Warspite1ORIGINAL: Grollub
Sorry Robert, but no one in here will take you seriously as an art critic unless you work in some "vis-a-vis" into your comments. [:'(]ORIGINAL: warspite1
Warspite1ORIGINAL: Dixie
Ah yes, I agree with my erstwhile companion on this facet of the piece. The usage of an ex-IDF tank does create a powerful image in regards to Israel vis-a-vis the Palestinian territories and people and the implied support for such policies that is received from the Western nations through the supplies of military hardware.
We can also see that the runner is wearing a blue outfit and is white. Need I remind you all that the colours of the Israeli flag are blue and white? Also the red stripe of his trainers represents the blood of victims.
You can claim anything is art these days [8|] When I were a lad you had to have some sort of actual talent [:D]
Sorry threadsters, but you are all wrong. This piece of art is:
A searing indictment of domestic servitude in the eighteenth century
I would have thought that was patently obvious, now all we need are some hot gypsies thrown in [:D][;)]
My dear Grollub, apropos my interpretation of the aforementioned art work, I think it fair to say that - vis-a-vis the earlier comments - my definition was by far the most accurate in conveying the artist's innermost thought process; a process of hellish turmoil and angst, out of which, such a masterpiece was created. This work is truly the ultimate expression of the plight of servants in the Edwardian era, n'est-pas?
Or am I talking complete B******?
