Rob vs. 2ndACR .. Divine intervention needed NIK mod 5.2

Post descriptions of your brilliant successes and unfortunate demises.

Moderators: wdolson, Don Bowen, mogami

User avatar
Rob Brennan UK
Posts: 3685
Joined: Sat Aug 24, 2002 8:36 pm
Location: London UK

RE: Rob vs. 2ndACR .. Divine intervention needed

Post by Rob Brennan UK »

ORIGINAL: KDonovan

I'm also the fan of the Timor defense strategy out of the 4 major DEI defense strategies (the other 3 being Signapore fortress, Java fortress, or Sir robin). So i say go with that. I would try to use as many dutch units your PP's allow though, as there are many units scattered around on those little islands, and the west coast of sumatra. They make good defensive units when concentrated. Then back them up with Aussie units that you can afford to lose. 30th Bde is always good, as its already a SWPAC force. Of course the one bad thing..is that this strategy really works best when you have lots of B17's operating out of Darwin...unfortunately (but rightly so)..they are hard to come by in Nik's mod. Good luck

Thats pretty much my stategy for the DEI .. proiority for PP's is aircraft in the PI .. then the smaller dutch bases and inf units to autralia to rebuild ( i know dutch inf squads are as rare as hens teeth, however the disabled squads will recover and improve the performance by 60% or so.

B25C's have the range to hit timor from darwin or derby .. (just) .. also hudsons are worth keeping for that [;)]

The aussie brigades and a couple of CD's are marching to N aus as we speak. The first brit supply convoy will go to derby to boost supply too. also kendari is a great supply maker you can transport to timor/aus if your able to. Having a few dakotas around help a lot too.

With Niks mod i tend to upgrade some bolos to michells instead of b17's .. and i dont waste the heavies if i can help it.



sorry for the spelling . English is my main language , I just can't type . and i'm too lazy to edit :)
Hipper
Posts: 254
Joined: Mon Jun 14, 2004 10:21 pm

RE: Rob vs. 2ndACR .. Divine intervention needed

Post by Hipper »

Fair enough on the Hermes .. not really in the spirit of the game i suppose. and i dont want them to become huge 72 plane swordfish units ( oh hang on ,, yes i DO !!!! )

Hmm

FAA units operated loads of times from land, the strike that hit the Vitorrio Veno came from crete and strikes from formidable would land on crete during the battle !!

Cheers
"Gefechtwendung nach Steuerbord"
User avatar
Rob Brennan UK
Posts: 3685
Joined: Sat Aug 24, 2002 8:36 pm
Location: London UK

RE: Rob vs. 2ndACR .. Divine intervention needed

Post by Rob Brennan UK »

ORIGINAL: Hipper

Fair enough on the Hermes .. not really in the spirit of the game i suppose. and i dont want them to become huge 72 plane swordfish units ( oh hang on ,, yes i DO !!!! )

Hmm

FAA units operated loads of times from land, the strike that hit the Vitorrio Veno came from crete and strikes from formidable would land on crete during the battle !!

Cheers

yes it is true .. BUT if i do mess up the base squadron size to ?? ( no idea) it may cause game play imbalace . which we both strive to achieve .. i.e i just offered to only make PT's in size 9/10 ports and then escort to the front with an AK .. magically appearing PT's have always pissed me off ( and im an allied player) .

If i knew the groups would stay at size 6 .. yup i'd disembark them .. but i may 'break' a mod add on by doing so . Niks work on the mod does require some self imposed restrictions for realistic play . there is no point in using niks mod and playing totally outside the box ..

anyway thanks hipper .. i appreciate the response and please feel free to continue commenting on my good/daft idea .. welcome [:D]

anyway war wise

16th DEC 1941

bang .. mine bang torp .. nice

AFTER ACTION REPORTS FOR 12/16/41

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Coastal Guns at Kuantan, 24,47, firing at TF 56
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
TF 56 encounters mine field at Kuantan (24,47)

TF 56 troops unloading over beach at Kuantan, 24,47


71 Coastal gun shots fired in defense.
Japanese Ships
AP Shinyo Maru (was a mine hit)

Japanese ground losses:
147 casualties reported

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Sub attack at 27,47

Japanese Ships
AP Kuroshio Maru, Shell hits 6, Torpedo hits 2, on fire, heavy damage

