Rob V miller . Allied game vs. Miller41

Post descriptions of your brilliant successes and unfortunate demises.

Moderators: wdolson, Don Bowen, mogami

User avatar
Rob Brennan UK
Posts: 3685
Joined: Sat Aug 24, 2002 8:36 pm
Location: London UK

RE: Rob Vs Miller .. allied perspective NIK MOD 4.2

Post by Rob Brennan UK »

next turn ..

and the ambush worked rather well . even though it only happened on the second day. and the hurricanes didnt fly for some odd reason.

Day Air attack on 74th Chinese Corps, at 49,27

Japanese aircraft
Ki-43-Ib Oscar x 79
Ki-51 Sonia x 52
Ki-15 Babs x 2

Allied aircraft
P-39D Airacobra x 5
P-40B Tomahawk x 21
P-40E Warhawk x 8

Japanese aircraft losses
Ki-43-Ib Oscar: 24 destroyed, 8 damaged
Ki-51 Sonia: 12 destroyed, 18 damaged



Allied ground losses:
21 casualties reported

Aircraft Attacking:
16 x Ki-51 Sonia bombing at 2000 feet
7 x Ki-51 Sonia bombing at 2000 feet
8 x Ki-51 Sonia bombing at 2000 feet

All helps ! ..

Also failed to dislodge the japs from around Lashio .. damn

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Ground combat at Lashio

Allied Deliberate attack

Attacking force 3699 troops, 36 guns, 0 vehicles

Defending force 4710 troops, 43 guns, 0 vehicles

Allied assault odds: 0 to 1


Japanese ground losses:
112 casualties reported
Guns lost 4

Allied ground losses:
78 casualties reported
Guns lost 4

Good Solid hit on the embattled japanese in burma

Day Air attack on 33rd/A Division, at 35,30


Allied aircraft
Blenheim IV x 46
Wellington III x 13
B-25C Mitchell x 42


No Allied losses

Japanese ground losses:
159 casualties reported
Guns lost 7

deliberate assault sent in next turn .. hopefully i will knock it into a useless jungle hex.

here is a piccie of whats lurking on Baker .. the AA will be phenominal !



Image
Attachments
Baker.jpg
Baker.jpg (169.35 KiB) Viewed 249 times
sorry for the spelling . English is my main language , I just can't type . and i'm too lazy to edit :)
User avatar
Rob Brennan UK
Posts: 3685
Joined: Sat Aug 24, 2002 8:36 pm
Location: London UK

RE: Rob Vs Miller .. allied perspective NIK MOD 4.2

Post by Rob Brennan UK »

3rd turn in one day .. cool PHILIPINES FALLS TO IMPERIALIST INVADERS

AFTER ACTION REPORTS FOR 04/24/42

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
TF 63 troops unloading over beach at Tenimbar, 36,81


Japanese ground losses:
13 casualties reported

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
ASW attack at 27,53

Japanese Ships
MSW Ranzan Maru
MSW W.6
MSW W.5
MSW W.4
MSW W.3

Allied Ships
SS S-37

Many japanese submarine invasion in the southern most DEI islands and Dili in Timor ,, unfortunately for the japs Dili has a gassison of 100% prepped aussies .. albeit only lark force [;)]

piccie will reveal the deal at the end of the post EDIT .. no it wont [:@]EDIT

Coastal Guns at Dili, 31,77, firing at TF 101
TF 101 troops unloading over beach at Dili, 31,77


Japanese ground losses:
179 casualties reported


Poor old S-37 got attacked 4 times in 2 days .. minimal damage from near misses (sys 20)

Japan also attacked singapore form lowish level .. 14K .. the supplt hits really hurt .. down to 7k supply and in the orange now. although almost all units have no disablements right now ( im not taking on reinforcements but the disablements are repairing so fast )

Day Air attack on Singapore , at 23,50

Japanese aircraft
Ki-43-Ib Oscar x 23
Ki-21 Sally x 62
Ki-49 Helen x 80

Japanese aircraft losses
Ki-21 Sally: 3 destroyed, 28 damaged
Ki-49 Helen: 8 destroyed, 42 damaged


Allied ground losses:
167 casualties reported
Guns lost 2
Vehicles lost 1

Port hits 18
Port fuel hits 1
Port supply hits 3

AA was a bit brutal mind you .. and this is only one dedicated AA battery and base forces .. the 4 AA on Baker should be awesome.

