For the experts out there

This new stand alone release based on the legendary War in the Pacific from 2 by 3 Games adds significant improvements and changes to enhance game play, improve realism, and increase historical accuracy. With dozens of new features, new art, and engine improvements, War in the Pacific: Admiral's Edition brings you the most realistic and immersive WWII Pacific Theater wargame ever!

Moderators: wdolson, MOD_War-in-the-Pacific-Admirals-Edition

User avatar
Local Yokel
Posts: 1494
Joined: Sun Feb 04, 2007 12:55 pm
Location: Somerset, U.K.

RE: For the experts out there

Post by Local Yokel »

Looks to me like a pretty accurate representation of Akagi. Difficult to be sure whether the accompanying cruiser is a Takao or a Myoko - I would guess the latter.

The hinomaru emblem was applied to the flight decks of all four fleet carriers lost at Midway. In the case of Akagi and (I think) Soryu it appeared on a white background, whilst on Kaga and Hiryu it was merely outlined in white.

It has been suggested that the emblem was applied to these four carriers following the attempt by some of Zuikaku's airgroup to land on an American carrier at Coral Sea - presumably the Japanese concluded that their carriers needed to better advertise their nationality in order to avoid a repeat of this incident! The majority of SBD pilots at Midway found the emblem a useful aiming point, so its application was probably not a good idea. If the suggestion that it was a post-Coral Sea recognition symbol is correct, it implies that the four Midway carriers carried these hinomaru for no more than about one month, given that this was the interval between Coral Sea and their sinking. However, other Japanese ships (e.g. some seaplane tenders) are also reported as having been painted with these emblems, so it's conceivable they were applied to the carriers before Coral Sea.

Anyway, a good painting; thanks for posting the link.
Image
User avatar
redcoat
Posts: 1034
Joined: Wed Aug 31, 2005 9:48 am
Location: UK

RE: For the experts out there

Post by redcoat »

ORIGINAL: Local Yokel

The hinomaru emblem was applied to the flight decks of all four fleet carriers lost at Midway. In the case of Akagi and (I think) Soryu it appeared on a white background, whilst on Kaga and Hiryu it was merely outlined in white.

It has been suggested that the emblem was applied to these four carriers following the attempt by some of Zuikaku's airgroup to land on an American carrier at Coral Sea - presumably the Japanese concluded that their carriers needed to better advertise their nationality in order to avoid a repeat of this incident! The majority of SBD pilots at Midway found the emblem a useful aiming point, so its application was probably not a good idea. If the suggestion that it was a post-Coral Sea recognition symbol is correct, it implies that the four Midway carriers carried these hinomaru for no more than about one month, given that this was the interval between Coral Sea and their sinking. However, other Japanese ships (e.g. some seaplane tenders) are also reported as having been painted with these emblems, so it's conceivable they were applied to the carriers before Coral Sea.

Here is a photo of the Akagi shortly after leaving Port Stirling, Celebes Island, for her attack on Colombo.

Image

There looks like there might – possibly? - be something painted on the forward flight deck in front of the Kates. A Hinomaru (Sun disc) perhaps? I’m just speculating. The photo was taken on 26 March, 1942. Some time before Coral Sea in May. If it is a Hinomaru they must have added a white background sometime before Midway.

If anyone is wondering, the ships in the background are, from left to right: Soryu, Hiryu, Hiei, Kirishima, Haruna, Kongô, Zuikaku and Shokaku.
“‘Who controls the past,’ ran the Party slogan, ‘controls the future: who controls the present controls the past.’”

George Orwell, 1984
User avatar
Gilbert
Posts: 243
Joined: Sat Aug 08, 2009 1:28 pm
Location: Hendaye, France

RE: For the experts out there

Post by Gilbert »

No Hinomaru was painted for "C Sakusen" on any carrier. The Hinomaru was indeed painted on a white background for "MI Sakusen" on Akagi.

HTH

Gilbert
UMI YUKABA
"If I go away to sea, I shall return a corpse awash, if duty calls me to the mountain, a verdant will be my pall, thus for the sake of the Emperor, I will not die peacefully at home...."
User avatar
redcoat
Posts: 1034
Joined: Wed Aug 31, 2005 9:48 am
Location: UK

RE: For the experts out there

Post by redcoat »

ORIGINAL: Gilbert

No Hinomaru was painted for "C Sakusen" on any carrier. The Hinomaru was indeed painted on a white background for "MI Sakusen" on Akagi.

HTH

Gilbert

I’ve looked at a much larger version of the Akagi ‘C Sakusen’ photo. The ‘blotch’ in front of the B5Ns does not look like a Hinomaru close up. It is too angular. The theory that the Hinomaru was added after the Zuikaku incident at Coral Sea still has legs.

Click the 'full resolution photograph' link on this webpage to see the larger photo.
“‘Who controls the past,’ ran the Party slogan, ‘controls the future: who controls the present controls the past.’”

George Orwell, 1984
User avatar
skrewball
Posts: 305
Joined: Sun Dec 10, 2000 10:00 am
Location: Belgium

RE: For the experts out there

Post by skrewball »

ORIGINAL: Local Yokel

Looks to me like a pretty accurate representation of Akagi. Difficult to be sure whether the accompanying cruiser is a Takao or a Myoko - I would guess the latter.

The hinomaru emblem was applied to the flight decks of all four fleet carriers lost at Midway. In the case of Akagi and (I think) Soryu it appeared on a white background, whilst on Kaga and Hiryu it was merely outlined in white.

It has been suggested that the emblem was applied to these four carriers following the attempt by some of Zuikaku's airgroup to land on an American carrier at Coral Sea - presumably the Japanese concluded that their carriers needed to better advertise their nationality in order to avoid a repeat of this incident! The majority of SBD pilots at Midway found the emblem a useful aiming point, so its application was probably not a good idea. If the suggestion that it was a post-Coral Sea recognition symbol is correct, it implies that the four Midway carriers carried these hinomaru for no more than about one month, given that this was the interval between Coral Sea and their sinking. However, other Japanese ships (e.g. some seaplane tenders) are also reported as having been painted with these emblems, so it's conceivable they were applied to the carriers before Coral Sea.

Anyway, a good painting; thanks for posting the link.


That's correct...I remember watching a documentary on Midway...or maybe it was Enterprise 360, anyways...

One of the first SBD bomber pilots said that he aimed at that "Big Red Meatball" on the front of the carrier. He said he released his bomb and it hit right before the symbol on the deck.
"Some people spend an entire lifetime wondering if they've made a difference. The Marines don't have that problem."
spence
Posts: 5421
Joined: Sun Apr 20, 2003 6:56 am
Location: Vancouver, Washington

RE: For the experts out there

Post by spence »

One of the first SBD bomber pilots said that he aimed at that "Big Red Meatball" on the front of the carrier. He said he released his bomb and it hit right before the symbol on the deck.

Since Akagi was destroyed by one "perfect" hit on the midships elevator Hiryu would most likely be the carrier referred to by the pilot.




Image
Attachments
Hiryu_Burning.jpg
Hiryu_Burning.jpg (12.41 KiB) Viewed 141 times
Post Reply

Return to “War in the Pacific: Admiral's Edition”