Allied Ships
SS O16
TF 56 encounters mine field at Kuantan (24,47)

TF 56 troops unloading over beach at Kuantan, 24,47


Japanese Ships
AP Shinyo Maru, Mine hits 1, on fire, heavy damage

Coastal Guns at Kuantan, 24,47, firing at TF 56
7 Coastal gun shots fired in defense.
Japanese Ships
AP Tsuruga Maru

Japanese ground losses:
2 casualties reported

------------------------
again allied ASW was great off singapore

Sub attack at 23,51

Japanese Ships
SS I-122, hits 6

Allied Ships
MSW Maryborough, Torpedo hits 1, on fire, heavy damage
MSW Goulburn
MSW Burnie

BUT

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Day Air attack on TF at 23,51

Japanese aircraft
G3M Nell x 9

Japanese aircraft losses
G3M Nell: 1 destroyed, 1 damaged

Allied Ships
MSW Burnie, Torpedo hits 1, on fire, heavy damage HEADING to singers 1 hex
MSW Goulburn, Torpedo hits 2, on fire, heavy damage SINKS

ouch ! ..

also the last AK from operation 'scoop' unloaded in manilla .. i got 2k supply for the loss of about 15 ak's .. not good .. and the last one was walloped

Day Air attack on TF, near Manila at 43,52

Japanese aircraft
A6M2 Zero x 13
B5N Kate x 39

Allied aircraft
P-40E Warhawk x 27

Japanese aircraft losses
A6M2 Zero: 1 destroyed
B5N Kate: 4 destroyed

Allied aircraft losses
P-40E Warhawk: 7 destroyed, 6 damaged

Allied Ships
AK Compagnia Filipinas, Torpedo hits 4, on fire, heavy damage


well at least the kates were carrier based .. so probably good plots dead

also HK fell ! yesterday .. i did get out of legaspi to naga in time though .. naga now holdss 2 PI divs and one US tank battalion .. with 2 BF for support personell.

all available eng units heding to manilla .. the last bastion ..

also vacany hex between naga and manilla will be defended .. my PI div at lamon bay ordered to retire while CD / art and 2 more divs sent here .. i suspect he'll try and land to cut off naga. lets make it difficult :)

thank you all for reading





sorry for the spelling . English is my main language , I just can't type . and i'm too lazy to edit :)
aztez
Posts: 4031
Joined: Sat Feb 26, 2005 9:32 am
Location: Finland

RE: Rob vs. 2ndACR .. Divine intervention needed

Post by aztez »

Hmm.. CVL Hermes at DEI [:D] ...You are going for aggressive style of play again Rob [;)]

It seems overall that you have hold your defensive perimeter so that is good news.

Also, I think it is wise to bolster Manila... It gives you defesive bonus and city hexes can be very troublesome for the Japanese [:)]
User avatar
Rob Brennan UK
Posts: 3685
Joined: Sat Aug 24, 2002 8:36 pm
Location: London UK

RE: Rob vs. 2ndACR .. Divine intervention needed

Post by Rob Brennan UK »

ORIGINAL: aztez

Hmm.. CVL Hermes at DEI [:D] ...You are going for aggressive style of play again Rob [;)]

It seems overall that you have hold your defensive perimeter so that is good news.

Also, I think it is wise to bolster Manila... It gives you defesive bonus and city hexes can be very troublesome for the Japanese [:)]

Thanks for your comments , and yes i do tend to be agressive in the DEI. so many bases are closeby and LRcap can seriously disrupt nell attacks (i.e stops them flying )

I cant believe how fast the gam can go with 1 days turns, so used to 2 i keep feeling we are in january already.

anyway, on with the show

AFTER ACTION REPORTS FOR 12/18/41

TF 12 encounters mine field at Kuantan (24,47)

Japanese Ships
BB Hyuga, Mine hits 1, on fire EXCELLENT


That was bonus ! .. also a real hit as 2ndACR commented about dutch mines [;)]. and regular readers will know i do like my mines [:D]

well good and bad today ..

ASW is still doing well .. and not interupted by nells due to LR cap from batavia.

