Review and Editing of Unit Descriptions

[Rams128]

I just realized that this topic is about editing and reviewing "existing" descriptions only . Idk why, but in my mind the DB update one was for images, and this one was for descriptions ... I’ll continue on the right one for the next posts.

[CV60]

I just realized that this topic is about editing and reviewing "existing" descriptions only . Idk why, but in my mind the DB update one was for images, and this one was for descriptions ... I’ll continue on the right one for the next posts.

It is fine to post descriptions here. This is sort of a "group editing" forum for the description files. If you post them here, I will see them and load them.

[Rams128]

I just realized that this topic is about editing and reviewing "existing" descriptions only . Idk why, but in my mind the DB update one was for images, and this one was for descriptions ... I’ll continue on the right one for the next posts.

It is fine to post descriptions here. This is sort of a "group editing" forum for the description files. If you post them here, I will see them and load them.

Received. I'm completing the weapon/ironBomb descriptions section. Since many details are classified and will remain so indefinitely, i think it's better to provide a sourced overview plus detail sections rather than having no information at all ?.
Specifications and performance can still be added later as needed. (and are already accessible to users through the in-game general data.) meaning there is no additional benefit for players/users.

Regarding the priority use of descriptions, I understand they may serve as a extra resource for developers by providing accurate, sourced information. However, I would like to clarify whether the primary focus is on assisting players/users or helping developers to have missing data ?.

As I'm fully prioritizing players/users for now.

[blu3s]

This is mainly for players.

There's a github for DB issues where you can upload corrections of current units in the DB, or ask for a new unit.

https://github.com/PygmalionOfCyprus/cm ... sts/issues

[Rams128]

This is mainly for players.

There's a github for DB issues where you can upload corrections of current units in the DB, or ask for a new unit.

https://github.com/PygmalionOfCyprus/cm ... sts/issues

OK, Thanks.

[Rams128]

Priority to Weapons used by default for now, here are all the IronBomb-Section Descriptions (74 Files)
(The ones it will ask to confirm replacement are ONLY remaining inaccurate descriptions of the MIM-23 HAWK.)

[Rams128]

All rockets used by default (80 Files)

[CV60]

All rockets used by default (80 Files)

Thanks. I've submitted the Description packet, so I'll add this to the next update. Incidentally, thank you very much for your work on these

[Rams128]

OPTIONAL: some basic DB3000 aircraft Descriptions: (221 Files) No copy.

- ALL Panavia Tornado (61 Files)
- ALL Su-30, Su-33, Su-34, Su-35, J-15, J-16, (57 Files)
- ALL AV8/Harrier (47 Files).
- ELINT-SIGINT (56 Files)

UPDATED/CORRECTED

[Rams128]

More DB3000 weapon sections: (201 Files)
Decoy Expendable - Decoy Towed - Decoy vehicle - Mines - Depth charges ... etc

[Rams128]

Generic Weapons for CWDB (58 files)

[Rams128]

DB3000 Weapon: Torpedo (175 Files)

[ClaudeJ]

Hey there good people,

just to mention that theses weapons ID still harbor the elusive MIM-23 Hawk description

