ORIGINAL: Tallyman662
Some prudish women would complain about it!
I try to make it habit to not participate in any kind of gaming with prudish women... [8D]
Moderators: wdolson, MOD_War-in-the-Pacific-Admirals-Edition
ORIGINAL: Tallyman662
Some prudish women would complain about it!

ORIGINAL: Tallyman662
Sometimes you can't avoid them unfortunately! LOL

ORIGINAL: Kwik E Mart
ORIGINAL: Tallyman662
Sometimes you can't avoid them unfortunately! LOL
I've also noticed that some women that claim to be prudish actually have quite a good time at games like strip poker....but I digress....[:-]
ORIGINAL: medicff
You really have a knack for playtesting, wouldn't have given a thought to trying that move. LOL
Pat
ORIGINAL: Yamato hugger
ORIGINAL: castor troy
while I somewhat understood it at some point that it´s possible in an empty hex (while still being very ABSTRACT) I have no idea how you want to justify this "feature" in an occupied hex. You can´t move through them but in an abstracted way you do that as some of your troops are marching North and when the rest of your troops kick the enemy out of the hex you then order the "magic move" and perhaps your troops marching North have then marched 45 miles South. Boy, oh boy... [:(]
So at the same day your attacking troops kick out the enemy your marching North troops did in fact march THROUGH the enemy (if we think the enemy holds in the middle of the hex). Sorry, the miles are wrong though as I was thinking about a 60 mile hex. But it´s nothing different in a 40 miles hex. This "magic move" is just bullocks.
Quite easy to justify really. 46 mile hex. How much terrain does a - pick a unit - airbase company? They are going to freeze ANY movement "past" them? Lets say a division. A division on the defense covers an area about 3 miles wide if deployed in an open formation. Artillery support out to maybe 10 miles. Leaves plenty of room for maneuver, not to mention the minor fact that the guy doing the maneuvering still has to have enough force to kick that division out of the hex. So if the moving player has enough force to move the defender then likely the defender has enough to do without worrying about the unit that didnt bother to stop. His arty would be firing FPLs and interdiction fire (if even the maneuvering unit was even in range) would be out of the question. Like I said, in that regard it is no different than pursuit other than instead of chasing the retreating units you go in the direction that you want to go.
Actually whether you like it or not doesnt really matter. It has been reviewed and this is the way its going to stay. It isnt even on the pile of stuff to consider for the first patch.
Edit: and 1 other thing. Its a GAME. It has limitations. There is a lot about AE that people arent going to like. I dare say no one will be 100% happy with it. But then, name any game that can claim that everyone is 100% happy with.
And if you say it won´t make it for the first patch it nearly does sound as if someone would consider it a strange "feature" and while it´s no game breaker it may be fixed in patch number 117. 
ORIGINAL: castor troy
Now my question: What if an Army of 500.000 men are defending this hex? How do you justify that workaround then?
ORIGINAL: Yamato hugger
ORIGINAL: castor troy
Now my question: What if an Army of 500.000 men are defending this hex? How do you justify that workaround then?
Very simple. Listen carefully because this is the LAST time I am going to address this to you. I have said the exact same thing each time. Ready?
YOU HAVE TO RETREAT THE DEFENDERS OUT OF THE HEX
Now, if I had the force to retreat your army of 500,000 men, then I think I deserve to get 1 days march out of the guys that DIDNT ATTACK.
Plain enough for you now? (actually dont care if it is or not, Im done addressing this).

ORIGINAL: Flying Tiger
Well. I guess we finally settled that little puppy to rest! Now back to the AAR.....
ORIGINAL: Yamato hugger
ORIGINAL: Flying Tiger
Well. I guess we finally settled that little puppy to rest! Now back to the AAR.....
Tree is out of town until Sunday.
ORIGINAL: CV Zuikaku
Then, if you have some time and good will, can you tell us something more about replacement pilots? [;)] How can we increase their quality? Are we able to withdraw some crack combat pilots to act as instructors and help in training pilots in flight schools? Something like that was mentioned a year ago, but I don't understand what is it working like. Or if it has been implemented at all...

ORIGINAL: Herrbear
I notice in the picture of the pilots in reserve, they show a number of the Japanese pilots as assigned to the 27th RAF Squadron.??