Mergui: This doesn't look like a pushover, by any means. At least, though, the blocking-position troops are in place.

Moderators: wdolson, MOD_War-in-the-Pacific-Admirals-Edition




ORIGINAL: Lokasenna
I don't think that was cold effects so much as: lots of heavy coastal guns and lack of 100% prep and lack of 100% prepped HQm on AGC and lack of really wearing down all those coastal guns.
Also, that combat report showing 500+ squads disabled... the LCU losses (in any screen) seem to be on a FOW multiplier of anywhere from -50% of actual to +100% of actual.
ORIGINAL: Canoerebel
ORIGINAL: Lokasenna
I don't think that was cold effects so much as: lots of heavy coastal guns and lack of 100% prep and lack of 100% prepped HQm on AGC and lack of really wearing down all those coastal guns.
Also, that combat report showing 500+ squads disabled... the LCU losses (in any screen) seem to be on a FOW multiplier of anywhere from -50% of actual to +100% of actual.
Loka, that makes sense, and I want to accept it, because then the difficulties become predictable and therefore manageable.
But look at the Paramushiro graphics above. Erik really didn't have many guns there, and my combat ships and LCI gunships seemed to suppress them well. The Allied amphibious ships took essentially no damage.
So, from my seat, with an admitted lack of experience to fully digest this info, it doesn't seem like Para's CD units played a big role. From where I sit, I think Cold Zone and dice were the primary culprits, aided by the lower (70%) prep.




ORIGINAL: Canoerebel
2/26/45
Paramushiro: I am not the master of nuclear bombardments. A few guns destroyed, which may be helpful. I don't think the port or airfield will be a factor, but it's odd that not hits were scored.
My primary concern here is that the Allied army suffered such heavy disablements that Erik might counterattack. Probably not, but bombardment and bombings were scheduled to (hopefully) soften the defenses a bit. Also, supply is coming in, heavy on LCI gunship support.
![]()



