Spanking Lowpe (NJP72 vs Lowpe (A))

Post descriptions of your brilliant victories and unfortunate defeats here.

Moderators: wdolson, MOD_War-in-the-Pacific-Admirals-Edition

User avatar
traskott
Posts: 1577
Joined: Mon Jun 23, 2008 8:30 am
Location: Valladolid, Spain

RE: Spanking Lowpe (NJP72 vs Lowpe (A))

Post by traskott »

The "must do" upgrade for the Clemsons is APD. Lot of ASW value, and got some fast transport capability which comes handy. If u check reinforcements, DEs will be plenty, APD not, so, the "right" decision is upgrade them to APD. [:)]
User avatar
witpqs
Posts: 26376
Joined: Mon Oct 04, 2004 7:48 pm
Location: Argleton

RE: Spanking Lowpe (NJP72 vs Lowpe (A))

Post by witpqs »

ORIGINAL: Lowpe

Lets talk Clemson Destroyers for a bit...converting some to DE class?


They have a decently long upgrade path...and our useful thru 43.

They are the fastest DE the Americans have...

They lose combat ability, such that it was, for better AA and ASW. The six new 3" guns are good to 15K feet against planes.

Potential uses:

Hunter Killer Sqn...doesn't excite me.

Cripple guardian Sqn...follows fleets and rushes into merge with cripples to provide that extra bit of ASW help plus emergency repair help. I like this idea.[:)]

Pair with CVE...I haven't thought about how I am going to use the CVE that much. To replenish Deathstar planes, surely, but after that the role as ASW platforms I don't think so. Perhaps as small recon task force? I got plenty of time to figure it out.

2 knots too slow to be paired with fleet carriers

In bombardment task forces to provide that extra bit of ASW...with the slow BBs, like this idea too.

Generally I don't like to use DDs (and variants) in merchant/tanker fleets but will use them in invasion fleets for the invasion.

Unfortunately, I upgraded most Clemsons to the next DD version, and that rules out other conversions...but I think the remaining Clemsons will go DE to provide some operational flexibility thru 43.

Looks like I can convert 2 Clemsons...would have preferred to do 3...but I will give it a go as a special cripple guardian task force and later on with the slow battleships.

Anybody use the DE?

Image
In some earlier games I did, but now I convert them all to APD.
User avatar
Lowpe
Posts: 24582
Joined: Mon Feb 25, 2013 2:25 pm

RE: Spanking Lowpe (NJP72 vs Lowpe (A))

Post by Lowpe »

Aye, Carumba![X(]

Image
Attachments
a.jpg
a.jpg (407.71 KiB) Viewed 596 times
User avatar
Lowpe
Posts: 24582
Joined: Mon Feb 25, 2013 2:25 pm

RE: Spanking Lowpe (NJP72 vs Lowpe (A))

Post by Lowpe »

Clemson to APD.

Wickes to APD.

[:D]

Just not a fan, they can carry only troops, no supply. Plus you get 6+ in the reinforcement que which is more than enough.

My Wickes and Clemsons have been on the front lines, slugging it out with the Japanese and have more than earned back their VP in trashing troop convoys and sinking ships.

To take perfectly good destroyers and turn them into slow APDs...that 3 hex, no cargo is a killer.

However, converting say 3 from DD into DE they might provide some utility and prevent the IJN from capturing move victory points.



Image
Attachments
a.jpg
a.jpg (97.48 KiB) Viewed 596 times
User avatar
Lowpe
Posts: 24582
Joined: Mon Feb 25, 2013 2:25 pm

RE: Spanking Lowpe (NJP72 vs Lowpe (A))

Post by Lowpe »

More on Clemsons:

Note, that for some reason I thought the DE got 30knots...but at least it is still 4 hex movement.[:)]



Image
Attachments
a.jpg
a.jpg (286.51 KiB) Viewed 596 times
User avatar
Lowpe
Posts: 24582
Joined: Mon Feb 25, 2013 2:25 pm

RE: Spanking Lowpe (NJP72 vs Lowpe (A))

Post by Lowpe »

ORIGINAL: traskott

The "must do" upgrade for the Clemsons is APD. Lot of ASW value, and got some fast transport capability which comes handy. If u check reinforcements, DEs will be plenty, APD not, so, the "right" decision is upgrade them to APD. [:)]


DEs don't show up until Spring of 43, and they are god awful slow....would never want them in a bombardment taskforce or as a guardian angel SAG---well, rear area anti sub guardian angel task force would be ok...can't see them racing in to save a stricken fleet carrier or cruiser.