Sub attack at 21,58

Japanese Ships
SS I-164, hits 2, on fire

Allied Ships
TK Iris
DD Pope
DD Banckert
DD Piet Hein


Kuantan was heavily disruted and a LOT of support troops died

Naval bombardment of Kuantan, at 24,47

Japanese Ships
DD Uranami
DD Hatsuyuki
DD Shirayuki
DD Shirakumo
DD Usugumo
CA Atago
CL Oi
BB Haruna
BB Kongo
BB Ise
BB Yamashiro
BB Fuso


Allied ground losses:
687 casualties reported OUCH
Guns lost 7

Airbase hits 6
Airbase supply hits 1
Runway hits 44
Port hits 3
Port fuel hits 8
Port supply hits 4

My daily sub activity

Sub attack at 33,47

Japanese Ships
AP Ayaha Maru, Torpedo hits 1, on fire

Allied Ships
SS Sturgeon

Japanese ground losses:
39 casualties reported

Excellent a troop ship !

In chins i was trying to train up some I15's with ground attack missions vs nanning .. the I16's on escort were also capping wuchow and a zero fighter sweep hurt

Day Air attack on Wuchow , at 42,39

Japanese aircraft
A6M2 Zero x 25

Allied aircraft
I-16c x 6

No Japanese losses

Allied aircraft losses
I-16c: 3 destroyed

He's coming for Rabaul too . also landings at lunga

Naval bombardment of Rabaul, at 61,88


Allied aircraft
no flights


Allied aircraft losses
Wirraway: 2 destroyed

Japanese Ships
CL Kashima
DD Oboro
DD Kikuzuki
CA Aoba
CA Kako
CA Furutaka
CA Kinugasa


Allied ground losses:
13 casualties reported

Airbase hits 5
Airbase supply hits 6
Runway hits 33
Port hits 1


In ground combat Naga was a picture of perfect defence .. vs 2 full jap divs ( i think the armour made a differance as the PI units are a bit poor). But i need to hold here untill i can get my div back from Lamon bay ( was there to prevent naga being cut off, but now its looking very isolated and very slow to return to the rail line SW. )

Ground combat at Naga

Japanese Deliberate attack

Attacking force 45088 troops, 553 guns, 13 vehicles

Defending force 12399 troops, 109 guns, 67 vehicles

Japanese assault odds: 0 to 1 (fort level 3)


Japanese ground losses:
1454 casualties reported EXCELLENT !
Guns lost 40
Vehicles lost 3

Allied ground losses:
180 casualties reported
Guns lost 11
Vehicles lost 1

North PI is quiet as the grave .. i think he;s trying to take the PI south-north. makes sense as you avoid the river line near san marc and clarke field. BUT manilla is being fortified asap ( damn slow though).

Kuantan was a differant matter , the bombardment and heavr air attacks have left the units virtually useless and the japs just rolled over me ( heavy losses are BAD)

Ground combat at Kuantan

Japanese Deliberate attack

Attacking force 45033 troops, 459 guns, 117 vehicles

Defending force 11696 troops, 53 guns, 0 vehicles

Japanese assault odds: 10 to 1 (fort level 3)

Japanese forces CAPTURE Kuantan base !!!


Japanese ground losses:
226 casualties reported
Guns lost 8

Allied ground losses:
869 casualties reported
Guns lost 24


Defeated Allied Units Retreating!

I was hopeing to hold for one attack at least (fort 3) then pull back to malacca .. now its a rout !

2 bases in the SW pac fall

Ground combat at Talasea

Japanese Shock attack

Attacking force 681 troops, 5 guns, 0 vehicles

Defending force 0 troops, 0 guns, 0 vehicles

Japanese assault odds: 13 to 1 (fort level 0)

Japanese forces CAPTURE Talasea base !!!



--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Ground combat at Kavieng

Japanese Shock attack

Attacking force 719 troops, 6 guns, 0 vehicles

Defending force 0 troops, 0 guns, 0 vehicles

Japanese assault odds: 23 to 1 (fort level 0)

Japanese forces CAPTURE Kavieng base !!!

No suprise there .. but the CL adelaide is lurking and will try for a hit on a transport TF soon.




















