OT - Providing for Common Defense - Natl Defense Strategy Comm. Report

This new stand alone release based on the legendary War in the Pacific from 2 by 3 Games adds significant improvements and changes to enhance game play, improve realism, and increase historical accuracy. With dozens of new features, new art, and engine improvements, War in the Pacific: Admiral's Edition brings you the most realistic and immersive WWII Pacific Theater wargame ever!

Moderators: wdolson, MOD_War-in-the-Pacific-Admirals-Edition

User avatar
Lokasenna
Posts: 9303
Joined: Sat Mar 03, 2012 3:57 am
Location: Iowan in MD/DC

RE: Providing for Common Defense - Natl Defense Strategy Comm. Report

Post by Lokasenna »

OK
User avatar
Yaab
Posts: 5457
Joined: Tue Nov 08, 2011 2:09 pm
Location: Poland

RE: Providing for Common Defense - Natl Defense Strategy Comm. Report

Post by Yaab »

ORIGINAL: Rusty1961

http://www.thedrive.com/the-war-zone/22 ... rise-again

Billions blown on the MIC for this failed weapon system. The reason Western military systems are so ineffectual is they are designed not for the benefit of the troops, but of the profits of the MIC.

Maybe they will warm up to a thermobaric one?
Rusty1961
Posts: 1239
Joined: Thu Feb 04, 2010 4:18 am

RE: Providing for Common Defense - Natl Defense Strategy Comm. Report

Post by Rusty1961 »

ORIGINAL: Encircled

Not an expert on this by any stretch of the imagination, but unless China can work out a way to destroy the US Carrier capacity that can't be stopped (some sort of laser device or whatever) then only one nation will be be capable of serious world power projection away from its bases and that isn't going to change anytime soon.

Not even our carriers challenge that! [;)]


US Carriers are archaic by today's standards. Thinking what worked in '45 or '73 will work in 2020 is comical.

Captor mines alone will devastate all naval vessels on the surface.
God made man, but Sam Colt made them equal.
Rusty1961
Posts: 1239
Joined: Thu Feb 04, 2010 4:18 am

RE: Providing for Common Defense - Natl Defense Strategy Comm. Report

Post by Rusty1961 »

you got it.
God made man, but Sam Colt made them equal.
User avatar
FlyByKnight
Posts: 245
Joined: Sat Oct 08, 2016 6:00 pm
Location: West Coast

RE: Providing for Common Defense - Natl Defense Strategy Comm. Report

Post by FlyByKnight »

ORIGINAL: Rusty1961

http://www.thedrive.com/the-war-zone/22 ... rise-again

Billions blown on the MIC for this failed weapon system. The reason Western military systems are so ineffectual is they are designed not for the benefit of the troops, but of the profits of the MIC.
Don't worry, there are dozens of bloggers standing by to cover each of these military boondoggles as they happen. The future really is now.
ORIGINAL: Big B

The obvious question is - "Will each shell do at least 0ne Million Dollars worth of damage?" If not, someone needs to look at this again and rethink it.
User avatar
Lokasenna
Posts: 9303
Joined: Sat Mar 03, 2012 3:57 am
Location: Iowan in MD/DC

RE: Providing for Common Defense - Natl Defense Strategy Comm. Report

Post by Lokasenna »

ORIGINAL: Rusty1961

ORIGINAL: Encircled

Not an expert on this by any stretch of the imagination, but unless China can work out a way to destroy the US Carrier capacity that can't be stopped (some sort of laser device or whatever) then only one nation will be be capable of serious world power projection away from its bases and that isn't going to change anytime soon.

Not even our carriers challenge that! [;)]


US Carriers are archaic by today's standards. Thinking what worked in '45 or '73 will work in 2020 is comical.

Captor mines alone will devastate all naval vessels on the surface.

Yes, because our carriers today operate in exactly the same way with exactly the same weapons as in 1945 and 1973.

Get real.
Rusty1961
Posts: 1239
Joined: Thu Feb 04, 2010 4:18 am

RE: Providing for Common Defense - Natl Defense Strategy Comm. Report

Post by Rusty1961 »

ORIGINAL: Lokasenna

ORIGINAL: Rusty1961

ORIGINAL: Encircled

Not an expert on this by any stretch of the imagination, but unless China can work out a way to destroy the US Carrier capacity that can't be stopped (some sort of laser device or whatever) then only one nation will be be capable of serious world power projection away from its bases and that isn't going to change anytime soon.

Not even our carriers challenge that! [;)]


US Carriers are archaic by today's standards. Thinking what worked in '45 or '73 will work in 2020 is comical.

Captor mines alone will devastate all naval vessels on the surface.

Yes, because our carriers today operate in exactly the same way with exactly the same weapons as in 1945 and 1973.

Get real.

Ok!
God made man, but Sam Colt made them equal.
Rusty1961
Posts: 1239
Joined: Thu Feb 04, 2010 4:18 am

RE: Providing for Common Defense - Natl Defense Strategy Comm. Report

Post by Rusty1961 »

ORIGINAL: CharlieVane
ORIGINAL: Rusty1961

http://www.thedrive.com/the-war-zone/22 ... rise-again

Billions blown on the MIC for this failed weapon system. The reason Western military systems are so ineffectual is they are designed not for the benefit of the troops, but of the profits of the MIC.
Don't worry, there are dozens of bloggers standing by to cover each of these military boondoggles as they happen. The future really is now.


I know, many are in this thread making up their favorite excuses.
God made man, but Sam Colt made them equal.
Post Reply

Return to “War in the Pacific: Admiral's Edition”