Chinese units are still hitting the japs west of ichang in readienes for yet another attack .. 4 days time i expect as one more corp is coming in tomorrow.

Day Air attack on 40th Division, at 46,33


Allied aircraft
IL-4c x 6
SB-2c x 30


No Allied losses

Japanese ground losses:
75 casualties reported
Guns lost 1

This was repeated about 5 times in 4 days ( attacks from chungking and Sian)

Again the RAF did good on the lone jap in burma

Day Air attack on 33rd/C Division, at 32,29


Allied aircraft
Buffalo I x 10
Hurricane II x 5
Blenheim I x 12
Blenheim IV x 40
Wellington III x 15
B-25C Mitchell x 40


No Allied losses

Japanese ground losses:
149 casualties reported
Guns lost 4

and the PI fianlly falls

Ground combat at San Marcelino

Japanese Shock attack

Attacking force 159532 troops, 976 guns, 518 vehicles

Defending force 19553 troops, 29 guns, 64 vehicles

Japanese engineers reduce fortifications to 1

Japanese assault odds: 8 to 1 (fort level 1)

Japanese forces CAPTURE San Marcelino base !!!


Japanese ground losses:
3483 casualties reported
Guns lost 62
Vehicles lost 11

Allied ground losses:
38168 casualties reported
Guns lost 56
Vehicles lost 39

still got some good kills from my perspective .. shock attack was a waste imo.

Yenen was again the target of another failed jap attack

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Ground combat at Yenen

Japanese Deliberate attack

Attacking force 125100 troops, 838 guns, 2 vehicles

Defending force 61277 troops, 376 guns, 0 vehicles

Japanese assault odds: 0 to 1 (fort level 7)


Japanese ground losses:
5152 casualties reported
Guns lost 107

Allied ground losses:
883 casualties reported
Guns lost 18


--------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Great .. i also closely had a look at supply in china .. looks fine and both ichang and yenen are ordered to rebuild the lost fort levels. both cities now fine with supply.

The british also kicked out the japanese in burma ( hex NW of mandalay ) this secures the RR nicely

Ground combat at 32,29

Allied Deliberate attack

Attacking force 5054 troops, 28 guns, 106 vehicles

Defending force 5994 troops, 47 guns, 1 vehicles

Allied assault odds: 6 to 1


Japanese ground losses:
86 casualties reported
Guns lost 2
Vehicles lost 1

Allied ground losses:
66 casualties reported


Defeated Japanese Units Retreating!


He is now on a hill in the middle of nowhere and will be ignored unless i want some ariel target practise [;)]

the units that did this are ordered back to defend the riverline West of Mandalay.

also the 1st Burma rifles is recovering very well in anasol .. only the supprt personell are notcibly short ( still need 40 ish) .. the inf is at full along with heavy weapons .. the 2nd Burma rifles arrived here today too .. one week to recover then back to mandalay. this switching and swopping of units from a malarial base makes the defence of burma so much tougher. more hurricanes moved to mandalay so he cant intercept the dakotas.

AFTER ACTION REPORTS FOR 04/25/42


--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Coastal Guns at Dili, 31,77, firing at TF 101
TF 101 troops unloading over beach at Dili, 31,77


Japanese ground losses:
42 casualties reported

invasion Dili continues ..

Even though he is using subs to attack he is loading up pretty strong forces .. 5-700 troops for invasion . so i dont consider this gamey at all .. he out numbers me in dili 2-1 .. dakotas at derby to fly in the zanzibar bde <SP> ( its a dutch garrison that has recovered in australia) .. also all a/c in koepang to hit as ground support and for the first timer in the war B17E's from darwin will bomb the beaches too. Hopefully i will hold Dili .. as i really dont want it to become a jap fighter base ..

P>S GAH .. cant load the screenie .. and cant go back for another as i have sent the turn back .. i will do one of the South DEI tomorrow.

A Japanese Div crosses the river to my troops SE of ichang ..

Ground combat at 48,34

Japanese Shock attack

Attacking force 15900 troops, 183 guns, 0 vehicles

Defending force 11373 troops, 71 guns, 77 vehicles

Japanese assault odds: 0 to 1


Japanese ground losses:
347 casualties reported
Guns lost 6

Allied ground losses:
76 casualties reported
Vehicles lost 4

annoying and the armour moved/retreated ( not sure which ) toward hengchow .. i will send back to rest and refit for a bit ( week at most ).. before being annoying with it again .. the chinese tank unit is weak but good fun [:D]

final allied bombardment at dili reveals i am out numbered

Ground combat at Dili

Allied Bombardment attack

Attacking force 1156 troops, 18 guns, 0 vehicles

Defending force 2600 troops, 17 guns, 0 vehicles


Japanese ground losses:
44 casualties reported

Allied ground losses:
4 casualties reported
Guns lost 1

i am amazed he can carry so many troops in subs ! .. is this normal for japanese ? although recon says the group is 4 subs and 3 AK's ?????? very bizarre ..

