RUNNING POLL - gameplay features [Feature Requests Go Here]

Take command of air and naval assets from post-WW2 to the near future in tactical and operational scale, complete with historical and hypothetical scenarios and an integrated scenario editor.

Moderator: MOD_Command

Pukeko
Posts: 16
Joined: Wed Jan 15, 2014 3:24 am
Location: New Zealand

RE: RUNNING POLL - gameplay features

Post by Pukeko »

If you use 1/3 rule this will not happen.

Ah, yes it does. It's happened to me many times. I now don't assign all the aircraft to a mission at the start of a scenario so when the aircraft do hit bingo fuel, they all don't head back at once and leave me with no/minimal aircraft in the patrol zone.
But 1/3 rule will leave gaps, as I mentioned in my post.

True, that's why I am seconding your post. We both agree that it would be better to change 1/3 rule so the bingo fuel aircraft is leaving the patrol zone at the same time that the replacement aircraft is entering it. It's not too big a deal if the patrol zone is near the airbase/carrier, but it is a much bigger deal if the patrol area is far away. Especially tankers/maritime patrol aircraft. They have very long ranges and are fairly slow.
kimaera026
Posts: 8
Joined: Mon Jun 02, 2014 11:07 am

RE: RUNNING POLL - gameplay features

Post by kimaera026 »

it could be done with a "pre-bingo" trigger, maybe? That calculates the time it takes for the aircraft to fly to the patrol zone (including take-off times) and substract it from the time the aicraft on active patrol has got before hitting its bingo fuel.

Sounds easy to me, in fact I can pretty much do it manually without even thinking about it. But im not sure if it's as easy to implement, but I wouldn't think it's impossible.
User avatar
KewDok
Posts: 31
Joined: Tue Dec 17, 2013 10:13 am
Location: Norway

RE: RUNNING POLL - gameplay features

Post by KewDok »

Ah, sorry for misunderstanding what you meant.
Grubwurm
Posts: 41
Joined: Sat May 20, 2000 8:00 am
Location: Tampa, FL USA

RE: RUNNING POLL - gameplay features

Post by Grubwurm »

What I want is not on this list - Editable DB.
ckfinite
Posts: 208
Joined: Fri Jul 19, 2013 10:33 pm

RE: RUNNING POLL - gameplay features

Post by ckfinite »

You can do it with a little bit of knowledge of SQL and a SQL editor. The underlying DB isn't that complex, and some guesswork goes a long way. You do have to keep updating your changes, but I'm working on something that should help with that.
magi
Posts: 1533
Joined: Sat Feb 01, 2014 1:06 am

RE: RUNNING POLL - gameplay features

Post by magi »

have the ability to use multiple monitors..... and more than one map window...
Dimitris
Posts: 15315
Joined: Sun Jul 31, 2005 10:29 am
Contact:

RE: RUNNING POLL - gameplay features

Post by Dimitris »

ORIGINAL: magi
have the ability to use multiple monitors..... and more than one map window...

Multiple monitors have been supported even from v1.0. Multiple map windows.... maybe someday.
magi
Posts: 1533
Joined: Sat Feb 01, 2014 1:06 am

RE: RUNNING POLL - gameplay features

Post by magi »

voice activated commands....
User avatar
ETF
Posts: 1767
Joined: Thu Sep 16, 2004 12:26 pm
Location: Vancouver, Canada

RE: RUNNING POLL - gameplay features

Post by ETF »

Congrats on an amazing update. Sorry if mentioned above. How are we coming with engaging a REAL opponent :)
Where are we with Multiplayer options?
My Top Matrix Games 1) CMO MP?? 2) WITP/AE 3) SOW 4) Combat Mission 5) Armor Brigade

Twitter
https://twitter.com/TacticWargamer
Dimitris
Posts: 15315
Joined: Sun Jul 31, 2005 10:29 am
Contact:

RE: RUNNING POLL - gameplay features

Post by Dimitris »

Thanks. Currently multiplayer is possible via Baloogan's Joint-Command plugin, available here: http://baloogancampaign.com/command-plu ... t-command/

Other modes of MP are being considered for development in the future.
magi
Posts: 1533
Joined: Sat Feb 01, 2014 1:06 am

RE: RUNNING POLL - gameplay features

Post by magi »

ORIGINAL: Sunburn
ORIGINAL: magi
have the ability to use multiple monitors..... and more than one map window...

