OT:Just because

This new stand alone release based on the legendary War in the Pacific from 2 by 3 Games adds significant improvements and changes to enhance game play, improve realism, and increase historical accuracy. With dozens of new features, new art, and engine improvements, War in the Pacific: Admiral's Edition brings you the most realistic and immersive WWII Pacific Theater wargame ever!

Moderators: wdolson, MOD_War-in-the-Pacific-Admirals-Edition

User avatar
AW1Steve
Posts: 14527
Joined: Sat Mar 10, 2007 6:32 am
Location: Mordor aka Illlinois

RE: OT:Just because

Post by AW1Steve »

ORIGINAL: Leandros

ORIGINAL: AW1Steve

And the Browning appear to be a local mod on the bipod. The standard issue wad shorter legged.

Actually it was adjustable in height.

Fred
Yes it was. But look at how long this one is. There may have been a post war version that was longer , but any of the world war two versions I've seen or handled didn't extend that far.
User avatar
Leandros
Posts: 1980
Joined: Thu Mar 05, 2015 3:03 pm
Contact:

RE: OT:Just because

Post by Leandros »


You may be right. Anyway, good job by the guy....[:)]..

Fred
River Wide, Ocean Deep - a book on Operation Sea Lion - www.fredleander.com
Saving MacArthur - a book series on how The Philippines were saved - in 1942! https://www.amazon.com/gp/product/B07D3 ... rw_dp_labf
User avatar
witpqs
Posts: 26376
Joined: Mon Oct 04, 2004 7:48 pm
Location: Argleton

RE: OT:Just because

Post by witpqs »

ORIGINAL: BBfanboy

ORIGINAL: Leandros

ORIGINAL: AW1Steve

And the Browning appear to be a local mod on the bipod. The standard issue wad shorter legged.

Actually it was adjustable in height.

Fred
In a communications seminar I actually attended, the instructor actually emphasized to never say/write "actually" when you are actually correcting someone. It is actually like slapping them in the face and actually saying "You idiot! How could you not know that!".
I actually fixed your post for you. [:'(]
User avatar
Chickenboy
Posts: 24648
Joined: Fri Jun 28, 2002 11:30 pm
Location: San Antonio, TX

RE: OT:Just because

Post by Chickenboy »

ORIGINAL: BBfanboy

ORIGINAL: Leandros

ORIGINAL: AW1Steve

And the Browning appear to be a local mod on the bipod. The standard issue wad shorter legged.

Actually it was adjustable in height.

Fred
In a communications seminar I attended, the instructor emphasized to never say/write "actually" when you are correcting someone. It is like slapping them in the face and saying "You idiot! How could you not know that!".

Are you saying to Fred that he actually shouldn't be correcting someone in that fashion? [:'(]
Image
User avatar
Chickenboy
Posts: 24648
Joined: Fri Jun 28, 2002 11:30 pm
Location: San Antonio, TX

RE: OT:Just because

Post by Chickenboy »

ORIGINAL: BBfanboy
It is like slapping them in the face and saying "You idiot! How could you not know that!".

And? What's wrong with that? [:D]
Image
User avatar
MakeeLearn
Posts: 4274
Joined: Sun Sep 11, 2016 1:01 pm

RE: OT:Just because

Post by MakeeLearn »

ROK soldiers in Vietnam?!






User avatar
Lecivius
Posts: 4845
Joined: Sun Aug 05, 2007 12:53 am
Location: Denver

RE: OT:Just because

Post by Lecivius »

ORIGINAL: BBfanboy
It is like slapping them in the face and saying "You idiot! How could you not know that!".




Image
Attachments
f7223dbdd1..41d82a61.jpg
f7223dbdd1..41d82a61.jpg (43.07 KiB) Viewed 174 times
If it ain't broke, don't fix it!
User avatar
AW1Steve
Posts: 14527
Joined: Sat Mar 10, 2007 6:32 am
Location: Mordor aka Illlinois

RE: OT:Just because

Post by AW1Steve »

ORIGINAL: Chickenboy

ORIGINAL: BBfanboy
It is like slapping them in the face and saying "You idiot! How could you not know that!".

And? What's wrong with that? [:D]


Absolutely nothing wrong with that. I've had much worse than that. Especially here on this forum. Why just the other day , "somebody" suggested that I be sold for scrap. No buyers though. [:D]
User avatar
MakeeLearn
Posts: 4274
Joined: Sun Sep 11, 2016 1:01 pm

RE: OT:Just because

Post by MakeeLearn »

ORIGINAL: MakeeLearn

ROK soldiers in Vietnam?!


Yes....

"The soldier is from the Baekma Division (White Horse) which is the 9th infantry.



"On November 27, 1967, a soldier of the 30th regiment of the Baekma Division (백마부대) rescues Vietnamese children at the battle of Dien Can. This soldier's name is An Sang-Byung (안상병). ""






User avatar
Chickenboy
Posts: 24648
Joined: Fri Jun 28, 2002 11:30 pm
Location: San Antonio, TX

RE: OT:Just because

Post by Chickenboy »

ORIGINAL: MakeeLearn

ORIGINAL: MakeeLearn

ROK soldiers in Vietnam?!


Yes....

"The soldier is from the Baekma Division (White Horse) which is the 9th infantry.



