Once Again into the Breach - Mike (J) vs. tc464 (A)

Post descriptions of your brilliant victories and unfortunate defeats here.

Moderators: wdolson, MOD_War-in-the-Pacific-Admirals-Edition

User avatar
obvert
Posts: 14051
Joined: Mon Jan 17, 2011 11:18 am
Location: PDX (and now) London, UK

RE: Once Again into the Breech - Mike (J) vs. tc464 (A)

Post by obvert »

Good question. I just know I can't do anything with those. Whereas the [R} can be bought out, right?
"Success is the ability to go from one failure to another with no loss of enthusiasm." - Winston Churchill
User avatar
ny59giants
Posts: 9902
Joined: Mon Jan 10, 2005 12:02 pm

RE: Once Again into the Breech - Mike (J) vs. tc464 (A)

Post by ny59giants »

For us that are very, very, very reliant on Tracker. [;)]
The Kate will show up next time when a factory starts to expand and repair.

Image
Attachments
AirframesScen1.jpg
AirframesScen1.jpg (408.63 KiB) Viewed 1987 times
[center]Image[/center]
User avatar
Mike Solli
Posts: 16336
Joined: Wed Oct 18, 2000 8:00 am
Location: the flight deck of the Zuikaku

RE: Once Again into the Breech - Mike (J) vs. tc464 (A)

Post by Mike Solli »

*Shrug* I haven't tried. Just curious.
Image
Created by the amazing Dixie
User avatar
ny59giants
Posts: 9902
Joined: Mon Jan 10, 2005 12:02 pm

RE: Once Again into the Breech - Mike (J) vs. tc464 (A)

Post by ny59giants »

Engine planning via Tracker

Image
Attachments
EnginesScen1.jpg
EnginesScen1.jpg (488.32 KiB) Viewed 1971 times
[center]Image[/center]
hkbhsi
Posts: 96
Joined: Sun Apr 22, 2007 12:58 pm
Location: Rome, Italy

RE: Once Again into the Breech - Mike (J) vs. tc464 (A)

Post by hkbhsi »

ORIGINAL: Mike Solli

ORIGINAL: Chickenboy

ORIGINAL: Mike Solli




I totally agree with you Rob. I'm not even going to look at R&D with the possible exception of increasing the A6M3 research. I want to build 60 and am considering converting one of my A6M2 factories when the M3 arrives so I'll probably increase my M3 R&D somewhat. I'll probably also look at the Helen to figure that one out too. I'll worry about R&D later.
Mike: A6M3 or A6M3a research? The former is a 'dead ender', the latter the progenitor of later A6 models. Just sayin...

What?! I thought the A6M3 was in the A6 upgrade path! [X(] Well, that changes things. [:D]


The A6M3 does upgrade to the A6M3a while the A6M2 upgrades to the Sen Baku fighter bomber
User avatar
Mike Solli
Posts: 16336
Joined: Wed Oct 18, 2000 8:00 am
Location: the flight deck of the Zuikaku

RE: Once Again into the Breech - Mike (J) vs. tc464 (A)

Post by Mike Solli »

ORIGINAL: hkbhsi

ORIGINAL: Mike Solli

ORIGINAL: Chickenboy



Mike: A6M3 or A6M3a research? The former is a 'dead ender', the latter the progenitor of later A6 models. Just sayin...

What?! I thought the A6M3 was in the A6 upgrade path! [X(] Well, that changes things. [:D]


The A6M3 does upgrade to the A6M3a while the A6M2 upgrades to the Sen Baku fighter bomber

That's what I thought. [:D]
Image
Created by the amazing Dixie
User avatar
PaxMondo
Posts: 10846
Joined: Fri Jun 06, 2008 3:23 pm

RE: Once Again into the Breech - Mike (J) vs. tc464 (A)

Post by PaxMondo »

ORIGINAL: Mike Solli

ORIGINAL: Chickenboy

ORIGINAL: Mike Solli




I totally agree with you Rob. I'm not even going to look at R&D with the possible exception of increasing the A6M3 research. I want to build 60 and am considering converting one of my A6M2 factories when the M3 arrives so I'll probably increase my M3 R&D somewhat. I'll probably also look at the Helen to figure that one out too. I'll worry about R&D later.
Mike: A6M3 or A6M3a research? The former is a 'dead ender', the latter the progenitor of later A6 models. Just sayin...