Image
Attachments
a.jpg
a.jpg (198.19 KiB) Viewed 596 times
User avatar
witpqs
Posts: 26376
Joined: Mon Oct 04, 2004 7:48 pm
Location: Argleton

RE: Spanking Lowpe (NJP72 vs Lowpe (A))

Post by witpqs »

Long term usefulness is what decided it for me. Just don't have enough APD until much later on.
User avatar
Lowpe
Posts: 24582
Joined: Mon Feb 25, 2013 2:25 pm

RE: Spanking Lowpe (NJP72 vs Lowpe (A))

Post by Lowpe »

ORIGINAL: JohnDillworth


During raids on Port Moresby they used to send the P-39's out over the ocean to get them out of the way because they could never get to altitude in time to make a difference and if the Betty's were escorted they would just get shot down. They referred to them as the "Port Moresby Fishing Fleet". Your results may just be historically accurate.

Great flavor![&o][:)]

Sigh, I set them training. Probably better off that way anyhow...[:)]
User avatar
Lowpe
Posts: 24582
Joined: Mon Feb 25, 2013 2:25 pm

RE: Spanking Lowpe (NJP72 vs Lowpe (A))

Post by Lowpe »

Lots of excitement...Japan has movement pips out of Rockhampton now, but they have to --- to secure the road. There are 3 Tank units and one recon at Rockhampton so it could just presage a control movement.



Image
Attachments
a.jpg
a.jpg (281.4 KiB) Viewed 596 times
User avatar
Lowpe
Posts: 24582
Joined: Mon Feb 25, 2013 2:25 pm

RE: Spanking Lowpe (NJP72 vs Lowpe (A))

Post by Lowpe »

ORIGINAL: witpqs

Long term usefulness is what decided it for me. Just don't have enough APD until much later on.

Nothing wrong with it.[:)]

Perhaps I will sing a different song in five months time.[:D]
mind_messing
Posts: 3394
Joined: Mon Oct 28, 2013 11:59 am

RE: Spanking Lowpe (NJP72 vs Lowpe (A))

Post by mind_messing »

ORIGINAL: Lowpe

Looking at the Allied OB, trying to find those units that work great on Pacific Atoll defense.

I normally like for Japan:

1 Artillery unit...
1 AA unit as a soak...for Japan I like the 20mm AA guys.
1 Eng unit for engineers, aviation support, minor flak, soak
1-2 combat units of infantry
1 armored car unit (these guys usually survive the bombardments and actually stop the attack)
1 cd unit
Mines


to around 6-9k troops.

Early on I think the chance of Japan launching a counter attack to take an atoll is pretty high depending on circumstances elsewhere...

Do you AFBs have any favorite units for atoll defense? What is your makeup?

I seem to be swimming in CD gun units, but armored car units are scarce...perhaps NZ? Small AA doesn't seem to exist. Smaller infantry seems to be Australia or NZ or Can.

From memory, there's plenty of USA artillery units floating around the West Coast to provide. Same with AA units.

Engineer units are a bit of a bottleneck - worth prioritising the USN base forces for atolls where there's at least a 0(1) port or better to take advantage of the naval support squads.

Army base forces aren't suited for atolls, but you can use the USAAF base forces pretty freely if you don't plan on using the port.

Where you really struggle in my experience is with infantry units. The Allies don't really have LCU's akin to the IJN Naval Guards/SNLF that you can use as almost a modular garrison force.

US Army regiments will eat up a lot of a 6k stacking limit, but would take a lot of effort for the IJ to move off (especially on an atoll).

You don't get many battalion sized formations for the US Army - might want to look at replacing the detachments of the 298th Infantry (starts off on the Hawaii Islands) with bigger formations and use the 3 separate battalions for atoll garrison.

Armoured cars - not many of those on the eastern side of the map IIRC. You could use the US tank units, but maybe the Oz armoured units might be a better fit.

I wouldn't undersell the Allied AA either. The average USA AA regiment is stock full of automatic weapons, plus the 90mm guns may even get some CD fire going too.

ORIGINAL: Lowpe

Lets talk Clemson Destroyers for a bit...converting some to DE class?

I go for a mixed approach.

You get a bunch of APD's a couple months into the war, and they will generally suffice for your fast transport needs. I think you need this functionality less with the Allies than you do with Japan as the Allies have more and better air transport options.

What you do need is escorts with semi-decent range. You can gather up enough KV's, SC's and the like to cover immediate needs, but there's a bit of a gap with the longer range stuff until the longer range PC and DE start to arrive. Most of my Clemson's end up as DE's.

I do send a fairly hefty squadron (8 or so) off to the Indian Ocean. They get paired with the old RN BB's that operate in theatre. The RN always feel short of DD's to me, so that keeps some of the better RN destroyers for more active duties.
User avatar
RangerJoe
Posts: 19242
Joined: Mon Nov 16, 2015 2:39 pm
Location: Who knows?