Weapon_65 RIM-66A SM-1MR Blk IV ASuW
Weapon_466 GBU-24/B Paveway III LGB [BPG-2000 PGM, CPE-800 Penetrator]
Weapon_494 100mm/59 A-190 HE
Weapon_657 RIM-66L-2 SM-2MR Blk IIIA
Weapon_658 RIM-66L-1 SM-2MR Blk III
Weapon_659 RIM-66J SM-2MR Blk II
Weapon_660 RIM-66H SM-2MR Blk II
Weapon_668 20mm GAM-BO1 Oerlikon Burst [20 rnds]
Weapon_671 SS.12
Weapon_672 Red Top
Weapon_674 R.440N Crotale V3S
Weapon_675 R.440N Crotale V3N
Weapon_679 57mm/81 ZIF-75 Quad DP Burst [6 rnds]
Weapon_681 Aster 30 Blk 1
Weapon_685 120mm M256 HE
Weapon_686 120mm M256 HEAT
Weapon_688 120mm M256 APFSDS-T
Weapon_691 105mm M68A1 HE
Weapon_692 BGM-71A TOW
Weapon_699 SA-N-20a Gargoyle [48N6]
Weapon_719 ASMP-A [300kT Nuclear]
Weapon_733 AIM-92E Stinger ATAS RPM Blk I
Weapon_734 FIM-92D Stinger RMP
Weapon_739 AIM-92C Stinger ATAS RPM
Weapon_743 FIM-92C Stinger RMP
Weapon_745 40mm/70 Twin Breda Vesta Fast Forty Burst [32 rnds]
Weapon_749 37mm/63 Single Burst [20 rnds]
Weapon_788 100mm/55 Model 1953 PFHE
Weapon_793 Elma ASW-600 ASW Mortar Salvo [M90 Hard Kill DC, 9 rnds]
Weapon_815 BGM-71F TOW 2B
Weapon_817 500 USG Conformal Tank
Weapon_2237 Condib 120

Cheers

[ClaudeJ]

Hey there,
this issue seems to have resisted your best efforts to fix it.

(...)[*]delete Aircraft_2105 (P-3AM Orion (Brazil, Navy 2012) but has the MiG-23MS description file).

Cheers

[thewood1]

Hey there good people,

just to mention that theses weapons ID still harbor the elusive MIM-23 Hawk description

Weapon_65 RIM-66A SM-1MR Blk IV ASuW
Weapon_466 GBU-24/B Paveway III LGB [BPG-2000 PGM, CPE-800 Penetrator]
Weapon_494 100mm/59 A-190 HE
Weapon_657 RIM-66L-2 SM-2MR Blk IIIA
Weapon_658 RIM-66L-1 SM-2MR Blk III
Weapon_659 RIM-66J SM-2MR Blk II
Weapon_660 RIM-66H SM-2MR Blk II
Weapon_668 20mm GAM-BO1 Oerlikon Burst [20 rnds]
Weapon_671 SS.12
Weapon_672 Red Top
Weapon_674 R.440N Crotale V3S
Weapon_675 R.440N Crotale V3N
Weapon_679 57mm/81 ZIF-75 Quad DP Burst [6 rnds]
Weapon_681 Aster 30 Blk 1
Weapon_685 120mm M256 HE
Weapon_686 120mm M256 HEAT
Weapon_688 120mm M256 APFSDS-T
Weapon_691 105mm M68A1 HE
Weapon_692 BGM-71A TOW
Weapon_699 SA-N-20a Gargoyle [48N6]
Weapon_719 ASMP-A [300kT Nuclear]
Weapon_733 AIM-92E Stinger ATAS RPM Blk I
Weapon_734 FIM-92D Stinger RMP
Weapon_739 AIM-92C Stinger ATAS RPM
Weapon_743 FIM-92C Stinger RMP
Weapon_745 40mm/70 Twin Breda Vesta Fast Forty Burst [32 rnds]
Weapon_749 37mm/63 Single Burst [20 rnds]
Weapon_788 100mm/55 Model 1953 PFHE
Weapon_793 Elma ASW-600 ASW Mortar Salvo [M90 Hard Kill DC, 9 rnds]
Weapon_815 BGM-71F TOW 2B
Weapon_817 500 USG Conformal Tank
Weapon_2237 Condib 120

Cheers

Just make sure you delete ALL descriptions before you copy the new ones in. Sometimes those left over Hawk descriptions will linger in the directory if not cleaned out. Doesn't mean they aren't still in the description bundles, but just making sure.

[ClaudeJ]

Thanks for the advice, thewood1.
This on a fresh install.
I'm not installing the description bundle manually, though. I let the autodownload feature do its magic

[pboiler]

The description for #4394 LRHW is incorrect and describes a torpedo.