One mystery was solved a few turns back .. the aussie 30th brigade that i was bemoaning hadnt been increasing in size .. found another fragment in perth that was getting all the new troops.. its now heading to rejoin the parent unit in koepang .. so i will have 3 full strength aussie brigades and refreshed dutch garrisons for the defence when the time comes.

Keeping 32 Dakotas in australia instead of moving them up to india is really paying off . and the ones in RAF service are moving troops around instead of supplying china . and china is fine supply wise.

The japanese troops in the PI are i imagine badly battered , maybe he will wait before re-using them for the final attacks on sumatra and Java .. Given that the DEI is lasting so long i am tempted to try and reinforce Java with brits and aussies ( from india/australia) respectively .. any suggestions ? is this a good idea ? or will i create a large allied POW camp. One aussie Div is prepping for PM .. still unsure about whether to defend here or not ?

also in the news the 5 US CV's and 3 oilers are moving from Perth to Derby .. where i will evetually deploy 5 US CV 2 Brit CV .. and 6 brit BB's .. quite a large force ! + assorted CA /CL/DD escort too.

2 US carriers upgraded to F4 today too .. the units are stood down for the transit but 3 F3 squdrons are flying cap .. only the float planes will fly search though .. the DB and TB are still set to naval attack range 4 0% search .. sort of stealthy.

dili looks to be the next hot spot and some allied Cl's and DD;s sent to bombard from koepang under LR buffalo cap. should hit in the next day or so .. the DD's may even bag a transport sub .. fingers crossed.


any ideas anyone ? it looks very rosy for the allies at present and im tempted to try a new op somewhere ( except the north pac which is so supply short it isnt funny )



[:@][:@]
sorry for the spelling . English is my main language , I just can't type . and i'm too lazy to edit :)
User avatar
Rob Brennan UK
Posts: 3685
Joined: Sat Aug 24, 2002 8:36 pm
Location: London UK

RE: Rob Vs Miller .. allied perspective NIK MOD 4.2

Post by Rob Brennan UK »

Turn 4 ! wow

the brits get a taste of AA fire !

Day Air attack on Pagan , at 31,31


Allied aircraft
Blenheim I x 6
Blenheim IV x 26
Wellington III x 13
P-40B Tomahawk x 15
B-25C Mitchell x 21


Allied aircraft losses
Blenheim I: 1 destroyed, 1 damaged
Blenheim IV: 3 destroyed, 10 damaged
Wellington III: 1 destroyed, 3 damaged
B-25C Mitchell: 1 destroyed, 5 damaged

Japanese ground losses:
339 casualties reported
Guns lost 3

Airbase hits 1
Airbase supply hits 4
Runway hits 17

ouch ! .. altough i did some heavy damage .. i have re set at higher alt tomorrow

singapore supply gets hit again

Day Air attack on Singapore , at 23,50

Japanese aircraft
Ki-21 Sally x 37
Ki-49 Helen x 37

Japanese aircraft losses
Ki-21 Sally: 3 destroyed, 23 damaged
Ki-49 Helen: 3 destroyed, 25 damaged


Allied ground losses:
83 casualties reported
Guns lost 2

Port hits 7
Port fuel hits 2
Port supply hits 3
Day Air attack on Singapore , at 23,50

Japanese aircraft
Ki-43-Ib Oscar x 23
Ki-21 Sally x 42
Ki-49 Helen x 59

Japanese aircraft losses
Ki-21 Sally: 15 damaged
Ki-49 Helen: 2 destroyed, 39 damaged


Allied ground losses:
91 casualties reported
Guns lost 1
Vehicles lost 1

Port hits 12
Port fuel hits 2
Port supply hits 2
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Day Air attack on 35th Division, at 46,33


Allied aircraft
Buffalo I x 27
P-39D Airacobra x 13
P-40B Tomahawk x 19
IL-4c x 9
SB-2c x 29


No Allied losses

Japanese ground losses:
56 casualties reported
Guns lost 2
we tack here in china tomorrow ! ;; free ichang !

