BIZARRE COINCIDENCE- JUNE 20 1941

[parusski]

I can't imagine why no one realizes that SLAAKMAN is actually George W. Bush, according to many of a certain political BENT to be the most evil human to ever live. In 1551 S. Ambrose discovered Brazilian Peanut butter and that changed history. Everyone knows that all evil is rooted in something. Evil comes from THERE. I am not ranting. Go repair my toilet, it leaks urine from Barry Goldwater and Barrack Hussein Obummer. Hey, you kids get off my damned lawn. George Bush was given the presidency on the day of his birth, by Michael Corleone. And then I discovered someone had stolen my gold eagle coins to pay for SLAAKMAN's plastic surgery. Anyway, I hate ranting conspiracy nuts.

[SLAAKMAN]

Bruder Lützow,

I blame the Yanks for our defeat.

Without lend-lease it had been a safe run.

Wahre Mein Herr. In der Zukunft wird es Wiedergutmachung für die Sünden und Verbrechen, die von allen und alle Täter in dieser katastrophalen Verrat der westlichen Zivilisation begangen bezahlt werden. Gott wird nichts unversucht lassen und den Tod aller Unschuldigen von allen Seiten Opfer wird gerächt werden! Er wird die Illuminati und deren Anti-Christ Schergen vor Gericht zu bringen! Hosianna in der Höhe.

[SLAAKMAN]

rogo727

Years of bad money management and poor crops lead to the French Revolution come on mr.w this is your realm of history. To say that by helping the Americans out in which they did pushed them over the edge.......they could not recover from that. America broke the back of France make no mistake. I'm thinking mr. Chicken boy should go back and read a book or two on this matter. We did and still do I feel owe France for helping us throw off the yoke of the tyrant king George.

Silly parruski-Newblette is confused Mr Rogo. We need to get help for him since he attributes historical events such as the Illuminati's infiltration & provocateuring behind the French Revolution with some kind of silly so-called, "conspiracy theory". Isnt that preoposterous & silly to claim that their methods were only an illusion?! After all we know for certain that human beings are inherently transparent & nobody would ever try to incite rebellion covertly. [:'(]

France Didn't Have a Revolution

July 14, 2011

(left, July 14, Happy Bastille Day!)

The French Revolution was part of the long-term Illuminati banker plan to reshape mankind to serve them and their god Lucifer.

" The Illuminati operating in the guise of the Jacobins forced the regime change historians call the French Revolution."


by Andrew Smith
(henrymakow.com)

The value of history lies primarily in appreciating what's happening today. We have a sense that events are driven by the past and that history repeats itself.

But why? Perhaps, the hidden planners of historical events have a limited repertoire of dirty tricks. They suppress the history of the deceptions practiced on our great grandparents, so they can mislead, maim and mutilate us and later generations.

Only when we see that the French Revolution of 1789 was planned and financed from abroad (just like the Russian Revolution of 1917) can we suspect that the current "unrest" and "revolutions" in Tunisia, Libya, Egypt, Bahrain, Thailand, Yemen, Syria and now Malaysia are not truly popular revolts but irregular warfare coups. Of course, in the case of Libya where Qadaffi came close to eradicating the rebels, the foreign coup has become a regular military operation supported by NATO air strikes. But they still call it a revolution.

The dictionary defines "revolution" as a "sudden and violent change in government or in the political constitution of a country, mainly brought about by internal causes; as the French Revolution of 1789." But subversive elements in London working with French and European revolutionaries--NOT INTERNAL CAUSES--engineered the Paris bloodbaths historians call a revolution.

Before 1919 when Nesta B. Webster published her history of the French tragedy, there was nothing in English except Thomas Carlyle's The French Revolution (1837). In her preface to The French Revolution: A Study in Democracy (1919) she expressed shock. "So far, in England, the truth is not known; we have not even been told what really happened.

BASTILLE-Sans-culotte.jpgHistories still teach that before the French Revolution the French aristocracy kept the peasantry hungry and desperate without any real hope or direction for the future. In her work, Webster explodes these notions regarding peasant misery before 1789 with the letters of Dr. Rigby who traveled through the French countryside in 1789 and who described "its extraordinary fertility" and its "state of the highest cultivation."

