The Elephant Vanishes : obvert (J) vs Historiker_SqzMyLemon_Canoerebel (A)

Post descriptions of your brilliant victories and unfortunate defeats here.

Moderators: wdolson, MOD_War-in-the-Pacific-Admirals-Edition

User avatar
obvert
Posts: 14051
Joined: Mon Jan 17, 2011 11:18 am
Location: PDX (and now) London, UK

RE: The Elephant Vanishes : obvert (J) vs Historiker_SqzMyLemon_Canoerebel (A)

Post by obvert »

A shot of Tokyo. Believe it or not, I've still been shipping some resources back from Mindanao. The factories here don't run most of the time. The defences have kept a lot of the Strat bombing points from being harvested though.

Image
Attachments
Screenshot..07.50.20.jpg
Screenshot..07.50.20.jpg (336.74 KiB) Viewed 490 times
"Success is the ability to go from one failure to another with no loss of enthusiasm." - Winston Churchill
User avatar
obvert
Posts: 14051
Joined: Mon Jan 17, 2011 11:18 am
Location: PDX (and now) London, UK

RE: The Elephant Vanishes : obvert (J) vs Historiker_SqzMyLemon_Canoerebel (A)

Post by obvert »

The end of January and still hanging by a thread.

Image
Attachments
Screenshot..12.08.41.jpg
Screenshot..12.08.41.jpg (379.35 KiB) Viewed 490 times
"Success is the ability to go from one failure to another with no loss of enthusiasm." - Winston Churchill
User avatar
obvert
Posts: 14051
Joined: Mon Jan 17, 2011 11:18 am
Location: PDX (and now) London, UK

RE: The Elephant Vanishes : obvert (J) vs Historiker_SqzMyLemon_Canoerebel (A)

Post by obvert »

A look at industry and remaining stocks. A lot of good. One very important bad; resources. Very few left producing in the Home Islands.

Image
Attachments
Screenshot..12.13.51.jpg
Screenshot..12.13.51.jpg (344.41 KiB) Viewed 490 times
"Success is the ability to go from one failure to another with no loss of enthusiasm." - Winston Churchill
User avatar
obvert
Posts: 14051
Joined: Mon Jan 17, 2011 11:18 am
Location: PDX (and now) London, UK

RE: The Elephant Vanishes : obvert (J) vs Historiker_SqzMyLemon_Canoerebel (A)

Post by obvert »

A massive set of sweeps on Feb 5. Didn't do badly considering the quality of the competition.

Image
Attachments
Screenshot..13.25.56.jpg
Screenshot..13.25.56.jpg (449.48 KiB) Viewed 490 times
"Success is the ability to go from one failure to another with no loss of enthusiasm." - Winston Churchill
User avatar
obvert
Posts: 14051
Joined: Mon Jan 17, 2011 11:18 am
Location: PDX (and now) London, UK

RE: The Elephant Vanishes : obvert (J) vs Historiker_SqzMyLemon_Canoerebel (A)

Post by obvert »

With Sapporo falling the Allies are getting close now.

Image
Attachments
Screenshot..13.12.46.jpg
Screenshot..13.12.46.jpg (361.44 KiB) Viewed 490 times
"Success is the ability to go from one failure to another with no loss of enthusiasm." - Winston Churchill
User avatar
obvert
Posts: 14051
Joined: Mon Jan 17, 2011 11:18 am
Location: PDX (and now) London, UK

RE: The Elephant Vanishes : obvert (J) vs Historiker_SqzMyLemon_Canoerebel (A)

Post by obvert »

This was another huge day in the air. A set of sweeps and Strat bombing in daylight against Osaka.Definitely happy with the outcome, but stuff is burning and Allied Vps stack up closer every day.

Image
Attachments
Screenshot..21.01.09.jpg
Screenshot..21.01.09.jpg (478.15 KiB) Viewed 490 times
"Success is the ability to go from one failure to another with no loss of enthusiasm." - Winston Churchill
User avatar
obvert
Posts: 14051
Joined: Mon Jan 17, 2011 11:18 am
Location: PDX (and now) London, UK

RE: The Elephant Vanishes : obvert (J) vs Historiker_SqzMyLemon_Canoerebel (A)

Post by obvert »

With the beasts that were downed though the Japanese VP score went above 90k which is pretty cool.

Image
Attachments
Screenshot..23.40.55.jpg
Screenshot..23.40.55.jpg (377.69 KiB) Viewed 490 times
"Success is the ability to go from one failure to another with no loss of enthusiasm." - Winston Churchill
User avatar
obvert
Posts: 14051
Joined: Mon Jan 17, 2011 11:18 am
Location: PDX (and now) London, UK

RE: The Elephant Vanishes : obvert (J) vs Historiker_SqzMyLemon_Canoerebel (A)

Post by obvert »

The allies inching close to the finish line.

