Bozo (GER) vs Griefhead (SOV) BOZO Welcome

Post descriptions of your brilliant victories and unfortunate defeats here.

Moderators: Joel Billings, Sabre21

Griefhead
Posts: 38
Joined: Wed Oct 17, 2012 7:28 pm
Location: Richmond, VA

RE: Bozo (GER) vs Griefhead (SOV) BOZO Welcome

Post by Griefhead »

End of T6
GER push the Leningrad defenses back and moved 20 miles north and east to the outskirts of city. The bulk of AGN is in position to directly assault the close in Leningrad defenses next turn and is making no attempt to go south of Lake Ilmen at this time.
AGC moved east about 15 miles with infantry but the GER mechanized units headed 100 miles south to split the SOV defenses in half and pocket 13 SOV units. Some AGS mechanized units moved north to join AGC and complete the pocket, encircling another 3 SOV units. The remainder of the GER units that were north of Kiev last turn moved east about 40 miles and captured Kiev uncontested.
Further south, 4 GER mechanized units breached the Dnepr at Cherkassy and are followed by heavy infantry support just west of the river. Odessa was attacked and taken resulting in 1 SOV rifle division becoming isolated. The rest of the GER southern front made little advance towards the Dnepr or D’town.

SOV Response:
The Leningrad defensive line was moved back 10 miles just north of Lake Ilmen and the rest held fast. The number of GER troops in the Leningrad vicinity portends a direct assault on the city and the defenses are mostly F0s and F1s. The line may hold up 1 turn before the city is isolated except for port supply. A few reinforcements were added south of Ilmen because of general weakness in the area.
Since the main attack force of AGC moved south to pocket SOV troops it is expected that the main thrust on Moscow will come from that direction. The defensive line was shifted southward and reinforcements were added in this area. The majority of the SOV screening forces between Vyazma and Bryansk were pocketed last turn but there were no reinforcements available to add to this area. The line at Bryansk held fast with some reinforcements. Further south, between Novgorod Seversky and Cherkassy, the SOV screening forces fell back about 70 miles and formed up in a check board.
The Dnepr river defenses held fast from Kremenchug south.
A total of 17 SOV units with 136k men were surrounded this turn in 3 separate pockets. The largest pocket, with 13 units and 108k men was broken - at least temporarily. So far, 18 armor, 9 motorized, and 35 infantry divisions have been destroyed.
All on map units - morale mean 49, experience mean 36. Rifle divisions - 6 out of 214 have experience > 49.
Battles – 11 holds, 29 retreats, 3 surrenders, 1 scout, and 4 routs, with 28 airdrops
Casualties GER/SOV – 90.3k/985k men, 626/12.6k guns, 677/7.8k AFVs, and 232/1867 aircraft (including GER 81 recon and 31 transport).

Comment added at Posting:
I wish I had not reteated the SOV troops south of the straight at Leningrad. These well entrenched troops would have slowed the fall of Leningrad by at least a turn and maybe 2 or 3. I looked at getting these troops (maybe 75k men) out or pocketed with the rest of Leningrad and I decided to retreat. It would have been much better to remain in place. At T9 some of the panzer units from the north have shown up at the northern defenses of Moscow and it would have been much nicer if it was T10-T12.


Image
Attachments
T6North.jpg
T6North.jpg (4.7 MiB) Viewed 531 times
Griefhead
Posts: 38
Joined: Wed Oct 17, 2012 7:28 pm
Location: Richmond, VA

RE: Bozo (GER) vs Griefhead (SOV) BOZO Welcome

Post by Griefhead »

T9 South


Image
Attachments
T6South.jpg
T6South.jpg (2.2 MiB) Viewed 531 times
Griefhead
Posts: 38
Joined: Wed Oct 17, 2012 7:28 pm
Location: Richmond, VA

RE: Bozo (GER) vs Griefhead (SOV) BOZO Welcome

Post by Griefhead »

T6
The retreat south of Leningrad actually didn't happen until next turn.  But I still regret it.
User avatar
Bozo_the_Clown
Posts: 890
Joined: Tue Jun 25, 2013 1:51 pm
Location: Bozotown

RE: Bozo (GER) vs Griefhead (SOV) BOZO Welcome

Post by Bozo_the_Clown »

At T9 some of the panzer units from the north have shown up at the northern defenses of Moscow and it would have been much nicer if it was T10-T12.

