Pacific War 3.0 (No Encircled please!)

Post descriptions of your brilliant victories and unfortunate defeats here.

Moderators: wdolson, MOD_War-in-the-Pacific-Admirals-Edition

User avatar
BBfanboy
Posts: 20695
Joined: Wed Aug 04, 2010 5:36 pm
Location: Winnipeg, MB
Contact:

RE: Pacific War 3.0 (No Encircled please!)

Post by BBfanboy »

Is Dili (the base, not the forumite) within the normal range threshold from Darwin for the Bettys?
No matter how bad a situation is, you can always make it worse. - Chris Hadfield : An Astronaut's Guide To Life On Earth
Alfred
Posts: 6683
Joined: Thu Sep 28, 2006 7:56 am

RE: Pacific War 3.0 (No Encircled please!)

Post by Alfred »

Toggle off the torpedo.
 
Alfred
User avatar
rader
Posts: 1241
Joined: Mon Sep 13, 2004 6:06 pm

RE: Pacific War 3.0 (No Encircled please!)

Post by rader »

ORIGINAL: Alfred

Toggle off the torpedo.

Alfred

Great, will try that! Do I need to worry about Flak & fighters at Darwin? Can/should I fly at night? Does altitude matter?
User avatar
rader
Posts: 1241
Joined: Mon Sep 13, 2004 6:06 pm

RE: Pacific War 3.0 (No Encircled please!)

Post by rader »

August 8, 1943.

Alert Alert!

Enemy task forces spotted heading toward Japanese bases in the Arafura sea. Definitely accompanied by heavy enemy carrier cover, but by the APA spotted, likely an invasion of somewhere. Japanese forces reacting to intervene.

Image
Attachments
image.jpg
image.jpg (318.95 KiB) Viewed 436 times
User avatar
BBfanboy
Posts: 20695
Joined: Wed Aug 04, 2010 5:36 pm
Location: Winnipeg, MB
Contact:

RE: Pacific War 3.0 (No Encircled please!)

Post by BBfanboy »

ORIGINAL: rader

ORIGINAL: Alfred

Toggle off the torpedo.

Alfred

Great, will try that! Do I need to worry about Flak & fighters at Darwin? Can/should I fly at night? Does altitude matter?
Last I heard, mine missions have a "drop to altitude to launch" profile, just like a torpedo mission. I think they drop to 3000 feet. Set whatever approach altitude you like.
No matter how bad a situation is, you can always make it worse. - Chris Hadfield : An Astronaut's Guide To Life On Earth
User avatar
rader
Posts: 1241
Joined: Mon Sep 13, 2004 6:06 pm

RE: Pacific War 3.0 (No Encircled please!)

Post by rader »

Aug 9, 1943.

Well he's ashore in good order with 14 units at Taberfane. Hard to say his exact strength but with 45K troops and 845 AFVs, likely well enough to secure the place against the two Japanese brigades and base forces.

Heavy battles in the air in Burma, Solomons and over the only Japanese surface TF in the area around Kai-eilanden. Lots of air losses on both sides. Higher for the Japanese, but probably better aircraft for the Allies so the disparity isn't as bad as it looks.

Image
Attachments
image.jpg
image.jpg (388.96 KiB) Viewed 436 times
User avatar
rader
Posts: 1241
Joined: Mon Sep 13, 2004 6:06 pm

RE: Pacific War 3.0 (No Encircled please!)

Post by rader »

Can you sweep a friendly base if it contains enemy troops? I assume not...
User avatar
rader
Posts: 1241
Joined: Mon Sep 13, 2004 6:06 pm

RE: Pacific War 3.0 (No Encircled please!)

Post by rader »

In Burma, he used to old sacrificial unit trick to block the movement of my forces that were going to expel his offending units. I guess that makes up for my "gamey bombing" [:'(]

Image
Attachments
image.jpg
image.jpg (208.81 KiB) Viewed 436 times
User avatar
rader
Posts: 1241
Joined: Mon Sep 13, 2004 6:06 pm

RE: Pacific War 3.0 (No Encircled please!)

Post by rader »

August 10, 1943.

Well Gardner's Horse Regiment was fed into the slaughterhouse today. Looks like he's moving another sacrificial unit blocker to protect his main force. Let's see who's next on the dinner plate.

Image
Attachments
image.jpg
image.jpg (232.46 KiB) Viewed 436 times
User avatar
rader
Posts: 1241
Joined: Mon Sep 13, 2004 6:06 pm

RE: Pacific War 3.0 (No Encircled please!)

Post by rader »

And he easily secured Taberfane. Japanese adjusted defense was 67!? That's kind of strange given Jungle terrain and level 3 forts (before engineers). They must have been ridiculously disrupted but the shore bombardment didn't look all that bad.

I'm guessing he will move on to take Dobo overland next. It always seems that Allied players like to press through the Arafura sea. Much more effective than the historical Solomons option it seems.

Image
Attachments
image.jpg
image.jpg (120.45 KiB) Viewed 436 times
mind_messing
Posts: 3394
Joined: Mon Oct 28, 2013 11:59 am

RE: Pacific War 3.0 (No Encircled please!)