dili is hit hard

EG

Day Air attack on Sasebo 6th SNLF, at 31,77


Allied aircraft
Brewster 339D x 4
Hurricane II x 27
Martin 139 x 8
A-24 Dauntless x 15


No Allied losses

Japanese ground losses:
83 casualties reported

Aircraft Attacking:
3 x Martin 139 bombing at 6000 feet
6 x Hurricane II bombing at 2000 feet
14 x Hurricane II bombing at 2000 feet
5 x Hurricane II bombing at 2000 feet
13 x A-24 Dauntless bombing at 2000 feet
3 x Martin 139 bombing at 6000 feet
2 x Hurricane II bombing at 2000 feet
2 x A-24 Dauntless bombing at 2000 feet
2 x Martin 139 bombing at 6000 feet
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Day Air attack on Sasebo 6th SNLF, at 31,77


Allied aircraft
B-17E Fortress x 30


No Allied losses

Japanese ground losses:
39 casualties reported
Guns lost 1

Aircraft Attacking:
18 x B-17E Fortress bombing at 11000 feet
12 x B-17E Fortress bombing at 11000 feet
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------

this happened 2 days running .. and the Z force ( dutch inf ) arrived safely in dili. attacking tomorrow

Ichang again stops a big jap attak cold

Ground combat at Ichang

Japanese Deliberate attack

Attacking force 107868 troops, 803 guns, 142 vehicles

Defending force 38358 troops, 146 guns, 0 vehicles

Japanese assault odds: 0 to 1 (fort level 6)


Japanese ground losses:
3212 casualties reported
Guns lost 47
Vehicles lost 6

Allied ground losses:
367 casualties reported
Guns lost 7

DAY 2 .. and the RAF again cause big casulaties in pagan

Day Air attack on Pagan , at 31,31


Allied aircraft
Buffalo I x 10
Blenheim I x 8
Blenheim IV x 25
Wellington III x 16
P-40B Tomahawk x 15
B-25C Mitchell x 18


Allied aircraft losses
Blenheim I: 3 damaged
Blenheim IV: 14 damaged
Wellington III: 9 damaged
B-25C Mitchell: 1 destroyed, 6 damaged

Japanese ground losses:
652 casualties reported
Guns lost 10

Airbase hits 10
Airbase supply hits 4
Runway hits 39

other than that .. same old in china .. sorry i forgot to take a screenie AGAIN ! .. lord im dumb :)
sorry for the spelling . English is my main language , I just can't type . and i'm too lazy to edit :)
User avatar
Rob Brennan UK
Posts: 3685
Joined: Sat Aug 24, 2002 8:36 pm
Location: London UK

RE: Rob Vs Miller .. allied perspective NIK MOD 4.2

Post by Rob Brennan UK »

AFTER ACTION REPORTS FOR 04/28/42

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Day Air attack on Pagan , at 31,31


Allied aircraft
Buffalo I x 11
Blenheim I x 4
Blenheim IV x 40
Wellington III x 19
P-40B Tomahawk x 15
B-25C Mitchell x 6


Allied aircraft losses
Blenheim IV: 1 damaged
Wellington III: 1 damaged

Resources hits 5

upped the altitude and as you can see its a LOT safer up here

Mixed bag of planes from koepang hit the japs at dili quite hard

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Day Air attack on Sasebo 6th SNLF, at 31,77


Allied aircraft
Brewster 339D x 8
Hurricane II x 22
Martin 139 x 8
A-24 Dauntless x 15


No Allied losses

Japanese ground losses:
80 casualties reported
Day Air attack on Sasebo 6th SNLF, at 31,77


Allied aircraft
B-17E Fortress x 26 (operating from Darwin)


No Allied losses

Japanese ground losses:
69 casualties reported
Guns lost 1


Agaian japan is bouncing at singapore . although my losses are getting worse

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Ground combat at Singapore

Japanese Deliberate attack

Attacking force 109996 troops, 624 guns, 102 vehicles

Defending force 79888 troops, 485 guns, 24 vehicles

Japanese assault odds: 0 to 1 (fort level 9)


Japanese ground losses:
3814 casualties reported
Guns lost 68
Vehicles lost 2

Allied ground losses:
2192 casualties reported
Guns lost 86
Vehicles lost 2


--------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Also badly time japanese attack on dili ..