RE: Spanking Lowpe (NJP72 vs Lowpe (A))

Post by RangerJoe »

Loaded with supplies, the APDs can carry 60 units of supply. While that is not alot, they can do the Fast Transport TF. That supply also gets unloaded in one turn for an amphibious invasion. Not a lot but it is there right away. With 6 ASW early, they are your best ASW units. If the ones in the Asiatic Fleet survive, they should have a nice experience gain which is useful for prosecuting enemy submarines.

Those APDs can also be used to strip out the soft devices from your US Tank Battalions which you can then break down for small island garrisons. Those Naval guard units do have a hard time against those Stuarts defending atolls.

The Sampson was the last of its class and was used for convoy escorts between the West Coast and Hawaii.
Seek peace but keep your gun handy.

I'm not a complete idiot, some parts are missing! :o

“Illegitemus non carborundum est (“Don’t let the bastards grind you down”).”
:twisted: ; Julia Child


Image
User avatar
HansBolter
Posts: 7457
Joined: Thu Jul 06, 2006 12:30 pm
Location: United States

RE: Spanking Lowpe (NJP72 vs Lowpe (A))

Post by HansBolter »

I also prefer converting to APDs as they are just too useful in '42 when that type is in short supply.

I also maintain a few as DDs as that type is also in such short supply in '42.

It's usually the Far East Fleet DDs that I keep as fighting craft, since getting replacement DDs to that theater is a non starter.

Marblehead and its accompanying 4 stackers have the highest crew experience in my entire fleet due to their proximity to the fight and constant use.
Hans

User avatar
BBfanboy
Posts: 20555
Joined: Wed Aug 04, 2010 5:36 pm
Location: Winnipeg, MB
Contact:

RE: Spanking Lowpe (NJP72 vs Lowpe (A))

Post by BBfanboy »

I will be surprised if you can save Kennison. How did you get a TF to dock with a ship on fire - the code is supposed to prohibit that!

I would send her out into the enemy fleet as a fire ship ...



Image
Attachments
GofTwildfire.gif
GofTwildfire.gif (963.48 KiB) Viewed 600 times
No matter how bad a situation is, you can always make it worse. - Chris Hadfield : An Astronaut's Guide To Life On Earth
User avatar
Lowpe
Posts: 24582
Joined: Mon Feb 25, 2013 2:25 pm

RE: Spanking Lowpe (NJP72 vs Lowpe (A))

Post by Lowpe »

ORIGINAL: RangerJoe
With 6 ASW early, they are your best ASW units.

Wrong, DE Clemsons are better as they have working surface radar.
User avatar
Lowpe
Posts: 24582
Joined: Mon Feb 25, 2013 2:25 pm

RE: Spanking Lowpe (NJP72 vs Lowpe (A))

Post by Lowpe »

ORIGINAL: BBfanboy

I will be surprised if you can save Kennison. How did you get a TF to dock with a ship on fire - the code is supposed to prohibit that!

You guys are bloodthirsty....turn is away, so we wills see if she can be saved later today.




User avatar
Encircled
Posts: 2097
Joined: Thu Dec 30, 2010 3:50 pm
Location: Northern England

RE: Spanking Lowpe (NJP72 vs Lowpe (A))

Post by Encircled »

More votes for APDs here

They are so useful as fast transports

User avatar
BBfanboy
Posts: 20555
Joined: Wed Aug 04, 2010 5:36 pm
Location: Winnipeg, MB
Contact:

RE: Spanking Lowpe (NJP72 vs Lowpe (A))

Post by BBfanboy »

The aforementioned Humber. Might be a Humber IV rather than the Humber I

Image
Attachments
humber.jpg
humber.jpg (29.95 KiB) Viewed 600 times
No matter how bad a situation is, you can always make it worse. - Chris Hadfield : An Astronaut's Guide To Life On Earth
User avatar
Lowpe
Posts: 24582
Joined: Mon Feb 25, 2013 2:25 pm

RE: Spanking Lowpe (NJP72 vs Lowpe (A))

Post by Lowpe »

Humber I



Image
Attachments
220pxIWM..uredCar.jpg
220pxIWM..uredCar.jpg (9.55 KiB) Viewed 600 times
User avatar
Lowpe
Posts: 24582
Joined: Mon Feb 25, 2013 2:25 pm

RE: Spanking Lowpe (NJP72 vs Lowpe (A))

Post by Lowpe »

April 20th, 1942

Our longest layered CAP ever, stretching form 2k to 35k. Goodness. Sometime soon I will be hit with Tojos...

The dogfights over Brisbane are decidedly one way. We are waiting for an HQa to arrive at Maryborough before we go on the heavy offensive.

Kennison founders at Brisbane despite our best efforts. Pity.[:(]

Image
Attachments
a.jpg
a.jpg (356.59 KiB) Viewed 600 times
Post Reply

Return to “After Action Reports”