Pat vs Ronnie GW AAR

Post descriptions of your brilliant successes and unfortunate demises.

Moderator: Shannon V. OKeets

User avatar
ashkpa
Posts: 1513
Joined: Thu Jan 16, 2014 3:11 am

RE: Pat vs Ronnie GW AAR

Post by ashkpa »

Note, with unlimited breakdowns, the 3-5 MOT could provide two MOT-divisions.
Pat
User avatar
Jagdtiger14
Posts: 1685
Joined: Mon Jan 21, 2008 11:58 pm
Location: Miami Beach

RE: Pat vs Ronnie GW AAR

Post by Jagdtiger14 »

4. I have always found limited overseas supply helps to make the Pacific war a bit more active. Without it, it always seems to fall back to a waiting game, with both sides keeping their main fleets in port until the other makes a move. I've never used this rule and not sure what to do. But, if you or someone else can fill me in on how this rule changes play and what I need to do to make sure I keep my troops in supply then sure, why not.

I've only played with this a couple times as it became too tedious for a board game. However, by computer, this might not be a bad option to play with. In our games the Japanese and US sailed out their CA's into various forward sea zones, in fact almost all sea zones had a CA's in the 4 or 3 box. The Japanese CA's are superior, but the main reason is to slow down the enemy. Its actually quite fun.

I disagree that the Pacific falls back to a waiting game...I have never seen a game like that (other than the US waiting for the Essex CV's). The Japanese need to use their fleet as much as possible and aggressively before the Essex class CV's show up (Fall '42)...the US waits for the Essex class, then makes their march across the Pacific. The Japanese fleet becomes a fleet in being, and only committed to critical events...normally protecting the Tokyo Express. If the Japanese aggressively built out their CV's (all of them including the CVL's), then there is a 1 year (or less depending on if the US advance built their 2nd round of Essex CV's) window before the second year Essex come on line where there could be many opportunities for huge carrier battles

Conflict with the unexpected: two qualities are indispensable; first, an intellect which, even in the midst of this obscurity, is not without some traces of inner light which lead to the truth; second, the courage to follow this faint light. KvC
User avatar
rkr1958
Posts: 30266
Joined: Thu May 21, 2009 10:23 am

RE: Pat vs Ronnie GW AAR

Post by rkr1958 »

ORIGINAL: ashkpa

Note, with unlimited breakdowns, the 3-5 MOT could provide two MOT-divisions.
I did think of that but didn't keep it because of the cost. It's going to take me a bit to get use to playing with unlimited divisions.
Ronnie
User avatar
Jagdtiger14
Posts: 1685
Joined: Mon Jan 21, 2008 11:58 pm
Location: Miami Beach

RE: Pat vs Ronnie GW AAR

Post by Jagdtiger14 »

I just got the game and played solitaire with unlimited breakdowns. I love it! It's my belief that it is also pro-Axis...although I think the USSR can take advantage of it on the Allied side.
Conflict with the unexpected: two qualities are indispensable; first, an intellect which, even in the midst of this obscurity, is not without some traces of inner light which lead to the truth; second, the courage to follow this faint light. KvC
User avatar
ashkpa
Posts: 1513
Joined: Thu Jan 16, 2014 3:11 am

RE: Pat vs Ronnie GW AAR

Post by ashkpa »

Here is the Italian Scrap screen.

Image
Attachments
ItalySetupScrap.jpg
ItalySetupScrap.jpg (287.22 KiB) Viewed 443 times
Pat
User avatar
ashkpa
Posts: 1513
Joined: Thu Jan 16, 2014 3:11 am

RE: Pat vs Ronnie GW AAR

Post by ashkpa »

Here is a collage of the Italian Setup. I did break down one 3-3 INF corp.

Image
Attachments
ItalianSetup.jpg
ItalianSetup.jpg (313.48 KiB) Viewed 443 times
Pat
User avatar
rkr1958
Posts: 30266
Joined: Thu May 21, 2009 10:23 am

RE: Pat vs Ronnie GW AAR

Post by rkr1958 »

Uh-oh. Looks like the Italians have the French in their sights and they aren't kidding around. I'll have to sleep on this one. Goodnight all. [:)]
Ronnie
brian brian
Posts: 3191
Joined: Wed Nov 16, 2005 6:39 pm

RE: Pat vs Ronnie GW AAR

Post by brian brian »

Hooray, more human-vs-human WiF to follow, thanks guys!

I think we can all agree that it isn't necessary to post the US Entry pool for all to see, however. [8D]
User avatar
rkr1958
Posts: 30266
Joined: Thu May 21, 2009 10:23 am

RE: Pat vs Ronnie GW AAR

Post by rkr1958 »

ORIGINAL: brian brian

Hooray, more human-vs-human WiF to follow, thanks guys!