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Ground combat at Dili

Japanese Shock attack

Attacking force 2014 troops, 4 guns, 0 vehicles

Defending force 2010 troops, 16 guns, 0 vehicles

Japanese assault odds: 0 to 1 (fort level 0)


Japanese ground losses:
463 casualties reported
Guns lost 2

Allied ground losses:
11 casualties reported

In the main news though .. ICHANG blockade has been lifted ! .. the road is re-open

-------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Ground combat at 46,33

Allied Deliberate attack

Attacking force 121742 troops, 867 guns, 0 vehicles

Defending force 57195 troops, 562 guns, 1 vehicles

Allied assault odds: 6 to 1


Japanese ground losses:
1403 casualties reported
Guns lost 62
Vehicles lost 1

Allied ground losses:
1617 casualties reported
Guns lost 52


Defeated Japanese Units Retreating!

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------

I think these units did a very odd retreat west ! .. the retreat paths in this game are a mystery to me completely.

We attack back in Dili too

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Ground combat at Dili

Allied Deliberate attack

Attacking force 1990 troops, 15 guns, 0 vehicles

Defending force 1478 troops, 0 guns, 0 vehicles

Allied assault odds: 88 to 1


Japanese ground losses:
19 casualties reported

Allied ground losses:
8 casualties reported

88-1 and all i get is 19 dead japs ! .. BAH ..

the 29th was almost a carbon cory of the 28th

-------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Ground combat at Dili

Allied Deliberate attack

Attacking force 1968 troops, 15 guns, 0 vehicles

Defending force 1326 troops, 0 guns, 0 vehicles

Allied assault odds: 61 to 1


Japanese ground losses:
29 casualties reported

Allied ground losses:
18 casualties reported

ah well .. he's no longer a threat here i suppose ..

again forgot screenie ( i did the turn very late last night)

will provide more in the next post




sorry for the spelling . English is my main language , I just can't type . and i'm too lazy to edit :)
User avatar
Nikademus
Posts: 22517
Joined: Sat May 27, 2000 8:00 am
Location: Alien spacecraft

RE: Rob Vs Miller .. allied perspective NIK MOD 4.2

Post by Nikademus »

Its looking like China is much more of a challenge yes?

User avatar
Rob Brennan UK
Posts: 3685
Joined: Sat Aug 24, 2002 8:36 pm
Location: London UK

RE: Rob Vs Miller .. allied perspective NIK MOD 4.2

Post by Rob Brennan UK »

China is a very intersting place and has been from the start. Ken likes to try encircleing and the level 9 forts hepled me massively as the cities survived long enough for relief columns (i.e big wodjes of men) to try and break the siege. success at ichang yesterday but yenen road still severed. although one open hex allows in some supply and is an escape route if necessary.

Also supply in china is much much better. especially not losing the big front line production cities in central china.

Ken must be pondering / screaming at the monitor .. for the next turn as no reply today.I am a very happy allied bunny right now
sorry for the spelling . English is my main language , I just can't type . and i'm too lazy to edit :)
User avatar
Nikademus
Posts: 22517
Joined: Sat May 27, 2000 8:00 am
Location: Alien spacecraft

RE: Rob Vs Miller .. allied perspective NIK MOD 4.2

Post by Nikademus »

cool!

While i have tested it in Head to head, my two PBEM vic_ er "opponents" leave China strictly alone given i took away the prizes in the forward cities... so I was watching your Chinawar with interest.
User avatar
Rob Brennan UK
Posts: 3685
Joined: Sat Aug 24, 2002 8:36 pm
Location: London UK

RE: Rob Vs Miller .. allied perspective NIK MOD 4.2

Post by Rob Brennan UK »

hope i can provide some good info for you Nik .. screenie of china coming up soon too. My take is the the 'old' way of attacking china i.e able to conduct 2 offensives is no longer possible without great pain. one big jap offense would imo work but that slows down the china war considerably and as china if you can guess that japan has amassed one huge army i think its is stoppable ( with care).

I have no real interest in using the chinese offensively nor basing allied 4E units to hammer the resources here so i am not tersting to breaking point as our little war is reasonably historical and no gaming the engine allowed.

Well May has arrived so an overall update .. mostly by pictures :)

firstly BB row .. no escorts available to get them back to the USA .. some DM's coming back and i'll transfer up sme DD's from the south pacific.

anyway .. KB has been spotted ! .. it slaughtered an empty AK group in TJiljap in Java. unfortunately the sea gladiators from hermes flew CAP .. so he knows she is in port .. ordered at full speed toward ceylon !

