Stukas ground strike Brussels to some effect.

Moderator: Shannon V. OKeets



Yes.I presume Allies choose Assault in Brussels?


warspite1ORIGINAL: Orm
I am sorry for the delay. I am stuck at doing production planning and I got to frustrated to continue. [:(]
Thank you.ORIGINAL: warspite1
warspite1ORIGINAL: Orm
I am sorry for the delay. I am stuck at doing production planning and I got to frustrated to continue. [:(]
Hang in there! [;)]
Thank you for showing interest. Although I can not agree with you.ORIGINAL: quiritus
very bad choice of belgian set up: the two inf in every other place prevent the Germany capture of Bruxelles. with the UK in Rotterdam and without para this is the only way Germany can break the Dyle line in rain this impulse.
I hold Centuur in highest esteem. But I fail to see why he should be given credit for this since I see no post of his mentioning it in this thread.ORIGINAL: Jagdtiger14
Very good post/response quiritus! Actually, the best location for those two INF would have been the hex just west of Brussels.
To give proper credit, Centuur mentioned it first.
Sorry, I am not persistent enough. I change the convoy route and the computer, at once, change it back. I am to frustrated to continue.ORIGINAL: AllenK
Mention in despatches for persistence in the face of the enemy.
ORIGINAL: Orm
I hold Centuur in highest esteem. But I fail to see why he should be given credit for this since I see no post of his mentioning it in this thread.ORIGINAL: Jagdtiger14
Very good post/response quiritus! Actually, the best location for those two INF would have been the hex just west of Brussels.
To give proper credit, Centuur mentioned it first.
ORIGINAL: Centuur
ORIGINAL: Orm
I hold Centuur in highest esteem. But I fail to see why he should be given credit for this since I see no post of his mentioning it in this thread.ORIGINAL: Jagdtiger14
Very good post/response quiritus! Actually, the best location for those two INF would have been the hex just west of Brussels.
To give proper credit, Centuur mentioned it first.
That's because I mentioned it in the Axis topic, not in this one. I've joined the "bad" guys. I fully expected that the Belgians would not set up in either Antwerp or Brussels, thus preventing the Germans from crossing the Dyle river line during the surprise impulse in Belgium. The lack of cooperation between the Allies and the neutral Belgians however, proved otherwise, giving the Axis the opportunity to crush the valiant but powerless Belgian defenders in one blow...

I rather say that the "No ZOC on Surprise" is completely unneeded. Germany can setup strong in the West already and do not need any more advantage. Historical opening with heavy German setup against Poland is becoming a rare thing. At least according to some posters. And who has ever seen a phoney war in MWIF?ORIGINAL: AllenK
ORIGINAL: Mayhemizer
Polish setup it not what I expected, sneaky...
![]()
See, this is what happens when you play without "No ZOC on Surprise". It's so totally unrealistic. Steve should have dropped everything and made this compulsory optional rule his number one priority to code. The game is completely unplayable without it.
warspite1ORIGINAL: Orm
I rather say that the "No ZOC on Surprise" is completely unneeded. Germany can setup strong in the West already and do not need any more advantage. Historical opening with heavy German setup against Poland is becoming a rare thing. At least according to some posters. And who has ever seen a phoney war in MWIF?ORIGINAL: AllenK
ORIGINAL: Mayhemizer
Polish setup it not what I expected, sneaky...
See, this is what happens when you play without "No ZOC on Surprise". It's so totally unrealistic. Steve should have dropped everything and made this compulsory optional rule his number one priority to code. The game is completely unplayable without it.
The ZOC cutting the supply for the German units in this setup might be a little weird. But if Germany placed a historical amount of units against the Poles then it wouldn't matter how the Poles placed their units.