too bad for him.
We are all dreams of the Giant Space Butterfly.
User avatar
rtrapasso
Posts: 22655
Joined: Tue Sep 03, 2002 4:31 am

RE: Just had to show this

Post by rtrapasso »

ORIGINAL: Feinder

The next question would be, "How many, which of the squadrons were equipped with torps?"  As I recall, about half the bombers were carrying bombs, not torps (never see that in WitP!).  But that would help narrow your identification, if you knew which squadrons were carrying bombs.

-F-

From Wiki:

"At 1005, Tenedos reported she was being attacked by Japanese aircraft, about 140 miles southeast of Force Z. The attack was by nine Mitsubishi G3M 'Nell' twin-engined medium bombers from the Genzan Air Corps, 22nd Air Flotilla, based at Saigon, each armed with one 500 kg (1,100 lb) armor-piercing bomb. They mistook the destroyer for a battleship and wasted their ordnance with all bombs scoring no hits."

"At 1113, the fleet was attacked by three waves of Japanese planes, the first being 17 Nell high-level bombers from Bihoro Air Corps, armed with 500 kg (1,100 lb) bombs, as well as eight Nells with two 250 kg (550 lb) bombs. Beside eight near misses by 250 kg (550 lb) bombs,[32] they scored just one hit on the hangar deck area of the Repulse, which started a small fire. She was making 25 kt (46 km/h, 29 mph) again within minutes."

"Around 1140, the first of 16 Nell torpedo bombers (two squadrons from Genzan Air Corps) arrived and attacked, sending at least six torpedoes into Prince of Wales. The first wave of attackers delivered one catastrophic torpedo hit on her outer port propeller shaft..."

"Another high altitude attack by bombers aimed at the Repulse passed without damage. Then a second attack by eight torpedo bombers from the Mihoro Air Corps attacked Repulse from two directions, but she avoided all the torpedoes "brilliantly""

"The third and final attack by 26 Mitsubishi G4M 'Betty' torpedo bombers from the Kanoya Air Corps, a detachment from the 21st Air Flotilla also based near Saigon, struck from several directions. Repulse, which had dodged 19 torpedoes so far, was caught between two Japanese torpedo attacks and hit by two, possibly four of them, the first jamming her rudder."

This account seems to be innacurate, as it it turns out there were only 4 torpedo hits on POW as determined by exploring the wreck.

i rather doubt that the torpedoes had the shallow water adapters installed... as pointed out, they were designed for use by the PH strike force, and literally were not completed until the last moment.
bradfordkay
Posts: 8592
Joined: Sun Mar 24, 2002 8:39 am
Location: Olympia, WA

RE: Just had to show this

Post by bradfordkay »

Probably the artist had seen a photograph of the torpedoes being used at Pearl Harbor and based his drawing on them in the mistaken belief that all the Japanese aerial torpedoes looked like that. 
fair winds,
Brad
User avatar
m10bob
Posts: 8583
Joined: Sun Nov 03, 2002 9:09 pm
Location: Dismal Seepage Indiana

RE: Just had to show this

Post by m10bob »

This may be controversial, but I have a book which says the Japanese had 2 or 3 Betty units which were special trained as torpedo units.
They were the ones which attacked Force Z and later were the same planes encountered in the Solomons. Since they were used in such important areas, maybe this is why all the G4m's were interpreted as torpedo-bombers?

Perhaps this might be corrected in a mod by having them broken into 2 distinct planes, one a level bomber, the other a torpedo bomber?
I can furnish the names and deployment of those specialty units, but many of us know them already..

Interesting the mayhem caused by those 3 units with their torpedoes might have caused such a misrepresentation of the plane.
Kind of like thinking the B 29 only had one mission.

www.vectorsite.net/avbetty.html

www.combinedfleet.com/ijna/g4m.htm

Here is the OOB for the attack on Force Z..The Japanese planes with torps are the special units I was referring to.
I have a book which sez they scored 70% hits on stationary targets before the war with their torps, and they much inspired by the exploits and feats of the Brits at Taranto.

http://www.navweaps.com/index_oob/OOB_W ... orce-Z.htm
Image

User avatar
rtrapasso
Posts: 22655
Joined: Tue Sep 03, 2002 4:31 am

RE: Just had to show this

Post by rtrapasso »

ORIGINAL: m10bob

This may be controversial, but I have a book which says the Japanese had 2 or 3 Betty units which were special trained as torpedo units.
They were the ones which attacked Force Z and later were the same planes encountered in the Solomons. Since they were used in such important areas, maybe this is why all the G4m's were interpreted as torpedo-bombers?