Plenty of land based betties joined in after my pathetic cap was reduced

Day Air attack on TF, near Tjilitjap at 19,62

Japanese aircraft
A6M2 Zero x 3
G4M1 Betty x 51

Allied aircraft
Sea Gladiator x 4
Wirraway x 4

Japanese aircraft losses
G4M1 Betty: 1 destroyed, 8 damaged

Allied aircraft losses
Sea Gladiator: 1 damaged

Allied Ships
MSW Pieter de Bitter, Torpedo hits 1, on fire, heavy damage
AK Empire Eagle, Torpedo hits 1, on fire, heavy damage
AK Sea Thrush, Torpedo hits 1
AK Empire Summer, Torpedo hits 1, on fire
MSW Wollongong
PG Fritillary, Torpedo hits 1, on fire, heavy damage
AK Enggano, Torpedo hits 4, on fire, heavy damage
AK Empire Selwyn
MSW Launceton, Torpedo hits 1, on fire, heavy damage

Day Air attack on TF, near Tjilitjap at 19,62

Japanese aircraft
A6M2 Zero x 35
D3A Val x 66
B5N Kate x 72

Allied aircraft
Sea Gladiator x 4
Wirraway x 4

Japanese aircraft losses
A6M2 Zero: 2 damaged
D3A Val: 1 damaged

Allied aircraft losses
Sea Gladiator: 3 destroyed
Wirraway: 4 destroyed

Allied Ships
AK Sea Thrush, Bomb hits 4, on fire
AK Empire Selwyn, Bomb hits 8, on fire, heavy damage
MSW Wollongong, Bomb hits 6, on fire, heavy damage
MSW Latrobe, Bomb hits 7, on fire, heavy damage
MSW Poole, Bomb hits 2, on fire, heavy damage
MSW Jan van Amstel, Bomb hits 5, on fire, heavy damage
AK Wind Rush, Bomb hits 13, on fire, heavy damage
AK Empire Liberty, Bomb hits 1, on fire
MSW Quatsino, Bomb hits 6, on fire, heavy damage

This is just a taster .. 6 attacks went in .. 3 burning hulks left ( who will in all likelyhood die soon).

soerbaja TB's set on attack ( were stood down for some reason )

In china both ichang and yenen were attacked

Ground combat at Ichang

Japanese Deliberate attack

Attacking force 109815 troops, 759 guns, 138 vehicles

Defending force 37693 troops, 120 guns, 0 vehicles

Japanese assault odds: 0 to 1 (fort level 5)


Japanese ground losses:
2123 casualties reported
Guns lost 26
Vehicles lost 2

Allied ground losses:
496 casualties reported
Guns lost 13

Ground combat at Yenen

Japanese Deliberate attack

Attacking force 124460 troops, 780 guns, 1 vehicles

Defending force 61884 troops, 389 guns, 0 vehicles

Japanese assault odds: 0 to 1 (fort level 6)


Japanese ground losses:
2065 casualties reported
Guns lost 27

Allied ground losses:
734 casualties reported
Guns lost 20

Ichang is fine now .. 3 more corps assigned and 2 HQ for defence. firsly they will clear out the blocking forces .. some chinese units round ichang were very very badly depleted and ordered back to chungking for refits.. the rest i am unsure of .. the jap retreat hex is a royal pain the backside !

Multiple allied attack on Pagan hurt the resources badly

Allied aircraft
Buffalo I x 8
Blenheim I x 11
Blenheim IV x 38
Wellington III x 23
P-40B Tomahawk x 13
B-25C Mitchell x 37


Allied aircraft losses
Blenheim I: 1 damaged

Resources hits 12

Day Air attack on Pagan , at 31,31


Allied aircraft
Buffalo I x 9
Blenheim I x 12
Blenheim IV x 40
Wellington III x 19
P-40B Tomahawk x 11
B-25C Mitchell x 38


Allied aircraft losses
Blenheim I: 1 damaged
Blenheim IV: 3 damaged

Resources hits 4

As its may i can start the upgrade to wellingtons ! .. superb

also some crummy brit fighter units can refit to hurricanes instead of mohawks :)

after varied and heavy air attack the japs in dili surrendered i think .. although the icon is still there ..

Ground combat at Dili

Allied Deliberate attack

Attacking force 1894 troops, 9 guns, 0 vehicles

Defending force 1143 troops, 0 guns, 0 vehicles

Allied assault odds: 67 to 1


Japanese ground losses:
2414 casualties reported
Guns lost 11


HUZZAH for the brave dutch and aussies !

