ORIGINAL: DanielAClark
An Australia attack...
Interesting.
Will look forward to seeing how you handle getting China under your thumb.
Here is hoping I don't muck everything up!
Moderators: wdolson, MOD_War-in-the-Pacific-Admirals-Edition
ORIGINAL: DanielAClark
An Australia attack...
Interesting.
Will look forward to seeing how you handle getting China under your thumb.
ORIGINAL: DesertWolf101
Aircraft R&D
Final item before I get to the first turn – my aircraft research:
12 X 30 Frank A
10 X 30 Sam
6 X 30 N1K1-J George
6 X 30 Ki-83
5 X 30 Shinden
4 X 30 Ki-44-IIa Tojo
3 x 30 Rufe (for transition to A6M5)
3 X 30 A6M3
3 X 30 B6N2 Jill
3 X 30 D4Y1 Judy
3 X 30 Ki-102c Randy
3 X 30 Ki-43-IIa Oscar
3 X 30 Ki-49-Ia Helen
2 X 30 Ki-45 Nick a
2 X 30 Grace
2 X 30 J1N1-S Irving
2 X 30 Ki46-III KAI Dinah
1 X 30 D4Y1-C Judy
1 X 30 Ki46-III Dinah
1 X 30 P1Y2-S Frances
1 X 5 H8K1 Emily (mostly just to set the factor for production)
1 X 5 H8K2-L Emily (mostly just to set the factor for production)
This was very much a work in progress initially, and certainly there are a number of areas here that I would have likely done differently if I knew more at the time. In particular, I would probably have done a less spread type approach in favor of a more narrow and concentrated one. Now that I am settled into the R&D process I don’t want to change much unless it is a critical mistake or omission. Do you guys see any?
ORIGINAL: mind_messing
ORIGINAL: DesertWolf101
Aircraft R&D
Final item before I get to the first turn – my aircraft research:
12 X 30 Frank A
10 X 30 Sam
6 X 30 N1K1-J George
6 X 30 Ki-83
5 X 30 Shinden
4 X 30 Ki-44-IIa Tojo
3 x 30 Rufe (for transition to A6M5)
3 X 30 A6M3
3 X 30 B6N2 Jill
3 X 30 D4Y1 Judy
3 X 30 Ki-102c Randy
3 X 30 Ki-43-IIa Oscar
3 X 30 Ki-49-Ia Helen
2 X 30 Ki-45 Nick a
2 X 30 Grace
2 X 30 J1N1-S Irving
2 X 30 Ki46-III KAI Dinah
1 X 30 D4Y1-C Judy
1 X 30 Ki46-III Dinah
1 X 30 P1Y2-S Frances
1 X 5 H8K1 Emily (mostly just to set the factor for production)
1 X 5 H8K2-L Emily (mostly just to set the factor for production)
This was very much a work in progress initially, and certainly there are a number of areas here that I would have likely done differently if I knew more at the time. In particular, I would probably have done a less spread type approach in favor of a more narrow and concentrated one. Now that I am settled into the R&D process I don’t want to change much unless it is a critical mistake or omission. Do you guys see any?
Some thoughts.
I like the focus on the late war airframes. More bang for your buck that way in my view.
I'd have concentrated the entire A6M line in the Rufes and push them to the A6M5c - it's probably the best all-round model of the Zero (though there may be others who differ and prefer the M8).
I'm not sold on the Tojo, I'd have dropped it and replaced it with the Ki-61 Tony (with the aim of moving forward the Ki-100).
I'm not sure it's worth R&D for the Helen, rather than just waiting till it (and subsequent improvements) arrive. I'd have used the factories for the Ki-74 Patsy (closest thing Japan gets to a B-29).
Dinah III isn't worth the R&D, better just waiting for it to arrive.
