Spanking Lowpe (NJP72 vs Lowpe (A))

Post descriptions of your brilliant victories and unfortunate defeats here.

Moderators: wdolson, MOD_War-in-the-Pacific-Admirals-Edition

User avatar
Lowpe
Posts: 24582
Joined: Mon Feb 25, 2013 2:25 pm

RE: Spanking Lowpe (NJP72 vs Lowpe (A))

Post by Lowpe »

July 27th, 1942

We unleash our PBYs against the Mogami...we get three hits, one failure to explode but two solid hits... there are no air bases close by as Tarawa is a level 0 AF...Mili and Baker are size 1.

Morning Air attack on TF, near Nikunau at 141,135

Weather in hex: Clear sky

Raid spotted at 20 NM, estimated altitude 15,700 feet.
Estimated time to target is 12 minutes

Allied aircraft
PBY-5A Catalina x 9

Allied aircraft losses
PBY-5A Catalina: 1 damaged

Japanese Ships
CA Mogami, Torpedo hits 1
DD Kisaragi

Aircraft Attacking:
9 x PBY-5A Catalina launching torpedoes at 200 feet
Naval Attack: 2 x 22.4in Mk 13 Torp.



--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Afternoon Air attack on TF, near Nikunau at 141,135

Weather in hex: Light rain

Raid spotted at 13 NM, estimated altitude 15,700 feet.
Estimated time to target is 7 minutes

Allied aircraft
PBY-5A Catalina x 3

Allied aircraft losses
PBY-5A Catalina: 2 damaged

Japanese Ships
CA Mogami, Torpedo hits 1

Aircraft Attacking:
3 x PBY-5A Catalina launching torpedoes at 200 feet
Naval Attack: 2 x 22.4in Mk 13 Torp.


Image
Attachments
a.jpg
a.jpg (398.26 KiB) Viewed 796 times
User avatar
Lowpe
Posts: 24582
Joined: Mon Feb 25, 2013 2:25 pm

RE: Spanking Lowpe (NJP72 vs Lowpe (A))

Post by Lowpe »

China

Image
Attachments
a.jpg
a.jpg (669.05 KiB) Viewed 796 times
User avatar
RangerJoe
Posts: 19368
Joined: Mon Nov 16, 2015 2:39 pm
Location: Who knows?

RE: Spanking Lowpe (NJP72 vs Lowpe (A))

Post by RangerJoe »

That is a little ways away from a Japanese body and fender shop as well. [&o]
Seek peace but keep your gun handy.

I'm not a complete idiot, some parts are missing! :o

“Illegitemus non carborundum est (“Don’t let the bastards grind you down”).”
:twisted: ; Julia Child


Image
User avatar
Lowpe
Posts: 24582
Joined: Mon Feb 25, 2013 2:25 pm

RE: Spanking Lowpe (NJP72 vs Lowpe (A))

Post by Lowpe »

The Darwin front

Image
Attachments
a.jpg
a.jpg (426.42 KiB) Viewed 797 times
User avatar
Lowpe
Posts: 24582
Joined: Mon Feb 25, 2013 2:25 pm

RE: Spanking Lowpe (NJP72 vs Lowpe (A))

Post by Lowpe »

End of July, 1942

Logistics of moving troops where they are needed is quite surprising this early, I am finding. I feel I should be pushing hard...but I am hesitant at finding targets worth the risk this early. I lack the small ships I want to risk forward this early...but still we making headway on numerous areas of Japanese Pacific ocean perimeter...there is another IJN destroyer force at Baker Island now...

In China another big fight...



Image
Attachments
a.jpg
a.jpg (294.28 KiB) Viewed 796 times
User avatar
RangerJoe
Posts: 19368
Joined: Mon Nov 16, 2015 2:39 pm
Location: Who knows?

RE: Spanking Lowpe (NJP72 vs Lowpe (A))

Post by RangerJoe »

Keep up the good work. You are showing how the Chinese do not need to fall like a house of cards . . .

Since I am reading and posting on both sides, I will not go farther than that . . .
Seek peace but keep your gun handy.