Multiple monitors have been supported even from v1.0. Multiple map windows.... maybe someday.

oh cool... thank you....im gonna buy another monitor now...
i started playing harpoon in like 91`92.... this game is so outstanding and bloody lovely to look at.... thank you guys... sometimes i spend hours moving around the map an going through the data base and dont run 5 minutes of game play....
magi
Posts: 1533
Joined: Sat Feb 01, 2014 1:06 am

RE: RUNNING POLL - gameplay features

Post by magi »



i would love to see real time co`op play.....
Belthorian
Posts: 16
Joined: Sun Apr 28, 2013 1:22 pm

RE: RUNNING POLL - gameplay features

Post by Belthorian »

How about the ability to have multiple windows. I would love the ability to create zoom windows on targets and place them on my 2nd monitor to eliminate the constant zooming in and out.
Dimitris
Posts: 15315
Joined: Sun Jul 31, 2005 10:29 am
Contact:

RE: RUNNING POLL - gameplay features

Post by Dimitris »

ORIGINAL: Belthorian

How about the ability to have multiple windows. I would love the ability to create zoom windows on targets and place them on my 2nd monitor to eliminate the constant zooming in and out.
You can use quick-jump slots to accomplish this. See the 'user interface' section on the manual addendum pages.
User avatar
Feltan
Posts: 1173
Joined: Tue Dec 05, 2006 6:47 am
Location: Kansas

RE: RUNNING POLL - gameplay features

Post by Feltan »

ORIGINAL: Sunburn

ORIGINAL: Belthorian

How about the ability to have multiple windows. I would love the ability to create zoom windows on targets and place them on my 2nd monitor to eliminate the constant zooming in and out.
You can use quick-jump slots to accomplish this. See the 'user interface' section on the manual addendum pages.

This is a bad idea. With the amount of time I am sitting and playing this game, scrolling on the mouse to zoom in and out is the only reliable exercise I am getting! :-)

Regards,
Feltan
jufinace20
Posts: 22
Joined: Tue Feb 11, 2014 4:22 pm

RE: RUNNING POLL - gameplay features

Post by jufinace20 »

Suggestions

1) Probably someone already proposed this: the ability of adding vectorial layers (e.g shp) to enhance the playing environment.

2) Some level of control over unit doctrines in order to enhance the fidelity of the behavior in some situations. For example Libians in the 80's firing at Egyptians, their stock of expensive weapons (e.g. missiles) was limited, and their salvoes would be most probably limited in number (keeping the remaining munitions until the first rounds came by the target).
Right now the AI is always in WWIII mode, very effective, but usually wasting about half the salvo on a burning hulk.

Keep the good work,[&o]
woos1981
Posts: 121
Joined: Sun Jul 13, 2014 4:40 pm

RE: RUNNING POLL - gameplay features

Post by woos1981 »

Hi how can it be possible to add an Feature like land a ground unit from transportships and aircraft in Game? such as landing mission type or airborne order etc ,thanks!
mikmykWS
Posts: 7185
Joined: Tue Mar 22, 2005 4:34 pm

RE: RUNNING POLL - gameplay features

Post by mikmykWS »

ORIGINAL: wwwws

Hi how can it be possible to add an Feature like land a ground unit from transportships and aircraft in Game? such as landing mission type or airborne order etc ,thanks!

This is already on our list. :)
mikmykWS
Posts: 7185
Joined: Tue Mar 22, 2005 4:34 pm

RE: RUNNING POLL - gameplay features

Post by mikmykWS »

ORIGINAL: Feltan

ORIGINAL: Sunburn

ORIGINAL: Belthorian

How about the ability to have multiple windows. I would love the ability to create zoom windows on targets and place them on my 2nd monitor to eliminate the constant zooming in and out.
You can use quick-jump slots to accomplish this. See the 'user interface' section on the manual addendum pages.

This is a bad idea. With the amount of time I am sitting and playing this game, scrolling on the mouse to zoom in and out is the only reliable exercise I am getting! :-)

Regards,
Feltan

LOL[:D]
mikmykWS
Posts: 7185
Joined: Tue Mar 22, 2005 4:34 pm

RE: RUNNING POLL - gameplay features

Post by mikmykWS »

ORIGINAL: jufinace20

Suggestions

1) Probably someone already proposed this: the ability of adding vectorial layers (e.g shp) to enhance the playing environment.

2) Some level of control over unit doctrines in order to enhance the fidelity of the behavior in some situations. For example Libians in the 80's firing at Egyptians, their stock of expensive weapons (e.g. missiles) was limited, and their salvoes would be most probably limited in number (keeping the remaining munitions until the first rounds came by the target).
Right now the AI is always in WWIII mode, very effective, but usually wasting about half the salvo on a burning hulk.

Keep the good work,[&o]

Both are on our list. Thanks!

Mike
Post Reply

Return to “Command: Modern Operations series”