"The crops are beyond any conception I could have had of them ,,, tens of thousands of acres of wheat superior to any that can be produced in England..." He described the French people as happy, prosperous and contented. (pp. 4-5)

Yet in the midst of this abundance there was famine. It triggered the French Revolution just like the unrest today in the Middle East. And we are still taught that upon hearing of the starving French peasantry, Louis XVI's wife, Queen Marie Antoinette remarked,"Let them eat cake." This bogus quotation is used to color the French aristocrats as out of touch. In fact Marie Antoinette blamed England. She knew what was happening.

And Americans today like Webster, have blinders on when it came to their own government's dishonorable foreign policy. Webster refused to hold her English Government responsible notwithstanding the overwhelmingly damning evidence.

"What, then, is the explanation of the belief in English cooperation with the revolutionary movement? Of the English guineas found on the rioters? Of the Englishmen mingling in the mobs of Paris during popular agitations? Of the seditious pamphlets printed in London? Of the traffic in letters, messages, and money maintained between England and the revolutionary leaders? Many of these leaders were constantly in England both before and during the Revolution... These facts admit of no denial: to suppose, however, any complicity on the part of the English Government is illogical and absurd." pp.30-31

A Royalist historian and contemporary of the worst atrocities, Felix Louis Montjoie, copiously documented the role of French King Louis XVI's cousin, the Freemason Duc d'Orleans, who bought up large portions of the French grain in 1789. This role backfired on him as he was guillotined in Nov. 1793.

Later historians document the role of Pitt, the English Parliament and the King's Privy Counsel in hoarding French grain with the aid of the Illuminati British East India Company in warehouses on the English Channel Islands of Guernsey and Jersey. ("Why the French Did Not Have an American Revolution," by Pierre Beaudry, p. 5.)

England was a mere pawn in the Illuminati game of pseudo-revolutions that overturn governments and give credit to democratic/communist freedom fighting homeboys and eventually even train the conquered population to celebrate the destruction of their history and culture. So today the French ironically celebrate their disgrace with Bastille Day, July 14

In the words of John Robison in his Proofs of a Conspiracy (1797)

"The earlier revolutionary leaders were, as we have seen, the disciples of the German Illuminati, and it was they who initiated them into the art of forming political committees " to carry through the great plan of a general overturning of religion and government . . . .These committees arose from the Illuminati in Bavaria . . . and these committees produced the Jacobin Club."

The chief lesson," Robison goes on to observe, that the revolutionary leaders took from Germany, " was the method of doing business, of managing their own correspondence, and of procuring and training pupils." pp. 190-191

The Illuminati operating in the guise of the Jacobins forced the regime change historians call the French Revolution. During the Russian Revolution they masqueraded as the Bolsheviks. Today they brag they are behind the Middle East revolutions. So maybe we should believe them.

http://www.henrymakow.com/french_revolu ... _revo.html
http://www.reformation.org/wall-st-bolshevik-rev.html

[SLAAKMAN]

And then I discovered someone had stolen my gold eagle coins to pay for SLAAKMAN's plastic surgery. Anyway, I hate ranting conspiracy nuts.

All the gold that I can eat!

[parusski]

ORIGINAL: SLAAKMAN

And then I discovered someone had stolen my gold eagle coins to pay for SLAAKMAN's plastic surgery. Anyway, I hate ranting conspiracy nuts.

All the gold that I can eat!

Holy prancing Brits Batman, I never would have guessed the SLAAKER stole parusskis gold eagles.

[Chickenboy]

ORIGINAL: warspite1

ORIGINAL: Chickenboy

ORIGINAL: warspite1
Which shows that Hitler learned nothing from history...oh and they were born 120 years apart..and they were defeated 130 years apart.

Oh well 2 out of 4 ain't bad. [:)]

HITLER learned nothing from history? What about Napolean? You'd think one failed campaign for world domination would have suited any man. Shoulda taken his 'retirement' package when he had the chance.

As for the American driving France into bankruptcy...blah, blah blah. They had that revolution thing going on right about then that didn't do much for their economy. Maybe that (unrelated to the Americans) was more important than some extraneous variable like the US? It's like saying that the Indians (and their requirements for British oversight) were the downfall of the British Empire. Not hardly.