Also the US CV's will arrive at derby tomorrow . the oilers are a bit behind as they had to load up at perth ( 6 days i guess).. Derby now has over 100k supply and 100k fuel on its own and australian industry is awash with oil from the DEI and america ! .. so supply in australia as a whole is great.

Still dont know what to do re PM ..

ok this is the first of many pics


Image
Attachments
BBrow.jpg
BBrow.jpg (153.21 KiB) Viewed 249 times
sorry for the spelling . English is my main language , I just can't type . and i'm too lazy to edit :)
User avatar
Rob Brennan UK
Posts: 3685
Joined: Sat Aug 24, 2002 8:36 pm
Location: London UK

RE: Rob Vs Miller .. allied perspective NIK MOD 4.2

Post by Rob Brennan UK »

Troops at baker is.

Image
Attachments
Baker.jpg
Baker.jpg (169.35 KiB) Viewed 249 times
sorry for the spelling . English is my main language , I just can't type . and i'm too lazy to edit :)
User avatar
Rob Brennan UK
Posts: 3685
Joined: Sat Aug 24, 2002 8:36 pm
Location: London UK

RE: Rob Vs Miller .. allied perspective NIK MOD 4.2

Post by Rob Brennan UK »

surface forces in canton

Image
Attachments
SDEI.jpg
SDEI.jpg (177.08 KiB) Viewed 249 times
sorry for the spelling . English is my main language , I just can't type . and i'm too lazy to edit :)
User avatar
Rob Brennan UK
Posts: 3685
Joined: Sat Aug 24, 2002 8:36 pm
Location: London UK

RE: Rob Vs Miller .. allied perspective NIK MOD 4.2

Post by Rob Brennan UK »

Timor

Image
Attachments
burma.jpg
burma.jpg (205.54 KiB) Viewed 249 times
sorry for the spelling . English is my main language , I just can't type . and i'm too lazy to edit :)
User avatar
Rob Brennan UK
Posts: 3685
Joined: Sat Aug 24, 2002 8:36 pm
Location: London UK

RE: Rob Vs Miller .. allied perspective NIK MOD 4.2

Post by Rob Brennan UK »

Burma

Image
Attachments
china.jpg
china.jpg (284.32 KiB) Viewed 249 times
sorry for the spelling . English is my main language , I just can't type . and i'm too lazy to edit :)
User avatar
Rob Brennan UK
Posts: 3685
Joined: Sat Aug 24, 2002 8:36 pm
Location: London UK

RE: Rob Vs Miller .. allied perspective NIK MOD 4.2

Post by Rob Brennan UK »

for some unknown reason [&:][&:][&:][&:]all my screenshots were of the previous capture ?? i.e Burma.jpg is the DEI shot ??? so china shot was actually burma ?? and china being the last didnt come out .. so next turn promise china shot !

very confusing .. had 2 shots of BB row .. [&:][&:]

stooopid screen capture software ..
sorry for the spelling . English is my main language , I just can't type . and i'm too lazy to edit :)
User avatar
Nikademus
Posts: 22517
Joined: Sat May 27, 2000 8:00 am
Location: Alien spacecraft

RE: Rob Vs Miller .. allied perspective NIK MOD 4.2

Post by Nikademus »

Yikes....why so many guns and troops at Baker? (five AA units??!!!!!) [X(]

He keeps up those attacks in China and the entire army is going to be a mess.
User avatar
Rob Brennan UK
Posts: 3685
Joined: Sat Aug 24, 2002 8:36 pm
Location: London UK

RE: Rob Vs Miller .. allied perspective NIK MOD 4.2

Post by Rob Brennan UK »

ORIGINAL: Nikademus

Yikes....why so many guns and troops at Baker? (five AA units??!!!!!) [X(]

He keeps up those attacks in China and the entire army is going to be a mess.

The AA is there to hurt KB .. he can only really take baker using massed carrier forces now .. so i want it to be as much trouble as possible .. might well be overkill though .. also all the artillery will destroy any AP landing ships too. he has a long way back for repairs and might catch a few unwary DD's if he bombards using escorts [;)]

Its basically one HUGE trap ! ( and not needing the Cv's either so its a lot safer from my perspective).
sorry for the spelling . English is my main language , I just can't type . and i'm too lazy to edit :)
User avatar
Nikademus
Posts: 22517
Joined: Sat May 27, 2000 8:00 am
Location: Alien spacecraft

RE: Rob Vs Miller .. allied perspective NIK MOD 4.2

Post by Nikademus »

wow....well hopefully it won't turn out be a trap the other way around [;)]

Isolating KB is one reason why i don't tend to expand much outside of Japan's original defense perimeter. I'd much rather use KB in conjunction with my interior lines and LBA support....a winning combination. Still....with all that gunpower concentrated at that one isolated point....what are your other bases looking like? Usually i won't devote more than two AA units to any one base as there are a number to cover. Even if the Japan player takes them it will still be a bit on the costly side...nothing for free in other words.

