Übercorsair and übercap

Gary Grigsby's strategic level wargame covering the entire War in the Pacific from 1941 to 1945 or beyond.

Moderators: Joel Billings, wdolson, Don Bowen, mogami

User avatar
Apollo11
Posts: 25190
Joined: Thu Jun 07, 2001 8:00 am
Location: Zagreb, Croatia
Contact:

RE: Übercorsair and übercap

Post by Apollo11 »

Hi all,
ORIGINAL: Rainer

It's also one of the best books about German nightfighters: the men, the waepons, the tactics, and the technology. Very good reading.

Yes - indeed!

The book prompted me to buy books about nightfighting over Germany in WWII and download several very interesting and good essays about the same topic!


Leo "Apollo11"
Image

Prior Preparation & Planning Prevents Pathetically Poor Performance!

A & B: WitW, WitE, WbtS, GGWaW, GGWaW2-AWD, HttR, CotA, BftB, CF
P: UV, WitP, WitP-AE
User avatar
bobogoboom
Posts: 3799
Joined: Mon Feb 13, 2006 7:02 pm
Location: Dallas

RE: Übercorsair and übercap

Post by bobogoboom »

ORIGINAL: mdiehl

As I recall, Japanese intel was very concerned that in the event of a war with Britain and other European colonial states, and with the US neutral and thus free to arm and build up the Phillippines into a really unbreakable salient intruding on Japanese interior lines, that the US would make a "Lend Lease" arrangement that would simply put much of Borneo, New Guinea, and southeastern Indonesia out of reach of Japan absent an attack on the United States.

In that regard I think the Japanese assessment was correct. I have no doubt that Roosevelt would have found a way to make Balikpapan a US-Managed asset and officially "neutral ground." The more time the Japanese would have spent messing around not attacking the US, the less likely Japan would have been to successfully conclude operations in southern waters.

The other thing is that I can't see Japan developing, in any realistic time frame, any logistical capability for waging even a low-intensity war in Siberia unless they abandoned their effort in China. And even then, China, for all it's relatively low state of economic development (w/ respect to infrastructure) was substantially more developed than eastern and southeastern Siberia. The idea of Japan developing resources in Siberia (absent the giant labor pool of China, and absent any decent logistical infrastructure) within the time frame of WW2 seems very improbable. At least to me.
Yes the japs got handed their *&^ in 38-39 because the russians had their best troops there by 41 the russians were being strained by the germans i just wonder if a jap attack in siberia would have been the straw that broke the camels back.
I feel like I'm Han Solo, and you're Chewie, and she's Ben Kenobi, and we're in that bar.
Member Texas Thread Mafia.
Image
Sig art by rogueusmc
User avatar
marky
Posts: 5777
Joined: Mon Mar 08, 2004 7:39 pm
Location: Wisconsin

RE: Übercorsair and übercap

Post by marky »

i agree

i think if japan had attacked from the east with germany attacking from the west they couldve beaten russia

especially if they had a jointly developed long range bomber to hit the industry the russkies mopved east
mdiehl
Posts: 3969
Joined: Sat Oct 21, 2000 8:00 am

RE: Übercorsair and übercap

Post by mdiehl »

Yeah, Siberia had lots of mineral and oil wealth, and also wood. Pretty much ALL of it completely inaccessible to the Japanese, because MOST of it in Eastern Siberia was not accessible in any great way to the Russians in 1941. It was all pretty much undeveloped land. Think Maine or Oregon in 1750. Or Alaska in 1941.

For this to work, Japan has to get an army together to invade the USSR -- which means abandoning China -- and discovers, once they get there, that with perhaps 15 years of investment and development aid, they'll be able to make use of the resources in Siberia, provided that they can find anyone to do the work... which they can't unless they export labor from China -- which they can't because by invading Siberia they'll have abandoned China.

In 1941 the only easily accessible part of Siberia was Vladivostok, and from there the only place one could go was back out to sea.
Show me a fellow who rejects statistical analysis a priori and I'll show you a fellow who has no knowledge of statistics.

Didn't we have this conversation already?
Mike Scholl
Posts: 6187
Joined: Wed Jan 01, 2003 1:17 am
Location: Kansas City, MO

RE: Übercorsair and übercap

Post by Mike Scholl »

ORIGINAL: bobogoboom
Yes the japs got handed their *&^ in 38-39 because the russians had their best troops there by 41 the russians were being strained by the germans i just wonder if a jap attack in siberia would have been the straw that broke the camels back.


Actually the casualties were suprisingly even in these encounters..., but the Japanese felt they had been beaten. The big problem revealed was that it took most of the Manchurian Army's transport to support a reinforced Division at Kalkin Gol. The simply didn't have the infastructure to support a major incursion into Siberia. They might have taken Vladivostok, but they couldn't support a move West in reality..., and they would have had to go a long way West to get anywhere that mattered.

