Naval and Defense News

Take command of air and naval assets from post-WW2 to the near future in tactical and operational scale, complete with historical and hypothetical scenarios and an integrated scenario editor.

Moderator: MOD_Command

Hongjian
Posts: 841
Joined: Fri Jan 02, 2015 1:11 pm

RE: Naval and Defense News

Post by Hongjian »

"Airforce Dragon" - So, "Mighty Dragon" is confirmed as the J-20's official nickname?

Image
Hongjian
Posts: 841
Joined: Fri Jan 02, 2015 1:11 pm

RE: Naval and Defense News

Post by Hongjian »

http://weibo.com/tv/v/FeKDoo2ly?fid=103 ... 05f7476516

Interview with J-20 drivers:

- Subsonic maneuverbility is good (sounds like "only good")
- Once it reaches supersonic speeds, the J-20 has extreme maneuverbility
- The entire plane's sensor fusion is so well made "as if the Pilot is feeling the air-currents on his own skin, seeing everything and hearing everything around him"
User avatar
Dysta
Posts: 1909
Joined: Fri Aug 07, 2015 9:32 pm

RE: Naval and Defense News

Post by Dysta »

HMDS

I cannot expect much from the video, it still looks quite like a older gen helmet display for F-16 and F/A-18 pilots.

EDIT: Henri presumed the helmet is TK-31. It's not equivalent to the one for F-35, but designed to perform off-bore launching with PL-10 AAM.

https://mobile.twitter.com/HenriKenhman ... 8157114369
User avatar
jbyng
Posts: 32
Joined: Sat Nov 02, 2013 4:43 pm
Location: rocky mountain high

RE: Naval and Defense News

Post by jbyng »

In that J-20 screen capture, what could be revealed if the censor hadn't blurred the nose of the plane?
AlphaSierra
Posts: 132
Joined: Mon Feb 13, 2017 9:35 am

RE: Naval and Defense News

Post by AlphaSierra »

Weapon Engagement Zone Maximum Launch Range

https://etd.ohiolink.edu/rws_etd/document/get/wright1313763379/inline

Interesting read
I wish to have no connection with any ship that does not sail fast; for I intend to go in harm's way. -John Paul Jones
Hongjian
Posts: 841
Joined: Fri Jan 02, 2015 1:11 pm

RE: Naval and Defense News

Post by Hongjian »

ORIGINAL: jbyng

In that J-20 screen capture, what could be revealed if the censor hadn't blurred the nose of the plane?


Not much, actually.

EOTS/IRST under the nose and radome, mostly.

User avatar
xavierv
Posts: 511
Joined: Wed Jul 10, 2013 11:33 am
Contact:

RE: Naval and Defense News

Post by xavierv »

ORIGINAL: Gunner98

I guess 'Digital' works after all!

https://news.usni.org/2017/07/28/video- ... ult-launch



'Digital doesn't have the power, we need Goddam Steam!'
User avatar
kevinkins
Posts: 2465
Joined: Wed Mar 08, 2006 11:54 am

RE: Naval and Defense News

Post by kevinkins »

The entire plane's sensor fusion is so well made "as if the Pilot is feeling the air-currents on his own skin, seeing everything and hearing everything around him"

Not sure how desirable that is. It's not about information overload. It's about the right info at the right time. Perhaps that's just hyperbole.

Kevin
“The study of history lies at the foundation of all sound military conclusions and practice.”
Alfred Thayer Mahan
Hongjian
Posts: 841
Joined: Fri Jan 02, 2015 1:11 pm

RE: Naval and Defense News

Post by Hongjian »

Just a figure of speech. Chinese language is full of poetic figures even in daily conversations.
The pilot just means that the sensor fusion has reached a point where they have very good situational awareness now.
Hongjian
Posts: 841
Joined: Fri Jan 02, 2015 1:11 pm

RE: Naval and Defense News

Post by Hongjian »

DF-31AG
2nd picture shows a good comparisson: DF-16, DF-31A and DF-31AG.
The parade square had 16 of them. We can assume that at least one brigade is in service now...

