GC41 - Saper222 (Ger) vs Kamil (Sov) (No Saper222)

Post descriptions of your brilliant victories and unfortunate defeats here.

Moderators: Joel Billings, Sabre21

KamilS
Posts: 2041
Joined: Fri Feb 04, 2011 10:51 pm

RE: GC41 - Saper222 (Ger) vs Kamil (Sov) (No Saper222)

Post by KamilS »

T3 south (German)


Speed of panzers as usual has taken me by surprise. Pocketed units are best my best formations in the south. Situation looks serious.

Image
Attachments
sap3sger.jpg
sap3sger.jpg (255.87 KiB) Viewed 515 times
Kamil
KamilS
Posts: 2041
Joined: Fri Feb 04, 2011 10:51 pm

RE: GC41 - Saper222 (Ger) vs Kamil (Sov) (No Saper222)

Post by KamilS »

T3 north (Soviet)


I do not have enough units to be able to relieve any of pockets, so I decided to spread encircled divisions around to lock supply routes in my ZOCs.

Image
Attachments
sap3nsov.jpg
sap3nsov.jpg (203.14 KiB) Viewed 515 times
Kamil
KamilS
Posts: 2041
Joined: Fri Feb 04, 2011 10:51 pm

RE: GC41 - Saper222 (Ger) vs Kamil (Sov) (No Saper222)

Post by KamilS »

T3 centre (Soviet)


My defences in land-bridge are getting stronger, but soon I will face same dilemma - risk surrounding or fall back to less exposed by less entrenched positions.

Image
Attachments
sap3csov.jpg
sap3csov.jpg (294.89 KiB) Viewed 515 times
Kamil
KamilS
Posts: 2041
Joined: Fri Feb 04, 2011 10:51 pm

RE: GC41 - Saper222 (Ger) vs Kamil (Sov) (No Saper222)

Post by KamilS »

T3 south (Soviet)


Thanks to high mobility of 13th tank division luckily not limited by interception I was able to re-establish corridor to pocketed units. It enabled me conducting series of successful attacks. It was fun, although I know fate of these formations is sealed.


Rest of my units is carefully withdrawing from exposed positions.

Image
Attachments
sap3ssov.jpg
sap3ssov.jpg (239.86 KiB) Viewed 515 times
Kamil
KamilS
Posts: 2041
Joined: Fri Feb 04, 2011 10:51 pm

RE: GC41 - Saper222 (Ger) vs Kamil (Sov) (No Saper222)

Post by KamilS »

T4 north (Germany)


Previous pocket was annihilated, new established. Not much ground was lost, but my best units are being lost, so once my line is breached I won't be able to patch it up properly.

Image
Attachments
sap4nger.jpg
sap4nger.jpg (170.53 KiB) Viewed 515 times
Kamil
KamilS
Posts: 2041
Joined: Fri Feb 04, 2011 10:51 pm

RE: GC41 - Saper222 (Ger) vs Kamil (Sov) (No Saper222)

Post by KamilS »

T4 centre (German)


Mighty panzer fist was concentrated near Vitebsk, so my only choice is either sacrificing few troops and loosing little ground or withdrawing them from exposed positions but risking loosing much more territory.

Image
Attachments
sap4cger.jpg
sap4cger.jpg (194.95 KiB) Viewed 515 times
Kamil
KamilS
Posts: 2041
Joined: Fri Feb 04, 2011 10:51 pm

RE: GC41 - Saper222 (Ger) vs Kamil (Sov) (No Saper222)

Post by KamilS »

T4 south (German)


As it could have been anticipated my units near Zhitomir were once again surrounded, this time I think for good. Unfortunately it is not all - minor pocket west of Cherkasy was created.

Well, it seems, that soon running away will be only option.

Image
Attachments
sap4sger.jpg
sap4sger.jpg (233.01 KiB) Viewed 515 times
Kamil
User avatar
ETF
Posts: 1767
Joined: Thu Sep 16, 2004 12:26 pm
Location: Vancouver, Canada

RE: GC41 - Saper222 (Ger) vs Kamil (Sov) (No Saper222)

Post by ETF »

Love you arrows on the pics.....What program are you using?
My Top Matrix Games 1) CMO MP?? 2) WITP/AE 3) SOW 4) Combat Mission 5) Armor Brigade

Twitter
https://twitter.com/TacticWargamer
KamilS
Posts: 2041
Joined: Fri Feb 04, 2011 10:51 pm

RE: GC41 - Saper222 (Ger) vs Kamil (Sov) (No Saper222)

Post by KamilS »

Photoshop - I know 3 or 4 functions and that is it. I am aware it is not best program for the purpose of writing AAR, but I don't know how to use any other.