Those are actually tanks from army group center. There was a change of plans due to the successful Partisan attack on turn 8.
Griefhead
Posts: 38
Joined: Wed Oct 17, 2012 7:28 pm
Location: Richmond, VA

RE: Bozo (GER) vs Griefhead (SOV) BOZO Welcome

Post by Griefhead »

End of T7
GER broke through the center of the Leningrad defensive in a strike 30-50 miles south of the city, pushing east through a 30 mile line with F1 defenses. The lead GER motorized division then turned north 20 miles in an attempt to isolate not only the SOV defenders north of the straight but also another 13 units south of the straight. South of Ilmen GER infantry has moved east to the SOV defenses forces that are well dug in with F2s but few in number.
East of Moscow GER infantry moves west about 30 miles to bump up against the outer defensive line without any engagements. To the immediate south of Moscow the GER mechanized forces moved further south to join up with infantry forces just south of Bryansk with one or two skirmishes. The pocket from last turn that was broken was firmly sealed isolating 11 SOV units.
GER troops west of Gomel moved 90 miles east, finding little resistance, with the lead mechanized units (at least 3 motorized and 3 panzer divisions) resting 65 miles west of Kursk. Further south from Kiev and from across the Dnepr GER infantry and mechanized units advanced 75-100 miles in heavy fighting against the SOV checker board defense. The lead panzer division (9th) is now 110 miles west of Kharkov. The GER allies solidified their hold on Odessa and moved east about 10 miles towards the Dnepr without any engagements.

SOV Response:
The pincer move south of Leningrad through the defensive line forces SOV to pull back all troops south of the straight to try to develop defenses for the port cities that supply Leningrad across Lake Ladoga and for the rail lines to these ports. Two infantry divisions were left behind who will try to make it to Leningrad. The rest of the line around Novgorod followed suit and pulled back to make a continuous defense from Novgorod to the port city of Novaya Ladoga, 20 miles or more wide without any fortifications. A hard GER push east will likely break this line and end up isolating Leningrad. SOV armor was evacuated from the peninsular at Osinovets by ship.
Directly west of Moscow there appears to be few, if any, GER mechanized units in the area. They seem to have been pulled south indicating that the major push on the city will come from this direction. The defensive lines adjusted themselves somewhat to the southeast again this turn.
The pocketed units (94k men and 1400 guns) west of Bryansk are doomed and the rest of the Sov forces pulled northeast to set-up defensive positions east of Bryansk to protect Tula and slow an expected GER offensive through this area headed towards the city and later towards Moscow. Screening forces between Kursk and Kharkov pulled back 70 miles to the Sumy area to avoid a possible encirclement and to shore up defenses. Along the Dnepr forces pulled east about 50 miles, forming a checker board defense and will continue to pull back towards Stalino as necessary.

All on map units - morale mean 50, experience mean 36. Rifle divisions - 7 out of 212 have experience > 49.
Battles – 1 holds, 21 retreats, 8 surrenders, and 7 routs, with 33 airdrops
Casualties GER/SOV – 109.3k/1083k (+19.0k/98k) men, 690/14.0k (+64/1.4k) guns, 805/8.0k (128/200) AFVs, and 282/2104 (+50/237) aircraft (including GER 103 (+22) recon and 39 (+8) transport).


Image
Attachments
T7Overview.jpg
T7Overview.jpg (2.21 MiB) Viewed 531 times
Griefhead
Posts: 38
Joined: Wed Oct 17, 2012 7:28 pm
Location: Richmond, VA

RE: Bozo (GER) vs Griefhead (SOV) BOZO Welcome

Post by Griefhead »

Some detail shots:

Image
Attachments
T7Detail.jpg
T7Detail.jpg (3.32 MiB) Viewed 532 times
User avatar
Bozo_the_Clown
Posts: 890
Joined: Tue Jun 25, 2013 1:51 pm
Location: Bozotown

RE: Bozo (GER) vs Griefhead (SOV) BOZO Welcome

Post by Bozo_the_Clown »

Turn 9
Model and his II Corps secure a bridgehead over the Neva. I was also trying to bomb the port at Osinovets but that failed. Does anyone know how many bombers I need to damage the port?

Turn 10
Rendulic and his I Corps take Osinovets. Tanks establish a link to the Finnish allies.

