Concerning High Altitude Fighter Sweeps

Share your gameplay tips, secret tactics and fabulous strategies with fellow gamers here.

Moderators: wdolson, MOD_War-in-the-Pacific-Admirals-Edition

User avatar
rustysi
Posts: 7472
Joined: Tue Feb 21, 2012 3:23 am
Location: LI, NY

RE: Concerning High Altitude Fighter Sweeps

Post by rustysi »

ORIGINAL: Chickenboy

ORIGINAL: DanSez

Just for maintaining 'historic flavor' I tend to recommend a 3 tiered cap to reflect the rise of service ceiling and increased capabilities as the war progressed

1941/1942 Top altitude 25k
1943/1944 Top altitude 30k
1945/1946 Top altitude 35k

easy to remember, easy to set

some people don't like any rules, I am sure you will hear from them soon


Something akin to this is a HR in my games too. With a further reminder that only recon planes are granted exception to high flying (but that's not a fighter sweep, is it?).

One of my Allied PBEM partners' (Joseph-aka 'SqzMyLemon') ongoing beefs with the high altitude uber-sweep involved the handcuffing of the lower CAP to be forced to accept any combat. IRL, fighters flying low CAP could have refused combat if they found themselves in a poor tactical environment. The game mandates engagement in an unfriendly engagement envelope and applies the requisite hard-coded bonuses for those at superior altitude.

Better to omit this silliness and the silly ahistoric workarounds altogether by homogenizing sweep altitude max settings. In a HR if necessary.

+1

With the caveat that I prefer these altitudes.

42 20k.
43 25k
44 31k

Not much different.
It is seldom that liberty of any kind is lost all at once. Hume

In every party there is one member who by his all-too-devout pronouncement of the party principles provokes the others to apostasy. Nietzsche

Cave ab homine unius libri. Ltn Prvb
Big B
Posts: 4638
Joined: Wed Jun 01, 2005 5:41 pm
Location: Cali
Contact:

RE: Concerning High Altitude Fighter Sweeps

Post by Big B »

Ok, thank you everyone for your input.
What I decided was this;
Instead of imposing mandatory ceilings - that would correspond to realistic altitude ceilings - data-wise, I decided to expand a bit on ceilings of aircraft.
As several have said - "don't get hung up on numbers, let it work as an abstract of altitude performance" - what I decided to do was stretch ceilings for some aircraft to let them fly and fight at slightly higher altitudes than book numbers, so essentially we don't have a situation where some aircraft (fighters only) are restricted to altitudes in the 20'000's while others operate in the 30'000's.
In reality all aircraft operated fighter missions at max 25,000-29,000. But now, all can operate at 32,000 to 40,000 depending on the model and year... the ultimate in disregarding real ceilings.
Some, the best high altitude fighters can fly a bit higher than others that are older in design - but altitude has been equalized.

This should negate the need for House Rules, and faithfully recreate capabilities.

B
Post Reply

Return to “The War Room”