Serious need to rethink how Carriers work

This new stand alone release based on the legendary War in the Pacific from 2 by 3 Games adds significant improvements and changes to enhance game play, improve realism, and increase historical accuracy. With dozens of new features, new art, and engine improvements, War in the Pacific: Admiral's Edition brings you the most realistic and immersive WWII Pacific Theater wargame ever!

Moderators: wdolson, MOD_War-in-the-Pacific-Admirals-Edition

HexHead
Posts: 464
Joined: Tue Feb 09, 2010 3:27 pm
Location: I'm from New Hampshire; I only work in cyberspace

RE: Serious need to rethink how Carriers work

Post by HexHead »

It doesn't make that much of a difference if your CIC reports that 10^Boatloads of enemy aircraft are approaching the TF. Sorry, but I think you're asking your CVs to do too much at too great a risk. You need airfields so that you can bomb industries, etc., and cripple Japan's ability to war.
"Goddamn it, they're gittin' away!!"
- unknown tincan sailor near the end of Leyte Gulf, when Kurita retired
User avatar
chesmart
Posts: 904
Joined: Sun Jan 14, 2007 8:51 pm
Location: Malta

RE: Serious need to rethink how Carriers work

Post by chesmart »

Sfbayf when I invaded japan I concentrated all my carriers in hex and put cap at 80% for the entire hex took me a few turns but ireduced the amount of fighters to a resonable amount for me to start airfield attacks after a whole month of making these kind of attacks i basically had air superiority over southern and central japan. Be prepared to take casualties from kamis .
sfbaytf
Posts: 1392
Joined: Tue Apr 12, 2005 9:54 pm

RE: Serious need to rethink how Carriers work

Post by sfbaytf »

With Japan potentially getting a version of the ME262 in large numbers and he fact they don't seem to run out of pilots and fuel the equation becomes more complex.
User avatar
chesmart
Posts: 904
Joined: Sun Jan 14, 2007 8:51 pm
Location: Malta

RE: Serious need to rethink how Carriers work

Post by chesmart »

By the time japan gets the Me-262 he would haave run out of supplies. Worry about the escorted Kamis thats my experience. 
sfbaytf
Posts: 1392
Joined: Tue Apr 12, 2005 9:54 pm

RE: Serious need to rethink how Carriers work

Post by sfbaytf »

I've already had massive encounters with escorted kamis off Amami Oshima. In multiple engagements over the time span of a couple of weeks I gunned down over 1600 aircraft. I now count at least 900 fighters and as they say if they're one cockroach there are thousands more you don't see. My opponent is nowhere near out of supplies as far as I can tell. By the next month I expect production of the jets to begin. Not a lot of time.
User avatar
chesmart
Posts: 904
Joined: Sun Jan 14, 2007 8:51 pm
Location: Malta

RE: Serious need to rethink how Carriers work

Post by chesmart »

from where is he getting the fuel ?
sfbaytf
Posts: 1392
Joined: Tue Apr 12, 2005 9:54 pm

RE: Serious need to rethink how Carriers work

Post by sfbaytf »

I think he stashed a bunch on ships and parked them in the Sea of Japan. Not sure but I also think he ships some to Haiphong harbor unloads it and then rails it to a port in China or Korea to be shipped to the Home Islands. Quite some time ago my opponent said he was swimming in oil and his warehouses were overflowing with stockpiled goods.
User avatar
chesmart
Posts: 904
Joined: Sun Jan 14, 2007 8:51 pm
Location: Malta

RE: Serious need to rethink how Carriers work

Post by chesmart »

If you stop his tankers he is toast. Are you using tracker if yes load a new scenario from the japanese side and you will see that if you stop hisfuel he has a max of six months before he starts having problems.
sfbaytf
Posts: 1392
Joined: Tue Apr 12, 2005 9:54 pm

RE: Serious need to rethink how Carriers work

Post by sfbaytf »

I've cut off the direct route to the HI. I suspect he had/has tens of dozens of freighters and tankers filled with fuel stashed in the Sea of Japan and elsewhere. That sneeky *%#! is probably nowhere near hurting.
User avatar
chesmart
Posts: 904
Joined: Sun Jan 14, 2007 8:51 pm
Location: Malta

RE: Serious need to rethink how Carriers work

Post by chesmart »

Then you got a problem. Do not try to force your way in the sea of japan he will toast you. Land wise tried to make a landing in korea ?
sfbaytf
Posts: 1392
Joined: Tue Apr 12, 2005 9:54 pm

RE: Serious need to rethink how Carriers work

Post by sfbaytf »

Yes Korea is a possibility and I have a few other ideas floating around in my head. Since I could care less about winning by book-what good are trophies anyway they just sit on a shelf and collect dust, I can try some different approaches and not worry about the clock so much. I'm already ahead of the historical timeline in most respects.

