ASW Patrol vs Naval Search

Gary Grigsby's strategic level wargame covering the entire War in the Pacific from 1941 to 1945 or beyond.

Moderators: Joel Billings, wdolson, Don Bowen, mogami

User avatar
tsimmonds
Posts: 5490
Joined: Fri Feb 06, 2004 2:01 pm
Location: astride Mason and Dixon's Line

RE: ASW Patrol vs Naval Search

Post by tsimmonds »

ORIGINAL: Captain Cruft

irrelevant - no worries. It suits your nick [:)]
[:'(][8D][;)]

BTW, I have been sorely tempted, every time I see the word "irrelevant" in a post (which is maybe 5 times a day) to make this reply:
"...irrelevant..."
[8D]

...but I figure that would get annoying pretty fast.
Fear the kitten!
User avatar
dpstafford
Posts: 1329
Joined: Sun May 26, 2002 5:50 am
Location: Colbert Nation

RE: ASW Patrol vs Naval Search

Post by dpstafford »

ORIGINAL: Kid

It’s working for me. I just ran a test using the tutorial. The only TF I had deployed were submarine and all aircraft were either grounded or assigned ASW missions at 100%. There were no aircraft assigned to any other type of mission so there is no possibility of anything but an AWS mission spotting something. All the reports below are sub sightings. Do you have the percentage set up? Also, the reports do not distinguish between normal sighting reports and ASW sighting reports.
What altitude did you use. What is the best altitude for ASW?
User avatar
siRkid
Posts: 4177
Joined: Tue Jan 29, 2002 10:00 am
Location: Orland FL

RE: ASW Patrol vs Naval Search

Post by siRkid »

For the test I just used what ever happened to be set. I was intrested in spotting not attacking. I like to stay below 10,000 when conducting ASW in the game. I've no proof that that works better than others. ASW is what I did in RL for 9 years and we spent most of the time between 5,000 and 10,000.
Former War in the Pacific Test Team Manager and Beta Tester for War in the East.

Image
User avatar
Fallschirmjager
Posts: 3555
Joined: Mon Mar 18, 2002 12:46 am
Location: Chattanooga, Tennessee

RE: ASW Patrol vs Naval Search

Post by Fallschirmjager »

ORIGINAL: Kid

For the test I just used what ever happened to be set. I was intrested in spotting not attacking. I like to stay below 10,000 when conducting ASW in the game. I've no proof that that works better than others. ASW is what I did in RL for 9 years and we spent most of the time between 5,000 and 10,000.

I would imagine that you relied more on surface scan radar and sonar than your eyeballs didnt you?
User avatar
siRkid
Posts: 4177
Joined: Tue Jan 29, 2002 10:00 am
Location: Orland FL

RE: ASW Patrol vs Naval Search

Post by siRkid »

I would imagine that you relied more on surface scan radar and sonar than your eyeballs didnt you?

Good intel was the most important. Most of the time it was passive sonar. We kept the radar off so as not to be detected. Although, you can see a snorkel from very high up on a good day.
Former War in the Pacific Test Team Manager and Beta Tester for War in the East.

Image
User avatar
Fallschirmjager
Posts: 3555
Joined: Mon Mar 18, 2002 12:46 am
Location: Chattanooga, Tennessee

RE: ASW Patrol vs Naval Search

Post by Fallschirmjager »

ORIGINAL: Kid
I would imagine that you relied more on surface scan radar and sonar than your eyeballs didnt you?

Good intel was the most important. Most of the time it was passive sonar. We kept the radar off so as not to be detected. Although, you can see a snorkel from very high up on a good day.

Ahh I didnt think about detection. I never knew subs were outfitted with electronics to detect airbored radar.
User avatar
Howard Mitchell
Posts: 449
Joined: Mon Jun 03, 2002 11:41 am
Location: Blighty

RE: ASW Patrol vs Naval Search

Post by Howard Mitchell »

I never knew subs were outfitted with electronics to detect airbored radar.

Some were even in the Second World War. German U-Boats had detectors nickmaned 'Biscay Crosses' which could detect meter-length radar. Unfortunately for the Germans, one captured Allied airman told them that Costal Command aircraft could detect emmisions from it and so they lost confidence in it.

USN subs had radar detectors in the latter part of the Pacific War when Japanese ships started turning up with radar. My only accuracy Gripe with the old Silent Hunter game was that it didn't have them in.
While the battles the British fight may differ in the widest possible ways, they invariably have two common characteristics – they are always fought uphill and always at the junction of two or more map sheets.

General Sir William Slim
Post Reply

Return to “War In The Pacific - Struggle Against Japan 1941 - 1945”