(as a comparison, i'm at 4/43 in an old 2.0 game....stopped my expansion at the Solomons and New G. and dug in. ) Used KB as a raiding tool only scoring some notable successes....the last being the sinking of 40+ TK's near Baker.)

User avatar
Rob Brennan UK
Posts: 3685
Joined: Sat Aug 24, 2002 8:36 pm
Location: London UK

RE: Rob Vs Miller .. allied perspective NIK MOD 4.2

Post by Rob Brennan UK »

ill do a post of my other bases in the south pac ..

from memory

canton 2 inf DIV s. 27th and 2nd USMC
2-3 CD
2AA
3 eng
1 armour

pago

1RCT

suva .. just start forces

Noumea

NZ bde
AMerical div
1 eng
1art

need more at noumea then spread out to cover luganville and efate.

Iam in th process of moving the split 1/3 rds' of 25th div on PH to midway/johnson/paymyra

also a small island south of chrismas ( dot base) will become a size 1 af tomorrow .. its really useful to transfer fighters to/from central-south pacific.

fighter cover is very patchy but bombers patrol from all bases and PBY chain set up too.

This is really my defensive line with baker an a bonus.. if its ever seriously threatened i can sub evac some if i have too as canton has an AS in port. and is my main South Pac sub hub :)



sorry for the spelling . English is my main language , I just can't type . and i'm too lazy to edit :)
User avatar
Nikademus
Posts: 22517
Joined: Sat May 27, 2000 8:00 am
Location: Alien spacecraft

RE: Rob Vs Miller .. allied perspective NIK MOD 4.2

Post by Nikademus »

Looks good....what about the Central pacific? Well one thing's for sure.....the mod will demonstrate that KB was more properly a "raiding" force vs a an attritional force ala the late war TF's of the USN.

Still....i almost feel guilty. [X(]

Actually if you have your CV's nearby you could score a potential Midway too.
User avatar
Rob Brennan UK
Posts: 3685
Joined: Sat Aug 24, 2002 8:36 pm
Location: London UK

RE: Rob Vs Miller .. allied perspective NIK MOD 4.2

Post by Rob Brennan UK »

Central pac is midway etc .. 1/3 div ( regiment) on each .. but not much else .. the hilo BF is now on palmya ( av support c.90) and a/f 4 operatins A20's on a naval search role. ( crummy range but they can find/hit subs).

PH itself has plenty of stuff ! ,, cannot remember off hand .. but at least 2 div of equivalent and lots of 'smaller' units.

the N pacific is being completely ignored and n Pac troops sent to the south and central ( no sending the nor pac hq to kerachi cheat).

Yes i 'could' use my carriers as an ambush force for baker but i really want to try and hold timor in this game ( i always lose it in other games) so its the main focus of defence .. also being central the RN is able to help out too.

should baby KB try and escort an invasion of Timor it will get thoroughly destroyed ! .. only a full jap commitment wil have much hope imo.

"Still....i almost feel guilty." nah don't :) if i was japan i may feel differantly however. neither side has had an air attack vs carriers ( may pull one off tomorrow ) so the 'leak' % is unknown other than your demos and AAR's as a guide. I want to try it on japan rather than be the sacrificial lamb. leaking nells and betties give me heebie jeebies .. i HATE those planes [:D]
sorry for the spelling . English is my main language , I just can't type . and i'm too lazy to edit :)
User avatar
Nikademus
Posts: 22517
Joined: Sat May 27, 2000 8:00 am
Location: Alien spacecraft

RE: Rob Vs Miller .. allied perspective NIK MOD 4.2

Post by Nikademus »

Yes, works both ways.....alot less 2E's get the chop making nells and beatties much more dangerous potentially though they still need a good escort. Baby KB won't stand a chance against a three-four CV USN grouping. Yikes.

com'on...you know you want to......send those CV's in...Nimitz is counting on you [;)]


Post Reply

Return to “After Action Reports”