I was even contemplating this-eventhough I have no interest in using the ABomb as a strategic war ending weapon, there's nothing I can seer that wouldn't stop me from using it as an operational or tactical weapon. It could be useful as a "can opener" to punch a hole in the emperors defense from which a ground force could move through and exploit.

The Allieds will come up with a solution..
User avatar
chesmart
Posts: 904
Joined: Sun Jan 14, 2007 8:51 pm
Location: Malta

RE: Serious need to rethink how Carriers work

Post by chesmart »

The A-Bomb does not effect ground units it destroys manpower and industry, you will have to use another aproach.
User avatar
chesmart
Posts: 904
Joined: Sun Jan 14, 2007 8:51 pm
Location: Malta

RE: Serious need to rethink how Carriers work

Post by chesmart »

I dropped 4 bombs 2 on tokyo 1 on osaka and 1 on hiroshima. If you want i can send you the screenshots of before and after. Ground units are not effected.
User avatar
freeboy
Posts: 8969
Joined: Sun May 16, 2004 9:33 am
Location: Colorado

RE: Serious need to rethink how Carriers work

Post by freeboy »

I think there may be too much fuel.. My pbem oponent seems?????????????????? to have lots of fuel in late 44 BUT this is unconfirmed, and I just overram Palambango and it had lots of fuel there...
interesting.. when did the Japs get jets? I am not sure how to win any other way than takling the armed forces march route..
Back on track, are your B29's eliminating enemy cities... in Witp I was able to firestorm several...
"Tanks forward"
sfbaytf
Posts: 1392
Joined: Tue Apr 12, 2005 9:54 pm

RE: Serious need to rethink how Carriers work

Post by sfbaytf »

Sure go ahead and post the screenshots. I trust your judgement and observation about he ABomb. Now that I know I'll seek out other solutions.
ORIGINAL: che200

I dropped 4 bombs 2 on tokyo 1 on osaka and 1 on hiroshima. If you want i can send you the screenshots of before and after. Ground units are not effected.
sfbaytf
Posts: 1392
Joined: Tue Apr 12, 2005 9:54 pm

RE: Serious need to rethink how Carriers work

Post by sfbaytf »

No question liberties have been taken with regards to history and he Allieds are fighting a Japan on steroids while they've been castrated, but that the hand he Allieds have been dealt and we'll just have to live with it.

I have conducted firebombing raids on Kyoto, Osaka, Nagoya and Tokyo and racked up 7000 points. I had to divert the B29s to other tasks like attacking airfields and a mining campaign. Simply not enough to go around and they spend a lot of time on he ground getting repaired.

Besides getting a lot of points what other effects does night firebombing bring? Dos it affect industry?

I have some decent airfields close to the Homeislands so the B-24s can now participate.

Also received the A-26 Invader. I'm wondering if I'll get Skyraiders and when do I get jets.
User avatar
chesmart
Posts: 904
Joined: Sun Jan 14, 2007 8:51 pm
Location: Malta

RE: Serious need to rethink how Carriers work

Post by chesmart »

Tokyo pre A-Bomb

Image
Attachments
TokyoPrebomb.jpg
TokyoPrebomb.jpg (280.07 KiB) Viewed 192 times
User avatar
chesmart
Posts: 904
Joined: Sun Jan 14, 2007 8:51 pm
Location: Malta

RE: Serious need to rethink how Carriers work

Post by chesmart »

Tokyo after A-bomb

Image
Attachments
TokyoAfterA.jpg
TokyoAfterA.jpg (286.15 KiB) Viewed 192 times
John Lansford
Posts: 2664
Joined: Mon Apr 29, 2002 12:40 am

RE: Serious need to rethink how Carriers work

Post by John Lansford »

That's it?  The worst damaged facility was the repair shipyard; heavy and light industry lost only about 100 points, most others lost nothing at all.  That atomic bomb must have been a dud!
sfbaytf
Posts: 1392
Joined: Tue Apr 12, 2005 9:54 pm

RE: Serious need to rethink how Carriers work

Post by sfbaytf »

Mabye that too is a new game balancing feature. Abombs that go pfffftttt instead of boom...
Post Reply

Return to “War in the Pacific: Admiral's Edition”