Why do people always assume that the Soviet Union was "on the verge of collapse" and "one more push" would somehow brought it on. The were in far better shape than Germany was in the Spring of 1944, and even with the successful Invasion of France, the loss of most of Italy, and the Destruction of Army Group Center, the German's dragged the war out another year.
spence
Posts: 5421
Joined: Sun Apr 20, 2003 6:56 am
Location: Vancouver, Washington

RE: Übercorsair and übercap

Post by spence »

Why do people always assume that the Soviet Union was "on the verge of collapse" and "one more push" would somehow brought it on.

Because das ist vas der Fuhrer sprecht und ve all know der Fuhrer ist niematz mistaken.[:D]
User avatar
Historiker
Posts: 4742
Joined: Wed Jul 04, 2007 8:11 pm
Location: Deutschland

RE: Übercorsair and übercap

Post by Historiker »

ORIGINAL: Mike Scholl
Why do people always assume that the Soviet Union was "on the verge of collapse" and "one more push" would somehow brought it on. The were in far better shape than Germany was in the Spring of 1944, and even with the successful Invasion of France, the loss of most of Italy, and the Destruction of Army Group Center, the German's dragged the war out another year.
In Spring 44, we still had a powerful army and the Luftwaffe hit the Allied AFs still hard. In the East, we were still able to match the Red Air Force.
The turning point came later, the war was not finally lost before mid of August 44...
Without any doubt: I am the spawn of evil - and the Bavarian Beer Monster (BBM)!

There's only one bad word and that's taxes. If any other word is good enough for sailors; it's good enough for you. - Ron Swanson
User avatar
Historiker
Posts: 4742
Joined: Wed Jul 04, 2007 8:11 pm
Location: Deutschland

RE: Übercorsair and übercap

Post by Historiker »

ORIGINAL: spence
Why do people always assume that the Soviet Union was "on the verge of collapse" and "one more push" would somehow brought it on.

Because das ist vas der Fuhrer sprecht und ve all know der Fuhrer ist niematz mistaken.[:D]
Weil (es=it) das ist, was der Führer spricht und wir alle wissen, (daß/dass = that) der Führer niemals Fehler macht! [;)]
Without any doubt: I am the spawn of evil - and the Bavarian Beer Monster (BBM)!

There's only one bad word and that's taxes. If any other word is good enough for sailors; it's good enough for you. - Ron Swanson
spence
Posts: 5421
Joined: Sun Apr 20, 2003 6:56 am
Location: Vancouver, Washington

RE: Übercorsair and übercap

Post by spence »

Bad English speaking Kraut!

Non German speaking Yankee Doodle[;)]
User avatar
witpqs
Posts: 26376
Joined: Mon Oct 04, 2004 7:48 pm
Location: Argleton

RE: Übercorsair and übercap

Post by witpqs »

ORIGINAL: Mike Scholl

ORIGINAL: bobogoboom
Yes the japs got handed their *&^ in 38-39 because the russians had their best troops there by 41 the russians were being strained by the germans i just wonder if a jap attack in siberia would have been the straw that broke the camels back.


Actually the casualties were suprisingly even in these encounters..., but the Japanese felt they had been beaten. The big problem revealed was that it took most of the Manchurian Army's transport to support a reinforced Division at Kalkin Gol. The simply didn't have the infastructure to support a major incursion into Siberia. They might have taken Vladivostok, but they couldn't support a move West in reality..., and they would have had to go a long way West to get anywhere that mattered.

Why do people always assume that the Soviet Union was "on the verge of collapse" and "one more push" would somehow brought it on. The were in far better shape than Germany was in the Spring of 1944, and even with the successful Invasion of France, the loss of most of Italy, and the Destruction of Army Group Center, the German's dragged the war out another year.


Stalin was very worried over it. Of course, he thought he was going to be arrested and deposed shortly after the first German offensive began. It took him several days to snap out of it and get going. Maybe it was that sense of precariousness that leads to that 'conventional wisdom' about an invasion from the east?
User avatar
Historiker
Posts: 4742
Joined: Wed Jul 04, 2007 8:11 pm
Location: Deutschland

RE: Übercorsair and übercap

Post by Historiker »

ORIGINAL: witpqs

ORIGINAL: Mike Scholl

ORIGINAL: bobogoboom
Yes the japs got handed their *&^ in 38-39 because the russians had their best troops there by 41 the russians were being strained by the germans i just wonder if a jap attack in siberia would have been the straw that broke the camels back.


Actually the casualties were suprisingly even in these encounters..., but the Japanese felt they had been beaten. The big problem revealed was that it took most of the Manchurian Army's transport to support a reinforced Division at Kalkin Gol. The simply didn't have the infastructure to support a major incursion into Siberia. They might have taken Vladivostok, but they couldn't support a move West in reality..., and they would have had to go a long way West to get anywhere that mattered.

Why do people always assume that the Soviet Union was "on the verge of collapse" and "one more push" would somehow brought it on. The were in far better shape than Germany was in the Spring of 1944, and even with the successful Invasion of France, the loss of most of Italy, and the Destruction of Army Group Center, the German's dragged the war out another year.