Image
Attachments
malaya.jpg
malaya.jpg (97.62 KiB) Viewed 180 times
sorry for the spelling . English is my main language , I just can't type . and i'm too lazy to edit :)
User avatar
U2
Posts: 2009
Joined: Tue Jul 17, 2001 8:00 am
Location: Västerås,Sweden
Contact:

RE: Rob vs. 2ndACR .. Divine intervention needed

Post by U2 »

Hi Rob,

This is Dan from Sweden. I am also playing against your opponent so it is really interesting to follow you AAR. It sort gives me some hints as to what he might do. I am USN and we are in early Jan '42
User avatar
Rob Brennan UK
Posts: 3685
Joined: Sat Aug 24, 2002 8:36 pm
Location: London UK

RE: Rob vs. 2ndACR .. Divine intervention needed

Post by Rob Brennan UK »

Hi Dan .. welocome to my little piece of Witp history [:)]I if i can help you vs ACR i will .. but i dont really want any advice about his playing style ( well un less im losing badly )

AFTER ACTION REPORTS FOR 12/20/41

again its the subs .. heros all !

Sub attack at 27,47

Japanese Ships
AK Argun Maru, Torpedo hits 1, on fire

Allied Ships
SS O16

well not all subs ,, cant stop this !

Naval bombardment of Tarakan, at 33,61 - Coastal Guns Fire Back!


Allied aircraft
no flights


Allied aircraft losses
T.IVa: 1 destroyed

2 Coastal gun shots fired in defense.
Japanese Ships
DD Ariake
DD Wakaba
DD Hatsuharu
DD Shigure
DD Shiratsuyu
CA Nachi
CA Haguro, Shell hits 1
CA Myoko
BB Mutsu
BB Nagato


Allied ground losses:
184 casualties reported
Guns lost 6
Vehicles lost 1

Airbase hits 7
Airbase supply hits 2
Runway hits 31
Port fuel hits 1
Port supply hits 1

duff yankee torps are a pain :_

Sub attack at 29,47

Japanese Ships
AK Brisbane Maru

Allied Ships
SS Stingray

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Sub attack at 47,54

Japanese Ships
AP Zenoa Maru

Allied Ships
SS Swordfish

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
ASW attack at 28,47

Japanese Ships
DD Yugiri
DD Usugumo
DD Shirakumo
DD Oshio

Allied Ships
SS Seal

--------------------

I also switched the bombers in singapore to ground attack so i can get back to malacca

Day Air attack on 18th Division, at 24,47


Allied aircraft
Buffalo I x 9
Blenheim I x 5
Blenheim IV x 3
Hudson I x 6
B-17C Fortress x 5


Allied aircraft losses
Blenheim I: 1 damaged

Japanese ground losses:
29 casualties reported
Guns lost 1

and SHAME

Day Air attack on TF, near Tarakan at 33,61


Allied aircraft
Brewster 339D x 3
T.IVa x 3


Allied aircraft losses
T.IVa: 3 damaged

Japanese Ships
BB Nagato BAH


however the american P40's are gettign better

Day Air attack on TF, near Legaspi at 44,55


Allied aircraft
P-40E Warhawk x 31


Allied aircraft losses
P-40E Warhawk: 1 damaged

Japanese Ships
AP Humburugu Maru, Bomb hits 1
AP Kenshin Maru
AP Komeyama Maru
AP Reiyo Maru
AP Kashu Maru, Bomb hits 3, on fire
AP Tsuiba Maru


Day Air attack on TF, near Legaspi at 44,55


Allied aircraft
P-40E Warhawk x 30


No Allied losses

Japanese Ships
AP Kashu Maru, Bomb hits 2, on fire



go on you SUBS !

Sub attack near Catanduanes at 45,55

Japanese Ships
AP Kaedesan Maru, Torpedo hits 1, on fire

Allied Ships
SS Sealion

Japanese ground losses:
27 casualties reported

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Sub attack at 38,47

Japanese Ships
AP Ryoyo Maru, Torpedo hits 2, on fire, heavy damage

Allied Ships
SS S-36


nice one


piccie of SW pac so far .. adelaida back to lae .. but aussie CA and CL +2DD's heading to lunga









Image
Attachments
TRI9169.jpg
TRI9169.jpg (82.59 KiB) Viewed 180 times
sorry for the spelling . English is my main language , I just can't type . and i'm too lazy to edit :)
User avatar
Rob Brennan UK
Posts: 3685
Joined: Sat Aug 24, 2002 8:36 pm
Location: London UK

RE: Rob vs. 2ndACR .. Divine intervention needed

Post by Rob Brennan UK »

I just noticed doing the turn .. BUT ALL the kuantan units are now isolated .. between kuantan and malacca .. and wont move there becouse of contested hex rules .. BIG/MAJOR whoops .. looks like i messed up malaysia badly after all ..
sorry for the spelling . English is my main language , I just can't type . and i'm too lazy to edit :)
User avatar
Nikademus
Posts: 22517
Joined: Sat May 27, 2000 8:00 am
Location: Alien spacecraft

RE: Rob vs. 2ndACR .. Divine intervention needed

Post by Nikademus »

blame it on the Frog......hang him!!!!!!