Post by mind_messing »

Taberfane is actually clear terrain IIRC.
User avatar
rader
Posts: 1241
Joined: Mon Sep 13, 2004 6:06 pm

RE: Pacific War 3.0 (No Encircled please!)

Post by rader »

ORIGINAL: mind_messing

Taberfane is actually clear terrain IIRC.

Wow, you're right! I had no idea and probably wouldn't have built there if I'd known, but looks like it's clear but has the wrong graphic texture. Just like Waigeo up there. I'm guessing this is a hex info assignment error rather than a map error but who knows. Wow. That sucks a bit but also makes me feel a bit better about the combat result.

Image
Attachments
image.jpg
image.jpg (170.75 KiB) Viewed 436 times
User avatar
rader
Posts: 1241
Joined: Mon Sep 13, 2004 6:06 pm

RE: Pacific War 3.0 (No Encircled please!)

Post by rader »

August 12, 1943

Heavy air battles, mostly in Burma, result in high losses today.

With one Japanese advance toward Allied troops blocked, several other divisions shock attacked across the river into the Allied column. I was a bit worried about this but it worked out well, dealing heavy losses to the Allied formations and forcing them to retreat to the safety of the jungle.

Image
Attachments
image.jpg
image.jpg (359.76 KiB) Viewed 436 times
User avatar
rader
Posts: 1241
Joined: Mon Sep 13, 2004 6:06 pm

RE: Pacific War 3.0 (No Encircled please!)

Post by rader »

August 13, 1943.

A follow-up landing at Timoeka. A day after the landing, some Vals got through to hit an APA and AKA without much trouble and Japanese forces managed to hold the base against an Allied shock attack. Likely this will lead to more escalation, but the KB has finally arrived in the area to intervene. Looks like it was spotted by Allied search planes so it will be interesting to see if he sticks around for a carrier fight or takes this opportunity to withdraw his valuable ships.

Image
Attachments
image.jpg
image.jpg (280.53 KiB) Viewed 436 times
User avatar
rader
Posts: 1241
Joined: Mon Sep 13, 2004 6:06 pm

RE: Pacific War 3.0 (No Encircled please!)

Post by rader »

August 15, 1943

Heavy action in the air every day now as Allied bombers come in to hit airbases around the Arafura sea, and also in Burma around Magwe as the Japanese army retreats to safety. We've lost around three hundred planes over the last four days. Allied losses have also been significant, but a lot less heavy than Japanese ones. On the other hand, most Japanese fighters have been shot down over friendly territory so pilot losses aren't all that bad (around 20 KIA per day, with around as many wounded). Hopefully some of those wounded pilots will eventually come back.

The KB is lurking just to the North of the Arafura, but he's being cautious and hanging back, protecting Taberfane with fighters and surface warships. Will this be a titanic clash, or more of a fizzle? Time will tell.

Image
Attachments
image.jpg
image.jpg (268.58 KiB) Viewed 436 times
User avatar
rader
Posts: 1241
Joined: Mon Sep 13, 2004 6:06 pm

RE: Pacific War 3.0 (No Encircled please!)

Post by rader »

It really does seem like night bombing (or more precisely, night interception) is borked. I decided to throw a bunch of expert George pilots to interdict the Allied might raids in Burma. This was the result [8|]

Image
Attachments
image.jpg
image.jpg (89.29 KiB) Viewed 436 times
User avatar
rader
Posts: 1241
Joined: Mon Sep 13, 2004 6:06 pm

RE: Pacific War 3.0 (No Encircled please!)

Post by rader »

No turn today because my opponent got drunk at the pub. Priorities [:-]
User avatar
rader
Posts: 1241
Joined: Mon Sep 13, 2004 6:06 pm

RE: Pacific War 3.0 (No Encircled please!)

Post by rader »

Question: if there are say 50 Allied PT boats defending a base (say 10 TFs of 5 each), are they likely to pose a serious risk to Battleships coming in to bombard?
User avatar
BBfanboy
Posts: 20695
Joined: Wed Aug 04, 2010 5:36 pm
Location: Winnipeg, MB
Contact:

RE: Pacific War 3.0 (No Encircled please!)

Post by BBfanboy »

ORIGINAL: rader

Question: if there are say 50 Allied PT boats defending a base (say 10 TFs of 5 each), are they likely to pose a serious risk to Battleships coming in to bombard?
Risk of being torpedoed - not likely. Risk of using up all ammo and most ops points - likely.
No matter how bad a situation is, you can always make it worse. - Chris Hadfield : An Astronaut's Guide To Life On Earth
User avatar
rader
Posts: 1241
Joined: Mon Sep 13, 2004 6:06 pm

RE: Pacific War 3.0 (No Encircled please!)

Post by rader »

ORIGINAL: BBfanboy

ORIGINAL: rader

Question: if there are say 50 Allied PT boats defending a base (say 10 TFs of 5 each), are they likely to pose a serious risk to Battleships coming in to bombard?
Risk of being torpedoed - not likely. Risk of using up all ammo and most ops points - likely.

So what's the best way to handle the situation if the base is heavily defended by fighters? Does that make it impregnable?
Post Reply

Return to “After Action Reports”