Why is sonar not listed in ship equipment

Gary Grigsby's strategic level wargame covering the entire War in the Pacific from 1941 to 1945 or beyond.

Moderators: Joel Billings, wdolson, Don Bowen, mogami

User avatar
Tankerace
Posts: 5408
Joined: Fri Mar 21, 2003 12:23 pm
Location: Stillwater, OK, United States

RE: Why is sonar not listed in ship equipment

Post by Tankerace »

Yep.

Also, I have a quick question on DC modeling in the game. Is it possible to simulate a dud rate? If memory serves me, a good portion of the time, early DCs wouldn't even detonate. And in early WW2, the WWI era DCs still had the same problem.
Designer of War Plan Orange
Allied Naval OOBer of Admiral's Edition
Naval Team Lead for War in the Med

Author of Million-Dollar Barrage: American Field Artillery in the Great War coming soon from OU Press.
User avatar
Montbrun
Posts: 1506
Joined: Wed Feb 07, 2001 10:00 am
Location: Raleigh, NC, USA

RE: Why is sonar not listed in ship equipment

Post by Montbrun »

Absolutely correct. WWI-II subs were, in fact, submersibles, not true submarines...

Brad
WitE Alpha/Beta Tester
WitE Research Team
WitE2.0 Alpha/Beta Tester
WitE2.0 Research Team
WitW Alpha/Beta Tester
WitW Research Team
Piercing Fortress Europa Research Team
Desert War 1940-1942 Alpha/Beta Tester
User avatar
Tankerace
Posts: 5408
Joined: Fri Mar 21, 2003 12:23 pm
Location: Stillwater, OK, United States

RE: Why is sonar not listed in ship equipment

Post by Tankerace »

I seem to remember hearing a US admiral call them "Submersible PT boats". LOL. Just don't tell that to a submariner.
Designer of War Plan Orange
Allied Naval OOBer of Admiral's Edition
Naval Team Lead for War in the Med

Author of Million-Dollar Barrage: American Field Artillery in the Great War coming soon from OU Press.
User avatar
Ron Saueracker
Posts: 10967
Joined: Mon Jan 28, 2002 10:00 am
Location: Ottawa, Canada OR Zakynthos Island, Greece

RE: Why is sonar not listed in ship equipment

Post by Ron Saueracker »

ORIGINAL: Tankerace

Yep.

Also, I have a quick question on DC modeling in the game. Is it possible to simulate a dud rate? If memory serves me, a good portion of the time, early DCs wouldn't even detonate. And in early WW2, the WWI era DCs still had the same problem.

I'd be happy with reduced accuracy at this point. That and randomize belt hits so that more deck hits result (less flooding...more system damage).
Image

Image

Yammas from The Apo-Tiki Lounge. Future site of WITP AE benders! And then the s--t hit the fan
User avatar
Tankerace
Posts: 5408
Joined: Fri Mar 21, 2003 12:23 pm
Location: Stillwater, OK, United States

RE: Why is sonar not listed in ship equipment

Post by Tankerace »

Yeah. Right now I am trying to figure out how to not have "uber" DCs in the WPO project. That could be a game killer. Im thinking either attempting to drastically reduce accuracy, or give ahistorically few amounts of DCs to ships.
Designer of War Plan Orange
Allied Naval OOBer of Admiral's Edition
Naval Team Lead for War in the Med

Author of Million-Dollar Barrage: American Field Artillery in the Great War coming soon from OU Press.
mikemike
Posts: 500
Joined: Wed Jun 02, 2004 11:26 pm
Location: a maze of twisty little passages, all different

RE: Why is sonar not listed in ship equipment

Post by mikemike »

ORIGINAL: Tankerace

Like Ron pointed out, for a time US PT boats (Higgins and Elco 77 footers) carried DCs, yet had no sonar.

Depth charges were not just for ASW, especially on PT boats (or similar vessels in other navies). Drop a DC close to a surface vessel and you can blow it right out of the water or at least damage it severely. It makes more sense to use DCs to sink barges than torps. Also, DCs are an economical way to kill survivors swimming in the water. Doesn´t tire out your machine gunners.
DON´T PANIC - IT´S ALL JUST ONES AND ZEROES!
User avatar
tigercub
Posts: 2026
Joined: Mon Feb 03, 2003 12:25 pm
Location: brisbane oz

RE: Why is sonar not listed in ship equipment

Post by tigercub »

Hi

The small coastal and harbour patrol boats like PTs would be watching the bouys attached to harbour netting. If an intruding sub had fouled the netting it would pull the bouys down giving away its position. A fast PT could respond quickly to the site and drop DCs on the sub even though it didn't have sonar. The depth of the harbour entrance would reduced the need to set the DC. Both sides would be able to do this.

PS. The Pacific Ocean was suprising clear to a reasonable depth in WWII and a long sub at a shallow depth was still an easy target if a sited early enough to get your PT boat overhead. Even though the sub might have submerged it was still visible. So no sonar was needed for some harbours.
Image
You have enemies? Good. That means you've stood up for something, sometime in your life
Post Reply

Return to “War In The Pacific - Struggle Against Japan 1941 - 1945”