What Campaigns would you be interested in

SPWaW is a tactical squad-level World War II game on single platoon or up to an entire battalion through Europe and the Pacific (1939 to 1945).

Moderator: MOD_SPWaW

User avatar
MarkFroio
Posts: 125
Joined: Wed Dec 20, 2000 10:00 am
Location: Reno, NV

Post by MarkFroio »

I love playing the campaigns in SPWAW. For your collective Operations or Campaigns would be fine with me. I like them to be challenging and to pick the core force. I prefer smaller battles and short to medium campaigns. I play with C & C on.

I'd like to see a long German campaign, Allies in Sicily and Italy, Market Garden as Allies and the Bulge as Allies or Germans.

Thanks for asking our opinion.
Randy
Posts: 627
Joined: Tue Aug 22, 2000 8:00 am
Location: Torrance, Calif. USA

Post by Randy »

I think a Burma campaign would be a good idea. I think this part of the Pacific War seems to seen as a side show. I've started reading about it, and its pretty impressive how the Brits/Commonwealth forces battled back against the Japanese. It seems that the Central Pacific gets all the attention.
Semper Fi
Randy

The United States Marines: America's 911 Force-The Tip of the Spear
alassi
Posts: 37
Joined: Mon Jul 30, 2001 8:00 am
Location: Luleå, Sweden
Contact:

Post by alassi »

Why not a longer hypothetical campaign..covering Sealion and further Germany/Japan invades USA :)
Sgt.A.Lassi FwdObserver 2nd Arctic Mortar Platoon I19/P5--Hell is not hot,its cold.
Alexei
Posts: 35
Joined: Sun Jun 17, 2001 8:00 am
Location: France

Post by Alexei »

What about hypothetical invasion of Middle East, south Caucasus, northern India by DAK?
It would begin in Alexandria, then Suez, Jerusalem, Damas, Grozny (junction with Army Group South). Then continue pushing South-East towards India... Hey, it would be great meeting Japanese there :) .
Of course it could be only part of a DAK 1942 classical campaign, but it could also be a full campaign.
Alexei.
User avatar
bchapman
Posts: 288
Joined: Thu Mar 30, 2000 10:00 am
Location: Oklahoma

Post by bchapman »

How about Allied Invasion of Sicily and Italy.
Me too. :rolleyes:
"A government big enough to give you everything you want is a government big enough to take from you everything you have."<br />- Gerald Ford
User avatar
skukko
Posts: 1046
Joined: Tue Oct 24, 2000 8:00 am
Location: Finland
Contact:

Post by skukko »

SS-Freiwillige in 42-44.

mosh
salute

mosh

If its not rotten, shoot again
Gen. Maczek
Posts: 70
Joined: Wed May 09, 2001 8:00 am
Location: Tychy, Poland

Post by Gen. Maczek »

The Norway one is an interesing idea...Also all for the Polish one obviously ;)
Regards.
Gen. Maczek
A_B
Posts: 248
Joined: Wed Apr 11, 2001 8:00 am
Location: San Jose, CA

Post by A_B »

The Alternative History one is intreging - the german advance to Suez. India would be a bit much, but if the germans had done better agianst the russians in '41, they may have been more willing to push resources into the Med in '42. Taking Malta and Gibraltor would have made the naval domination of the med possible. Turkey may have been cooerced into allowing german troops/supplies move by rail through their country to support mideast ops, if russia was severely weakened. Russia couldn't be out of the war though - US/Britan didn't have enough strengh to challenge Germany alone.

The above situation would make for a couple great campaign scenario's. Germans attacking through egypt in '42, and into Iran in '43. The Allies defending through '43, and then launching counter attacks.

Seems like this could be a lot of fun. Iraq/Iran offers a lot of terrain types, desert, river crossings, mountains. Good armor terrain.

Some good Fallschirmjaeger options to - Malta, Suez, Bagdad, etc.
Unconventional war requires unconventional thought
Arto
Posts: 70
Joined: Fri Mar 09, 2001 10:00 am
Location: Suomusjärvi, Finland

Post by Arto »

Originally posted by skukko:
SS-Freiwillige in 42-44.
Which country? I´d like more 41-43, then I would have a chance to play the Finns in Wiking.

[ August 09, 2001: Message edited by: Arto ]
User avatar
parusski
Posts: 4789
Joined: Mon May 08, 2000 8:00 am
Location: Jackson Tn
Contact:

Post by parusski »

Sealion would be great.
"I hate newspapermen. They come into camp and pick up their camp rumors and print them as facts. I regard them as spies, which, in truth, they are. If I killed them all there would be news from Hell before breakfast."- W.T. Sherman
User avatar
RockinHarry
Posts: 2344
Joined: Thu Jan 18, 2001 10:00 am
Location: Germany
Contact:

Post by RockinHarry »

I would like to see one from UK/Canadian side either in NWE44/45 or Italy also.

If I scratch the needed time I probably start a 5-6 battle campaign based on "Veritable" Feb-March 45. Involved units: Either 15th Scots, 3.Can Inf. or 43. Wessex..depends upon needed historical info.
As a base I take D.Whittakers "Rhineland:The last battles"(?).

_________
Harry
RockinHarry in the web:

https://www.facebook.com/harry.zann
A_B
Posts: 248
Joined: Wed Apr 11, 2001 8:00 am
Location: San Jose, CA

Post by A_B »

A lot of people here want Italy from the allied side. Kind of surprises me, as Italy was a very frustrating for the allies - lots of resources for a very slow advance.

Why all the interest? What is the compelling element of a Italy campaign?
Unconventional war requires unconventional thought
User avatar
skukko
Posts: 1046
Joined: Tue Oct 24, 2000 8:00 am
Location: Finland
Contact:

Post by skukko »

Originally posted by Arto:


Which country? I´d like more 41-43, then I would have a chance to play the Finns in Wiking.