Stalin was very worried over it. Of course, he thought he was going to be arrested and deposed shortly after the first German offensive began. It took him several days to snap out of it and get going. Maybe it was that sense of precariousness that leads to that 'conventional wisdom' about an invasion from the east?
There were also two peace offers to Germany by Stalin, both delivered by Bulgaria. One shortly after the war began, another when the German troops got close to Moskau. In both offers he was willed to give Germany a massive amount of territory...
Without any doubt: I am the spawn of evil - and the Bavarian Beer Monster (BBM)!

There's only one bad word and that's taxes. If any other word is good enough for sailors; it's good enough for you. - Ron Swanson
User avatar
Historiker
Posts: 4742
Joined: Wed Jul 04, 2007 8:11 pm
Location: Deutschland

RE: Übercorsair and übercap

Post by Historiker »

ORIGINAL: spence
Bad English speaking Kraut!

Non German speaking Yankee Doodle[;)]
Egregious, philistine! [;)][:D]
Without any doubt: I am the spawn of evil - and the Bavarian Beer Monster (BBM)!

There's only one bad word and that's taxes. If any other word is good enough for sailors; it's good enough for you. - Ron Swanson
mdiehl
Posts: 3969
Joined: Sat Oct 21, 2000 8:00 am

RE: Übercorsair and übercap

Post by mdiehl »

OT but worth a thought.

Turning points in the ETO/N.Africa/Eastern Front

1939-August 1940: the war was being handily won by Germany.
October 1940-May 1941: Germany was contained, but still winning on points.
May 1941-November 1942: the war was being handily won by Germany.
December 1942-June 1943: Germany was contained and winning on points, but losing points.
July 1943-May 1944: Germany was contained, and winning on points, but the ETO Axis Team was losing on points.
June 1944-Dec 1944: Germany was losing on points.
Jan 1945 + : The end was unavoidable.

I think through November 1942 there was a chance that the Axis could have negotiated a peace had it involved something like a return to Dec 1939 borders and reparations to the USSR, but I can't see any negotiated peace there lasting very long at all.

Show me a fellow who rejects statistical analysis a priori and I'll show you a fellow who has no knowledge of statistics.

Didn't we have this conversation already?
trollelite
Posts: 444
Joined: Sat Jan 28, 2006 10:01 pm

RE: Übercorsair and übercap

Post by trollelite »

The game balance is very poor.  I think, as a successful game, it should at least provide a what if scenario that could provide some balance play. If every Japanese player get disgusted with this fact and simply quit ( they can do that, while their historical  counterpart cannot), then what's the use to allies even F4U as strong as F-22? If with corsair even morons can win battle, then the game is dead. 
 
User avatar
Charbroiled
Posts: 1181
Joined: Thu Oct 14, 2004 10:50 pm
Location: Oregon

RE: Übercorsair and übercap

Post by Charbroiled »

ORIGINAL: trollelite

...If with corsair even morons can win battle, then the game is dead. 

Wow....I'm really glad that you straightened out my misguided ways. Because of you, I just figured out that I have been wasting the last 3 years of my life on a game that "is dead".[8|]
"When I said I would run, I meant 'away' ". - Orange
trollelite
Posts: 444
Joined: Sat Jan 28, 2006 10:01 pm

RE: Übercorsair and übercap

Post by trollelite »

I think your confidence to the game already shaken by those invincible corsairs....[;)]
trollelite
Posts: 444
Joined: Sat Jan 28, 2006 10:01 pm

RE: Übercorsair and übercap

Post by trollelite »

Zeros are very strong in early months, but even they sometimes vulnerable while on sweep or escort missions. One can surprise or ambush them, using altitude tactic to chop them down. Against corsair there is no solution. While no-solution invincible component introduced into a human vs human game, the game itself almost a half-failure.
Speedysteve
Posts: 15974
Joined: Tue Sep 11, 2001 8:00 am
Location: Reading, England

RE: Übercorsair and übercap

Post by Speedysteve »

Hi,
 
I take it you're a regular player?
WitE 2 Tester
WitE Tester
BTR/BoB Tester
trollelite
Posts: 444
Joined: Sat Jan 28, 2006 10:01 pm

RE: Übercorsair and übercap

Post by trollelite »

I have only confidence against inexperienced player with this corsair mass..... They could easily be drawn to ambush.

The so-called CAP trap that actually should be prohibited , but with corsair problem I cannot afford to be so chivalric.
User avatar
witpqs
Posts: 26376
Joined: Mon Oct 04, 2004 7:48 pm
Location: Argleton

RE: Übercorsair and übercap

Post by witpqs »

ORIGINAL: Historiker

There were also two peace offers to Germany by Stalin, both delivered by Bulgaria. One shortly after the war began, another when the German troops got close to Moskau. In both offers he was willed to give Germany a massive amount of territory...

Wow! First I've heard of that. Thanks for the info. I wonder if he meant it to be a 'temporary peace' until SU was more ready?
Post Reply

Return to “War In The Pacific - Struggle Against Japan 1941 - 1945”