Ground Strike:observations from a new player

A sub-forum for players new to WIF, containing information on how to get started and become an experienced player.

Moderator: Shannon V. OKeets

User avatar
Joseignacio
Posts: 3138
Joined: Fri May 08, 2009 11:25 am
Location: Madrid, Spain

RE: Ground Strike:observations from a new player

Post by Joseignacio »

ORIGINAL: jboldt007

Btw. As GE I can't imagine going after Yu/ Gr at the same time as France and Low Countries. Seems like a recipe for disiaster - but I'm a newb...

To be true, it should not be that bad. You need to leave some troops garrisoning the border with FR + NL, and for invading DK anyway, and you don't need your whole army in Poland, half is enough. Then come the reserves, but they come disorganized.

But the second turn... you can use all the nice reserve units (even railing and restoring them with HQs in the front, plus your production from the "spiral" (what is being produced-in the setup-)and you still have to break through NL, which has very few units.

In this case you can send like 2/3 of your army from Poland to YU (while the rest is railed to NL), all you have to do is take a couple of cities with the help of the IT, and they are not too strong, nor they have FTRs to stop your couple of stukas + the IT planes you can send... The UK player is usually too committed in France to be able to land significant forces in YU...

But it's risky. Ambitious and risky.
AlbertN
Posts: 4280
Joined: Tue Oct 05, 2010 3:44 pm
Location: Italy

RE: Ground Strike:observations from a new player

Post by AlbertN »

An "old opening" to go against Yugoslavia on impulse 2 to deny Bessarabia claim. And exploiting "Med Weather" for the wintery turn to deal with Yugoslavia at least.
It includes aligning Romania in '39 that impulse so that Bessarabia can't be demanded. It has an amount of setbacks - one among them is that you have to buy Antonescu for instance (That is a '40 unit).

Obvious one should not touch Belgium in the process that the forces are away.
User avatar
Courtenay
Posts: 4396
Joined: Wed Nov 12, 2008 4:34 pm

RE: Ground Strike:observations from a new player

Post by Courtenay »

I like ART for the US. It is guaranteed to get through, and it is double on a US land O-chit. I also like it late war for the Soviets. They frequently won't have air superiority, so the ability to have an non-interceptable ground strike can be very, very useful. And in my opinion, they are key for the Chinese. They will not have air superiority, but without artillery, Japanese units can go out of supply with impunity. With ART, the Chinese have the possibility of cheap kills.
I thought I knew how to play this game....
User avatar
Jagdtiger14
Posts: 1685
Joined: Mon Jan 21, 2008 11:58 pm
Location: Miami Beach

RE: Ground Strike:observations from a new player

Post by Jagdtiger14 »

I agree with Paul in post #15. They take up room in a '39/'40 France campaign that is very constricted and could be better utilized by other toppers. Offensively in a Barb is possible. Defensively probably behind the front lines adding to a critical hex would be best.

Like Joseignacio mentions in post #17, I practically never buy ART's (the bombardment types) since I rarely have the funds...maybe US or China.

I prefer the arty that fly's...costs about the same, but has range, rebuilt quicker when lost, can rebase to distant front lines without flipping (vs rail for ARTY), and possibly costing less when destroyed if the pilot is saved. You can take a chance in sneaking it in without having air parity as well. Sometimes just the threat of its use will require your opponent to factor it in their calculations.
Conflict with the unexpected: two qualities are indispensable; first, an intellect which, even in the midst of this obscurity, is not without some traces of inner light which lead to the truth; second, the courage to follow this faint light. KvC
Shannon V. OKeets
Posts: 22165
Joined: Wed May 18, 2005 11:51 pm
Location: Honolulu, Hawaii
Contact:

RE: Ground Strike:observations from a new player

Post by Shannon V. OKeets »

ORIGINAL: Jagdtiger14

I agree with Paul in post #15. They take up room in a '39/'40 France campaign that is very constricted and could be better utilized by other toppers. Offensively in a Barb is possible. Defensively probably behind the front lines adding to a critical hex would be best.

Like Joseignacio mentions in post #17, I practically never buy ART's (the bombardment types) since I rarely have the funds...maybe US or China.

I prefer the arty that fly's...costs about the same, but has range, rebuilt quicker when lost, can rebase to distant front lines without flipping (vs rail for ARTY), and possibly costing less when destroyed if the pilot is saved. You can take a chance in sneaking it in without having air parity as well. Sometimes just the threat of its use will require your opponent to factor it in their calculations.
One advantage of ART that hasn't been mentioned is that they are doubled in Ground Support or add an extra die roll in Ground Strikes if the enemy is surprised. That makes them glorious in attacking Belgium - and in neither instance do they use Air Missions. I'll use the 8 combat factors from the 4-2 German ART instead of a 2 factor divisional "hit taker". The added heft to the attack can make it automatic - or near automatic - negating the need for a hit taker.
Steve

Perfection is an elusive goal.
User avatar
Centuur
Posts: 9089
Joined: Fri Jun 03, 2011 12:03 pm
Location: Hoorn (NED).

RE: Ground Strike:observations from a new player

Post by Centuur »

That's also why they are very valuable in the first turn of war with the Soviets, to make it easier to take out the border cities in Bessarabia. It gives the Soviets something to think about when planning the defenses...
Peter
User avatar
Joseignacio
Posts: 3138
Joined: Fri May 08, 2009 11:25 am
Location: Madrid, Spain

RE: Ground Strike:observations from a new player

Post by Joseignacio »

ORIGINAL: Shannon V. OKeets

ORIGINAL: Jagdtiger14

I agree with Paul in post #15. They take up room in a '39/'40 France campaign that is very constricted and could be better utilized by other toppers. Offensively in a Barb is possible. Defensively probably behind the front lines adding to a critical hex would be best.

Like Joseignacio mentions in post #17, I practically never buy ART's (the bombardment types) since I rarely have the funds...maybe US or China.

I prefer the arty that fly's...costs about the same, but has range, rebuilt quicker when lost, can rebase to distant front lines without flipping (vs rail for ARTY), and possibly costing less when destroyed if the pilot is saved. You can take a chance in sneaking it in without having air parity as well. Sometimes just the threat of its use will require your opponent to factor it in their calculations.
One advantage of ART that hasn't been mentioned is that they are doubled in Ground Support or add an extra die roll in Ground Strikes if the enemy is surprised. That makes them glorious in attacking Belgium - and in neither instance do they use Air Missions. I'll use the 8 combat factors from the 4-2 German ART instead of a 2 factor divisional "hit taker". The added heft to the attack can make it automatic - or near automatic - negating the need for a hit taker.


Same happens with bombers anyway in surprise.
User avatar
Joseignacio
Posts: 3138
Joined: Fri May 08, 2009 11:25 am
Location: Madrid, Spain

RE: Ground Strike:observations from a new player

Post by Joseignacio »

ORIGINAL: Centuur

That's also why they are very valuable in the first turn of war with the Soviets, to make it easier to take out the border cities in Bessarabia. It gives the Soviets something to think about when planning the defenses...

That would only endanger units 1 hex away. When URSS player I keep always as far from the border (that too) as I can according to the limits imposed by the rules (it means within 3 hexes, so most are 2 or 3 hexes away), except Hero cities or woods/swamps, because the RU bomber but also several long range GE bombers, from Southern Poland can do the job all the same.
Post Reply

Return to “WIF School”