What to do with all those ENG units?

Gary Grigsby's strategic level wargame covering the entire War in the Pacific from 1941 to 1945 or beyond.

Moderators: Joel Billings, wdolson, Don Bowen, mogami

User avatar
foliveti
Posts: 375
Joined: Thu Sep 12, 2002 7:24 pm
Location: Buffalo, NY

RE: What to do with all those ENG units?

Post by foliveti »

Can't assault rating also mean defense against assault?
[sarc]Can zero assault rated ENG units be wiped out via sneak attack by 4 troopers (JNSL / Marines) from a sub launched life raft??? [/sarc]

I seem to recall from my recent reread of the manual, that noncombat squads have a combat strenght of something like 1/10 of combat squads.
Frank
User avatar
rhohltjr
Posts: 541
Joined: Thu Apr 27, 2000 8:00 am
Location: When I play pacific wargames, I expect smarter AI.

RE: What to do with all those ENG units?

Post by rhohltjr »

ORIGINAL: foliveti
I seem to recall from my recent reread of the manual, that noncombat squads have a combat strenght of something like 1/10 of combat squads.

It's just like these guys to hide some info in some sort of manual!!!![;)]

I wish they could do more. I have 3 ENG units sitting at/on/in an undefended Japanese base and they can't do anything because they have not even a single unit of assault power. [8D] I am sending in some really bloodthirsty base force guys (with assault > 0) to form up an attack, so I can capture the base.

Hoo Yaahh and Semper Fi base force killer force.
My e-troops don't unload OVER THE BEACH anymore, see:
Amphibious Assault at Kota Bharu
TF 85 troops securing a beachhead at Kota Bharu, 51,75
whew! I still feel better.
User avatar
Sardaukar
Posts: 12728
Joined: Wed Nov 28, 2001 10:00 am
Location: Finland/Israel

RE: What to do with all those ENG units?

Post by Sardaukar »

I did actually read manual again...and it says that only "engineer squads" are considered "combat engineers". And it says that "combat engineers" help to reduce fortification levels. Thus, plain engineers don't...but then, there have been lot of changes in patches...

Cheers,

M.S.
"To meaningless French Idealism, Liberty, Fraternity and Equality...we answer with German Realism, Infantry, Cavalry and Artillery" -Prince von Bülov, 1870-

Image
User avatar
eMonticello
Posts: 525
Joined: Fri Mar 15, 2002 7:35 am

RE: What to do with all those ENG units?

Post by eMonticello »

Only combat engineers would intentionally engage the enemy. They were, after all, trained for that mission. To have a non-combat engineer engage in combat would be equivalent to ordering a Signal Corp radio operator to assault a strongpoint. It just wouldn't happen under normal circumstances.
ORIGINAL: rhohltjr
I would agree with the no extra AV rating but why no assault ability. Not even a 1? Engineers don't spend all their training or time building bridges over rivers and filling bomb craters. They do carry weapons.

Few things are harder to put up with than the annoyance of a good example. -- Pudd'nhead Wilson
User avatar
Cmdrcain
Posts: 1161
Joined: Mon Aug 21, 2000 8:00 am
Location: Rebuilding FLA, Busy Repairing!
Contact:

RE: What to do with all those ENG units?

Post by Cmdrcain »

ORIGINAL: LargeSlowTarget
ORIGINAL: Capt Cliff
Bases should degrade if there is no engineering unit present to do the upkeep.

That's what I'm advocating.
ORIGINAL: Cmdrcain
Even with 0 assault, engineers in with an attack force are supposed to help reduce the fortifications.

Dump question - does the game differentiate between combat and construction engineers?

EDIT: I'm so dumb I can't even spell it correctly [:D]


Checked, a number of construction type engineers have assault ratings, 2-5

like the road construction, and others.



Noise? What Noise? It's sooooo quiet and Peaceful!
Image
Battlestar Pegasus
Post Reply

Return to “War In The Pacific - Struggle Against Japan 1941 - 1945”