Image
Attachments
Screenshot..08.21.39.jpg
Screenshot..08.21.39.jpg (359.29 KiB) Viewed 490 times
"Success is the ability to go from one failure to another with no loss of enthusiasm." - Winston Churchill
User avatar
Bif1961
Posts: 2014
Joined: Wed Jun 25, 2008 11:52 pm
Location: Phenix City, Alabama

RE: The Elephant Vanishes : obvert (J) vs Historiker_SqzMyLemon_Canoerebel (A)

Post by Bif1961 »

the end is nigh and one day away maybe from the 2-1 VP level.
User avatar
inqistor
Posts: 1813
Joined: Wed May 12, 2010 1:19 pm

RE: The Elephant Vanishes : obvert (J) vs Historiker_SqzMyLemon_Canoerebel (A)

Post by inqistor »

ORIGINAL: obvert

A look at industry and remaining stocks. A lot of good. One very important bad; resources. Very few left producing in the Home Islands.

Image
Jeez, you still have 3.7 mil of fuel? And you are making 1743 planes per month? I wonder, which unit uses Vickers VI tank? :)

There seems also to be bug with Type 4, and Type 93 mines, as they were never used, or produced.


Fuel, HI, and armament stockpiles probably will last till end of game. Good job.

I never thought, that it would be possible to run out of Resources though. Where are those 3 millions located? Those islands NE of Java? Is that recent accumulation, or some long time stockpiling?
User avatar
obvert
Posts: 14051
Joined: Mon Jan 17, 2011 11:18 am
Location: PDX (and now) London, UK

RE: The Elephant Vanishes : obvert (J) vs Historiker_SqzMyLemon_Canoerebel (A)

Post by obvert »

ORIGINAL: inqistor

ORIGINAL: obvert

A look at industry and remaining stocks. A lot of good. One very important bad; resources. Very few left producing in the Home Islands.
Jeez, you still have 3.7 mil of fuel? And you are making 1743 planes per month? I wonder, which unit uses Vickers VI tank? :)

There seems also to be bug with Type 4, and Type 93 mines, as they were never used, or produced.


Fuel, HI, and armament stockpiles probably will last till end of game. Good job.

I never thought, that it would be possible to run out of Resources though. Where are those 3 millions located? Those islands NE of Java? Is that recent accumulation, or some long time stockpiling?

It's not too hard to run short of resources when the Allies take the North. Sakhalin is a huge production centre and losing that alone will send Japan into a deficit. That can e easily remedied by pulling from the SRA.

Dan though began bombing resources all over Hokkaido and Northern Honshu because they were the largest factories available. So in a few months I lost another 1,000-1,500 resource production points. Suddenly it was an oh shit kind of moment. I've been hoarding and saving virtually everything well beyond my previous targets, and one of the major components of the economy has just gone into freefall with not enough time or pulling capacity to build a new positive pool.

I should have seen that coming earlier, but to be honest, there isn't much more I would have gained by now anyway. Most HI/LI in large urban centres other than Tokyo are wiped out, plus more supply generation would only allow me to stall a bit longer in some ground battles, nothing more. The only action I have to compete right now is CAP and that is still functional, so the fuel and the armaments/vehicles points and the gazzillion HI I have saved does me diddly squat.

I can still produce fighters and I can still fly them.
"Success is the ability to go from one failure to another with no loss of enthusiasm." - Winston Churchill
GetAssista
Posts: 2836
Joined: Sat Sep 19, 2009 6:13 am

RE: The Elephant Vanishes : obvert (J) vs Historiker_SqzMyLemon_Canoerebel (A)

Post by GetAssista »

ORIGINAL: obvert
It's not too hard to run short of resources when the Allies take the North. Sakhalin is a huge production centre and losing that alone will send Japan into a deficit. That can e easily remedied by pulling from the SRA.
On the one hand it shows that longer resource convoys other than your usual Sakhalin-Hokkaido-Korea-China might be useful. On the other hand, few games will be as long as this one..

Also, 150 Super Forts downed in one day [X(]
User avatar
castor troy
Posts: 14331
Joined: Mon Aug 23, 2004 10:17 am
Location: Austria

RE: The Elephant Vanishes : obvert (J) vs Historiker_SqzMyLemon_Canoerebel (A)

Post by castor troy »

Where are you getting the pilots from? Losing hundreds of pilots in one day in 46 really puzzles me when the replacement rates are at something like 300 per month.
User avatar
obvert
Posts: 14051
Joined: Mon Jan 17, 2011 11:18 am
Location: PDX (and now) London, UK

RE: The Elephant Vanishes : obvert (J) vs Historiker_SqzMyLemon_Canoerebel (A)

Post by obvert »

ORIGINAL: castor troy

Where are you getting the pilots from? Losing hundreds of pilots in one day in 46 really puzzles me when the replacement rates are at something like 300 per month.