Kamil
randallw
Posts: 2060
Joined: Wed Sep 01, 2010 9:28 pm

RE: GC41 - Saper222 (Ger) vs Kamil (Sov) (No Saper222)

Post by randallw »

Saper has gone a little crazy with the regimental breakdowns, hmm?
KamilS
Posts: 2041
Joined: Fri Feb 04, 2011 10:51 pm

RE: GC41 - Saper222 (Ger) vs Kamil (Sov) (No Saper222)

Post by KamilS »

randallw

Saper has gone a little crazy with the regimental breakdowns, hmm?


They are pretty tempting target of my counter-attacks, but it proves poisoned chalice - I commit few divisions and next turn he swallows then plus some other too.
Kamil
KamilS
Posts: 2041
Joined: Fri Feb 04, 2011 10:51 pm

RE: GC41 - Saper222 (Ger) vs Kamil (Sov) (No Saper222)

Post by KamilS »

T4 north (Soviet)


I managed to open corridor to encircled units hence prolonged their existence by one turn.


Other units were withdrawn to next defensive line.

Image
Attachments
sap4nsov.jpg
sap4nsov.jpg (354.28 KiB) Viewed 563 times
Kamil
KamilS
Posts: 2041
Joined: Fri Feb 04, 2011 10:51 pm

RE: GC41 - Saper222 (Ger) vs Kamil (Sov) (No Saper222)

Post by KamilS »

T4 centre (Soviet)


I keep strengthening my positions across land-bridge. They look relatively secure, but my flanks are very weak and it terrifies me.

Image
Attachments
sap4csov.jpg
sap4csov.jpg (476.45 KiB) Viewed 563 times
Kamil
KamilS
Posts: 2041
Joined: Fri Feb 04, 2011 10:51 pm

RE: GC41 - Saper222 (Ger) vs Kamil (Sov) (No Saper222)

Post by KamilS »

T4 south (Soviet)


It is busies area of the front. My situation is not good, because I lost plenty of troops plus not to many reinforcements were sent there.


I somehow managed to re-establish connection to eastern pocket. I hope it will give me enough time to build trenches.



Image
Attachments
sap4ssov.jpg
sap4ssov.jpg (462.62 KiB) Viewed 563 times
Kamil
User avatar
smokindave34
Posts: 881
Joined: Tue Jan 15, 2008 12:56 am

RE: GC41 - Saper222 (Ger) vs Kamil (Sov) (No Saper222)

Post by smokindave34 »

Nice job opening up the pocket near Pskov - that will buy you at least another turn for the defenders of Leningrad to dig in.

The SW front's defense of the Dnepr is very weak (no forts). I'd send any reinforcements in the south to dig in along the Sula/Uday rivers while you guard the Dnepr as it won't be long before the axis is across the Dnepr and you will need some fixed line to fall back to (although sadly you may not have enough time....). Also - get the T-34's out of Kharkov quickly since it will soon be under threat.
KamilS
Posts: 2041
Joined: Fri Feb 04, 2011 10:51 pm

RE: GC41 - Saper222 (Ger) vs Kamil (Sov) (No Saper222)

Post by KamilS »

All non-armament factories are withdrawn transporting only 1 element (size), so all tanks from Leningrad and Kharkov are safe.
Kamil
hfarrish
Posts: 731
Joined: Mon Jan 03, 2011 1:52 pm

RE: GC41 - Saper222 (Ger) vs Kamil (Sov) (No Saper222)

Post by hfarrish »

You might try to get your strongest infantry units in the river bends as well, since he most likely to force a crossing there...
KamilS
Posts: 2041
Joined: Fri Feb 04, 2011 10:51 pm

RE: GC41 - Saper222 (Ger) vs Kamil (Sov) (No Saper222)

Post by KamilS »

hfarrish

You might try to get your strongest infantry units in the river bends as well, since he most likely to force a crossing there...



I will try, but in the south I lost my best troops already.
Kamil
KamilS
Posts: 2041
Joined: Fri Feb 04, 2011 10:51 pm

RE: GC41 - Saper222 (Ger) vs Kamil (Sov) (No Saper222)

Post by KamilS »

T5 north and centre (German)



Well, well, well. It could be cruical turn.


As it could have been predicted my units east of Pskov were once again surrounded. Unfortunately my opponent didn't follow regular path of advance and turned his attention east, pushing deep enough to outflank my land-bridge positions.

He got one bridgehead across Dnepr but it is of secondary importance, since I am not going to stay there any longer.


Overall situation is rapidly deteriorating.

Image
Attachments
sap5ncger.jpg
sap5ncger.jpg (502.85 KiB) Viewed 563 times
Kamil
KamilS
Posts: 2041
Joined: Fri Feb 04, 2011 10:51 pm

RE: GC41 - Saper222 (Ger) vs Kamil (Sov) (No Saper222)

Post by KamilS »

T5 south (German)


Not much happened here, so I guess it is calm before the storm.


One pocket is being reduced, second was re-established.

Image
Attachments
sap5sger.jpg
sap5sger.jpg (395.83 KiB) Viewed 563 times
Kamil
Post Reply

Return to “After Action Reports”