Image
Image

Broncepulido
Posts: 438
Joined: Thu Sep 26, 2013 6:12 pm

RE: Naval and Defense News

Post by Broncepulido »

Actually, poetical images aside, if true, are describing the same sensor fussion and information overload of F-35.
Wiz33
Posts: 148
Joined: Wed May 16, 2007 8:00 pm

RE: Naval and Defense News

Post by Wiz33 »

Looks like the Navy finally placed their first order for the LRASM. Old video just to go with the news.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=h449oIjg2kY
jtoatoktoe
Posts: 208
Joined: Wed Oct 09, 2013 12:38 pm

RE: Naval and Defense News

Post by jtoatoktoe »

ORIGINAL: Wiz33

Looks like the Navy finally placed their first order for the LRASM. Old video just to go with the news.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=h449oIjg2kY

Its a co order with the Air Force for air launched. B-1B's will field them first then the Super Hornet fleet.
AlphaSierra
Posts: 132
Joined: Mon Feb 13, 2017 9:35 am

RE: Naval and Defense News

Post by AlphaSierra »

One has to wonder how much experience B-1 pilots have shooting at ships
I wish to have no connection with any ship that does not sail fast; for I intend to go in harm's way. -John Paul Jones
Hongjian
Posts: 841
Joined: Fri Jan 02, 2015 1:11 pm

RE: Naval and Defense News

Post by Hongjian »

First time officially named: HQ-9B SAM and the new HQ-22.

Image


Info for the HQ-22:
http://defence-blog.com/army/china-unve ... huhai.html
The HQ-22 has large kill airspace ranges up to 150-170 km at an altitude from 50 to 27,000m which super adaptive anti-jamming capacity with several anti-jamming measures.

Has basically similiar range as quoted for the HQ-9 series... Which makes PLA watchers think that the rumors of the 200+km range for the HQ-9B has more to it.
User avatar
Dysta
Posts: 1909
Joined: Fri Aug 07, 2015 9:32 pm

RE: Naval and Defense News

Post by Dysta »

It's impossible to rapidly ditch all the HQ-2/12 in favor to HQ-9, even for China that is a very steep price, and will contest with PLAN since they need more HQ-9 for new destroyers than the Army do. HQ-22 is still cheap, with steerable and maneuverable TEL, and with minimal transitional training from older derivatives.

Obviously it is not designed to counter saturation strike, but it's a combat-proven platform against very high altitude targets, it might comes in handy to counter some loitering decoys and drones.
AlphaSierra
Posts: 132
Joined: Mon Feb 13, 2017 9:35 am

RE: Naval and Defense News

Post by AlphaSierra »

combat proven where?
I wish to have no connection with any ship that does not sail fast; for I intend to go in harm's way. -John Paul Jones
User avatar
Dysta
Posts: 1909
Joined: Fri Aug 07, 2015 9:32 pm

RE: Naval and Defense News

Post by Dysta »

ORIGINAL: AlphaSierra

combat proven where?
I doubly any of these were put on the frontline during the Sino-Viet war because it's still too new after it's successfully copied. But for the even older kind, like the true SA-2 imported from USSR before the breakup, then it's indeed gave Uncle Sam quite of headache in 50s.

Many famous high-altitudes aircrafts, like some of those U-2 and one D-21 are all wreckages in Chinese hands. The crash of D-21 remain in mystery because it's way smaller and faster for SA-2 to hit, and it's a drone that prone to easily flop around with 60s techs. But, the SR-71 is the only aircraft make China no longer able to put a crosshair on her, and then later the satellites.


One discussion I found about those U-2 were shot: http://forum.keypublishing.com/showthre ... ragon-Lady
And the crash of D-21: http://forum.keypublishing.com/showthre ... -1960s-70s
User avatar
kevinkins
Posts: 2465
Joined: Wed Mar 08, 2006 11:54 am

RE: Naval and Defense News

Post by kevinkins »

http://www.cnn.com/2017/07/31/politics/ ... index.html

The US military has detected "highly unusual and unprecedented levels" of North Korean submarine activity and evidence of an "ejection test" in the days following Pyongyang's second intercontinental ballistic missile launch this month.
“The study of history lies at the foundation of all sound military conclusions and practice.”
Alfred Thayer Mahan
Hongjian
Posts: 841
Joined: Fri Jan 02, 2015 1:11 pm

RE: Naval and Defense News

Post by Hongjian »

Chinese Base in Djibouti officially opened!

They have some combat troops there, including AFVs like the ZBL-08 8x8 IFV and RWS armed Mengshi Humvees.

Image
Post Reply

Return to “Command: Modern Operations series”