DBB-C status

Please post here for questions and discussion about scenario design, art and sound modding and the game editor for WITP Admiral's Edition.

Moderators: wdolson, MOD_War-in-the-Pacific-Admirals-Edition

DD696
Posts: 976
Joined: Fri Jul 09, 2004 12:57 pm
Location: near Savannah, Ga

RE: DBB-C status

Post by DD696 »

Some can change, some cannot, and therefore become obsolete.

I have jumped on John many times in the past, but only because of his despicable behavior.

No tears shed.
USMC: 1970-1977. A United States Marine.
We don't take kindly to idjits.
vicberg
Posts: 1178
Joined: Sat Apr 19, 2008 2:29 am

RE: DBB-C status

Post by vicberg »

It's both a good and bad thing. It's such a good game that people get really invested in it. People who get invested, usually get emotional. Then you throw the AFB vs. JFB, history vs. game play and oh boy.

If it wasn't good game, none of this would be happening.

I think Xanax would be a good addition to this forums at time. Or Marijuana, definitely marijuana (no offense meant. I take neither). But Chill. Take a step back. It's a game.

On the positive note, there's scenarios for everyone. More historical, such as stock (scen 1), more radical and less historical. The important part is find the scenario you like, the player you like and have fun. No game is perfect and neither is this, but it's about as close to it as you can get. Except not having a unit auto un-strat when it reaches it target. Hate that. And subs in general, their very existence is an affront to honor and humanity and Gorns, which is why Gorns hate Romulans and clocking devices. Hate them.
User avatar
Lecivius
Posts: 4845
Joined: Sun Aug 05, 2007 12:53 am
Location: Denver

RE: DBB-C status

Post by Lecivius »

.

Image
Attachments
th.jpg
th.jpg (4.43 KiB) Viewed 113 times
If it ain't broke, don't fix it!
User avatar
pontiouspilot
Posts: 1131
Joined: Fri Jul 27, 2012 7:09 pm

RE: DBB-C status

Post by pontiouspilot »

Wow.....I'm going to miss getting Symonized from time to time! I have always had a wee SM fetish.
User avatar
Yaab
Posts: 5556
Joined: Tue Nov 08, 2011 2:09 pm
Location: Poland

RE: DBB-C status

Post by Yaab »

Just check before starting the grand campaign, if the scenario is bug free.

Check the two US Corps HQ on Luzon for their TOEs (previously had none) and Bird battalions for correct number of motorized support. Mine had 162 mot support per battalion - a real hell to transport.

I don't think the latest version of scenario 28 has incorporated the fixes.

EDIT: The DaBigBabes site says:
"
"v015: 04/10/15 Error Corrections, Cleanup"

Which errors have been fixed is not explained.
US87891
Posts: 422
Joined: Sun Jan 02, 2011 1:31 pm

RE: DBB-C status

Post by US87891 »

ORIGINAL: LargeSlowTarget
Not so fast - Symon's message says that "they" (I assume that means the DBB team) no longer support their scenarios (I assume that is not only "Operation SF" but all other scenarios including DBB) on this forum.

I only know the official DaBabes Website - I suggest that you contact Symon by mail (via link in his profile) to check on any work in progress.
John is gone. He won’t return. He is working on a book project that will take 3 years to complete. He comes to College Station, every month or so, to consult with the Marine Archeology people and I put him up. We talk.

He still plays, and is a Master Umpire. But our system is so far different from AE that what we do is not portable to the Matrix title. We routinely look at possibilities, but they often require background that is not otherwise available in the commercial game.

I think you must live with what you have. Babes changes to the AE system have been documented fully, so going forward one needs to follow the paradigm if one wants to make fundamental changes. It’s hard and takes a great deal of research and math. You might be rewarded by investing that degree of effort.

Matt
User avatar
stuman
Posts: 3945
Joined: Sun Sep 14, 2008 8:59 am
Location: Elvis' Hometown

RE: DBB-C status

Post by stuman »

Please tell him " thank you " for all of the hard work he put into the game. It is much appreciated.
" Gentlemen, you can't fight in here! This is the War Room. " President Muffley

Image
Mac Linehan
Posts: 1519
Joined: Sun Dec 19, 2004 9:08 pm
Location: Denver Colorado

RE: DBB-C status

Post by Mac Linehan »

US87891-

It is difficult to consider the future without John; I enjoyed his insights and incredible knowledge of how it all fit together and worked. My respect for all the Mod teams, in regards to sheer research and work, is high; the Babes Team will always be at the top of the list.

A sincere "Thank You" to the Babes Team for all the wonderful work and effort put into the DBB mod in all it's flavors; there is still so much to uncover and learn over time through playing AE.

I am very pleased that John is focused on writing and publishing his book; I know and trust that it will give him a deep sense of satisfaction.

Time heals all wounds; there have been many differences of opinions on this forum. The fact that this is the only forum I visit (and enjoy enormously) says much about those who frequent and post- whose company I enjoy and become accustomed to.

Please tell him that I miss him, and thank him for all that he has done for AE in general and me in particular. John was an awesome mentor.

Sincerely, Mac
LAV-25 2147
Post Reply

Return to “Scenario Design and Modding”