What?! I thought the A6M3 was in the A6 upgrade path! [X(] Well, that changes things. [:D]
Ok, from the editor for Scen 1, here is the upgrade path:

A6M3 -> A6M3a -> A6M5 -> A6M5b -> A6M5c -> A6M8

Pax
User avatar
PaxMondo
Posts: 10846
Joined: Fri Jun 06, 2008 3:23 pm

RE: Once Again into the Breech - Mike (J) vs. tc464 (A)

Post by PaxMondo »

[R] - permanent restrict
(R) - temp restrict
[S] - static
Pax
User avatar
Chickenboy
Posts: 24648
Joined: Fri Jun 28, 2002 11:30 pm
Location: San Antonio, TX

RE: Once Again into the Breech - Mike (J) vs. tc464 (A)

Post by Chickenboy »

ORIGINAL: hkbhsi

The A6M3 does upgrade to the A6M3a while the A6M2 upgrades to the Sen Baku fighter bomber
You're right...sorry for the false information, guys. That's what I get for relying on my so-called 'memory' whilest posting from work. [:D]
Image
User avatar
PaxMondo
Posts: 10846
Joined: Fri Jun 06, 2008 3:23 pm

RE: Once Again into the Breech - Mike (J) vs. tc464 (A)

Post by PaxMondo »

ORIGINAL: Chickenboy
You're right...sorry for the false information, guys. That's what I get for relying on my so-called 'memory' whilest posting from work. [:D]

NP. I'll send you the bill for my cardiac meds. [:D]

Or, you can stop by and we can hoist a few schooners!!!



PS: The Major might have you doing some close order drill though! Hut HUT Hut!!!
Pax
User avatar
Chickenboy
Posts: 24648
Joined: Fri Jun 28, 2002 11:30 pm
Location: San Antonio, TX

RE: Once Again into the Breech - Mike (J) vs. tc464 (A)

Post by Chickenboy »

ORIGINAL: PaxMondo
Or, you can stop by and we can hoist a few schooners!!!

Sounds good! Will your friend (points to avatar) be there too? [:D]
Image
User avatar
PaxMondo
Posts: 10846
Joined: Fri Jun 06, 2008 3:23 pm

RE: Once Again into the Breech - Mike (J) vs. tc464 (A)

Post by PaxMondo »

possible, but she is a cheap drunk ... about a 1/4 glass max. [:D]
Pax
User avatar
Mike Solli
Posts: 16336
Joined: Wed Oct 18, 2000 8:00 am
Location: the flight deck of the Zuikaku

RE: Once Again into the Breech - Mike (J) vs. tc464 (A)

Post by Mike Solli »

Hell, I'm too old for that stuff, Pax.

I got some easy stuff out of the way.

Armament Factories: I bumped them up from 620 to 650. Three factories increased 10 each.

Vehicle Factories: I increased 5 of the 6 by 6 each to bring them from 72 to 102. They'll need more but I'll do it a little at a time. The 6th factory was in a town that had little supply.

Repair Shipyards: Only Hiroshima has a 100 pt repair shipyard. I increased Yokohama, Nagasaki and Kobe each by 10 bringing them up to 100. In addition, I doubled Osaka from 25 to 50. That's my major merchant ship base and I like to have it available for repairs and upgrades.

Naval Shipyards: This is something new for me that I have been thinking about for years. I decided to increase the naval shipyards from the starting 1384 to 1500. That 116 will allow me to accelerate a CV and ~5 DDs, or just about 2 CVs. It's something new I'm trying.

In addition, I finally decided what I wanted to do with my Zeros in the pool. I opted to upgrade Hosho's fighters to Zeros. Her complement is now 14 A6M2s and 6 B5N1s. Since there are only a dozen Zeros left in the pool, I can't do any more with carrier daitai. I resized the Ryujo to 30 fighters and 18 TBs. She now has 28 of 30 A5M4s and 18 of 18 B5N1s.

I will probably upgrade the Kawai Det (9 A5M4s) in the 21 Air Flotilla to Zeros using up most of my remaining pool.
Image
Created by the amazing Dixie
User avatar
Mike Solli
Posts: 16336
Joined: Wed Oct 18, 2000 8:00 am
Location: the flight deck of the Zuikaku

RE: Once Again into the Breech - Mike (J) vs. tc464 (A)

Post by Mike Solli »

Something interesting I learned. In order to resize the Ryuho air groups, I moved her to a new Air TF. When I did that, the old one (TF 3) became a surface TF. That TF has a * so it is one of the magic move TFs. I resized the Ryujo and found I couldn't move her back into TF 3. I changed TF 3 to an escort TF and moved her in, then changed it back to an Air TF. Problem solved. But, it got me to thinking. Since I can move ships into and out of that TF, I can essentially make it whatever kind of TF I want. Invasion TF? Not sure I'd do that because I'd have to move loaded ships into it in order to do that. I'll probably leave it the way it is because that smells of gaminess. Just a thought.....
Image
Created by the amazing Dixie
User avatar
Mike Solli
Posts: 16336
Joined: Wed Oct 18, 2000 8:00 am
Location: the flight deck of the Zuikaku

RE: Once Again into the Breech - Mike (J) vs. tc464 (A)

Post by Mike Solli »

Some thoughts on using TF 3. In the past I have always sent it toward Jolo to go after enemy merchant shipping fleeing that way. I'm thinking of sending it to the north side of the Philippines this time around. Maybe the 2 BBs can head south of the Philippines this time to take care of Houston and Boise. The Hosho and Zuiho will team up with Ryujo giving them 14 A6M2s, 46 A5M4s and 36 B5N1s. That should be able to take care of Force Z should it be stupid enough to hang around. Thoughts?
Image
Created by the amazing Dixie
User avatar
PaxMondo
Posts: 10846
Joined: Fri Jun 06, 2008 3:23 pm