[;)]
User avatar
U2
Posts: 2009
Joined: Tue Jul 17, 2001 8:00 am
Location: Västerås,Sweden
Contact:

RE: Rob vs. 2ndACR .. Divine intervention needed

Post by U2 »

ORIGINAL: Rob Brennan UK

Hi Dan .. welocome to my little piece of Witp history [:)]I if i can help you vs ACR i will .. but i dont really want any advice about his playing style ( well un less im losing badly )

[/img]

No help needed [8D] Just reading to understand my opponent better. He is doing some things differently in your game. I'm the testing ground it seems [:)]
User avatar
Rob Brennan UK
Posts: 3685
Joined: Sat Aug 24, 2002 8:36 pm
Location: London UK

RE: Rob vs. 2ndACR .. Divine intervention needed

Post by Rob Brennan UK »

sounds ominous U2 [:D]

Its official Malaysia has gone tits up in a major way ( see piccie).


and japan gets a small measure of revenge vs my subs

AFTER ACTION REPORTS FOR 12/21/41

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
ASW attack at 28,47

Japanese Ships
DD Yugiri
DD Shirakumo
DD Usugumo
DD Oshio

Allied Ships
SS S-38, hits 1


RAF switched to hit ground forces at malacca..

Day Air attack on 5th Division, at 22,47


Allied aircraft
Buffalo I x 15
Blenheim I x 5
Blenheim IV x 7
Hudson I x 14
B-17C Fortress x 8


No Allied losses

Japanese ground losses:
54 casualties reported
Guns lost 2

not enough unfortunately

Ground combat at Malacca

Allied Deliberate attack

Attacking force 8797 troops, 81 guns, 0 vehicles

Defending force 28361 troops, 307 guns, 6 vehicles

Allied assault odds: 0 to 1


Japanese ground losses:
69 casualties reported
Guns lost 6

Allied ground losses:
171 casualties reported
Guns lost 11

The REALLY annoying thing is that i have managed to get 6000 oil and over 25k supply into singapore by now ( single ships from india all made it and there are more arriving soon)

ASW featured heavily this turn too

Sub attack at 46,45

Japanese Ships
APD APD-34 hit with a dud torp ( again)
APD APD-36
APD APD-33
APD APD-32

Allied Ships
SS Perch, hits 10, on fire, heavy damage V BAD

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
ASW attack at 121,62

Japanese Ships
SS I-4, hits 7

Allied Ships
DD Downes
DD Reid
DD Conyngham
DD Cummings
DD Jarvis



and warhawks out of manilla arent getting much better despite a lot of practise

Day Air attack on TF, near Legaspi at 44,55


Allied aircraft
P-40E Warhawk x 27


No Allied losses

Japanese Ships
AP Saipan Maru
AP Nichiryo Maru

Sub attack at 46,54

Japanese Ships
AP Kashu Maru, Torpedo hits 1, on fire, heavy damage SUNK

Allied Ships
SS Sealion

an AP a day keeps the japs away [;)]

Image
Attachments
mayalybad.jpg
mayalybad.jpg (101.39 KiB) Viewed 180 times
sorry for the spelling . English is my main language , I just can't type . and i'm too lazy to edit :)
User avatar
Rob Brennan UK
Posts: 3685
Joined: Sat Aug 24, 2002 8:36 pm
Location: London UK

RE: Rob vs. 2ndACR .. Divine intervention needed

Post by Rob Brennan UK »

22nd DEC 1941


It just keeps getting worse ! .. KB sank 2 DD's heading back to USA .. so its still lurking .. all merchant tf's ordered back to america .. I had one to PH .. onr to Pago - Sydney and another supply/oil convoy - Sydney .. all turning round and heading home ( do not unload ).

