Most effective single torpedo attack of WWII Pacific Theatre?

This new stand alone release based on the legendary War in the Pacific from 2 by 3 Games adds significant improvements and changes to enhance game play, improve realism, and increase historical accuracy. With dozens of new features, new art, and engine improvements, War in the Pacific: Admiral's Edition brings you the most realistic and immersive WWII Pacific Theater wargame ever!

Moderators: wdolson, MOD_War-in-the-Pacific-Admirals-Edition

User avatar
treespider
Posts: 5781
Joined: Sun Jan 30, 2005 7:34 am
Location: Edgewater, MD

RE: Most effective single torpedo attack of WWII Pacific Theatre?

Post by treespider »

How about Torpedo Sqd 8 June 5 1942?
Here's a link to:
Treespider's Grand Campaign of DBB

"It is not the critic who counts, .... The credit belongs to the man who is actually in the arena..." T. Roosevelt, Paris, 1910
Mike Scholl
Posts: 6187
Joined: Wed Jan 01, 2003 1:17 am
Location: Kansas City, MO

RE: Most effective single torpedo attack of WWII Pacific Theatre?

Post by Mike Scholl »

Can't at the moment remember the details.., but didn't some Dutch Sub sink the ship bringing most of Japan's Petroleum Engineers to the DEI to work on bringing the oil fields back into production.  That seems pretty effective...
User avatar
LargeSlowTarget
Posts: 4982
Joined: Sat Sep 23, 2000 8:00 am
Location: Hessen, Germany - now living in France

RE: Most effective single torpedo attack of WWII Pacific Theatre?

Post by LargeSlowTarget »

See post #8 above. Great minds... [:)].[/align] [/align]Might have been a Dutch sub instead of a USN sub. Have to check Morison.[/align]
Mike Scholl
Posts: 6187
Joined: Wed Jan 01, 2003 1:17 am
Location: Kansas City, MO

RE: Most effective single torpedo attack of WWII Pacific Theatre?

Post by Mike Scholl »

ORIGINAL: LargeSlowTarget
See post #8 above. Great minds... [:)].[/align] [/align]Might have been a Dutch sub instead of a USN sub. Have to check Morison.[/align]


Whoops! Yeah, I missed that one in my scan to keep up. [:(] Trouble with interesting new threads is that they grow so fast. [:D]
User avatar
Chickenboy
Posts: 24648
Joined: Fri Jun 28, 2002 11:30 pm
Location: San Antonio, TX

RE: Most effective single torpedo attack of WWII Pacific Theatre?

Post by Chickenboy »

Certainly a high value rare target that got nailed, but IRL how much effect did the loss of this engineer unit affect bringing the oil fields back up to snuff? If it didn't do anything to the IJ timetable other than kill a bunch of oil engineers, wouldn't that call into question its effectiveness?
Image
User avatar
witpqs
Posts: 26376
Joined: Mon Oct 04, 2004 7:48 pm
Location: Argleton

RE: Most effective single torpedo attack of WWII Pacific Theatre?

Post by witpqs »

The bit a I remember reading about it claimed it was quite meaningful. True or false, I don't know.
Mike Scholl
Posts: 6187
Joined: Wed Jan 01, 2003 1:17 am
Location: Kansas City, MO

RE: Most effective single torpedo attack of WWII Pacific Theatre?

Post by Mike Scholl »

ORIGINAL: Chickenboy

Certainly a high value rare target that got nailed, but IRL how much effect did the loss of this engineer unit affect bringing the oil fields back up to snuff? If it didn't do anything to the IJ timetable other than kill a bunch of oil engineers, wouldn't that call into question its effectiveness?


Well, Japan is a rather oil-poor nation, so losing the majority of a very small supply of petroleum engineering specialists was a kick in the crotch. By the time they could get supply back up to the necessary levels, US subs had started devastating their tanker fleet. Which resulted in much of the IJN having to base itself in the SRA for fuel reasons because their home bases (and support installations) couldn't supply it.
User avatar
Chickenboy
Posts: 24648
Joined: Fri Jun 28, 2002 11:30 pm
Location: San Antonio, TX

RE: Most effective single torpedo attack of WWII Pacific Theatre?

Post by Chickenboy »

ORIGINAL: Mike Scholl

ORIGINAL: Chickenboy

Certainly a high value rare target that got nailed, but IRL how much effect did the loss of this engineer unit affect bringing the oil fields back up to snuff? If it didn't do anything to the IJ timetable other than kill a bunch of oil engineers, wouldn't that call into question its effectiveness?


Well, Japan is a rather oil-poor nation, so losing the majority of a very small supply of petroleum engineering specialists was a kick in the crotch. By the time they could get supply back up to the necessary levels, US subs had started devastating their tanker fleet. Which resulted in much of the IJN having to base itself in the SRA for fuel reasons because their home bases (and support installations) couldn't supply it.
Hi Mike,

I understand the *theoretical* impact of losing such a limited pool of skilled workers, but IRL was this effect worked around or was it, IRL, as crippling as the initial loss portended?
Image
Mike Scholl
Posts: 6187
Joined: Wed Jan 01, 2003 1:17 am
Location: Kansas City, MO

RE: Most effective single torpedo attack of WWII Pacific Theatre?