RE: Once Again into the Breech - Mike (J) vs. tc464 (A)

Post by PaxMondo »

ORIGINAL: Mike Solli

Something interesting I learned. In order to resize the Ryuho air groups, I moved her to a new Air TF. When I did that, the old one (TF 3) became a surface TF. That TF has a * so it is one of the magic move TFs. I resized the Ryujo and found I couldn't move her back into TF 3. I changed TF 3 to an escort TF and moved her in, then changed it back to an Air TF. Problem solved. But, it got me to thinking. Since I can move ships into and out of that TF, I can essentially make it whatever kind of TF I want. Invasion TF? Not sure I'd do that because I'd have to move loaded ships into it in order to do that. I'll probably leave it the way it is because that smells of gaminess. Just a thought.....
Yep, you can move ships around and adjust your TF's. In particular the "*" magic move ones. I don't consider it gamey. First off, you can't add any more troops. So, you can change destinations and escorts but thats about it. For the Ryuho, either you make another small amphib unit or leave it as an Air Combat. The Ryuho can't be in an amphib TF. I usually choose the Air TF (orig starting TF) as I want her up around Luzon to help close the door on the fleeing ships from Manila.
Pax
User avatar
Mike Solli
Posts: 16336
Joined: Wed Oct 18, 2000 8:00 am
Location: the flight deck of the Zuikaku

RE: Once Again into the Breech - Mike (J) vs. tc464 (A)

Post by Mike Solli »

Yeah, if I did switch out ships to make it an invasion TF, I would create another Air TF for Ryujo. I probably won't do that. Anyway, you got me wondering how you get Ryujo to the Philippines. Where exactly? The west side off Manila? Also, how do you get there. To you go directly there or do you loop around from the east then north of the Philippines? Going directly there has always gotten me into trouble. I usually end up with some US cruiser taking pot shots at her.
Image
Created by the amazing Dixie
User avatar
PaxMondo
Posts: 10846
Joined: Fri Jun 06, 2008 3:23 pm

RE: Once Again into the Breech - Mike (J) vs. tc464 (A)

Post by PaxMondo »

ORIGINAL: Mike Solli

Yeah, if I did switch out ships to make it an invasion TF, I would create another Air TF for Ryujo. I probably won't do that. Anyway, you got me wondering how you get Ryujo to the Philippines. Where exactly? The west side off Manila? Also, how do you get there. To you go directly there or do you loop around from the east then north of the Philippines? Going directly there has always gotten me into trouble. I usually end up with some US cruiser taking pot shots at her.
I just put her on the SE side. Kates have good range, I restrict them so they won't get too close to Manila AF's and the CAP there. Players rarely ever CAP the fleeing ships, so intercepts are rare. Even if I don't hit any, the search "lights" them up for my surface forces which are on the west side who can then close and get them in a surface action.

I've got Nettties at Samah and Taiwan to "light" up all the West and North of Manila and also flee-ers from HK as well.

If the player shifts some of his fighters south, I'm good with that too. Then I can't hit the ships so easily, but he's gonna leave his 4E's exposed. I'd actually rather get the 4E's if I can before he can PP them out ... more dangerous than some piddly xAKL's ....

Once in a while you can get lucky on either the Houston or Boise too ... did I mention how much I HATE the Boise? [:D]
Pax
User avatar
Mike Solli
Posts: 16336
Joined: Wed Oct 18, 2000 8:00 am
Location: the flight deck of the Zuikaku

RE: Once Again into the Breech - Mike (J) vs. tc464 (A)

Post by Mike Solli »

Yeah, I hate the Boise too. I figure it's a decisive victory if the Boise goes down. [:D]

The SE side, I like it. That keeps the Ryujo out of trouble from US cruisers. Once the Hosho arrives, then the Zeros can escort the Kates easily.

I'm thinking of breaking down Ryujo's Kates into chutai. That would be 3x 6 plane chutai. Then I can assign 2 to bombs and 1 to torpedoes. The Ryujo is blessed with 27 torpedoes so they would last a while.
Image
Created by the amazing Dixie
User avatar
Mike Solli
Posts: 16336
Joined: Wed Oct 18, 2000 8:00 am
Location: the flight deck of the Zuikaku

RE: Once Again into the Breech - Mike (J) vs. tc464 (A)

Post by Mike Solli »

Another thought. There are basically few to no pilots in reserve, especially for the IJAAF. Some of the sentai are over strength, and some of those are very over strength. I'm thinking of pulling some of the excess planes and pilots into the reserve and allocating them to units that are under strength. Basically, there will be no change to the over all air strength, but instead of being in reserve, they will fly. It will allow more planes to fly each turn early on. The problem is that it's going to be awhile before the on map training starts producing a significant number of pilots. Thoughts?
Image
Created by the amazing Dixie
Post Reply

Return to “After Action Reports”