Turn 11
Leningrad falls and the Finnish troops move south. Next turn they will hopefully destroy the remaining three Russian divisions in the pocket. Rendulic and his I Corps were obviously to tired and failed. [:@]

Still pondering what to do next. I have many options but because of supply difficulties and entrenched Russian units none of them look very attractive. [&:]

Finally finished the turn. Developments:
1. Instead of that dude who always talks about his right hook I'm doing a left hook!
2. Lots of weirdness in front of Voronezh. Pocket resealed. I believe a total of 16 units are pocketed right now.
3. Tambov was taken. [X(] I'm sure I will pay for it. Griefhead has his cavalry well positioned. Does the industry in Tambov matter at all?

Griefhead
Posts: 38
Joined: Wed Oct 17, 2012 7:28 pm
Location: Richmond, VA

RE: Bozo (GER) vs Griefhead (SOV) BOZO Welcome

Post by Griefhead »

End of T8
After breaking through the defenses at Leningrad last turn GER cleared out some stragglers and consolidated south of the city. No attack was made against the newly formed Novgorod - Novaya Ladoga defensive line. There was little further activity south of Ilmen and north of Moscow.
West of Moscow, GER infantry advanced 20 miles north in light fighting and moved 30-40 miles east but stopped short of the Moscow outer defenses and consolidated. The pocketed SOV units west of Bryansk were destroyed and GER continued east 40 miles to form a partial pocket around the city.
GER mechanized units east of Kursk moved south to Sumy to join up with other mechanized forces that were moving east towards Kharkov. These GER units moving towards Kharkov advanced east 70 miles in the heaviest fighting of the turn and now rest 30 miles west of the city. There was little noticeable GER activity south of Kharkov.

SOV Response:
The general lack of GER assaults from Moscow to Leningrad gives the SOV defensive lines time to entrench and strengthen. GER forces south of Leningrad appear to be of sufficient strength to take the city in 2 or 3 turns but there does not appear to be any mechanized forces positioned that can attempt a northern flanking move of Moscow, at least until Leningrad falls. Available reinforcements are added to the Tula and Ilmen areas.
South of Moscow to Kharkov GER forces are consolidating earlier gains with only small advances east. Most SOV troops have already evacuated the territory and are now being positioned to defend Kharkov and Stalino. The number of engagements this turn was about the same as last turn but vital SOV defenses were not assaulted, allowing SOV to rest, build up existing defensive lines, and reposition itself to better address the tips of the GER advance.
All on map units - morale mean 49, experience mean 36. Rifle divisions - 9 out of 223 (3.9%) have experience > 49.
Battles – 6 holds, 38 retreats, 5 surrenders, and 6 routs, with 23 airdrops
Casualties GER/SOV – 128.4k/1214k (+19.1k/131k) men, 768/16.0k (+78/2.0k) guns, 921/8.1k (116/100) AFVs, and 330/2193 (+48/89) aircraft (including GER 125 (+22) recon and 41 (+2) transport).


Image
Attachments
T8North.jpg
T8North.jpg (4.11 MiB) Viewed 531 times
Griefhead
Posts: 38
Joined: Wed Oct 17, 2012 7:28 pm
Location: Richmond, VA

RE: Bozo (GER) vs Griefhead (SOV) BOZO Welcome

Post by Griefhead »

The South.

Image
Attachments
T8South.jpg
T8South.jpg (1.59 MiB) Viewed 531 times
Griefhead
Posts: 38
Joined: Wed Oct 17, 2012 7:28 pm
Location: Richmond, VA

RE: Bozo (GER) vs Griefhead (SOV) BOZO Welcome

Post by Griefhead »

End of T9
GER forces crossed the straight and moved infantry into the “backdoor” space next to Pavlovo. The 6&8 panzer divisions, which had joined in the attack, moved south towards Moscow. Other panzer divisions (12&19) have already left Leningrad and have shown up at the northern defenses of Moscow to start a flanking move.
GER mechanized units moved north from Moscow towards the hills south of Lake Ilmen and encircled 3 airborne units, putting pressure upon the defenses in the area. The bulk of AGC moved 40 miles west in light fighting against the Orel/Kursk checker board defense.
The major battles this turn were fought in the GER advance north of Kharkov, which pushed through the defenses and started a flanking move around the city. The defensive line north of D’town was pushed back 10 miles in light fighting.