When the KB went up in flames on day 2 of the campaign I decided I'd have to devote most of my energy to the air war in this one. I began intensive training using every available group from the beginning, compromising some offensive use early and leaving most of the work to the IJN.

In the second half of the war playing both Sqz and Dan, I favoured a defensive air setup, letting the Allies lose more pilots per day while ours were mostly WIA and lived to fight another day.

Below is an example from a day when I lost almost 300 airframes. Pilot losses were relatively few, and I'll bet anything the Allies lost more than the Japanese that day. Only 78 KIA from 282 downed. Also, as you can see, I still have a few in the pipeline, and a lot in the late war training groups with their extended reserve numbers, usually 2x the active number or more. There are more than enough pilots at current rates of loss to fight well beyond the supply available.

I have some thoughts on this I'll go into later. I don't think this is idea for game balance, but it is what it is when both sides can do it.



Image
Attachments
Screenshot..09.05.30.jpg
Screenshot..09.05.30.jpg (358.5 KiB) Viewed 492 times
"Success is the ability to go from one failure to another with no loss of enthusiasm." - Winston Churchill
User avatar
obvert
Posts: 14051
Joined: Mon Jan 17, 2011 11:18 am
Location: PDX (and now) London, UK

RE: The Elephant Vanishes : obvert (J) vs Historiker_SqzMyLemon_Canoerebel (A)

Post by obvert »

Here is an example of reserves in both the IJN and IJAAF.


Image
Attachments
Screenshot..09.06.39.jpg
Screenshot..09.06.39.jpg (659.55 KiB) Viewed 492 times
"Success is the ability to go from one failure to another with no loss of enthusiasm." - Winston Churchill
User avatar
obvert
Posts: 14051
Joined: Mon Jan 17, 2011 11:18 am
Location: PDX (and now) London, UK

RE: The Elephant Vanishes : obvert (J) vs Historiker_SqzMyLemon_Canoerebel (A)

Post by obvert »

ORIGINAL: GetAssista
ORIGINAL: obvert
It's not too hard to run short of resources when the Allies take the North. Sakhalin is a huge production centre and losing that alone will send Japan into a deficit. That can e easily remedied by pulling from the SRA.
On the one hand it shows that longer resource convoys other than your usual Sakhalin-Hokkaido-Korea-China might be useful. On the other hand, few games will be as long as this one..

Also, 150 Super Forts downed in one day [X(]

I've always prioritised fuel and oil on return convoys from the SRA, but this one made me think that maybe it's better to manage that in balance with developing a slightly larger resource pool early in the HI in order to deal with unforeseen contingencies in the late game. If Sakhalin and Hokkaido resources hadn't been stripped away in mid-44 then the Japanese would be in better shape. Usually from other areas resources would not be the primary Strat bombing target. From the North they are.
"Success is the ability to go from one failure to another with no loss of enthusiasm." - Winston Churchill
User avatar
castor troy
Posts: 14331
Joined: Mon Aug 23, 2004 10:17 am
Location: Austria

RE: The Elephant Vanishes : obvert (J) vs Historiker_SqzMyLemon_Canoerebel (A)

Post by castor troy »

ORIGINAL: obvert

ORIGINAL: castor troy

Where are you getting the pilots from? Losing hundreds of pilots in one day in 46 really puzzles me when the replacement rates are at something like 300 per month.

When the KB went up in flames on day 2 of the campaign I decided I'd have to devote most of my energy to the air war in this one. I began intensive training using every available group from the beginning, compromising some offensive use early and leaving most of the work to the IJN.

In the second half of the war playing both Sqz and Dan, I favoured a defensive air setup, letting the Allies lose more pilots per day while ours were mostly WIA and lived to fight another day.

Below is an example from a day when I lost almost 300 airframes. Pilot losses were relatively few, and I'll bet anything the Allies lost more than the Japanese that day. Only 78 KIA from 282 downed. Also, as you can see, I still have a few in the pipeline, and a lot in the late war training groups with their extended reserve numbers, usually 2x the active number or more. There are more than enough pilots at current rates of loss to fight well beyond the supply available.

I have some thoughts on this I'll go into later. I don't think this is idea for game balance, but it is what it is when both sides can do it.



Image

your screenshot of the pilot pool explains my question, you get 450 IJN and 615 IJA pilots each month while I'm only used to some 300 pilots as replacements alltogether which is not even 1/3 of your pilots. What scenario is this?
User avatar
JohnDillworth
Posts: 3104
Joined: Thu Mar 19, 2009 5:22 pm

RE: The Elephant Vanishes : obvert (J) vs Historiker_SqzMyLemon_Canoerebel (A)

Post by JohnDillworth »


[/quote]
I've always prioritised fuel and oil on return convoys from the SRA, but this one made me think that maybe it's better to manage that in balance with developing a slightly larger resource pool early in the HI in order to deal with unforeseen contingencies in the late game. If Sakhalin and Hokkaido resources hadn't been stripped away in mid-44 then the Japanese would be in better shape. Usually from other areas resources would not be the primary Strat bombing target. From the North they are.

