Hardware Requirements Update

[fabertong]

Now I'm worrying my 17 inches won't be enough!!!!

[GBirkn]

Hear, hear. This is a game that really would really benefit from 1600x1200. No need for a higher-res map, just put more hexes on the screen. (And while I'm wishing for things, it would be very helpful to be able to move and resize the windows for TFs, ports, etc., as well as have more than one of them open at a time.)

[Reichenberg]

I fully agree with some of the posters above. A resolution of 1600x1200 and 1280x1024 (for all the 17", 19" and 20" LCDs out there) would be really great. Considering that this game will be on our HDs for quite some years, 1024x768 will look measly by then[:(]

Uwe

[pad152]

Now I'm worrying my 17 inches won't be enough!!!!

I'm running UV at 1024x768 resolution on a 17" LCD that has a native resolution of 1260x1024 it looks and runs great!

[TIMJOT]

Off topic, but this new flagship designation thingy #. Does it affect command and control. Example, the flag ship is sunk or heavily damage during combat does the TF suffer some sort of disruption hit?

[pasternakski]

ORIGINAL: TIMJOT

Off topic, but this new flagship designation thingy #. Does it affect command and control. Example, the flag ship is sunk or heavily damage during combat does the TF suffer some sort of disruption hit?

Yeah, and can you designate your own? I got very tired in UV of the game selecting a TF commander who was both a witless wonder and had the approximate charisma of Raverdave's butt (err, I guess it's "bum" down there).

[pasternakski]

ORIGINAL: fabertong

Now I'm worrying my 17 inches won't be enough!!!!

We'll never get that thing on the album cover.

[Raverdave]

Bum it is, but Arsehole or just plain arse works just as well.