SOV Response:
The defenses below Ilmen were pulled east to be better positioned to meet the advancing GER mechanized forces from the south. The outer defensive line at Moscow was moved to the north of the city as were some other units from the southern defenses. Both of these GER advances do not appear to be well supported by infantry at this time. The forces from D’town south held position at the Dnepr.
SOV troops were pulled back about 30 miles at Kursk, 20 miles at Kharkov, and 30 miles in the bulge below Kharkov to protect the cities and firm up the southern defensive line from Kharkov to the Dnepr.

All on map units - morale mean 50, experience mean 38. Rifle divisions - 10 out of 233 (4.3%) have experience > 49.
Battles – 5 holds, 21 retreats, 0 surrenders, and 5 routs, with 33 airdrops
Casualties GER/SOV – 147.8k/1244k (+19.4k/30k) men, 864/16.5k (+96/500) guns, 1031/8.3k (+110/200) AFVs, and 395/2329 (+65/136) aircraft (including GER 144 (+19) recon and 42 (+1) transport).

Comment Added at Posting:

Going into T13, the difference between operational and damaged GER airships grew from about 500 to 800. I will continue to watch this disparity, but it seems to me that a difference of 300-500 is normal (does anybody know?). I am thinking (hoping) that this growing disparity represents the couple thousand SOV airships that were not destroyed on T1 by GER bombardment. It may be that these little dragonflies are starting to take a bite out of great GER Luftwaffe. I will be keeping an eye on this and if it continues to grow I think it is indicative of wear and tear being inflicted by many thousands of obsolete SOV airships which will eventually lead to dead GER airships lying on the ground.

My opponent in this game seems more interested in destroying SOV infrastructure than SOV troops. Bozo makes wild swings to the north and then swings to the south; all the while avoiding pitched SOV defenses. He skirts the defenses and keeps moving to the outside of them. I don’t know how this strategy will work out for him and I don’t know how best to defend against it. GER players range between Dr. Hitman who keeps the tightest, goal oriented, and properly supported formations of any player in the game (here’s realism for you Flaviusx) and Bozo who uses the whacko mobility of the GER mechanized units to run amuck across the board. Pelton is sort of in the middle, leaning somewhat to the Bozo school of thought.


Image
Attachments
T9North.jpg
T9North.jpg (2.19 MiB) Viewed 531 times
Griefhead
Posts: 38
Joined: Wed Oct 17, 2012 7:28 pm
Location: Richmond, VA

RE: Bozo (GER) vs Griefhead (SOV) BOZO Welcome

Post by Griefhead »

T9 South

Image
Attachments
T9South.jpg
T9South.jpg (1.34 MiB) Viewed 531 times
Griefhead
Posts: 38
Joined: Wed Oct 17, 2012 7:28 pm
Location: Richmond, VA

RE: Bozo (GER) vs Griefhead (SOV) BOZO Welcome

Post by Griefhead »

Detail Shots

Image
Attachments
T9LenKharDetail.jpg
T9LenKharDetail.jpg (1.18 MiB) Viewed 531 times
User avatar
Bozo_the_Clown
Posts: 890
Joined: Tue Jun 25, 2013 1:51 pm
Location: Bozotown

RE: Bozo (GER) vs Griefhead (SOV) BOZO Welcome

Post by Bozo_the_Clown »

Bozo school of thought

There is a "Bozo school of thought?" [:D]
User avatar
Ketza
Posts: 2228
Joined: Sun Jan 14, 2007 7:11 am
Location: Columbia, Maryland

RE: Bozo (GER) vs Griefhead (SOV) BOZO Welcome

Post by Ketza »

The original Bozo the Clown had a very small upscale restaurant in Upper Darby PA outside Philly on the main line.

Excellent food. I ate there in 1990 on the 5th or 6th date with my wife.

He was rather old then so I doubt he or it is still there.
User avatar
Michael T
Posts: 4445
Joined: Sat Oct 21, 2006 9:35 pm
Location: Queensland, Australia.

RE: Bozo (GER) vs Griefhead (SOV) BOZO Welcome

Post by Michael T »

I just noticed this is a Sudden death game. Cool. It should mean the Axis will have to fight it out in the Blizzard should the Soviet's survive the Summer.
User avatar
Bozo_the_Clown
Posts: 890
Joined: Tue Jun 25, 2013 1:51 pm
Location: Bozotown

RE: Bozo (GER) vs Griefhead (SOV) BOZO Welcome

Post by Bozo_the_Clown »

It should mean the Axis will have to fight it out in the Blizzard should the Soviet's survive the Summer.