I believe your opponent did no have interdicting flow of fuel, supply, and resources from the SRA. I realize that Allied subs are pretty much neutered against escorted convoys but their is more than one way to skin a cat. Dan just did not make a concerted effort to choke off your industry. Sure, you can bomb it late in the game, but as you have pointed out, important production continued for a long time. My 2 cents
Today I come bearing an olive branch in one hand, and the freedom fighter's gun in the other. Do not let the olive branch fall from my hand. I repeat, do not let the olive branch fall from my hand. - Yasser Arafat Speech to UN General Assembly
User avatar
obvert
Posts: 14051
Joined: Mon Jan 17, 2011 11:18 am
Location: PDX (and now) London, UK

RE: The Elephant Vanishes : obvert (J) vs Historiker_SqzMyLemon_Canoerebel (A)

Post by obvert »

ORIGINAL: castor troy

ORIGINAL: obvert

ORIGINAL: castor troy

Where are you getting the pilots from? Losing hundreds of pilots in one day in 46 really puzzles me when the replacement rates are at something like 300 per month.

When the KB went up in flames on day 2 of the campaign I decided I'd have to devote most of my energy to the air war in this one. I began intensive training using every available group from the beginning, compromising some offensive use early and leaving most of the work to the IJN.

In the second half of the war playing both Sqz and Dan, I favoured a defensive air setup, letting the Allies lose more pilots per day while ours were mostly WIA and lived to fight another day.

Below is an example from a day when I lost almost 300 airframes. Pilot losses were relatively few, and I'll bet anything the Allies lost more than the Japanese that day. Only 78 KIA from 282 downed. Also, as you can see, I still have a few in the pipeline, and a lot in the late war training groups with their extended reserve numbers, usually 2x the active number or more. There are more than enough pilots at current rates of loss to fight well beyond the supply available.

I have some thoughts on this I'll go into later. I don't think this is idea for game balance, but it is what it is when both sides can do it.


your screenshot of the pilot pool explains my question, you get 450 IJN and 615 IJA pilots each month while I'm only used to some 300 pilots as replacements alltogether which is not even 1/3 of your pilots. What scenario is this?

It's scenario 1 stock. Vanilla as it gets.
"Success is the ability to go from one failure to another with no loss of enthusiasm." - Winston Churchill
User avatar
obvert
Posts: 14051
Joined: Mon Jan 17, 2011 11:18 am
Location: PDX (and now) London, UK

RE: The Elephant Vanishes : obvert (J) vs Historiker_SqzMyLemon_Canoerebel (A)

Post by obvert »

ORIGINAL: JohnDillworth

I've always prioritised fuel and oil on return convoys from the SRA, but this one made me think that maybe it's better to manage that in balance with developing a slightly larger resource pool early in the HI in order to deal with unforeseen contingencies in the late game. If Sakhalin and Hokkaido resources hadn't been stripped away in mid-44 then the Japanese would be in better shape. Usually from other areas resources would not be the primary Strat bombing target. From the North they are.
I believe your opponent did no have interdicting flow of fuel, supply, and resources from the SRA. I realize that Allied subs are pretty much neutered against escorted convoys but their is more than one way to skin a cat. Dan just did not make a concerted effort to choke off your industry. Sure, you can bomb it late in the game, but as you have pointed out, important production continued for a long time. My 2 cents

Eventually he got around to it, but I think he assumed being in such close proximity to the HI would be enough to shut down the economy.

Playing both the Japanese and the Allies late, and now the second time through with the Japanese, I've realised a few things. Its very hard to shut down airframe production. You have to target factories directly, not just manpower, and many are in areas that are always well defended. It's much easier to hit manpower at the top 7-8 industrial centers and wipe clean the HI/LI to create a supply production problem.

Many Allied players don't have a plan for what they want to do with strategic bombing because they've not played Japan, or at least not to the bitter end, and don't know the several available paths to creating a shutdown in some portion of the critical industry. In this game Dan chose to really prioritise resources, and that was a huge surprise, as I've never heard it discussed or thought of it as a strategy. Once it was a problem I realised that whether intended or not, it can be just as viable as shutting down oil/fuel or Strat bombing HI/LI.

The last bit of frantic shipping of resources back to the HI probably added a good few months worth of supply, if not more. I thought he would have taken Chichi and Iwo on the way to China just to get some control of the shipping lanes. That would have closed things much earlier.
"Success is the ability to go from one failure to another with no loss of enthusiasm." - Winston Churchill
Post Reply

Return to “After Action Reports”