
Admirals Edition Naval Thread II
Moderators: wdolson, MOD_War-in-the-Pacific-Admirals-Edition
RE: Cha and T23
Hi, question for the dev's. I don't believe the naval units that are withdrawn in WitP changed any when they can back. Will there be a die roll to see if there experiance goes up when they come back?


-
Yamato hugger
- Posts: 3791
- Joined: Tue Oct 05, 2004 5:38 am
RE: Cha and T23
ORIGINAL: tanksone
Hi, question for the dev's. I don't believe the naval units that are withdrawn in WitP changed any when they can back. Will there be a die roll to see if there experiance goes up when they come back?
I dont know for sure on all of them of course but some come back with new pilots and "new unit" experience. Why you cry? Because the units themselves were reformed.
-
bradfordkay
- Posts: 8686
- Joined: Sun Mar 24, 2002 8:39 am
- Location: Olympia, WA
RE: Cha and T23
Ummm.... YH, he said Naval Units, as in ships... they can be withdrawn for operations in the Med or Atlantic but don't gain any experience in doing so...
fair winds,
Brad
Brad
-
Yamato hugger
- Posts: 3791
- Joined: Tue Oct 05, 2004 5:38 am
RE: Cha and T23
Sorry I read that as naval air units. As for ships, I doubt they would come back with more experience either but I cant say for sure.
RE: Cha and T23
Just reading a report about Shokaku class and come across of their ammo storage facility.
Aircraft ordnance: forty-five torpedoes, ninety 800-kilo bombs, three hundred and six
250-kilo bombs, five hundred and forty 60-kilo bombs plus a fuel stowage of 496 tons
avgas.
That`s only two full strikes of B5N2 with torpedoes, 4 strikes of D3A1 with 800kg bombs, far less than we see in WITP
Are the ordnance handled different in AE or we have the same "air sorties"
Aircraft ordnance: forty-five torpedoes, ninety 800-kilo bombs, three hundred and six
250-kilo bombs, five hundred and forty 60-kilo bombs plus a fuel stowage of 496 tons
avgas.
That`s only two full strikes of B5N2 with torpedoes, 4 strikes of D3A1 with 800kg bombs, far less than we see in WITP
Are the ordnance handled different in AE or we have the same "air sorties"

RE: Cha and T23
ORIGINAL: Bliztk
Just reading a report about Shokaku class and come across of their ammo storage facility.
Aircraft ordnance: forty-five torpedoes, ninety 800-kilo bombs, three hundred and six
250-kilo bombs, five hundred and forty 60-kilo bombs plus a fuel stowage of 496 tons
avgas.
That`s only two full strikes of B5N2 with torpedoes, 4 strikes of D3A1 with 800kg bombs, far less than we see in WITP
Are the ordnance handled different in AE or we have the same "air sorties"
You just read'n that? We went through this months ago.
RE: Cha and T23
Not enough time to read the 68 pages of the two Naval threads [;)]
If this has been discussed already, then there is no problem
If this has been discussed already, then there is no problem

- jwilkerson
- Posts: 8272
- Joined: Sun Sep 15, 2002 4:02 am
- Location: Kansas
- Contact:
RE: Cha and T23
Yeah we should be used to answering things more than once. As to carrier torpedo capacity, yes that is modeled separately. So most carriers now only have enough torpedoes for 2 or less strikes. But you have a toggle "bombs or torpedoes" so if you think you will be bombing transports, then you can order up bombs and save your torpedoes for the enemy warships you expect to show up next turn!
WITP Admiral's Edition - Project Lead
War In Spain - Project Lead
War In Spain - Project Lead
-
rockmedic109
- Posts: 2464
- Joined: Tue May 17, 2005 11:02 am
- Location: Citrus Heights, CA
RE: Cha and T23
I don't think the Val carried the 800kg bomb. That was for the Kate and I thought it was only for the Pearl Harbor raid. Did they use them any other time?ORIGINAL: Bliztk
Just reading a report about Shokaku class and come across of their ammo storage facility.
Aircraft ordnance: forty-five torpedoes, ninety 800-kilo bombs, three hundred and six
250-kilo bombs, five hundred and forty 60-kilo bombs plus a fuel stowage of 496 tons
avgas.
That`s only two full strikes of B5N2 with torpedoes, 4 strikes of D3A1 with 800kg bombs, far less than we see in WITP
Are the ordnance handled different in AE or we have the same "air sorties"
RE: Cha and T23
ORIGINAL: rockmedic109
I don't think the Val carried the 800kg bomb. That was for the Kate and I thought it was only for the Pearl Harbor raid. Did they use them any other time?
To the best of my knowledge, no. That said, what else would have the Kates fielded asides from torpedos? If they were to be armed with bombs would they be bringing 250kgs or 800kgs? They had the payload for either...hell if there was a kit for it Kates could have carried three 250kg bombs(there wasn't).
EDIT: or was there... according to Wiki (right, well at least it's a start) they did posses the ability to carry three 250kg bombs at once.
huh...
Yamato, IMO the best looking Battleship.

