Scenario chain

[Marshal Villars]

Yes. I was thinking about the lack of a replacement system as a problem as well.

Couldn't we do something like what is currently done for supplies for that?

And they only get replacements in when R&R and sufficiently far from the front? (this has no basis in research, just a wild guess)

I was hoping to solve the withdrawl system by rewarding points for exiting units or something. Or penalize heavily if certain units are not exited by a certain time IF they are still in existance on the board (but that might lead to kamakazi attacks to get rid of them before they are scheduled to exit--so tricky). Perhaps if you lose more than half of any regiment/battalion scheduled to be withdrawn while under your command you would suffer HEAVY VP losses.

Oh well. Maybe we can have these problems solved for BFA (Battles from Africa). LOL

[wodin]

I'm another who wouldn't want to play a monster scenario....I think the engine runs better all round with a smaller unit density...not sure if it's me but it appears the more units the more the TacAI is prone to make mistakes like sending in HQ's or mortar units into a hornets nest...watch how a battalion shakes out into fighting formation then push's forward in a very small scenario...looks good and organised...when you have loads of units it seems to all break down a little...

[Marshal Villars]

Wodin,

I noticed the problem you are referring to (HQ issues going up in larger scenarios) in St. Lo.

But last night I played Epsom (arguably more units than I have ever seen in a game with this engine), and didn't have any serious issues.

Interesting.