ORIGINAL: squatter
"The defensive SU commitment bug did indeed show itself this turn. I had exactly one battle where my guys showed up. It was one of the few holds I had."
So, either defensive SUs make little difference to the game, and all our hours micromanagement to get them in the right place are wasted, or the game is not playable until patch 1.04 comes out.
The commitment is not the only big issue in my opinion. The fixing of SU not benefiting from forts/terrain will be VERY influential. Imagine a battle where the initial CV ratio is 540:530 (very typical for 43-45 beginning) and of your 540 who are in a level 3 fort, only 27 is contributed by a full Bn of 45 tigers.
The game is still playable imo, the game will just be rather different with the patch. Also, if they are really implementing more movement attrition this will mean a way slower German advance in 1941, as they have no railroads to use yet. I regard my current PBEM is a test to see how different play style for Germands and Soviets changes the dynamic of the 43-45 campaign as compered to BigA's and Oleg's first 14 turns, fully realizing that the German potential with the patch to hold out longer will rise.
I will post an AAR after Del and I finish a few more turns, but from the feel of the scenario I would say that BigA's decision to weaken the front line and put up 2 weak lines helps the Soviet player to do a lot of attacks, while simultaniously generating unsustainable losses for the Germans by exposing his troops to all those attacks.