Post by Mike Scholl »

ORIGINAL: Chickenboy

Hi Mike,

I understand the *theoretical* impact of losing such a limited pool of skilled workers, but IRL was this effect worked around or was it, IRL, as crippling as the initial loss portended?

What it cost them was any chance to get production back on line and humming BEFORE the US Sub campaign got into "high gear" and destroyed the means of transferring the oil home.

By the way..., I LOVE the "Tropical Disease Fanboy!" bit. Let's hear it for Beri Beri and Elephantiasis! [:D]
User avatar
Chickenboy
Posts: 24648
Joined: Fri Jun 28, 2002 11:30 pm
Location: San Antonio, TX

RE: Most effective single torpedo attack of WWII Pacific Theatre?

Post by Chickenboy »

ORIGINAL: Mike Scholl

ORIGINAL: Chickenboy

Hi Mike,

I understand the *theoretical* impact of losing such a limited pool of skilled workers, but IRL was this effect worked around or was it, IRL, as crippling as the initial loss portended?

What it cost them was any chance to get production back on line and humming BEFORE the US Sub campaign got into "high gear" and destroyed the means of transferring the oil home.

By the way..., I LOVE the "Tropical Disease Fanboy!" bit. Let's hear it for Beri Beri and Elephantiasis! [:D]
Mike, this is my not so subtle way of reminding folks about the critical omission of the effects of malaria in the game. This has been consistently overlooked and should be remedied. For the time being, I'll carry the flag for our uncharismatic animal bretheren and protozoal / bacterial 'guests'. [;)]
Image
User avatar
Nikademus
Posts: 22517
Joined: Sat May 27, 2000 8:00 am
Location: Alien spacecraft

RE: Most effective single torpedo attack of WWII Pacific Theatre?

Post by Nikademus »

not an omission. It broke. It being fixed.

User avatar
timtom
Posts: 1500
Joined: Wed Jan 29, 2003 9:23 pm
Location: Aarhus, Denmark

RE: Most effective single torpedo attack of WWII Pacific Theatre?

Post by timtom »

ORIGINAL: Chickenboy
ORIGINAL: Mike Scholl
ORIGINAL: Chickenboy

Hi Mike,

I understand the *theoretical* impact of losing such a limited pool of skilled workers, but IRL was this effect worked around or was it, IRL, as crippling as the initial loss portended?

What it cost them was any chance to get production back on line and humming BEFORE the US Sub campaign got into "high gear" and destroyed the means of transferring the oil home.

By the way..., I LOVE the "Tropical Disease Fanboy!" bit. Let's hear it for Beri Beri and Elephantiasis! [:D]
Mike, this is my not so subtle way of reminding folks about the critical omission of the effects of malaria in the game. This has been consistently overlooked and should be remedied. For the time being, I'll carry the flag for our uncharismatic animal bretheren and protozoal / bacterial 'guests'. [;)]

FYI, according to the WHO's '08 World Malaria Report, malaria was the cause of an estimated 610,000-1,212,000 deaths in '06 alone, 91% of whom where from Africa and 85% of whom were children.   

http://apps.who.int/malaria/wmr2008/
Where's the Any key?

Image
User avatar
Chickenboy
Posts: 24648
Joined: Fri Jun 28, 2002 11:30 pm
Location: San Antonio, TX

RE: Most effective single torpedo attack of WWII Pacific Theatre?

Post by Chickenboy »

timtom: Yep, pretty nasty stuff. As far as case fatality rate, it got even worse than that with other (mercifully rarer) tropical diseases in troops deployed to the tropical Pacific in WWII. Tremendous impact on pace of the war and unit cohesion / durability and certainly needed in such a detail-driven war game as this.

Nik: As always, glad to hear that devs are keeping up the good work. It be cool when it be fixed.

Image
User avatar
timtom
Posts: 1500
Joined: Wed Jan 29, 2003 9:23 pm
Location: Aarhus, Denmark

RE: Most effective single torpedo attack of WWII Pacific Theatre?

Post by timtom »

ORIGINAL: Chickenboy

timtom: Yep, pretty nasty stuff. As far as case fatality rate, it got even worse than that with other (mercifully rarer) tropical diseases in troops deployed to the tropical Pacific in WWII. Tremendous impact on pace of the war and unit cohesion / durability and certainly needed in such a detail-driven war game as this.

US Surgeon General's Office of Medical History has several studies available online on a variety of medical issues, incl. communicable diseases -> http://history.amedd.army.mil/default_index2.html
Where's the Any key?

Image
Post Reply

Return to “War in the Pacific: Admiral's Edition”