Moderators: wdolson, MOD_War-in-the-Pacific-Admirals-Edition
You can't withdraw a ship with that much damage. Don't you have to get all damage categories below 50 and total damage points below 100?ORIGINAL: Lowpe
Ramillies breaks out at a blistering speed!
The Japanese hold Columbo - were you meaning CT or were you suggesting it be sent for a quick sinking? [:D]ORIGINAL: witpqs
Send for repairs at Colombo to save PP penalties.
ORIGINAL: BBfanboy
The Japanese hold Columbo - were you meaning CT or were you suggesting it be sent for a quick sinking? [:D]ORIGINAL: witpqs
Send for repairs at Colombo to save PP penalties.
I think Lowpe has time to get her to CT and repair enough of the damage to withdraw her before the due date.
Baker Island bombarded for the first time, by only two destroyers, but they put in a solid show.
Night Naval bombardment of Baker Island at 149,136
Allied Ships
DD Balch
DD Porter
ORIGINAL: Lowpe
...I was always curious if the admin rating of the leaders had any effect on upgrades in that unit, my play experience tells me that if they do it is very minimal in the range of a few percentage points....
ORIGINAL: Capt. Harlock
Baker Island bombarded for the first time, by only two destroyers, but they put in a solid show.
Night Naval bombardment of Baker Island at 149,136
Allied Ships
DD Balch
DD Porter
Those are no ordinary destroyers! [:D]
ORIGINAL: witpqs
Send for repairs at Colombo to save PP penalties.
ORIGINAL: BBfanboy
The Japanese hold Columbo - were you meaning CT or were you suggesting it be sent for a quick sinking? [:D]ORIGINAL: witpqs
Send for repairs at Colombo to save PP penalties.
I think Lowpe has time to get her to CT and repair enough of the damage to withdraw her before the due date.
ORIGINAL: CaptBeefheart
On the leader ratings, everything I recall from hint sheets and old threads says "aggression" for ground leaders has no effect. Aggression does have an effect on the naval side and possibly on the air side. Someone please correct me if I'm wrong.
For the admin rating, I've split divisions into A, B and C and have clearly seen how leaders with higher admin un-disable devices more quickly, as expected. My guess is admin rating doesn't affect device upgrades.
Good luck with the Ramillies. I'm not sure what else you could do other than a suicide run.
Cheers,
CB
ORIGINAL: Alfred
ORIGINAL: Lowpe
...I was always curious if the admin rating of the leaders had any effect on upgrades in that unit, my play experience tells me that if they do it is very minimal in the range of a few percentage points....
The short answer is no re Admin rating. That rating does have an indirect impact on device recovery which in turn impacts on what gets returned to the pools when upgrading.
Alfred
ORIGINAL: Lowpe
ORIGINAL: CaptBeefheart
On the leader ratings, everything I recall from hint sheets and old threads says "aggression" for ground leaders has no effect. Aggression does have an effect on the naval side and possibly on the air side. Someone please correct me if I'm wrong.
For the admin rating, I've split divisions into A, B and C and have clearly seen how leaders with higher admin un-disable devices more quickly, as expected. My guess is admin rating doesn't affect device upgrades.
Good luck with the Ramillies. I'm not sure what else you could do other than a suicide run.
Cheers,
CB
I don't really give any credence to the old leader charts...rather, I use the definitions of the values and think could it apply...so I do a lot of crazy things like selecting high naval skills on a dive bomber squadron commander for example.
It is probably totally a waste of PPs, but it really increases my enjoyment of the game and gives me some tidbits to throw out in the AAR.
; Julia Child
ORIGINAL: Lowpe
...I need to look and see how what the HQ supply drain is....I could perhaps move extra HQ units into the wild where they wouldn't draw supplies or something else...