I think we can all agree that it isn't necessary to post the US Entry pool for all to see, however. [8D]
Oh ... too much solitary play. [:(]
Ronnie
User avatar
Centuur
Posts: 9077
Joined: Fri Jun 03, 2011 12:03 pm
Location: Hoorn (NED).

RE: Pat vs Ronnie GW AAR

Post by Centuur »

ORIGINAL: rkr1958
ORIGINAL: brian brian

Hooray, more human-vs-human WiF to follow, thanks guys!

I think we can all agree that it isn't necessary to post the US Entry pool for all to see, however. [8D]
Oh ... too much solitary play. [:(]


Image


Now, I want to see how this one will turn out to be. I'll be watching this closely [;)]

Have fun, guys! [8D]
Attachments
Enemylistens.jpg
Enemylistens.jpg (10 KiB) Viewed 443 times
Peter
User avatar
rkr1958
Posts: 30266
Joined: Thu May 21, 2009 10:23 am

RE: Pat vs Ronnie GW AAR

Post by rkr1958 »

ORIGINAL: Centuur

Now, I want to see how this one will turn out to be. I'll be watching this closely [;)]

Have fun, guys! [8D]
Aye, Aye Sir. Reporting for duty and ready to play.

Image
Attachments
Private_SNAFU.jpg
Private_SNAFU.jpg (37.87 KiB) Viewed 439 times
Ronnie
User avatar
AllenK
Posts: 7266
Joined: Mon Feb 17, 2014 1:17 pm
Location: England

RE: Pat vs Ronnie GW AAR

Post by AllenK »

Great to see another human v human AAR. Ronnie, glad you have found time to give to facing a live opponent.

Will be following this with interest.
User avatar
rkr1958
Posts: 30266
Joined: Thu May 21, 2009 10:23 am

RE: Pat vs Ronnie GW AAR

Post by rkr1958 »

Chinese Setup.

The Chinese scrap nothing.

I confess it's much different setting up when playing against an opponent versus solo. When playing solo, as much as I try not to, I do have insight into the intent of the other side. In setting up for this game I have no clue regarding Pat's intent. Again, I must confess that this adds an element of surprise and fun to the setup.

Image
Attachments
00ChineseSetup.jpg
00ChineseSetup.jpg (1.39 MiB) Viewed 439 times
Ronnie
User avatar
rkr1958
Posts: 30266
Joined: Thu May 21, 2009 10:23 am

RE: Pat vs Ronnie GW AAR

Post by rkr1958 »

CW Scrapped Units.

Image
Attachments
00CWScrapped.jpg
00CWScrapped.jpg (341.29 KiB) Viewed 439 times
Ronnie
User avatar
rkr1958
Posts: 30266
Joined: Thu May 21, 2009 10:23 am

RE: Pat vs Ronnie GW AAR

Post by rkr1958 »

CW Setup, The UK.

Image
Attachments
00SetupCWUK.jpg
00SetupCWUK.jpg (771.79 KiB) Viewed 442 times
Ronnie
User avatar
rkr1958
Posts: 30266
Joined: Thu May 21, 2009 10:23 am

RE: Pat vs Ronnie GW AAR

Post by rkr1958 »

CW Setup, Gibraltar & Malta.

Image
Attachments
00SetupC..arMalta.jpg
00SetupC..arMalta.jpg (842 KiB) Viewed 439 times
Ronnie
User avatar
rkr1958
Posts: 30266
Joined: Thu May 21, 2009 10:23 am

RE: Pat vs Ronnie GW AAR

Post by rkr1958 »

CW Setup, Egypt & Aden.

Image
Attachments
00-Setup-C..ypt-Aden.jpg
00-Setup-C..ypt-Aden.jpg (1.32 MiB) Viewed 439 times
Ronnie
User avatar
rkr1958
Posts: 30266
Joined: Thu May 21, 2009 10:23 am

RE: Pat vs Ronnie GW AAR

Post by rkr1958 »

CW Setup, India & Singapore.

Image
Attachments
00SetupC..ingapore.jpg
00SetupC..ingapore.jpg (1.68 MiB) Viewed 439 times
Ronnie
User avatar
rkr1958
Posts: 30266
Joined: Thu May 21, 2009 10:23 am

RE: Pat vs Ronnie GW AAR

Post by rkr1958 »

CW Setup, East Africa.

Thank goodness for territorials, because it appears to me that the Italians are up to no good in East Africa.

Image
Attachments
00SetupC..tAfrica.jpg
00SetupC..tAfrica.jpg (748.2 KiB) Viewed 439 times
Ronnie
User avatar
rkr1958
Posts: 30266
Joined: Thu May 21, 2009 10:23 am

RE: Pat vs Ronnie GW AAR

Post by rkr1958 »

CW Setup, Convoys.

Image
Attachments
00-Setup-CW-CPs.jpg
00-Setup-CW-CPs.jpg (1.12 MiB) Viewed 439 times
Ronnie
Post Reply

Return to “After Action Report”