Pat vs Ronnie GW AAR

Post descriptions of your brilliant successes and unfortunate demises.

Moderator: Shannon V. OKeets

User avatar
ashkpa
Posts: 1513
Joined: Thu Jan 16, 2014 3:11 am

RE: Pat vs Ronnie GW AAR

Post by ashkpa »

The Solomons, 2nd image. The Idaho was damaged and the CP was aborted.

With fighters still in the 3-box, the allies stayed for round 2. This time with rolls of 8/9 the combat was broken off.

Image
Attachments
JA42 i5 Th..s rnd 1b.jpg
JA42 i5 Th..s rnd 1b.jpg (1.44 MiB) Viewed 189 times
Pat
User avatar
ashkpa
Posts: 1513
Joined: Thu Jan 16, 2014 3:11 am

RE: Pat vs Ronnie GW AAR

Post by ashkpa »

JA42 i5 Naval Combats. The last searches are in Polynesia. First round rolls of 4/4 mean one of the subs find and engages in a submarine combat with 3 surprise points. Use two points to lower the ASW to ne. The CP is sunk with the D.

In round 2, search rolls of 10/5 break off the combat.

Image
Attachments
JA42 i5 Po..ia rnd 1.jpg
JA42 i5 Po..ia rnd 1.jpg (1.37 MiB) Viewed 189 times
Pat
User avatar
ashkpa
Posts: 1513
Joined: Thu Jan 16, 2014 3:11 am

RE: Pat vs Ronnie GW AAR

Post by ashkpa »

Well, impulse 5 naval combats were much more interesting, and to the axis favor, than impulse 3 naval combats. Time for bed now and back to this tomorrow.
Pat
User avatar
ashkpa
Posts: 1513
Joined: Thu Jan 16, 2014 3:11 am

RE: Pat vs Ronnie GW AAR

Post by ashkpa »

JA42 i5: Axis Ground Strike.
Apparently the Japanese need to improve their carrier crews ability to find land targets.

Image
Attachments
JA42 i5 Gr..d Strike.jpg
JA42 i5 Gr..d Strike.jpg (836.4 KiB) Viewed 189 times
Pat
User avatar
ashkpa
Posts: 1513
Joined: Thu Jan 16, 2014 3:11 am

RE: Pat vs Ronnie GW AAR

Post by ashkpa »

JA42 i5: Axis Land Attacks.
Only four land attacks declared, all in North Central Russia.
No axis planes flew support, nor was there any GE HQ support. There are two axis fighters that could intercept the 2 southern most attacks.
Do the Russians wish to fly support?

Image
Attachments
JA42 i5 Land Attack.jpg
JA42 i5 Land Attack.jpg (1.4 MiB) Viewed 189 times
Pat
User avatar
rkr1958
Posts: 30268
Joined: Thu May 21, 2009 10:23 am

RE: Pat vs Ronnie GW AAR

Post by rkr1958 »

No ground support.
Ronnie
User avatar
ashkpa
Posts: 1513
Joined: Thu Jan 16, 2014 3:11 am

RE: Pat vs Ronnie GW AAR

Post by ashkpa »

JA42 i5 Land Attack Results
First of two images.

Image
Attachments
JA42i5La..esultsa.jpg
JA42i5La..esultsa.jpg (1.3 MiB) Viewed 189 times
Pat
User avatar
ashkpa
Posts: 1513
Joined: Thu Jan 16, 2014 3:11 am

RE: Pat vs Ronnie GW AAR

Post by ashkpa »

2nd image

Image
Attachments
JA42i5La..esultsb.jpg
JA42i5La..esultsb.jpg (1.21 MiB) Viewed 189 times
Pat
User avatar
rkr1958
Posts: 30268
Joined: Thu May 21, 2009 10:23 am

RE: Pat vs Ronnie GW AAR

Post by rkr1958 »

Turn 18. Jul/Aug 1942. Allied #6. Actions.

Image
Attachments
06ALActions.jpg
06ALActions.jpg (493.85 KiB) Viewed 189 times
Ronnie
User avatar
rkr1958
Posts: 30268
Joined: Thu May 21, 2009 10:23 am

RE: Pat vs Ronnie GW AAR

Post by rkr1958 »

Turn 18. Jul/Aug 1942. Allied #6. Atlantic, Med. Contested Sea Areas.

Allies - no combat, axis - no opportunity to try.

Image
Attachments
06ALAtla..NoCombat.jpg
06ALAtla..NoCombat.jpg (1.09 MiB) Viewed 189 times
Ronnie
User avatar
rkr1958
Posts: 30268
Joined: Thu May 21, 2009 10:23 am

RE: Pat vs Ronnie GW AAR

Post by rkr1958 »

Turn 18. Jul/Aug 1942. Allied #6. USN. Pacific. Contested Sea Areas.

USN - no combat, IJN - no opportunity to try.

Image
Attachments
06ALUSN..NoCombat.jpg
06ALUSN..NoCombat.jpg (1.14 MiB) Viewed 189 times
Ronnie
User avatar
rkr1958
Posts: 30268
Joined: Thu May 21, 2009 10:23 am

RE: Pat vs Ronnie GW AAR

Post by rkr1958 »

Turn 18. Jul/Aug 1942. Allied #6. CW. Libya, Egypt and East Med.