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Day Air attack on TF at 128,58

Japanese aircraft
A6M2 Zero x 13
D3A Val x 22
B5N Kate x 24

Japanese aircraft losses
D3A Val: 5 damaged
B5N Kate: 10 damaged

Allied Ships
DD Reid, Bomb hits 6, on fire, heavy damage
DD Downes, Torpedo hits 2, on fire, heavy damage
DD Conyngham, Bomb hits 2, on fire
DD Cummings, Bomb hits 1, on fire
DD Jarvis




ASW attack at 27,46

Japanese Ships
DD Shirayuki
DD Fubuki
DD Akatsuki
DD Arashio
DD Asashio

Allied Ships
SS Sturgeon, hits 4, on fire BAD !!!


Just about my high point

TF 99 encounters mine field at Wake Island (82,63)

Japanese Ships
AP Kansan Maru, Mine hits 1, on fire

Japanese ground losses:
34 casualties reported

Japs also hit the empty AK's heading back to india .. lost all 3 to multiple nell and sumbarine attacks .. oh well at least they delivered the supply.

E.G

Day Air attack on TF at 25,37

Japanese aircraft
A6M2 Zero x 13
G3M Nell x 13
Ki-30 Ann x 19

No Japanese losses

Allied Ships
AK Washingtonian, Bomb hits 12, Torpedo hits 3, on fire, heavy damage BITS of this AK raining down at rangoon !


RAF continues to try and disrupt the japs at malacca , giving me time to run from ventral malaya ( if i die here big OOPS .. no possiblity of getting cadres out ) may well make India vulnerable in the future.

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Day Air attack on 5th Division, at 22,47


Allied aircraft
Blenheim I x 7


Allied aircraft losses
Blenheim I: 1 damaged

Japanese ground losses:
26 casualties reported
Guns lost 2

Aircraft Attacking:
7 x Blenheim I bombing at 6000 feet
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Day Air attack on 5th Division, at 22,47


Allied aircraft
Buffalo I x 16
Blenheim I x 5
Blenheim IV x 8
Hudson I x 12
B-17C Fortress x 10


No Allied losses

Japanese ground losses:
43 casualties reported
Guns lost 1

Japs bombarded me here .. minor losses BUT all allied inf listed at 0 assault strenght .. oh dear oh dear oh dear..

Jolo fell today too .. BUT Rabaul managed to fend off the SS detachment quite well ( suprisingly)

Ground combat at Rabaul

Japanese Deliberate attack

Attacking force 7040 troops, 81 guns, 0 vehicles

Defending force 3797 troops, 38 guns, 3 vehicles

Japanese assault odds: 0 to 1 (fort level 3)


Japanese ground losses:
268 casualties reported
Guns lost 11

Allied ground losses:
25 casualties reported

In the PI .. Naga me 3 PI divs + 1 tank units
Japan 3 Divs 1 arm unit 1 ind. Arty

Dont think i can last long .. if i reinforce i run the risk of getting cut off (again) .. He's too good for me to try that. fingers crossed survive another attack and withdraw to manilla after ive evacuated from Lamon bay ( seperate issue .. the inf here were 30 miles out of hex .. jap landed an NFL .. got butchered landing but then it disapeared ???? and now im stuck back at O miles moved ! GRRRRRR .. at about 2 miles a day i fear im doomed here. ).


2nd ACR is a very very good player .. else im a dumass [;)]. Oddly enough i never realised how much i controlled the pace of the game as allies before .. all forward plans worked and wihdrawls were planned and co-ordinated ( usually).. this game is very very differant .. I just don't feel secure at all.

so praise to ACR [&o] [&o]

piccie from pacific .. showing KB





Image
Attachments
kb.jpg
kb.jpg (66.31 KiB) Viewed 180 times
sorry for the spelling . English is my main language , I just can't type . and i'm too lazy to edit :)
User avatar
U2
Posts: 2009
Joined: Tue Jul 17, 2001 8:00 am
Location: Västerås,Sweden
Contact:

RE: Rob vs. 2ndACR .. Divine intervention needed

Post by U2 »

He is not using the KB that way in our game. In fact I have not seen it since early December when he stroke Manilla. I have a feeling it will pop up sooner or later though [:(] Next time could you show a pic of the Philippines?
User avatar
Rob Brennan UK
Posts: 3685
Joined: Sat Aug 24, 2002 8:36 pm
Location: London UK