"Hey, a packet of googly eyes! I'm so taking these." Hank Venture

"Hey, a packet of googly eyes! I'm so taking these." Hank Venture
- jwilkerson
- Posts: 8272
- Joined: Sun Sep 15, 2002 4:02 am
- Location: Kansas
- Contact:
RE: Cha and T23
Kate with 3x250kg


- Attachments
-
- Katewithbombs.jpg (5.38 KiB) Viewed 297 times
WITP Admiral's Edition - Project Lead
War In Spain - Project Lead
War In Spain - Project Lead
- jwilkerson
- Posts: 8272
- Joined: Sun Sep 15, 2002 4:02 am
- Location: Kansas
- Contact:
RE: Cha and T23
Kate with 800kg


- Attachments
-
- Katewith800kg.jpg (16.93 KiB) Viewed 295 times
WITP Admiral's Edition - Project Lead
War In Spain - Project Lead
War In Spain - Project Lead
- jwilkerson
- Posts: 8272
- Joined: Sun Sep 15, 2002 4:02 am
- Location: Kansas
- Contact:
RE: Cha and T23
Kate with racks for 60kg
- Attachments
-
- Kate with bombracks.jpg (15.6 KiB) Viewed 335 times
WITP Admiral's Edition - Project Lead
War In Spain - Project Lead
War In Spain - Project Lead
RE: Cha and T23
That 800kg is a BEAST.
RE: Cha and T23
ORIGINAL: Alikchi
That 800kg is a BEAST.
But not as much a beast as the Tall Boy 5,443 kg (12,000 lb)
or Grand Slam 9,979 kg (22,000 lb)
[:D][:D][:D]
-
Yamato hugger
- Posts: 3791
- Joined: Tue Oct 05, 2004 5:38 am
RE: Cha and T23
And yet neither of them was carried by a single engine aircraft launched from a carrier at sea either.
RE: Cha and T23
I would like to see D3A Vals carrying 250kg GP bombs. I think this was their standard ordonance, not the AP ones.
Target:
Land - Why the hell will you have APs? GPs and HEs are worth more...
Sea - priority:
Carriers - Unles you are going after RN, you will more likely have GPs then APs and HEs. The same for non-combatant ships, up to destroyer size.
Major ships - Well use Vals as flak distraction while the torpedobombers do the job.
It is somewhat funny (in WITP) to see Vals and Hellen/Sonias droping 250kg AP bombs on AKs... Well the other thing is to see Nells/Bettys droping 800kg AP bombs on AKs. [:D]
(According to Midway by Fuchida: Only Kates torpedos were rearmed for bombs and then back to torpedos. Vals were not mentioned to be rearmed. They were just taken below the flight deck to free it up to land 1st wave returning. Can someone confirm this?)
Target:
Land - Why the hell will you have APs? GPs and HEs are worth more...
Sea - priority:
Carriers - Unles you are going after RN, you will more likely have GPs then APs and HEs. The same for non-combatant ships, up to destroyer size.
Major ships - Well use Vals as flak distraction while the torpedobombers do the job.
It is somewhat funny (in WITP) to see Vals and Hellen/Sonias droping 250kg AP bombs on AKs... Well the other thing is to see Nells/Bettys droping 800kg AP bombs on AKs. [:D]
(According to Midway by Fuchida: Only Kates torpedos were rearmed for bombs and then back to torpedos. Vals were not mentioned to be rearmed. They were just taken below the flight deck to free it up to land 1st wave returning. Can someone confirm this?)

RE: Cha and T23
The D3A bomb was a SAP type that could be fused for HE. (GP) The majority in a strike would be SAP with a small# fused for HE.
RE: Cha and T23
ORIGINAL: Barb
I would like to see D3A Vals carrying 250kg GP bombs. I think this was their standard ordonance, not the AP ones.
Target:
Land - Why the hell will you have APs? GPs and HEs are worth more...
Sea - priority:
Carriers - Unles you are going after RN, you will more likely have GPs then APs and HEs. The same for non-combatant ships, up to destroyer size.
Major ships - Well use Vals as flak distraction while the torpedobombers do the job.
It is somewhat funny (in WITP) to see Vals and Hellen/Sonias droping 250kg AP bombs on AKs... Well the other thing is to see Nells/Bettys droping 800kg AP bombs on AKs. [:D]
(According to Midway by Fuchida: Only Kates torpedos were rearmed for bombs and then back to torpedos. Vals were not mentioned to be rearmed. They were just taken below the flight deck to free it up to land 1st wave returning. Can someone confirm this?)
Unfortunately, from what I have been able to gather from reading various AE threads, we are stuck with standard load outs AND EXP playing a factor on what certain planes will carry. The standard SBD loadout was a 1000lb SAP bomb which had enough penetration to go through a IJN CV's flight deck and the deck armor of some of the CA's. It didn't matter if a "Nugget" was flying the bird or a sesoned cobat veteran. The armorers did not consider whether it was ENS. Noobie's plance vice LCMDR. Grizzledvet's plane. The bomb's were loaded for the mission. This is a very frustrating aspect of the game.
"We have met the enemy and they are ours" - Commodore O.H. Perry
RE: Cha and T23
But there are certainly some bomb types selection like 2000lb GP bombs when unit pass some rolls (Exp i think). Could be nice to see them adapted to say 800kg APs too.









