A6M5, what next ?

Share your gameplay tips, secret tactics and fabulous strategies with fellow gamers here.

Moderators: wdolson, MOD_War-in-the-Pacific-Admirals-Edition

User avatar
BBfanboy
Posts: 20682
Joined: Wed Aug 04, 2010 5:36 pm
Location: Winnipeg, MB
Contact:

RE: A6M5, what next ?

Post by BBfanboy »

ORIGINAL: decourcy2

I don't think excess helps, but I know that less AS than needed slows maintenance.
At one point when the game first came out I recall something about excess air support helping up to 50% of the needed air support. More than that did not help because they wanted to simulate the limited space and equipment to have multiple people working in the same part of the aircraft. That is why a level 8 airfield doubles the effect of air support - the equipment and stands allow more mechanics to get to work on the same area or remove major parts of the aircraft for repairs.
No matter how bad a situation is, you can always make it worse. - Chris Hadfield : An Astronaut's Guide To Life On Earth
decourcy2
Posts: 516
Joined: Thu Jan 29, 2015 4:45 am

RE: A6M5, what next ?

Post by decourcy2 »

I am unsure if Don kept that; it is not in the manual now. Only the Don knows.
User avatar
Lokasenna
Posts: 9304
Joined: Sat Mar 03, 2012 3:57 am
Location: Iowan in MD/DC

RE: A6M5, what next ?

Post by Lokasenna »

ORIGINAL: BBfanboy

ORIGINAL: decourcy2

I don't think excess helps, but I know that less AS than needed slows maintenance.
At one point when the game first came out I recall something about excess air support helping up to 50% of the needed air support. More than that did not help because they wanted to simulate the limited space and equipment to have multiple people working in the same part of the aircraft. That is why a level 8 airfield doubles the effect of air support - the equipment and stands allow more mechanics to get to work on the same area or remove major parts of the aircraft for repairs.

Not to mention airfield size...

I suspect that excess air support may still help. I am basing that on nothing other than gut feeling, as I almost always have plenty of air support (more than I need in most cases) and I don't experience these extreme wait times for high SR aircraft. Noticeably longer than SR1 and SR2, yes, but not measured in weeks.
User avatar
Lowpe
Posts: 24582
Joined: Mon Feb 25, 2013 2:25 pm

RE: A6M5, what next ?

Post by Lowpe »

When you initially upgrade a unit, the wait time is 2 weeks plus. But if you ship them by rail to another base, they repair in 3-7 days.

User avatar
Lokasenna
Posts: 9304
Joined: Sat Mar 03, 2012 3:57 am
Location: Iowan in MD/DC

RE: A6M5, what next ?

Post by Lokasenna »

ORIGINAL: Lowpe

When you initially upgrade a unit, the wait time is 2 weeks plus. But if you ship them by rail to another base, they repair in 3-7 days.


We'll see... I'll check it. The time for the initial upgrade to bring the planes online is longer, yes. But replacements and repairs/maintenance do not take anywhere near as long.

Unpacking by rail is a bit different. Definitely affected by SR, but even SR1 takes more than a day to unpack.
User avatar
PaxMondo
Posts: 11123
Joined: Fri Jun 06, 2008 3:23 pm

RE: A6M5, what next ?

Post by PaxMondo »

Anecdotal evidence for me:
- larger AF helps
- excess AV support helps
- excess support helps
- excess supply helps



- air raids - hurts (a lot)
- AF damage - hurts (a lot)
- proximity to combat - hurts



So in the late game, when the HI is under attack and no longer a safe haven, I find that upgrades take much longer than in the mid game where you can upgrade in Tokyo and the units seem to just jump up ready to go. Just what I have seen ... consider it as you will ...

It may also be perception ... other than Mavis/Emily, you don't have many SR4 or higher AC until '45 ...
Pax
Xargun
Posts: 4406
Joined: Fri Feb 13, 2004 11:34 pm
Location: Near Columbus, Ohio
Contact:

RE: A6M5, what next ?

Post by Xargun »

ORIGINAL: PaxMondo
- AF damage - hurts (a lot)

So in the late game, when the HI is under attack and no longer a safe haven, I find that upgrades take much longer than in the mid game where you can upgrade in Tokyo and the units seem to just jump up ready to go. Just what I have seen ... consider it as you will ...

It may also be perception ... other than Mavis/Emily, you don't have many SR4 or higher AC until '45 ...

I have noticed mostly Airfield Service Damage affects repair time; not runway damage.
GetAssista
Posts: 2836
Joined: Sat Sep 19, 2009 6:13 am

RE: A6M5, what next ?

Post by GetAssista »

ORIGINAL: Xargun
ORIGINAL: PaxMondo
- AF damage - hurts (a lot)
So in the late game, when the HI is under attack and no longer a safe haven, I find that upgrades take much longer than in the mid game where you can upgrade in Tokyo and the units seem to just jump up ready to go. Just what I have seen ... consider it as you will ...
It may also be perception ... other than Mavis/Emily, you don't have many SR4 or higher AC until '45 ...
I have noticed mostly Airfield Service Damage affects repair time; not runway damage.
If your airgroup is on active duty, planes would be damaged by the poor condition of the runway. So full repair will be delayed. If the airgroup is on standoff (Training at 0) then runway damage does not matter. Service damage matters in all the cases.
User avatar
Lokasenna
Posts: 9304
Joined: Sat Mar 03, 2012 3:57 am
Location: Iowan in MD/DC

RE: A6M5, what next ?

Post by Lokasenna »

ORIGINAL: PaxMondo

Anecdotal evidence for me:
- larger AF helps
- excess AV support helps
- excess support helps
- excess supply helps



- air raids - hurts (a lot)
- AF damage - hurts (a lot)
- proximity to combat - hurts



So in the late game, when the HI is under attack and no longer a safe haven, I find that upgrades take much longer than in the mid game where you can upgrade in Tokyo and the units seem to just jump up ready to go. Just what I have seen ... consider it as you will ...

It may also be perception ... other than Mavis/Emily, you don't have many SR4 or higher AC until '45 ...

Mavis/Emily also have extremely high durability numbers, which I think might also affect it.

Proximity to combat means nothing. Why would it?
User avatar
Lowpe
Posts: 24582
Joined: Mon Feb 25, 2013 2:25 pm

RE: A6M5, what next ?

Post by Lowpe »

Proximity to combat is a rule myth.
Post Reply

Return to “The War Room”