Pat vs Ronnie GW AAR

Post descriptions of your brilliant successes and unfortunate demises.

Moderator: Shannon V. OKeets

User avatar
rkr1958
Posts: 30236
Joined: Thu May 21, 2009 10:23 am

RE: Pat vs Ronnie GW AAR

Post by rkr1958 »

Turn 17. May/June 1942. Allied #4. CW. HQ Reorg.

Three RAF fighters units are reorganized by the CW. Two in England and one in North Africa.

Image
Attachments
04ALCWHQReorg.jpg
04ALCWHQReorg.jpg (445.19 KiB) Viewed 353 times
Ronnie
User avatar
rkr1958
Posts: 30236
Joined: Thu May 21, 2009 10:23 am

RE: Pat vs Ronnie GW AAR

Post by rkr1958 »

Turn 17. May/June 1942. Axis #5. Weather.

I was hoping for storms in the Arctic and North Temperate but that was not to be.

Image
Attachments
05AXWEATHER.jpg
05AXWEATHER.jpg (687.22 KiB) Viewed 353 times
Ronnie
brian brian
Posts: 3191
Joined: Wed Nov 16, 2005 6:39 pm

RE: Pat vs Ronnie GW AAR

Post by brian brian »

That is certainly combat "in the Soviet style." The state of the war is rather frequently changed dramatically on the Ukrainian steppes.
User avatar
ashkpa
Posts: 1513
Joined: Thu Jan 16, 2014 3:11 am

RE: Pat vs Ronnie GW AAR

Post by ashkpa »

MJ42 i5:
Germany takes a land while Japan and Italy take combined actions.
Italy drops the NAV in the E. Med to the 1-box and flies another fighter out to the 1-box. They also use the transport in Sardinia to move 2-divisions to Tunisia.
Japan flys a fighter to the Coral Sea 0-box. Moves a CA to the Arabian Sea and an Amph (loaded with a MAR) and CV to the 3-box of the Bismarck Sea.

Naval combats all resulted in no contact except for the Arabian Sea where I had you avoid combat (image below).
Here are all of the search rolls:
E. Med 8/9
Arabian sea 8/3
Coral Sea 4/8
Hawaiian Islands 9/3
Christmas Islands 7/10

Edit: I did have your fighter fly to the 0-box in the E. Med.

The allies had no option of initiating combat.

Image
Attachments
MJ42i5Na..Combats.jpg
MJ42i5Na..Combats.jpg (768 KiB) Viewed 353 times
Pat
User avatar
ashkpa
Posts: 1513
Joined: Thu Jan 16, 2014 3:11 am

RE: Pat vs Ronnie GW AAR

Post by ashkpa »

Here are the Ground Strikes.
This impulse I am not rolling low in searches or GS. Hopefully that keeps up for any ground attacks.

Image
Attachments
MJ42i5Gr..Strikes.jpg
MJ42i5Gr..Strikes.jpg (1.64 MiB) Viewed 353 times
Pat
User avatar
ashkpa
Posts: 1513
Joined: Thu Jan 16, 2014 3:11 am

RE: Pat vs Ronnie GW AAR

Post by ashkpa »

During land moves, the Italians overran and captured the FR BB Bretagne (disorganized and out of supply in Corsica).

Image
Attachments
MJ42i5FRBBOverun.jpg
MJ42i5FRBBOverun.jpg (265.54 KiB) Viewed 353 times
Pat
User avatar
ashkpa
Posts: 1513
Joined: Thu Jan 16, 2014 3:11 am

RE: Pat vs Ronnie GW AAR

Post by ashkpa »

MJ42 i5 Land Attacks
Wish the first and third attacks rolls had been in opposite order. actually the first could have changed with either of the other two.


Image
Attachments
MJ42i5LandAttacks.jpg
MJ42i5LandAttacks.jpg (2.02 MiB) Viewed 353 times
Pat
User avatar
rkr1958
Posts: 30236
Joined: Thu May 21, 2009 10:23 am

RE: Pat vs Ronnie GW AAR

Post by rkr1958 »

Turn 17. May/June 1942. Allied #6. Actions.

Image
Attachments
06ALActions.jpg
06ALActions.jpg (515 KiB) Viewed 353 times
Ronnie
User avatar
rkr1958
Posts: 30236
Joined: Thu May 21, 2009 10:23 am

RE: Pat vs Ronnie GW AAR

Post by rkr1958 »

Turn 17. May/June 1942. Allied #6. USN, Pacific. Contested Sea Areas.

The USN elects not to attempt to initiate combat in any of these areas. The IJN, as the non-phasing player, can't.

Image
Attachments
06ALUSN..NoCombat.jpg
06ALUSN..NoCombat.jpg (1.17 MiB) Viewed 353 times
Ronnie
User avatar
rkr1958
Posts: 30236
Joined: Thu May 21, 2009 10:23 am

RE: Pat vs Ronnie GW AAR

Post by rkr1958 »

Turn 17. May/June 1942. Allied #6. USN. North Sea.