So, 1 out of 4 then? But still, you've got to admit that that one tangible fact is pretty telling! I mean, n=1 of anything is sufficient for people to draw some conclusive and universal precepts from, idnit? If you don't have n=1, then just opt for a convenient conspiracy of some sort or other.

"Cracked.com" SLAAK? Really? I grew up on "Cracked" magazine (I even had a subscription once, back in the day). "Mad" Magazine was OK too. "Crazy" was another underappreciated one. Perhaps you subscribe to "Crazy" still?

warspite1

Two things:

a) I think the French went bust as a result of fighting the British in North America (and the revolution followed from that)

b) I didn't understand the 1 out of 4 comment. I think 2 of those 4 statements are correct, aren't they?

Two things:

a. I don't think the French went bust as a result of fighting the British in North America. I'm sure it didn't help matters, but it wasn't a proximate cause.

b. I miscounted. [:D] 2 of 4. 50% bull****, which for Slaak is a monumental improvement.

[Chickenboy]

ORIGINAL: rogo727

Years of bad money management and poor crops lead to the French Revolution

Yes. Agreed.

To say that by helping the Americans out in which they did pushed them over the edge.......they could not recover from that.

Meh. I don't believe the commitment to helping America was sufficient to 'break their backs'. It probably didn't help matters, but they had a lot of other problems simultaneously.

I'm certainly willing to consider any primary research you have that indicates their involvement with the American Revolutionary War was the root cause of their collapse though.

I'm thinking mr. Chicken boy should go back and read a book or two on this matter.

Ummm...have. Thanks.

We did and still do I feel owe France for helping us throw off the yoke of the tyrant king George.

I think we did owe the French a debt of gratitude for their help with the Revolutionary War and sticking a finger in the eye of the English on our behalf. Once upon a time.

Of course, Napolean's privateer wars (that preyed on American shipping off our coasts) didn't help our relations any. We would have been within our rights to declare war against him and them in the early 1800s as a result of these purely illegal piratical acts.

Our debt to the French was finally paid in full (and then some) with our involvement in France during the First and Second World Wars. Either we're even or they 'owe us one' in the international karmic ledger.

[SLAAKMAN]

Holy prancing Brits Batman, I never would have guessed the SLAAKER stole parusskis gold eagles.

ANOTHER BIZARRE COINCIDENCE- PARRUSKI'S GOLDEN EAGLES TURN UP AT SLAAKS COIN SHOP IN ARUBA INSIDE OF "PIMP-JUICE BALLOON". UNKNOWN AS TO HOW OR WHY THEY WERE DEPLOYED THERE. SILLY PARRUSKI IS BAFFLED BUT DECLINES COMMENT AS CATWOMAN OFFERS HIM A REACH-AROUND.

[warspite1]

ORIGINAL: Lützow

I blame the Yanks for our defeat.

Without lend-lease it had been a safe run. [:(]

warspite1

Wow. You sound disappointed you lost [X(]......

[SLAAKMAN]

Wow. You sound disappointed you lost

We didnt "lose"...we're merely taking lunch. [:'(]

[warspite1]

ORIGINAL: Chickenboy

ORIGINAL: warspite1

ORIGINAL: Chickenboy




HITLER learned nothing from history? What about Napolean? You'd think one failed campaign for world domination would have suited any man. Shoulda taken his 'retirement' package when he had the chance.

As for the American driving France into bankruptcy...blah, blah blah. They had that revolution thing going on right about then that didn't do much for their economy. Maybe that (unrelated to the Americans) was more important than some extraneous variable like the US? It's like saying that the Indians (and their requirements for British oversight) were the downfall of the British Empire. Not hardly.

So, 1 out of 4 then? But still, you've got to admit that that one tangible fact is pretty telling! I mean, n=1 of anything is sufficient for people to draw some conclusive and universal precepts from, idnit? If you don't have n=1, then just opt for a convenient conspiracy of some sort or other.