Last impulse the Japanese were able to put all of the allies in the Mediterranean Theater of Operations (MTO) out of supply by sinking both allied convoys in the Arabian Sea. What has Hitler promised Tojo for such cooperation?! No matter, Churchill orders the RN to reestablish this vital supply line at any cost.

Image
Attachments
06-AL-CW-E..Nav-Move.jpg
06-AL-CW-E..Nav-Move.jpg (838.72 KiB) Viewed 189 times
Ronnie
User avatar
rkr1958
Posts: 30268
Joined: Thu May 21, 2009 10:23 am

RE: Pat vs Ronnie GW AAR

Post by rkr1958 »

Turn 18. Jul/Aug 1942. Allied #6. Azanian Sea. IJN Intercept Attempt.

In response to PM Churchill's orders the RN sends an unarmed, unescorted transport from its port at Majuaga, Madagascar into the Azanian Sea.

I made the assumption, or call, that the Japanese would wish to try to intercept the transport. The intercept attempt fails and the transport moves into the Arabian Sea and ...

Image
Attachments
06ALIJN..nianSea.jpg
06ALIJN..nianSea.jpg (257.32 KiB) Viewed 189 times
Ronnie
User avatar
rkr1958
Posts: 30268
Joined: Thu May 21, 2009 10:23 am

RE: Pat vs Ronnie GW AAR

Post by rkr1958 »

Turn 18. Jul/Aug 1942. Allied #6. CW. East Med.

... momentarily at least, reestablishes supply to allied forces in the MTO.

Image
Attachments
06ALCWL..tNavMove.jpg
06ALCWL..tNavMove.jpg (838.38 KiB) Viewed 189 times
Ronnie
User avatar
rkr1958
Posts: 30268
Joined: Thu May 21, 2009 10:23 am

RE: Pat vs Ronnie GW AAR

Post by rkr1958 »

Turn 18. Jul/Aug 1942. Allied #6. RN. Azanian Sea.

The allies choose not to try to initiate combat in the Azanian Sea. The Japanese should, if they wish, have the opportunity, however, MWiF doesn't give them the chance as I found out later.

1. Would you like to attempt to initiate? If so, I'll initiate with the allies and "reorganize" that unit

Image
Attachments
06ALUSN..NoCombat.jpg
06ALUSN..NoCombat.jpg (317.25 KiB) Viewed 189 times
Ronnie
User avatar
rkr1958
Posts: 30268
Joined: Thu May 21, 2009 10:23 am

RE: Pat vs Ronnie GW AAR

Post by rkr1958 »

Turn 18. Jul/Aug 1942. Allied #6. RN. Arabian Sea.

The RN also sends a CP and heavy cruisers to join the RN transport in the Arabian Sea. The RN chooses not to try to initiate combat. 2. I assume you'd wish to try. If so, the Japanese have one plane that can react. Do you wish to react with the plane and, if so, where?

Image
Attachments
06ALIJN..bianSea.jpg
06ALIJN..bianSea.jpg (681.47 KiB) Viewed 189 times
Ronnie
User avatar
ashkpa
Posts: 1513
Joined: Thu Jan 16, 2014 3:11 am

RE: Pat vs Ronnie GW AAR

Post by ashkpa »

The allies choose not to try to initiate combat in the Azanian Sea. The Japanese should, if they wish, have the opportunity, however, MWiF doesn't give them the chance as I found out later.

1. Would you like to attempt to initiate? If so, I'll initiate with the allies and "reorganize" that unit
I don't think I have the option. You moved a unit through the area, but at this point no new units are in the zone (based on your report), so I would not get the chance. If you did leave a new unit in the zone, yes I would initiate and it should be reported as a bug.
Pat
User avatar
rkr1958
Posts: 30268
Joined: Thu May 21, 2009 10:23 am

RE: Pat vs Ronnie GW AAR

Post by rkr1958 »

ORIGINAL: ashkpa
The allies choose not to try to initiate combat in the Azanian Sea. The Japanese should, if they wish, have the opportunity, however, MWiF doesn't give them the chance as I found out later.

1. Would you like to attempt to initiate? If so, I'll initiate with the allies and "reorganize" that unit
I don't think I have the option. You moved a unit through the area, but at this point no new units are in the zone (based on your report), so I would not get the chance. If you did leave a new unit in the zone, yes I would initiate and it should be reported as a bug.
OK, not a bug then. Just my misunderstanding.
Ronnie
User avatar
ashkpa
Posts: 1513
Joined: Thu Jan 16, 2014 3:11 am

RE: Pat vs Ronnie GW AAR

Post by ashkpa »

The RN also sends a CP and heavy cruisers to join the RN transport in the Arabian Sea. The RN chooses not to try to initiate combat. 2. I assume you'd wish to try. If so, the Japanese have one plane that can react. Do you wish to react with the plane and, if so, where?
No reaction with the fighter.
Use the Nachi (sp? last 4 point CA) to initiate. I will be targeting the transport and then the CP with the goal to destroy/clear them from the zone. If possible it may be best to make it a surface battle and not an air battle.
Pat
User avatar
rkr1958
Posts: 30268
Joined: Thu May 21, 2009 10:23 am

RE: Pat vs Ronnie GW AAR

Post by rkr1958 »

Turn 18. Jul/Aug 1942. Allied #6. IJN, Arabian Sea.

Neither side finds ... phew ...

Image
Attachments
06ALIJN..anSea2.jpg
06ALIJN..anSea2.jpg (331.08 KiB) Viewed 189 times
Ronnie
Post Reply

Return to “After Action Report”