The USN elects not to attempt to initiate combat in the North Sea. The Germans, as the non-phasing player, can't.

Image
Attachments
06ALUSN..NoCombat.jpg
06ALUSN..NoCombat.jpg (621.02 KiB) Viewed 353 times
Ronnie
User avatar
rkr1958
Posts: 30236
Joined: Thu May 21, 2009 10:23 am

RE: Pat vs Ronnie GW AAR

Post by rkr1958 »

Turn 17. May/June 1942. Allied #6. USSR. Ground Strike. Question.

The Soviets are flying their I-153 as a night bomber in an attempted in ground strike. The Luftwaffe has one fighter unit in place that could intercept. Do you wish to intercept? If so, I assume it must fly as a night fighter?

Image
Attachments
06ALUSSR..Question.jpg
06ALUSSR..Question.jpg (681.38 KiB) Viewed 353 times
Ronnie
User avatar
ashkpa
Posts: 1513
Joined: Thu Jan 16, 2014 3:11 am

RE: Pat vs Ronnie GW AAR

Post by ashkpa »

Turn 17. May/June 1942. Allied #6. USSR. Ground Strike. Question.

The Soviets are flying their I-153 as a night bomber in an attempted in ground strike. The Luftwaffe has one fighter unit in place that could intercept. Do you wish to intercept? If so, I assume it must fly as a night fighter?
I will not fly here.
Pat
cfinch
Posts: 88
Joined: Thu Jun 09, 2016 8:53 pm

RE: Pat vs Ronnie GW AAR

Post by cfinch »

Just to check my understanding please, from this post:
1/21/2017 1:02:13 AM

Odds of 12:13 are 5/6 of the way from 12:18 (2:3 = +1) and 12:12 (1:1 = +2), so the modifier is 1 + 5/6 = +1.8333
Then +5 for disorganized defenders
and +0.5 for ARM div in a blitz
Total is +7.333
=============================
you checked how far 12 was from 12:12 but not how far odds were from 1:1 which is 13:13!

Also, I think you need to check to what % you have progressed from the lower to higher odds ratios (using half ratios = +1 e.g. 3:1 = +6 and 3.5:1 = +7)

For Odds < 1:1 (over 1:1 you can double attack factors and divide by defense factors to get base +DRM) I believe it is correct to calculate as follows:
multiply both attack and defense factors to make calc easier - 12:13 = 36:39

What odds are we "above" 2:3 = 26:39
need 13 to get from 2:3 to 1:1.
We have 10 more than 26, so 10 / 13 = 0.769
So DRM = +1 for 3:2 and 0.769 for fractional (shown normally as 1.769) - correct?

If this is correct then some other calcs until we get <3:2 are
12:13 36:39 (36-26 = 10 of 13 steps to 39 , 10/13 = 0.769
11:13 33:39 (33-26 = 7 of 13 steps to 39 , 7/13 = 0.538
10:13 30:39 (30-26 = 4 of 13 steps to 39 , 4/13 = 0.307
9:13 27:39 (27-26 = 1 of 13 steps to 39 , 1/13 = 0.077
all are +1 with fractional as above

until we reach
8:13 48:78 < 2:3 (52:78) - recalc what are we higher than, 1:2 = 39:78

distance from 1:2 (39) to 2:3 (52) is 13
we have 48 so we are 9 over 39
9/13 = 0.692
So DRM = +0 for 1:2 and 0.692 for fractional

8:13 48:78 (48-39 = 9 of 13 steps to 39 , 9/13 = 0.692
7:13 42:78 (42-39 = 3 of 13 steps to 39 , 3/13 = 0.231
User avatar
rkr1958
Posts: 30236
Joined: Thu May 21, 2009 10:23 am

RE: Pat vs Ronnie GW AAR

Post by rkr1958 »

ORIGINAL: cfinch

Just to check my understanding please, from this post:
1/21/2017 1:02:13 AM

Odds of 12:13 are 5/6 of the way from 12:18 (2:3 = +1) and 12:12 (1:1 = +2), so the modifier is 1 + 5/6 = +1.8333
Then +5 for disorganized defenders
and +0.5 for ARM div in a blitz
Total is +7.333
=============================
you checked how far 12 was from 12:12 but not how far odds were from 1:1 which is 13:13!

Also, I think you need to check to what % you have progressed from the lower to higher odds ratios (using half ratios = +1 e.g. 3:1 = +6 and 3.5:1 = +7)

For Odds < 1:1 (over 1:1 you can double attack factors and divide by defense factors to get base +DRM) I believe it is correct to calculate as follows:
multiply both attack and defense factors to make calc easier - 12:13 = 36:39

What odds are we "above" 2:3 = 26:39
need 13 to get from 2:3 to 1:1.
We have 10 more than 26, so 10 / 13 = 0.769
So DRM = +1 for 3:2 and 0.769 for fractional (shown normally as 1.769) - correct?