RE: Rob vs. 2ndACR .. Divine intervention needed

Post by Rob Brennan UK »

will do U2.. looks quiet in the north and lots in the south. Also my subs are running riot ( when the torps work .. BAH ) . hit 3 APD's so far .. all duds !
sorry for the spelling . English is my main language , I just can't type . and i'm too lazy to edit :)
User avatar
KDonovan
Posts: 1157
Joined: Sun Sep 25, 2005 12:52 am
Location: New Jersey

RE: Rob vs. 2ndACR .. Divine intervention needed

Post by KDonovan »

with his carriers pre-occupied in b/t PH and WC...any plans for you CV's??...hows Rabual doing....is he committing an invasion there you can pound....or how about the Gilberts??

Or maybe you can sneak your CV's along the northern coast of NG and disrupt some shipping there...i saw that done in one AAR..with good results...

anyways good luck...sounds like you have one hell of a challenge

PS....i wouldn't worry about those cut off troops in Malaya...sometimes troops stuck in the jungles can take weeks to surrender causing players headaches.
Image
User avatar
Rob Brennan UK
Posts: 3685
Joined: Sat Aug 24, 2002 8:36 pm
Location: London UK

RE: Rob vs. 2ndACR .. Divine intervention needed

Post by Rob Brennan UK »

ORIGINAL: KDonovan

with his carriers pre-occupied in b/t PH and WC...any plans for you CV's??...hows Rabual doing....is he committing an invasion there you can pound....or how about the Gilberts??

Or maybe you can sneak your CV's along the northern coast of NG and disrupt some shipping there...i saw that done in one AAR..with good results...

anyways good luck...sounds like you have one hell of a challenge

PS....i wouldn't worry about those cut off troops in Malaya...sometimes troops stuck in the jungles can take weeks to surrender causing players headaches.

Well i have 2 US Cv's at suva .. and the CL adelaide at Lae .. also aussie CA'CL and 2 dd's raiding lunga.. withough rabaul im happy operating SC tf's. and i think he knows it .. no jap shipping seen for quite a few turns ..

Mayala confuses me .. my troops stuck between kuantan and malacca .. ok i cant move to malacca i know that BUT .. i also cant seem to move south ??? all units resetting to zero move every day even though im moving to an allied hex ( i checked using the W key) .. anyone any ideas ?? its about 1/2 my combat forces in malaysia so i am naturally concerned.

one other think CVL hermes and BB resolution ?? .. heading to derby .. tjiljap was too exposed .. although force Z is still in batavia ..
sorry for the spelling . English is my main language , I just can't type . and i'm too lazy to edit :)
User avatar
Rob Brennan UK
Posts: 3685
Joined: Sat Aug 24, 2002 8:36 pm
Location: London UK

RE: Rob vs. 2ndACR .. Divine intervention needed

Post by Rob Brennan UK »

PI on request



Image


Known facts

1) nells/betty operating from davao

2) weak japanese in the north, he has stated that he hates rivers.

3) Jolo just taken and no BF here yet i believe.

4) main thrust seems to be from the legaspi area. Naga held today (just).

5) to help/prevent a landing north of naga .. all available arty and CD + 1 arm
+2 inf units holding between naga and manilla.

6) im stuck in lamon bay ! stupid movement rules.

Attachments
Pi.jpg
Pi.jpg (155.67 KiB) Viewed 180 times
sorry for the spelling . English is my main language , I just can't type . and i'm too lazy to edit :)
User avatar
Rob Brennan UK
Posts: 3685
Joined: Sat Aug 24, 2002 8:36 pm
Location: London UK

RE: Rob vs. 2ndACR .. Divine intervention needed

Post by Rob Brennan UK »

Well christmas day 1941 ..

another sub attack succesful

Sub attack at 46,51

Japanese Ships
AP Hokutatsu Maru, Shell hits 4, Torpedo hits 1, on fire

Allied Ships
SS Snapper

the wildbeest were getting bored with no shipping close by .. so started a bombing of the port at kuantan. did rather well imo

Day Air attack on Kuantan , at 24,47


Allied aircraft
Wirraway x 4
Vildebeest IV x 21


No Allied losses

Port fuel hits 2
Port supply hits 1


slowly chipping away at jap AP's

Day Air attack on TF at 41,67


Allied aircraft
Hudson I x 5


No Allied losses

Japanese Ships
AP Sumanoura Maru
AP Shikano Maru, Bomb hits 1

The fleet returned to rabaul after the SS det failed the other day.