"Cracked.com" SLAAK? Really? I grew up on "Cracked" magazine (I even had a subscription once, back in the day). "Mad" Magazine was OK too. "Crazy" was another underappreciated one. Perhaps you subscribe to "Crazy" still?

warspite1

Two things:

a) I think the French went bust as a result of fighting the British in North America (and the revolution followed from that)

b) I didn't understand the 1 out of 4 comment. I think 2 of those 4 statements are correct, aren't they?

Two things:

a. I don't think the French went bust as a result of fighting the British in North America. I'm sure it didn't help matters, but it wasn't a proximate cause.
b. I miscounted. [:D] 2 of 4. 50% bull****, which for Slaak is a monumental improvement.

warspite1

No, and if my comment sounded like that was what I was saying then it was not supposed to - an event that big does not happen overnight and not for just one reason. I see it as the straw that broke the camels back. France had problems - involving themselves in the American Revolutionary War added greatly to those problems. My comment stemmed from your post 14 in which it sounded like France went "bust" during the revolution. My understanding, and this is not my area of expertise by any means, was that France was officially bankrupt in 1788 and the revolution followed the year after.

[warspite1]

ORIGINAL: SLAAKMAN

Wow. You sound disappointed you lost

We didnt "lose"...we're merely taking lunch. [:'(]

warspite1

Oh that's nice. What are you having?

[SLAAKMAN]

Oh that's nice. What are you having?

French Fries & English Crumpets;

[warspite1]

ORIGINAL: SLAAKMAN

Oh that's nice. What are you having?

French Fries & English Crumpets;

warspite1

Mmmm a very nice, if a little odd, combination.

Sad to see you are still dreaming of burnt out French tanks and shot down Hurricanes - make sure you have your box of kleenex to hand [;)]

[SLAAKMAN]

[:D]

Mmmm a very nice, if a little odd, combination.

Sad to see you are still dreaming of burnt out French tanks and shot down Hurricanes - make sure you have your box of kleenex to hand

Dreaming of burnt Allied hulks on lonely beaches is always nostalgic when channeling memories of past WiF Campaign Glory:

[parusski]

ORIGINAL: warspite1

ORIGINAL: SLAAKMAN

Wow. You sound disappointed you lost

We didnt "lose"...we're merely taking lunch. [:'(]

warspite1

Oh that's nice. What are you having?

I was having french(always surrender)fries and chips.

[parusski]

ORIGINAL: SLAAKMAN

[:D]

Mmmm a very nice, if a little odd, combination.

Sad to see you are still dreaming of burnt out French tanks and shot down Hurricanes - make sure you have your box of kleenex to hand

Dreaming of burnt Allied hulks on lonely beaches is always nostalgic when channeling memories of past WiF Campaign Glory:

Oh my, that gives me tingles up my leg(think Chris Matthews). Loverly.

[SLAAKMAN]

parruski

Very true. Few things in life are as glorious as luring the Allies into assaulting Vichy France thereby activating the 95% intact Vichy Fleet or taking Gibralter with German Para's & Italian Marines thereby activating Spain into the Axis. One day you & Warspite1 will be lured into my death-traps & you both will rejoice in your Doom merrily. [:'(]

[parusski]

ORIGINAL: SLAAKMAN

parruski

Very true. Few things in life are as glorious as luring the Allies into assaulting Vichy France thereby activating the 95% intact Vichy Fleet or taking Gibralter with German Para's & Italian Marines thereby activating Spain into the Axis. One day you & Warspite1 will be lured into my death-traps & you both will rejoice in your Doom merrily. [:'(]

What the hell is wrong with you? Do you forget who and what I am/was??? I fought for the glorious Fatherland against the evil Red Empire. Had I not been taking a lunch break, eating chips and French(surrenderers)fries and chips, Berlin would never have fallen.[:-][:-][:-]

[warspite1]

ORIGINAL: SLAAKMAN

[:D]

Mmmm a very nice, if a little odd, combination.

Sad to see you are still dreaming of burnt out French tanks and shot down Hurricanes - make sure you have your box of kleenex to hand

Dreaming of burnt Allied hulks on lonely beaches is always nostalgic when channeling memories of past WiF Campaign Glory:

warspite1

Those maps STINK!

Why did ADG do that??