As Lowpe has pointed out, the glaring omission for me is the Peggy T. You can get by till 1943 to get the Lily dive bomber model, but getting the Peggy T is a big one for giving the IJA serious anti-shipping capability. It really takes a lot of pressure off the IJN when it arrives, as the IJA suddenly has vastly more scope for training NavT (and you're likely awash with training ground bombing pilots by the time the Peggy T arrives).
ORIGINAL: DesertWolf101
Interesting points. In particular I was not aware that the Lilly used up less supplies per mission in comparison to the medium bombers. I guess I mistakenly thought that it was a per engine thing rather than designation based.
Edit: I took a look at the manual and now note that its a maximum load issue. Level bombers on offensive missions consume supplies equal to their maximum load divided by 1000. So I take it that means that a Lily with a max load of 881 would in fact consume only one supply point while a Sally with a max load of 2,205 would consume 2 (or 3 because we round up in AE right?)
ORIGINAL: Alamander
The biggest thing to keep in mind is to make all of you moves with purpose and a clear objective. Do not fly missions simply to fly missions and keep the boys busy. Do not just cruise around with KB, or BBs, or any ships really. Move to objectives. Do not use more than is necessary to accomplish objectives and do not use less. This is a fine line, and mistakes will be made from time to time. Try to fight quick, decisive battles rather than protracted engagements. You are right to want to use manuever as much as possible in China and elsehere.
Remember that your mechants have very large fuel tanks, which can be transferred to other ships. There is no reason to have these merchantmen sailing around with topped-off tanks all the time. Many times, the loss of 600 fuel in the topped off tanks of an Aden is more devastating than the loss of the ship itself.
ORIGINAL: DesertWolf101
Southeast of Johnston Island
Aboard the I-18, Commander Otani’s eyes widened as he studied the composition of the American task force ahead of him through the periscope. Despite the heavy destroyer presence, he skillfully maneuvered his boat between the Porter and the Flusser and launched 8 torpedoes at the prize in the center. Three torpedoes slammed one after the other into the Lexington, raising large water sprouts over its side as they tore ugly gashes along its side. Shortly after the third torpedo impact, an explosion ripped through the mighty ship as the aviation fuel went up in flames.
Otani took the I-18 sub deep and waited out the destroyer counterattack before the tin cans raced back to assist their stricken charge.
ORIGINAL: Bif1961
[&o] Good luck is always welcomed on your side and helps when plans meet reality and have to be adjusted on the fly. Good luck and have fun.
ORIGINAL: Alfred
ORIGINAL: DesertWolf101
Southeast of Johnston Island
Aboard the I-18, Commander Otani’s eyes widened as he studied the composition of the American task force ahead of him through the periscope. Despite the heavy destroyer presence, he skillfully maneuvered his boat between the Porter and the Flusser and launched 8 torpedoes at the prize in the center. Three torpedoes slammed one after the other into the Lexington, raising large water sprouts over its side as they tore ugly gashes along its side. Shortly after the third torpedo impact, an explosion ripped through the mighty ship as the aviation fuel went up in flames.
Otani took the I-18 sub deep and waited out the destroyer counterattack before the tin cans raced back to assist their stricken charge.
Are you now going to engage in a maskirovka and retitle this thread to "Revenge of the Lexington"?
Alfred
ORIGINAL: DesertWolf101
[:D][:D][:D]
Luckily for me, the Lexington's aircraft all went down with her, so I don't have to worry about them avenging their mothership.

ORIGINAL: RangerJoe
Well, if there are lots of small task forces with no CAP, do you break your carrier air units into thirds to attack as many as is possible? Kates with bombs at 1000 feet save the torpedoes and work very well against lightly armored or unarmored targets.
Did you also magic move and/or are moving to capture a base to position AKEs, ADs, and AOs? This could be useful for your carriers.
Don't forget night search.
ORIGINAL: CV10
Good luck Desertwolf! I play as the Allies and don't have much to offer in the way of advice, but I'll be following your AAR closely.