[ August 09, 2001: Message edited by: Arto ]
-41 they did not much, thats why -42-43, sorry about that -44 ;)
http://www.geocities.com/Pentagon/Quarters/2130/

mosh
salute

mosh

If its not rotten, shoot again
Saltone
Posts: 16
Joined: Fri Aug 03, 2001 8:00 am
Location: Baltimore, MD
Contact:

Post by Saltone »

I prefer long campaigns where you can alter history. I wish there were campaigns going through the whole war for every major nation, based on history, with the possibility of historic change. I would like to see some campaigns with more varied fighting/objectives - haven't seen much urban action so far, although I only just started Stalingrad. The dynamic campaigns seem to be all "hold/take the 3 hills 2/3 of the way across the map"? What happened to strategic cities/buildings/rivers/bridges/etc?

I prefer to compose my own units.

I think the Norway campaign would be great (being Norwegian). Another couple that leap to mind are a Marine campaign for the full war, allowing for invasion of Japan, or Jap campaign going to the West Coast.

Also, a campaign with the Foreign Legion unit would be fun, although they may have stayed in Vichy France during the occupation?

A campaign with Royal Marine Commandos has a lot of potential for varied, high-speed missions. Ops, no RM Commando units! D'oh.
Gen. Maczek
Posts: 70
Joined: Wed May 09, 2001 8:00 am
Location: Tychy, Poland

Post by Gen. Maczek »

Originally posted by A_B:
A lot of people here want Italy from the allied side. Kind of surprises me, as Italy was a very frustrating for the allies - lots of resources for a very slow advance.

Why all the interest? What is the compelling element of a Italy campaign?
The bloody battles ! Also has just about every Allied nation involved in the fighting...
Regards.
Gen. Maczek

[ August 10, 2001: Message edited by: Gen. Maczek ]
A_B
Posts: 248
Joined: Wed Apr 11, 2001 8:00 am
Location: San Jose, CA

Post by A_B »

The dynamic campaigns seem to be all "hold/take the 3 hills 2/3 of the way across the map"? What happened to strategic cities/buildings/rivers/bridges/etc?
I prefer to compose my own units.

I think the Norway campaign would be great (being Norwegian). Another couple that leap to mind are a Marine campaign for the full war, allowing for invasion of Japan, or Jap campaign going to the West Coast.

Also, a campaign with the Foreign Legion unit would be fun
The dynamic campaigns are pretty limited (very limited). Good for beginners to get a feel for things, maybe, but often as not just frustrating, such as when the italians buy 12 battleships of OffMap arty, in march of '43.

Norway would make a good campaign. I think Marine campaign wouldn't be fun - just slogging from Island to Island. Playing the japs would be better. Foreign legion could be good as well (free french of course), working with LeClerk in N. Africa.
Unconventional war requires unconventional thought
mcbradley
Posts: 19
Joined: Fri May 11, 2001 8:00 am
Location: Salt Lake City

Post by mcbradley »

How about some theoretical eastern Pacific campaigns?

How about . . .

. . . a campaign to see how far the Japanese could get into the Aleutians / Alaska? Could they possibly make it to Seattle? Exercise the ol' Molsen-muscle and help the Canadians defend the Great White North, eh?! (with beer in hand, of course!) :D

. . . an island-hopping campaign? I'm not talking MacArthur in the Philipines, but Yamamoto in Hawaii!

. . . a West Coast campaign? Invasion USA, anyone?

Bradley
Air Force Brat (Ret.)
A_B
Posts: 248
Joined: Wed Apr 11, 2001 8:00 am
Location: San Jose, CA

Post by A_B »

. . . a West Coast campaign? Invasion USA, anyone?

Bradley
You know, this would be fun in a perverse sort of way. I live in the bay area of California. What a riot to play some battles around here...'Attack on Anchorage', 'Showdown in Seattle', Bloodbath in Santa Cruz', 'Slaughter in San Jose'.

From what i understand, though, the logistics made all of this a fantasy.
Unconventional war requires unconventional thought
mcbradley
Posts: 19
Joined: Fri May 11, 2001 8:00 am
Location: Salt Lake City

Post by mcbradley »

Oh yea, it would definitely be fantasy! But I wouldn&#8217;t let that detract from the fun. ;) Since I&#8217;m talking fantasy scenarios anyway, I thought of another one after my original post . . . a South American campaign. Axis advance out of their bases in Argentina . . . Conquest of the Falklands, The Rumble in Rio, Siege of Santiago, the Liberation of Lima. Once the Axis conquered S.A., they could start their own island campaign through the Caribbean. Next stop, Miami! :cool:

Bradley
Air Force Brat (Ret.)
Rhodan
Posts: 211
Joined: Sat Feb 24, 2001 10:00 am
Location: Netherlands
Contact:

Post by Rhodan »

I for one would definitely be interested in playing campaigns/operations that do not deal with the (obvious) larger campaigns , like Africa or Normandy, don't get me wrong, I had great fun playing with those...but...

Something with minor nations would be fun, Italy in the Balkan definitely sounds interesting, or a campaign based on a east european ally under german arms at the Russian fronts. Chindits!!! Definitely like to play in Burma. I know there is a sceneario out there done by WBW but I wouldn't mind playing a full campaign based on the actual campaigns as done in Burma

Small scale city fighting would be fun. Did anyone do Caen yet in a mini-campaign?

ok so I am dreaming and hoping :D

[ August 12, 2001: Message edited by: Rhodan ]
Image
Image
Post Reply

Return to “Steel Panthers World At War & Mega Campaigns”