"On November 27, 1967, a soldier of the 30th regiment of the Baekma Division (백마부대) rescues Vietnamese children at the battle of Dien Can. This soldier's name is An Sang-Byung (안상병). ""

Interesting. Where did you find this, MakeeLearn?
Image
User avatar
Chickenboy
Posts: 24648
Joined: Fri Jun 28, 2002 11:30 pm
Location: San Antonio, TX

RE: OT:Just because

Post by Chickenboy »

ORIGINAL: Chickenboy

ORIGINAL: MakeeLearn

ORIGINAL: MakeeLearn

ROK soldiers in Vietnam?!


Yes....

"The soldier is from the Baekma Division (White Horse) which is the 9th infantry.



"On November 27, 1967, a soldier of the 30th regiment of the Baekma Division (백마부대) rescues Vietnamese children at the battle of Dien Can. This soldier's name is An Sang-Byung (안상병). ""

Interesting. Where did you find this, MakeeLearn?

Yes. Interesting. I'd be interested in finding the source of this too, MakeeLearn. [;)]
Image
User avatar
MakeeLearn
Posts: 4274
Joined: Sun Sep 11, 2016 1:01 pm

RE: OT:Just because

Post by MakeeLearn »

ORIGINAL: Chickenboy

ORIGINAL: MakeeLearn

ORIGINAL: MakeeLearn

ROK soldiers in Vietnam?!


Yes....

"The soldier is from the Baekma Division (White Horse) which is the 9th infantry.



"On November 27, 1967, a soldier of the 30th regiment of the Baekma Division (백마부대) rescues Vietnamese children at the battle of Dien Can. This soldier's name is An Sang-Byung (안상병). ""

Interesting. Where did you find this, MakeeLearn?


http://www.usmilitariaforum.com/forums/ ... 6-picture/

https://www.reddit.com/r/MilitaryPorn/c ... _during_a/

http://www.usmilitariaforum.com/forums/ ... n-vietnam/






User avatar
MakeeLearn
Posts: 4274
Joined: Sun Sep 11, 2016 1:01 pm

RE: OT:Just because

Post by MakeeLearn »

It was the tight cut of the pants, cuff, that made me feel that this was not US forces.



Image
Attachments
50AB0FE9F92060DE050.jpg
50AB0FE9F92060DE050.jpg (64.8 KiB) Viewed 174 times






User avatar
AW1Steve
Posts: 14527
Joined: Sat Mar 10, 2007 6:32 am
Location: Mordor aka Illlinois

RE: OT:Just because

Post by AW1Steve »

https://www.reddit.com/r/HistoryPorn/co ... _the_30th/ I knew the ROK Marines and Tiger division was there , but not the 9th. That explains the uniforms and the browning. I find it interesting that one of the troops has insecticide in his helmet band , just like USA troops did. [:)]
User avatar
Chickenboy
Posts: 24648
Joined: Fri Jun 28, 2002 11:30 pm
Location: San Antonio, TX

RE: OT:Just because

Post by Chickenboy »

Since we're picking nits (pun intended), troops in Vietnam carried insect repellent in their headbands rather than insecticide per se.
Image
User avatar
MakeeLearn
Posts: 4274
Joined: Sun Sep 11, 2016 1:01 pm

RE: OT:Just because

Post by MakeeLearn »


insecticide mixed with c-ration peanut butter = cooking fire fuel.






User avatar
Chickenboy
Posts: 24648
Joined: Fri Jun 28, 2002 11:30 pm
Location: San Antonio, TX

RE: OT:Just because

Post by Chickenboy »

ORIGINAL: MakeeLearn


insecticide mixed with c-ration peanut butter = cooking fire fuel.

And C-4. That was also used as a very useful cooking fire fuel.
Image
User avatar
MakeeLearn
Posts: 4274
Joined: Sun Sep 11, 2016 1:01 pm

RE: OT:Just because

Post by MakeeLearn »

ORIGINAL: Chickenboy

ORIGINAL: MakeeLearn


insecticide mixed with c-ration peanut butter = cooking fire fuel.

And C-4. That was also used as a very useful cooking fire fuel.

As long as you don't stomp the fire out [;)]






User avatar
Leandros
Posts: 1980
Joined: Thu Mar 05, 2015 3:03 pm
Contact:

RE: OT:Just because

Post by Leandros »

ORIGINAL: Chickenboy

Are you saying to Fred that he actually shouldn't be correcting someone in that fashion? [:'(]

It wasn't actually meant as a correction. More like a supplement to the discussion. And, I haven't actually
attended that course of BB's, soo.....or any other for that matter. Haven't actually handled an A6 either, or seen its bipod, for that matter.
The A4, on the other hand.... Or is it in the other hand....?

His boots look Marines to me. But the picture can be found if one googles korean soldiers in Vietnam.

Fred

Korean soldier in Vietnam with 1919A6:



Attachments
11vietnamW..er768[1].jpg
11vietnamW..er768[1].jpg (81.7 KiB) Viewed 177 times
River Wide, Ocean Deep - a book on Operation Sea Lion - www.fredleander.com
Saving MacArthur - a book series on how The Philippines were saved - in 1942! https://www.amazon.com/gp/product/B07D3 ... rw_dp_labf
User avatar
witpqs
Posts: 26376
Joined: Mon Oct 04, 2004 7:48 pm
Location: Argleton

RE: OT:Just because

Post by witpqs »

Actually a good post, Fred. [:D]
Post Reply

Return to “War in the Pacific: Admiral's Edition”