Naval bombardment of Rabaul, at 61,88

Japanese Ships
DD Kikuzuki
DD Oboro
CL Kashima
CA Kako
CA Furutaka
CA Kinugasa
CA Aoba


Allied ground losses:
124 casualties reported
Guns lost 1
Vehicles lost 2

Airbase hits 1
Runway hits 8
Port hits 3


no other jap shipping seen round here at all .. allied surface units prowl about though.

Ground combat at Naga

Japanese Deliberate attack

Attacking force 68449 troops, 779 guns, 164 vehicles

Defending force 16221 troops, 133 guns, 72 vehicles

Japanese engineers reduce fortifications to 2

Japanese assault odds: 1 to 1 (fort level 2)

Japanese Assault reduces fortifications to 2


Japanese ground losses:
1207 casualties reported
Guns lost 35
Vehicles lost 6

Allied ground losses:
423 casualties reported
Guns lost 13
Vehicles lost 3

GREAT news .. one more stay .. then bug out .. unless he brings in new troops. then bug out asap

In burma .. the indians guarding the river crossign east of moulmein battered out of the woods by the imp div and help.

Ground combat at 31,34

Japanese Shock attack

Attacking force 26132 troops, 314 guns, 87 vehicles

Defending force 2677 troops, 29 guns, 0 vehicles

Japanese assault odds: 14 to 1


Japanese ground losses:
190 casualties reported
Guns lost 5

Allied ground losses:
178 casualties reported
Guns lost 8


Defeated Allied Units Retreating!


time to leave moulmein and rabaul ..



Image
Attachments
MB.jpg
MB.jpg (196.83 KiB) Viewed 180 times
sorry for the spelling . English is my main language , I just can't type . and i'm too lazy to edit :)
aztez
Posts: 4031
Joined: Sat Feb 26, 2005 9:32 am
Location: Finland

RE: Rob vs. 2ndACR .. Divine intervention needed

Post by aztez »

I hate say this but a I have a bad feeling about Malaya and Philippines situation [:(]

The Legaspi route seems much wiser and less time consuming than via Northern PHI... and that means he will be in Manila soon. (That is one decent place to make a stand and it would be shame to loose it early)

In Malaya he is moving fast too. What kind of troops are cut off? Are these those infantry units from Northern Malaya or just engineer units? Hopefully, only engineers since if he can isolate those infantry units than I think Singapore is in trouble!! [:-]
User avatar
Rob Brennan UK
Posts: 3685
Joined: Sat Aug 24, 2002 8:36 pm
Location: London UK

RE: Rob vs. 2ndACR .. Divine intervention needed

Post by Rob Brennan UK »

ORIGINAL: aztez

I hate say this but a I have a bad feeling about Malaya and Philippines situation [:(]

The Legaspi route seems much wiser and less time consuming than via Northern PHI... and that means he will be in Manila soon. (That is one decent place to make a stand and it would be shame to loose it early)

In Malaya he is moving fast too. What kind of troops are cut off? Are these those infantry units from Northern Malaya or just engineer units? Hopefully, only engineers since if he can isolate those infantry units than I think Singapore is in trouble!! [:-]


Very bad feeling about Malaysia myself .. troops cut off are 4 inf brigades 1 AA and several base forces ( so a LOT ) .. i've sent up the last available bde to malacca ( i need 1/base to prevent paras) and decided to withdraw from <??> place NE of singers .. flown the wildebest to palambang.

also set movement orders for the cut off units to singapore ( maybe targetting a city will help) as all other orders are cancelled ??? daily.

PI is ?OK compared to malaya .. 4th USMC to bolster Naga vs one more attack ( he has no more troops in legaspi to send up). i may be able to hold here for a while at least.

i also may end up getting shafted on the burma/thai border.. so withdraw is the order of the day. I am getting comprehensively out manouvered. probably because

1) i was too agressive in malaysia .. should not have tried to hold kuantan.

2) my other games havn't even been like this so i am unprepared for his style of play.

3) I suck [;)] [;)]
sorry for the spelling . English is my main language , I just can't type . and i'm too lazy to edit :)
Post Reply

Return to “After Action Reports”