I'm not a complete idiot, some parts are missing! :o

“Illegitemus non carborundum est (“Don’t let the bastards grind you down”).”
:twisted: ; Julia Child


Image
User avatar
Yaab
Posts: 5542
Joined: Tue Nov 08, 2011 2:09 pm
Location: Poland

RE: Spanking Lowpe (NJP72 vs Lowpe (A))

Post by Yaab »

I see you play with stacking limits. How do you prepare for Chungking defence? You may suffer both supply spoilage and overstacking there, if you put too many units/supplies there, especially since destroyed Chinese units arrive in Chungking.
User avatar
Lowpe
Posts: 24582
Joined: Mon Feb 25, 2013 2:25 pm

RE: Spanking Lowpe (NJP72 vs Lowpe (A))

Post by Lowpe »

ORIGINAL: Yaab

I see you play with stacking limits. How do you prepare for Chungking defence? You may suffer both supply spoilage and overstacking there, if you put too many units/supplies there, especially since destroyed Chinese units arrive in Chungking.

I don't really plan on defending Chungking with more than about 80% of the stacking limit....and all but one HQc not there.


User avatar
Lowpe
Posts: 24582
Joined: Mon Feb 25, 2013 2:25 pm

RE: Spanking Lowpe (NJP72 vs Lowpe (A))

Post by Lowpe »

End of July, 1942

A surprise bombardment of Pago Pago...not much there seemingly.

Five IJA units are forcing a crossing into the rough terrain above Sian...troops are being bombed heavily, but only one corp is present but dug in (forts 4 I think). Could be ugly...

Not enough tanks in the pools to upgrade our Indian Armor in Paoshan...

Night Naval bombardment of Pago Pago at 148,161

Allied Ships
CA Minneapolis
CA Louisville
CL De Ruyter
CL Leander
DD King
DD Sands
DD Humphreys
DD Tenedos
DD Dale

Japanese ground losses:
161 casualties reported
Squads: 1 destroyed, 1 disabled
Non Combat: 2 destroyed, 4 disabled
Engineers: 0 destroyed, 2 disabled

Airbase hits 4
Airbase supply hits 5
Runway hits 14
Port hits 12
Port fuel hits 2
Port supply hits 3

CA Minneapolis firing at Pago Pago
SOC-1 Seagull acting as spotter for CA Louisville
CA Louisville firing at Pago Pago
CL De Ruyter firing at Pago Pago
CL Leander firing at Pago Pago
DD King firing at Pago Pago
DD Sands firing at Pago Pago
DD Humphreys firing at Pago Pago
DD Tenedos firing at Pago Pago
DD Dale firing at Pago Pago
User avatar
Lowpe
Posts: 24582
Joined: Mon Feb 25, 2013 2:25 pm

RE: Spanking Lowpe (NJP72 vs Lowpe (A))

Post by Lowpe »

July 31, 1942

My guess, is that Japan will think the invasion is coming for Canton...having spotted the CLAA/AMC fast transport fleet to the east of Enderbury, although both fast transports are simply expanding our presence on Enderbury Island.

I might bring up the deathstar to provide cover, or I might not....maybe route the fast transports to Sydney Island.

I think there are disbanded ships at Baker in port that might form up and look to catch my DMS and APDx2 fast transport currently at Howland Island...so I probably will disband them into Howland for now.

Building another flying boat base at Nikunau.



Image
Night Naval bombardment of Canton Island at 153,143

Japanese aircraft
no flights

Japanese aircraft losses
B5N2 Kate: 1 damaged

Allied Ships
CL Phoenix
CL Honolulu
DD Selfridge
DD Patterson
DD Henley
DD Bagley

Japanese ground losses:
217 casualties reported
Squads: 0 destroyed, 9 disabled
Non Combat: 3 destroyed, 30 disabled
Engineers: 1 destroyed, 3 disabled

Airbase hits 4
Airbase supply hits 1
Runway hits 24
Port hits 6
Port fuel hits 1
Port supply hits 3
Attachments
a.jpg
a.jpg (386.25 KiB) Viewed 796 times
User avatar
Lowpe
Posts: 24582
Joined: Mon Feb 25, 2013 2:25 pm

RE: Spanking Lowpe (NJP72 vs Lowpe (A))

Post by Lowpe »

China...teetering on the edge!