Clowns don't follow any rules. [:'(]

It should be interesting as this would be my first blizzard against human with FOW. [X(]

Can someone explain the Sudden Death rule to me? Do I have to hold a certain number of VPs. I honestly don't know.
User avatar
Bozo_the_Clown
Posts: 890
Joined: Tue Jun 25, 2013 1:51 pm
Location: Bozotown

RE: Bozo (GER) vs Griefhead (SOV) BOZO Welcome

Post by Bozo_the_Clown »

The original Bozo the Clown had a very small upscale restaurant in Upper Darby PA outside Philly on the main line.

Excellent food. I ate there in 1990 on the 5th or 6th date with my wife.

He was rather old then so I doubt he or it is still there.

Yes, that's me. I've since retired from the restaurant business. Instead, I'm playing this game until I drop dead. [:D]
Griefhead
Posts: 38
Joined: Wed Oct 17, 2012 7:28 pm
Location: Richmond, VA

RE: Bozo (GER) vs Griefhead (SOV) BOZO Welcome

Post by Griefhead »

[font=calibri]Oh wow!  I am seriously honored to meet you Bozo.  I didn’t know I was dealing with a movie star!  In my formative years of pool halls and back alleys in Washington, DC you brought a great deal of enjoyment into my life with your humor and lightheartedness.  We need a Bozo comeback, where you could tweak noses of a society that is almost devoid of the qualities that you brought to the stage.  Man, what I would do for an autographed photo to show my son, who calls me Bozo to this very day (you have influenced more than one generation).  I’ll throw the game for one.[/font]
Griefhead
Posts: 38
Joined: Wed Oct 17, 2012 7:28 pm
Location: Richmond, VA

RE: Bozo (GER) vs Griefhead (SOV) BOZO Welcome

Post by Griefhead »

End of T10
In the north, Osinovets fell, which isolated the remaining 7 units, 4 fortifications, and the 23rd Army HQ (73k men, 1200 guns, and 20 AFVs).
The flanking operation north of Moscow advanced 90 miles to the northeast in light fighting and now has substantial infantry ground support. This thrust is led by at least 7 GER mechanized units, mostly panzer divisions, which now are positioned 120 miles north of Moscow.
No advance was made towards Tula but a pocket was formed at Kursk, which isolated 10 SOV units and the 5th & 12th Army HQs (110k men, 1050 guns, and 430 AFVs). The pocket was formed by about 18 GER mechanized units. In the Kharkov/D’town area GER infantry advanced about 30 miles east to occupy the territory vacated by SOV last turn.

SOV Response:
The SOV troops in the north held their positions including the isolated units at Leningrad. South of Lake Ilmen the defenses pulled east to counter the potential threat from the GER mechanized that are now north of Moscow. These troops could go north as easily as going south.
Part of the defensive line south of Moscow pulled to the north of the city to start building an extended line east to protect against the GER flanking operation. Reinforcements were positioned around Moscow and in some of the vacated areas in the south.
The pocket at Kursk was broken in two places, which isolated the bulk of the flanking GER mechanized units – slowing them down a bit. SOV units west of Kharkov moved east to protect against another GER flanking move around the city. Defensive units south of Kharkov mostly held their positions.
Besides the 17 units that were surrounded GER gained strategic positioning north of Moscow and east of Kursk. Add to that the certain fall of Leningrad and this turn probably becomes the most destructive to the SOV army so far. SOV defensive lines retreated and shifted positions from Lake Ilmen to Kharkov.

All on map units - morale mean 50, experience mean 38. Rifle divisions - 12 out of 248 (4.8%) have experience > 49.
Battles – 9 holds, 32 retreats, 1 surrender, 1 scout, 1 shatter, and 2 routs, with 34 airdrops
Casualties GER/SOV – 172.0k/1283k (+24.2k/39k) men, 1036/17.1k (+172/600) guns, 1183/8.6k (+152/300) AFVs, and 468/2423 (+73/94) aircraft (including GER 165 (+21) recon and 53 (+11) transport).


Image
Attachments
Turn10.jpg
Turn10.jpg (3.88 MiB) Viewed 531 times
Griefhead
Posts: 38
Joined: Wed Oct 17, 2012 7:28 pm
Location: Richmond, VA

RE: Bozo (GER) vs Griefhead (SOV) BOZO Welcome

Post by Griefhead »

BTW, there is a "Bozo school of thought" and a whole lot of it has to do with tweaking noses - including you own when you need it.
Post Reply

Return to “After Action Reports”