If this is correct then some other calcs until we get <3:2 are
12:13 36:39 (36-26 = 10 of 13 steps to 39 , 10/13 = 0.769
11:13 33:39 (33-26 = 7 of 13 steps to 39 , 7/13 = 0.538
10:13 30:39 (30-26 = 4 of 13 steps to 39 , 4/13 = 0.307
9:13 27:39 (27-26 = 1 of 13 steps to 39 , 1/13 = 0.077
all are +1 with fractional as above

until we reach
8:13 48:78 < 2:3 (52:78) - recalc what are we higher than, 1:2 = 39:78

distance from 1:2 (39) to 2:3 (52) is 13
we have 48 so we are 9 over 39
9/13 = 0.692
So DRM = +0 for 1:2 and 0.692 for fractional

8:13 48:78 (48-39 = 9 of 13 steps to 39 , 9/13 = 0.692
7:13 42:78 (42-39 = 3 of 13 steps to 39 , 3/13 = 0.231
[&:]
Ronnie
brian brian
Posts: 3191
Joined: Wed Nov 16, 2005 6:39 pm

RE: Pat vs Ronnie GW AAR

Post by brian brian »

That particular Me-110 model does not receive the Night-Fighter bonus. The orange color of the Air-to-Air combat value indicates it is a Twin-Engine FTR, but the Air-to-Air value would have to be on a black background to be a Night Fighter.

Also the defending player does not make any decision about fighting a night air combat. If the phasing player announces a Night Mission, any interception attempt is automatically a night combat.
User avatar
ashkpa
Posts: 1513
Joined: Thu Jan 16, 2014 3:11 am

RE: Pat vs Ronnie GW AAR

Post by ashkpa »

What odds are we "above" 2:3 = 26:39
need 13 to get from 2:3 to 1:1.
We have 10 more than 26, so 10 / 13 = 0.769
So DRM = +1 for 3:2 and 0.769 for fractional (shown normally as 1.769) - correct?
Cfinch, you are correct. My error. In the end it made no difference in the result. Once the 0.5 for the ARM-div was added I needed to roll <0.269 and I rolled above that and my previously incorrect calculation as well. This just means I missed by a bit more.

For Ronnie:
You had 13 defense factors. I had 12 attack factors. The two odds ratios that are critical are 1:1 +2 and 2:3 +1.
With 13 defensive factors, it takes 8.667 (8 & 2/3) attack factors to make 2:3 odds. I was 12-8.667 = 3.333 of the way there and needed to be 4.333 of the way there to get to 1:1. So the ratio for the fractional should have been 3.333/4.333 = 0.769
I had kept the wrong thing constant (the attack factors of 12 and not the defense factors of 13).
Pat
cfinch
Posts: 88
Joined: Thu Jun 09, 2016 8:53 pm

RE: Pat vs Ronnie GW AAR

Post by cfinch »

original post had calcs for getting to 2:3 at 12:18 but you need to calc what is needed based defenders value of 13, 2:3 on this would be 8.667:13

so basically i found common denominators (e.g. 3x13 so could do the calcs for 2:3 without fractions)
26:39 = 2:3 exact, so then calculated how much of that number the attacker has
in this case 12x3 = 36, so he has 10 "increments" to the next odds level (2:3 or 26:39 until get to 39:39 or 1:1)

The "interval" from 26 to 39 has 13 steps we get a % for each 'step' we can cover, 10 in this case (we had 36 or 39 remember and 10 over 26 - we used 26 to get to base 2:3 odds)
so fractional = steps / interval = 10/13


another example 11:12 also below 1:1 causing manual calculation
2:3 = 8:12 in this case, and our calcs are much simpler
base is 8 we have 11 so 3 over to put towards fractional
interval is 12 - 8 = 4
remainder 3 / interval 4 = 0.750 fractional to get to 1:1 from 2:3 because we are 3/4 they distance from 2:3 (8:12) to 1:1 (12:12)

i was wondering if the rules intended to use the actual % distance from x to y odds or if some other simplification was used...

cfinch
Posts: 88
Joined: Thu Jun 09, 2016 8:53 pm

RE: Pat vs Ronnie GW AAR

Post by cfinch »

cross posted and thanks for confirming (before my second post!) and yes i knew it made no difference i just wasn't sure it was as per rules (see second post)
love the AAR
thanks for that as well

charles
User avatar
rkr1958
Posts: 30236
Joined: Thu May 21, 2009 10:23 am

RE: Pat vs Ronnie GW AAR

Post by rkr1958 »

Turn 17. May/June 1942. Allied #6. USSR. Ground Strike Execution.

Image
Attachments
06ALUSSR..xecution.jpg
06ALUSSR..xecution.jpg (351.44 KiB) Viewed 353 times
Ronnie
User avatar
rkr1958
Posts: 30236
Joined: Thu May 21, 2009 10:23 am

RE: Pat vs Ronnie GW AAR

Post by rkr1958 »

Turn 17. May/June 1942. Allied #6. USSR. Rail Blue Factory.

Image
Attachments
06ALUSSR..Factory.jpg
06ALUSSR..Factory.jpg (716.31 KiB) Viewed 353 times
Ronnie
Post Reply

Return to “After Action Report”