Perhaps this might be corrected in a mod by having them broken into 2 distinct planes, one a level bomber, the other a torpedo bomber?
I can furnish the names and deployment of those specialty units, but many of us know them already..

Interesting the mayhem caused by those 3 units with their torpedoes might have caused such a misrepresentation of the plane.
Kind of like thinking the B 29 only had one mission.

www.vectorsite.net/avbetty.html
Yes, relatively few Betty/Nell units could deliver torpedo attacks - and they required specialized report unit... this has been explored and people have tried mods that had different types of Bettys and Nells: those that could make torpedo attacks, and those that couldn't.

Unfortunately, something seems to be hard wired, and they couldn't stop the "bomb" Bettys/Nells from delivering torpedo attacks.
herwin
Posts: 6047
Joined: Thu May 27, 2004 9:20 pm
Location: Sunderland, UK
Contact:

RE: Just had to show this

Post by herwin »

ORIGINAL: rtrapasso

ORIGINAL: m10bob

This may be controversial, but I have a book which says the Japanese had 2 or 3 Betty units which were special trained as torpedo units.
They were the ones which attacked Force Z and later were the same planes encountered in the Solomons. Since they were used in such important areas, maybe this is why all the G4m's were interpreted as torpedo-bombers?

Perhaps this might be corrected in a mod by having them broken into 2 distinct planes, one a level bomber, the other a torpedo bomber?
I can furnish the names and deployment of those specialty units, but many of us know them already..

Interesting the mayhem caused by those 3 units with their torpedoes might have caused such a misrepresentation of the plane.
Kind of like thinking the B 29 only had one mission.

www.vectorsite.net/avbetty.html
Yes, relatively few Betty/Nell units could deliver torpedo attacks - and they required specialized report unit... this has been explored and people have tried mods that had different types of Bettys and Nells: those that could make torpedo attacks, and those that couldn't.

Unfortunately, something seems to be hard wired, and they couldn't stop the "bomb" Bettys/Nells from delivering torpedo attacks.

Those aircraft were designed to deliver torpedo attacks as part of the strategy for operation against the American advance across the Pacific. Torpedoes were expensive and finicky, so the real constraints were ground facilities and availability, not aircrew/aircraft capability.

BTW, the Japanese only made 150 of the 800 kg bombs before they wore out the machine tools used to make them from 16" AP shells.
Harry Erwin
"For a number to make sense in the game, someone has to calibrate it and program code. There are too many significant numbers that behave non-linearly to expect that. It's just a game. Enjoy it." herwin@btinternet.com
User avatar
rtrapasso
Posts: 22655
Joined: Tue Sep 03, 2002 4:31 am

RE: Just had to show this

Post by rtrapasso »

Those aircraft were designed to deliver torpedo attacks as part of the strategy for operation against the American advance across the Pacific. Torpedoes were expensive and finicky, so the real constraints were ground facilities and availability, not aircrew/aircraft capability.

Maybe i should have stated it as: "Yes, relatively few Betty/Nell units could deliver torpedo attacks BECAUSE they required specialized report unit".

However, units that didn't have access to torpedoes routinely probably wouldn't have made effective torpedo bombers if torpedoes suddenly became available... the pressing of B-26's into torpedo bomber mode during the Battle of Midway springs to mind.

The game as it stands now really doesn't model different pilot skills very well: bomb some rocks enough and a unit's pilots will soon be able to outmaneuver other planes in air-to-air combat. AE will change this to some degree
Dili
Posts: 4742
Joined: Fri Sep 10, 2004 4:33 pm

RE: Just had to show this

Post by Dili »

real constraints were ground facilities and availability, not aircrew/aircraft capability.

Torpedo attacks need to be trained to be efective. Italians set up Torpedo schools and Germans in Mediterranean went there too.
herwin
Posts: 6047
Joined: Thu May 27, 2004 9:20 pm
Location: Sunderland, UK
Contact:

RE: Just had to show this

Post by herwin »

ORIGINAL: Dili
real constraints were ground facilities and availability, not aircrew/aircraft capability.

Torpedo attacks need to be trained to be efective. Italians set up Torpedo schools and Germans in Mediterranean went there too.

Yes, but if you have some experts, they can bring the rest up to speed rapidly.
Harry Erwin
"For a number to make sense in the game, someone has to calibrate it and program code. There are too many significant numbers that behave non-linearly to expect that. It's just a game. Enjoy it." herwin@btinternet.com
Post Reply

Return to “War In The Pacific - Struggle Against Japan 1941 - 1945”