Image
Attachments
a.jpg
a.jpg (241.87 KiB) Viewed 794 times
User avatar
Lowpe
Posts: 24582
Joined: Mon Feb 25, 2013 2:25 pm

RE: Spanking Lowpe (NJP72 vs Lowpe (A))

Post by Lowpe »

A new month coming and some definite improvements!



Image
Attachments
a.jpg
a.jpg (131.87 KiB) Viewed 794 times
User avatar
RangerJoe
Posts: 19368
Joined: Mon Nov 16, 2015 2:39 pm
Location: Who knows?

RE: Spanking Lowpe (NJP72 vs Lowpe (A))

Post by RangerJoe »

ORIGINAL: Lowpe

A new month coming and some definite improvements!

Those Lancers aren't around for long but you will like what it develops into . . .

The newer version of Lightning has a lower SR if I remember correctly . . .
It makes a better broom . . .
Seek peace but keep your gun handy.

I'm not a complete idiot, some parts are missing! :o

“Illegitemus non carborundum est (“Don’t let the bastards grind you down”).”
:twisted: ; Julia Child


Image
User avatar
Lowpe
Posts: 24582
Joined: Mon Feb 25, 2013 2:25 pm

RE: Spanking Lowpe (NJP72 vs Lowpe (A))

Post by Lowpe »

PDU off...so I think I will have one NF squadron that an be deployed, and at least one upgradeable P38F squadron is already in India...to be tested against the IJA concentrations at either Ceylon or Magwe.

Another P38 squadron, the E, is near Australia. Haven't used them offensively yet though.

Not really a lot of planes available because of the PDU off...

User avatar
Lowpe
Posts: 24582
Joined: Mon Feb 25, 2013 2:25 pm

RE: Spanking Lowpe (NJP72 vs Lowpe (A))

Post by Lowpe »

August 1st, 1942

China is cracking...especially on the road north of Sian.

Image
Attachments
a.jpg
a.jpg (850.73 KiB) Viewed 794 times
User avatar
Lowpe
Posts: 24582
Joined: Mon Feb 25, 2013 2:25 pm

RE: Spanking Lowpe (NJP72 vs Lowpe (A))

Post by Lowpe »

Aug 2, 1942

Check that date...check the tank divisions allocated -- that could be busy rampaging across India, Australia, or China....and then you realize it is the first attack on Singapore with their original leaders unchanged.





Image
Attachments
a.jpg
a.jpg (506.87 KiB) Viewed 794 times
User avatar
Lowpe
Posts: 24582
Joined: Mon Feb 25, 2013 2:25 pm

RE: Spanking Lowpe (NJP72 vs Lowpe (A))

Post by Lowpe »

Interesting developments...

Image
Attachments
a.jpg
a.jpg (714.72 KiB) Viewed 794 times
User avatar
Lowpe
Posts: 24582
Joined: Mon Feb 25, 2013 2:25 pm

RE: Spanking Lowpe (NJP72 vs Lowpe (A))

Post by Lowpe »

I got up to 29K supply into China, from a low of 19K...but we are being overwhelmed...



Image
Attachments
a.jpg
a.jpg (724.93 KiB) Viewed 794 times
User avatar
jdsrae
Posts: 2796
Joined: Mon Mar 01, 2010 6:58 am
Location: Gandangara Country

RE: Spanking Lowpe (NJP72 vs Lowpe (A))

Post by jdsrae »

I think the empty hex just to the NW of your last Nth China battle is a mountain hex that is the best defensive terrain.
Currently playing my first PBEM, no house rules Scenario 1 as IJ.
AAR link (no SolInvictus): https://www.matrixgames.com/forums/tm.asp?m=4684655
User avatar
Lowpe
Posts: 24582
Joined: Mon Feb 25, 2013 2:25 pm

RE: Spanking Lowpe (NJP72 vs Lowpe (A))

Post by Lowpe »

Aug 2, 1942

Our damaged R class battleship will exit the map this day with a little less than 60 flood damage, but only 2 system damage. She has done a great job of escaping India.

Our 2nd damaged R class, with only 30 flood damage, leaves Bombay today.

Hoping both will make Mombasa safely and from there to Cape Town.

Post Reply

Return to “After Action Reports”